Judge dismisses classified documents case
against Donald Trump
CNN,
by
Katelyn Polantz
Original Article
Posted By: Beardo,
7/15/2024 10:06:18 AM
Judge Aileen Cannon has dismissed the classified documents case against Donald Trump.
In a ruling Monday, Cannon said the appointment of special counsel Jack Smith violated the Constitution.
“In the end, it seems the Executive’s growing comfort in appointing ‘regulatory’ special counsels in the more recent era has followed an ad hoc pattern with little judicial scrutiny,” Cannon wrote.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
shredmaster 7/15/2024 10:07:33 AM (No. 1757075)
Let the wailing and gnashing of teeth begin!
27 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
vrb8m 7/15/2024 10:08:59 AM (No. 1757078)
God is good.
34 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
udanja99 7/15/2024 10:09:09 AM (No. 1757079)
Boy, the demonicrats are having a really bad month. Let’s hope that it continues right up until Inauguration Day!
25 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
greyseal 7/15/2024 10:14:00 AM (No. 1757083)
Finally, logic and common sense prevails on the lawfare front. Perhaps this will start the snowball rolling to get these other spurious cases overturned or thrown out.
Looks like DJT is going to have a good week for a change. Started off literally dodging the bullet...!
greyseal
30 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
john56 7/15/2024 10:18:58 AM (No. 1757086)
If I were the lawfare guys, I'd throw in the towel on all this stuff. A nearly assainated man is going to be kindly looked at by any jury.
14 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Bur Oak 7/15/2024 10:20:52 AM (No. 1757087)
Merrick Garland should have to reimburse Trump for his legal fees and lost time. It won't happen. The Republicans lead by Mike Johnson can't even impeach Garland. They are more incompetent than him. Dittos Alejandro Mayorkas.
19 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Hazymac 7/15/2024 10:20:56 AM (No. 1757088)
You can almost hear Paul Harvey saying, "Ohhhhhh!" To Jack Smith one would say, "Go back to The Hague. Leave America. Why did you waste so much of President Trump's time? Now your time will be wasted. Get a good criminal lawyer. You'll need one. They're going to put you where you wanted to put Trump: in prison. How 'bout them apples?"
13 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
rememberwhen 7/15/2024 10:21:00 AM (No. 1757089)
How did the leftists mess up so badly? They allowed this case to be assigned to an honest judge. The other "cases" should have been given the same treatment,
18 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Jethro bo 7/15/2024 10:22:49 AM (No. 1757093)
Oh this is really gonna put the heat of the Obambi appointed activist in DC. How does she go forward with her predetermined verdict if there is a question about the constitution? And at least one Supreme Joke jester agrees Smith is unconstitutional which alerts all the Obambi/Biden/Clinton judges in DC that they will be watched very closely. Not that they care about the constitution or scrutiny.
14 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
DiegoDude 7/15/2024 10:29:02 AM (No. 1757099)
Can't wait to see the psycho cry fest tonight! If anyone doubts the existence of God, the last two weeks should remove all doubt.
16 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Catherine 7/15/2024 10:31:23 AM (No. 1757101)
# 8 - the leftists are really stupid, that's how they messed up. And they think we are, too. Guess they learned a big lesson.
7 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
DVC 7/15/2024 10:33:31 AM (No. 1757106)
Those thumping and booming noises you are hearing off in the distance are the Dem heads exploding after hearing this.
This is wonderful news, because it reaffirms that laws still mean something. NOW, get those fraudulent "cases" in NY erased, too.
13 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
thekidsmom66 7/15/2024 10:33:54 AM (No. 1757108)
This is exactly what should have happened right at the beginning. But, better late than never!
9 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Northcross 7/15/2024 10:34:59 AM (No. 1757109)
Judge Cannon is a partisan hack. We need fair and impartial judges like Juan Merchan and Arthur Engoron to preside over these cases.
- Lenny the Lib
4 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Mizz Fixxit 7/15/2024 10:45:17 AM (No. 1757122)
This decision by Judge Cannon is a major victory for President Trump and conservatives. Our long losing streak was followed by winning streak that started with the debate, then the Supreme Court immunity decision, now this. We can look forward to more winning.
14 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Birddog 7/15/2024 10:56:07 AM (No. 1757132)
It figures that CNN uses a totally STAGED photo to headline the story, those "Classified covers" were intentionally placed by the special counsels/FBI on stacks of other unmarked documents, then released to the Media, suggesting that the ones they make claims about were readily/easily/instantly recognizable as classified. keep in mind that at that time they also claimed they "Seized dozens of boxes of classified materials, Hundreds of documents, thousands of pages", though when looked at, nearly all were returned to Trump, or to the archives, only 31 pages were actually "Actionable". Several dozen spare "Classified" cover-sheets, without ANY documents attached were called "Evidence".
4 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Ruhn 7/15/2024 11:01:09 AM (No. 1757137)
Justice Thomas questioned Jack Smith's authority to prosecute in the SCOTUS Presidential immunity decision.
11 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Scottyboy 7/15/2024 11:03:57 AM (No. 1757140)
Hack Smith & Co. just learned that, once you get into the courtroom, the political bastardization of our judicial system (a/k/a ‘Lawfare’) only works if the court is as corrupt as you are
and that doesn’t appear to be the case with this particular court now, does it Mr. Smith❓
9 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy 7/15/2024 11:26:48 AM (No. 1757171)
Ah yes, the sound of leftist heads exploding.
5 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
mobyclik 7/15/2024 11:34:26 AM (No. 1757188)
Poster #2, absolutely, TWICE IN TWO DAYS!!!
3 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Birddog 7/15/2024 11:40:40 AM (No. 1757196)
Soooo...ALL of the subpoenas, grand jury summons, evidence collection/presentations, testimony, rulings are ALL now excluded because Smith never had the STANDING to issue, require, access, or even ASK any questions of anyone.It;s ALL Poison Tree/Poison Fruit.
9 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
mifla 7/15/2024 11:45:10 AM (No. 1757200)
Not surprised. This judge was simply waiting for the Supremes to rule on immunity. Makes it much easier to inform the world that she thinks Smith is a partisan hack. This should also be the means to have the other Jack Smith brought case against Trump (Election interference) dismissed since Jack was illegally appointed.
7 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Beardo"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)