DC Appeals Court Overrules Judge Chutkan
Gag Order
Conservative Treehouse,
by
Sundance
Original Article
Posted By: earlybird,
11/3/2023 8:45:41 PM
A three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has lifted District Judge Tanya Chutkan’s gag order prohibiting Trump from criticizing the special counsel, Jack Smith, or “any foreseeable witness” in the case. [2-Page Opinion Here] In my opinion, it was the generalized “foreseeable witness” part of the Chutkan order that became the central issue for the appellate court. Jack Smith could name anyone as a potential witness, just to silence the accused.
President Trump’s team previously indicated in their filing to the appeals court that they are prepared to seek immediate relief at the Supreme Court. However, at least now, that approach will not be needed
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Mcscow sailor 11/3/2023 9:22:35 PM (No. 1591404)
Chutons meets 1sr amendment
41 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Timber Queen 11/3/2023 9:28:09 PM (No. 1591408)
Judge Chunk-can overstepped her bounds with the open-ended "any foreseeable witness” clause, that left Trump and his lawyers having to guess. Any person Trump mentioned Jack Smith could say, "Hey, that's one of my unnamed witnesses! You're in violation of the gag order!" Even though the three judge panel were all Lefties, they had to perform institutional hiney covering because they saw Supreme Court review in their immediate future. It certainly wasn't their love of the law.
MAGA REVENGE - TRUMP 2024
93 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Lawsy0 11/3/2023 9:58:53 PM (No. 1591417)
What you wanna bet she become guest lecturer in some far-flung Law School?
47 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
DVC 11/3/2023 10:17:21 PM (No. 1591422)
Now, pull that biased judge off of the case.
78 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
MickTurn 11/3/2023 10:34:42 PM (No. 1591440)
The 3 Judges forgot to actually SLAP the crooked Judge into Submission!
44 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
mifla 11/4/2023 3:11:14 AM (No. 1591524)
Going to be a lot more of this as the Trump kangaroo court trials progress.
45 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Strike3 11/4/2023 4:00:48 AM (No. 1591542)
Jamaica won the lottery when both Kamala and Tanya decided to move over here.
37 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
anniebc 11/4/2023 7:36:14 AM (No. 1591605)
Drag her to jail. They never pay for their intentional, rogue "errors" in judgment.
30 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
LLAMA 11/4/2023 8:25:43 AM (No. 1591627)
The biggest hazard for having Judges like this one in the system is that they erode public competence in the justice system.
28 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
NamVet70 11/4/2023 8:26:58 AM (No. 1591628)
The Democrats planned all these kangaroo court trials to destroy Trump's election chances. In fact these lawfare attacks on Trump are becoming his best campaign fodder. Every time they attack him he becomes more popular. We certainly need Trump more now than we did in 2016! MAGA
34 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
bpl40 11/4/2023 8:29:52 AM (No. 1591630)
Pack that foreigner b/witch up and send her back to where she came from.
22 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy 11/4/2023 8:58:34 AM (No. 1591642)
Disbar Chutkan and deport her back to her homeland.
28 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
janjan 11/4/2023 9:39:06 AM (No. 1591670)
The judge was trying to silence what Trump was saying about her. She’s obviously not smart enough to take on his attorneys.
14 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Zigrid 11/4/2023 11:17:12 AM (No. 1591740)
Washington DC's swamp took one on the chin...the constitution one...democrats zero.....
10 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
PrayerWarrior 11/4/2023 11:17:44 AM (No. 1591741)
How in the world did this "woman" pass scrutiny in the Senate? Oh, wait, the Rinos and the demon-rats didn't see a problem with this Marxist jurist from Jamaica.
13 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Chicagoan 11/4/2023 11:55:59 AM (No. 1591767)
President Trump's Legal Team scored a direct hit with, "...Instead, when asked about the supposed threat to the case, the prosecution admitted, “of course this prejudice is speculative.”
Based this speculation, the district court entered a sweeping, viewpoint-based prior restraint on the core political speech of a major Presidential candidate, based solely on an unconstitutional “heckler’s veto.”
4 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
linkay6 11/4/2023 2:04:49 PM (No. 1591842)
So will they return the $15,000 fines they made Trump pay?
2 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
danu 11/4/2023 4:44:27 PM (No. 1591900)
the dc courts apparently see themselves as rightful heirs to higher realms.
chutney's vague and universal orders -compounded by a monetary shakedown-are worrisome to those 3 judge
panels.
shall we call it enlightened self-interest?
0 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
MickTurn 11/4/2023 9:28:19 PM (No. 1592036)
Same thing should happen to the other Marxist "Judge" handling the NY Case...
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)