National Review’s Kevin Williamson redefines conservatism
American Thinker,
by
Francis P. Sempa
Original Article
Posted By: DW626,
4/9/2022 9:00:39 AM
National Review’s Kevin Williamson is urging conservatives to divorce, or at least, separate, for a time, from the Republican Party -- that is, from the Donald Trump-led Republican Party.
In a recent column, Williamson claims that what he calls “sensible conservatives” twenty years ago or so “could take a realistic, instrumental view of the GOP and find it reasonably useful for our ends.” But not today. Not when the Republican Party consists of “vulgar” populists and “infantile” nationalists who loathe free trade, free speech, the U.S. military, and libertarians.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
fhancock 4/9/2022 9:10:41 AM (No. 1123776)
Donald Trump kept his promises and tried to make America a better place and DID make it a better place. That is why he got 75 million votes and why Williamson, Bill Kristol, Joe Scarborough and George Will are irrelevant today. They like platitudes and not action.
61 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
spacer 4/9/2022 9:12:49 AM (No. 1123783)
Right on cue when America is set to right the wrongs of the estabs in massive wins led by none other than Donald John Trump in mid terms election this fungi slithers out from under the rock to bare their dystopian hate for us, the real Americans.
38 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
WhamDBambam 4/9/2022 9:15:07 AM (No. 1123789)
Those who cannot create, redefine.
42 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
zuker5 4/9/2022 9:15:44 AM (No. 1123790)
Nobody loves Kevin Williamson more than Kevin Williamson. The only political party he’ll ever be happy with is one in which he is the only member. You’d be hard pressed to find a more arrogant, self-absorbed jerk. I get not liking Trump, but have to marvel at anyone who claims that breaking away from the GOP because he leads it, handing the radical Democrats a permanent majority, is the answer.
40 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
anniebc 4/9/2022 9:51:11 AM (No. 1123824)
Donald Trump separated a lot of US from the Republican Party. Many of US had been separated prior to Donald Trump. A lot of US went full-blown divorce after the GOP allowed the theft of the 2020 presidential election. Kevin, you need to let that bitterness go, my man. It's destroying everything in your RINO world.
36 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
MDConservative 4/9/2022 10:03:08 AM (No. 1123834)
FTA: "In the long term, ideas are and always have been the most powerful force in politics...
This should figure more prominently in our political thinking than does the question of the party registration of the next man to be elected chief dog-catcher of Penobscot."
Conservatives are forever on the defense because they "conserve". They are trying to shout "Stop!" at the drop of a hat, then adopt the outcome for a future defense line further left. No? Take Social Security or even Obamacare. "Socialism!" fully supported by "conservatives" these days, if not in 1933 or 2012. The only "ideas" are those to turn back the clock as though nothing has changed since. The Left, conversely, demands more as the clock moves forward and it all becomes engrained.
The third-party Republicans of 1856/60 are not the Republican Party of today. Today's Republican party is legally entrenched (as are the Democrats) to repel any attempt to break up the duopoly we so treasure as a "two-party system." From public financing to ballot access, the two major parties set the rules. No one has come close to actually challenging their political hegemony. Simply put, there is no alternative but to play their game by their rules, which can change. And, as seen between '16 through today, they can play rough as they control the institutions we are told to trust.
7 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Edgelady 4/9/2022 10:05:20 AM (No. 1123836)
Idealism is nice, but doesn’t work in the real world - nor does mischaracterizing much of hardworking Republicans. Kevin has turned into one of the elitist. Sad, he was once smarter than that.
12 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Italiano 4/9/2022 10:16:27 AM (No. 1123854)
I was a long-term subscriber. It is arguable that Donald Trump did more to advance conservative policies (and probably created more minority conservatives) in four years than NR over a much longer period. They were for the most part preaching to the choir. George Will? Please.
They spent decades "standing athwart history yelling "Stop!"" and getting their asses run over by Country Club Republicans and the left in the process. LBJ. Bush 41/43. Clinton. Obama. McCain. Romney, and now Biden/Harris. All on the NR Never Trump eunuchs' watch and in many cases with their support.
Won't get fooled again.
.
25 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
jasmine 4/9/2022 10:19:39 AM (No. 1123858)
In his column, Williamson opined that in the past, "The job of the Republican Party was to serve conservative interests..."
That might explain his bitterness today. Donald Trump spent four years putting the American people first, and he did so with no apologies.
Williamson looks down from his lofty throne, and sees a GOP base populated by vulgar populists and infantile nationalists. He falsely attributes to Americans a "loathing" of free trade, as though we're all too stupid to recognize that trade deals our own electeds aren't allowed to see (until it's time to vote) do not serve AMERICAN interests.
Establishment conservatives saw a Biden presidency as preferable to four more years of Donald Trump. And they got what they wanted! Now they can look forward to a strengthened GOP base, as voters prepare to "thank" them for working against Donald Trump.
11 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
MindMadeUp 4/9/2022 10:22:29 AM (No. 1123861)
So RINOs and neocons are trying to take over and redefine the word "sensible" in the same way the Leftists have tried to redefine words like "sustainable" and "woman". I think these "sensible" conservatives are mostly just afraid of looking bad to all their elite, Progressive friends, who might not sneer as much and might still invite you to parties if your conservative ideas stay a little to the left of Romney and you loudly join in the fun bonding ritual of ridiculing Trump.
12 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
curious1 4/9/2022 10:41:45 AM (No. 1123876)
A hallmark of commies is changing the meaning of words, to alter the 'narrative'.
9 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
clayusmcret 4/9/2022 10:53:13 AM (No. 1123893)
The stank coming from National Review is horrendous. It's writers, recent past and present, have defecated in every corner of its existence.
17 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
GustoGrabber 4/9/2022 11:13:33 AM (No. 1123908)
Standing athwart history, yelling “ sure, why not, what the hell, as long as it’s not those bitter clingers, deplorables and uptight Christians”
11 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
PostAway 4/9/2022 11:33:17 AM (No. 1123929)
In all the 30+ years I read NR there (I dropped it) were some writers who resonated (Steyn, Sowell, Sobran, King and Krauthammer, to name a few) but some were always lost on me. Insipid and predictable, most of them possess/ed more the upper class pretensions befitting a publication whose roots were planted by WFB, Jr. than the wit or insight of the man himself. Williamson is cast to be the rogue, the Texas Outlaw, the brooding skin-headed be-leathered bad boy, the “Wild Bunch” wannabe who adds muscle and grit to the magazine but fails to add any intellectual value, at least for me. But his multi-page feature stories always made dandy kindling or paper for polishing glass.
6 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Krause 4/9/2022 11:36:55 AM (No. 1123933)
He can say it all he wants. It falls on deaf ears. There's a new guy in charge, and the people really like him, and his ideas.
6 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
TheRevJMP 4/9/2022 11:38:40 AM (No. 1123935)
Three words now used so often they have become cliches: "reimagine," "redefine" and "transform."
When anybody uses one or all of those words, watch out. It's commie time.
10 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
ThreeBadCats3 4/9/2022 11:40:32 AM (No. 1123937)
National Review cleverly, they believe, begin each issue with several pages of what they seem to think are clever, sarcastic insults to President Trump and related subjects. A refreshing alternative, if you need something to accompany your lengthy bathroom breaks, is The American Spectator. Better written, better paper, and infinitely more accurate and entertaining.
7 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Ashley Brenton 4/9/2022 11:43:33 AM (No. 1123940)
I believe in fair trade, which is a bit different from free trade.
Free speech? I haven't forgotten that National Review got busted accepting hush money from Big Tech. Twitter, YouTube, etc. were silencing pro-Trump voices arbitrarily, and in return for cash, National Review agreed not to write stories about the silencing.
It was that revelation that forced Hayes and Goldberg out of NR.
I love the military. I'm a vet. And I think we've been in continuous military conflict since WW2. Time for that to end. No more neocon global "social engineering" using the lives, limbs, and mental health of the lower and middle class people who join the military to achieve its ends.
Do I hate libertarians? No. I am ambivalent to them, as they are inconsequential and irrelevent. And if your idea of "libertarianism" is some Koch brothers desire to flood America with cheap migrant labor and suppress the wages of American workers (who can just join the military, I guess...), then yes. Libertarians can go to Hell.
Haven't visited NRO in years, nor bought a print NR in that length of time either.
12 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Jubal 4/9/2022 11:43:46 AM (No. 1123941)
So many people here express my feeling about
Kevin "What's his Name?".
Just remembered that this week I received a notice
to renew my subscription to NR that I have read since
William F. Buckley, Jr.
Adios, NR.
5 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Italiano 4/9/2022 11:44:27 AM (No. 1123942)
Make sure that you click through to the Williamson piece. You will find to your dismay that we hate free speech, the military and Milton Friedman.
a disconcerting revelation, to be sure.
5 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
cold porridge 4/9/2022 11:49:49 AM (No. 1123947)
I didn't think the National Review could devolved any further to total bird cage flooring. I guess I was wrong.
7 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
AltaD 4/9/2022 11:59:27 AM (No. 1123958)
FTA: he floats the idea of supporting a "third party."
And how exactly would this party differ from the Dems? We populists, nationalists want to put America first, the Dems don't. There's no third option, Williams and friends are either pro-America or pro-NewWorldOrder
6 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
earlybird 4/9/2022 12:13:38 PM (No. 1123972)
I didn’t think anyone read Kevin Williamson any more.
4 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Vaquero45 4/9/2022 12:28:52 PM (No. 1123982)
I subscribed to NR for over 30 years. For all that time, they claimed they wanted a Republican president who would stand up to the socialist nutcases of the Democrap party. They finally got one - then they crapped all over him. I non-renewed, and I sent them a letter telling them why. Their response? Crickets.
Stick a fork in ‘em - they’re done.
12 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
robertthomason 4/9/2022 12:33:29 PM (No. 1123988)
Split the conservative vote? Cui bono, Kevin?
4 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
dwa 4/9/2022 2:02:03 PM (No. 1124030)
Williamson is an idiot. It is thinking like his that has led to Republican "leaders" constantly giving in to the Left causing the rise of all the problems we face today. He is just advocating for more of the old "vote for us because we are not as bad as the other guy" which was prevalent for decades. There were always promised, but never fulfilled. This article and Williamson's thinking is pure trash.
2 people like this.
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Ashley Brenton 4/9/2022 2:26:56 PM (No. 1124043)
In a way, I support Williamson's idea for a seperate party.
Let's give all the Romneys, Kasichs, Boehners, McConnells, Crists, etc. etc. a place of their own. That way, they stick out. They self-identify. And I can avoid them easily.
And I will not be put into the position of having to vote for one of them because the only other options are ceding the race to the Democrat or not voting at all.
2 people like this.
Reply 28 - Posted by:
DVC 4/9/2022 3:02:47 PM (No. 1124069)
Real conservatives divorced themselves from the pukes at NR years ago. NR is a sad joke, and Buckley would drive all of the current crop of fakers out and start over with an entirely new staff if he was alive.
NR is losers, Deep State supporters. Never worth bothering with any more. I had a subscription to NR for many years, but that NR is long gone.
7 people like this.
Reply 29 - Posted by:
doctorfixit 4/11/2022 12:12:28 PM (No. 1125445)
If National Repuke is conservatism, then I am not a conservative.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "DW626"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Not that anyone needs another reason to not read the once excellent National Review.