The Senate Version of the National Defense
Reauthorization Act Really DOES Require
18-Year-Old Women to Register for Draft
Conservative Treehouse,
by
Sundance
Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight,
6/16/2024 11:54:28 AM
Requiring women to register for Selective Service (ie, the draft) really is a part of the 2025 National Defense Reauthorization Act that has been assembled in the Senate. 3. Strengthening the Joint Force and Defense Workforce • Authorizes funding to support a 4.5 percent pay raise for military members and a 2
percent pay raise for DOD civilian employees. • Increases monthly basic pay for junior enlisted servicemembers in the grades of E-1
through E-3, in addition to the force-wide pay raise.
• Amends the Military Selective Service Act to require the registration of women for
Selective Service.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
stablemoney 6/16/2024 11:59:40 AM (No. 1738205)
We can thank the GOP, which continues to vote for Democrat bills.
19 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
VietVet68 6/16/2024 12:21:43 PM (No. 1738222)
Having been drafted into the Army and sent to Vietnam I can say without equivocation that I didn't like getting drafted and liked being sent to Vietnam even less. That said, the experience made me a better person. I don't see what's wrong with mandatory military service for men and women of draft age, it certainly builds character and provides a sense of something bigger than oneself. Israel does it, I think we should too.
68 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
WV.Hillbilly 6/16/2024 12:55:10 PM (No. 1738239)
Good.
It's just registration. Something men have been required to do for decades.
You want equal rights? Here you go. Good and hard. Let's see how quick the screaming starts from women.
It would take an act of Congress to actually bring back the draft.
44 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Red Ghost 6/16/2024 1:23:04 PM (No. 1738244)
I didn't realize that women were also included in this legislation. In fact, as a 72 year old woman, I was wondering why, before reading this, women were left out. We have had fifty years of feminism. Women have proven they are capable of doing anything, any job, within physical reason of course, that a man can do. I applaud including women. Look at those gals in Israel.
Both young men and women need to register and should have to take some basic training, just to understand their responsibilities to this country that has given them so much. And because love of country and the history of the country have been abandoned in our school systems, young people must learn about their country and I can think of no better way than some type of military service.
Moreover, it just might save the lives of those moronic liberal women running amok in the streets with those headscarves covering their heads and faces and not knowing that but for the grace of God, their lives would be a living Hell, if they lived in those muslim countries they now revere. Morons. So bring on the draft for ALL.
41 people like this.
Israeli women have to serve a term in their defense force.
28 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Mushroom 6/16/2024 2:18:40 PM (No. 1738276)
I disagree with mandatory service primarily because TI's are not babysitters. Basic Training is not high school. There is a real 'break down' and build up process that happens. It isn't for everyone.
As for learning about this country, THAT what school is for. What happened to citizenship classes?
The education system needs a reset. I don't want 'my country over all' students, but I do want honest information being shared AND, most importantly, being taught HOW to think, not so much WHAT to think.
Once the 'traditional' roles of men and women were abandoned, it was time to group everyone together.
Welcome to the machine, ladies.
14 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
DiegoDude 6/16/2024 2:38:04 PM (No. 1738286)
We'll, if guys can dress up and play Barbie and girls dress and act like GIJoe, then turnabout fair play. Glad I retired from the military in 1995.
15 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
dbdiva 6/16/2024 2:55:58 PM (No. 1738300)
Agree with #2 on this one. It would give these kids a huge dose of reality and force some much needed maturity on them. Having said that, these kids have no idea what actual work is so I'm sure that military life will come as a giant shock. How many will survive basic training? I don't envy those who are charged with training these bunch of whiners.
30 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
oldmagnolia 6/16/2024 3:09:06 PM (No. 1738304)
Well, the harpies wanted equality with men so now they have it.
20 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
berthabutt 6/16/2024 3:56:15 PM (No. 1738325)
What's the percentage of 18 y.o. gals who would be suitable, either physically or intellectually? Obesity rates sky-high & high school graduations rates in the toilet for years, especially in MetroLand. Will they include all the illegals, too? Nothing they are getting in schools now can prepare them to serve a nation they despise.
11 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Ashley Brenton 6/16/2024 3:59:14 PM (No. 1738327)
My uncle was sent to Vietnam. He died 20 years ago from cancer likely brought on by exposure to Agent Orange. I was in Iraq. I'm soon to drawing compensation for tinnitus, rhinitis, sinusitis, knee ligament surgery and PTSD.
And everytime there's a story like this there are guys who chime in about how nice it would be if the government raises our kids. And I can just tell they are of a certain age. Grew up in the shadow of WW2. Admired all their dads and uncles who served. Raised on a steady diet of war movies as kids. Well, I completely disagree with that thinking.
America SINCE WW2 fights wars that whether we win or don't win, have no effect or consequences on daily life in America at all. And short of slavery, I can't think of anything more horrific than providing without choice an unlimited source of bodies just to serve as the armed muscle for the post-war globalist system.
27 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
LadyHen 6/16/2024 4:09:55 PM (No. 1738333)
While I appreciate that the military of the past helped make a great many boys into men, it also made a great many boys (mostly middle class and poor ones) into corpses in pursuit of goals that had NOTHING to do with the safety and sovereignty of this nation. The government of this nation is not responsible for making you into a grownup. Your parents and then YOU are responsible for that and considering the kind of parenting we have now, no amount of military discipline is going to turn thugs and mentally maladjusted kids into adults much less trained professional military personnel.
But THAT friends was the military of the past.
Today's woke limp wristed military in the hands of Obamaites would gleefully send our young to Ukraine or just about anywhere to die in a meat grinder driven by their own political interests. They have already done this with the young of Ukraine.
Plus, I just have a real problem with INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE of men and women, even of the military kind if it is NOT specifically to safeguard our own nation and her people. Anyone who can be called upon to die at the whim of powerful old men who have never seen battle and never will is NOT a free person. They are a slave.
26 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
DVC 6/16/2024 4:13:03 PM (No. 1738336)
Be careful what you ask for, women. You might be taken seriously and get it.
16 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
earlybird 6/16/2024 4:20:02 PM (No. 1738341)
What did sending our military to Vietnam do for the United States of America? Iraq? Afghanistan? The list goes on and on...
(crickets?)
24 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
earlybird 6/16/2024 4:47:48 PM (No. 1738354)
Re #14, how could I forget Korea? What did we gain from that?
14 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Catherine 6/16/2024 6:37:53 PM (No. 1738380)
# 15, I was a teen and early 20-something during the Viet Nam war. The saying at that time was it's better to fight on foreign soil than to wait for them to come here and then fight them. I know zero about the military. Whether that was sensible or not, it's what we all heard over and over.
6 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
padiva 6/16/2024 6:44:57 PM (No. 1738382)
Gotta include all women in order to include the trans-females.
Can't isolate the trans-females.
7 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
NeonVortex 6/16/2024 7:39:13 PM (No. 1738397)
Good. Strong, independent women can now fulfill their destiny.
4 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
earlybird 6/16/2024 7:49:22 PM (No. 1738400)
Re #16, that's what they put out. It makes no more sense now than it did then.
4 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Tanker76 6/16/2024 8:20:41 PM (No. 1738412)
I'm former military - Armor Officer - I'm disgusted by the former and current so called leadership of today's military, starting with that fat slug milley vanilley. There is no way that my kids and grandkids are ever serving in this mess. Defend our shores - Yes - participate in European silliness when they refuse to field viable militaries to defend themselves - No Way !
15 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Ashley Brenton 6/16/2024 10:07:07 PM (No. 1738488)
#16, now, as was true then is that America cannot be invaded or occupied by any foreign military or combination of militaries. The reason for that is brutally simple. We have nuclear weapons. Any fleet approaching our shores would simply be annihilated.
3 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Adam 6/17/2024 6:44:43 AM (No. 1738621)
30 years ago I was saying no great nation deliberately would allow women in combat Now I am unsurprised that the architecture is being built to force women into combat
4 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
EVRgreen4058 6/17/2024 8:27:00 AM (No. 1738697)
So what? This is just part of the women's lib movement that demands EQUALITY but only with things they "like?" Witness those who ranted to belong to men's social clubs and/or civic organizations and got their way . The Karens of the world will always want to pick & choose what "offends" them anyway & most will be too WOKE for anything besides cancelling Aunt Jemima .
2 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
msjena 6/17/2024 8:55:40 AM (No. 1738715)
It won't pass. Not in the Senate most likely and definitely not in the House.
0 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
msjena 6/17/2024 9:00:52 AM (No. 1738719)
Not all women are screaming for radical equality. Women are not equal to men when it comes to combat situations. They are also in danger of sexual assault, not only by the enemy but, sadly, from our own military. And do we really want to put young women of childbearing age in danger of being killed? But it's all a moot point, most likely, because this is unlikely to pass.
2 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Zigrid 6/17/2024 10:04:28 AM (No. 1738780)
Any woman can volunteer...just like the men...if they want...the government has no business requiring them to register...it's not a good think for the country....
1 person likes this.
Reply 27 - Posted by:
NotaBene 6/17/2024 1:37:30 PM (No. 1738924)
You’ve come a long way, Baby.
Wish you lock, wish you plenty,
Wish you a husband before you are twenty,
Wish you first a baby boy,
And when his hair begins to curl,
Wish you then a baby girl.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "FlyRight"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)