One fuzzy drone image may send Kyle Rittenhouse
to prison
American Thinker,
by
Andrea Widburg
Original Article
Posted By: Magnante,
11/13/2021 3:28:39 AM
Up until Friday, the Kyle Rittenhouse trial was very clear: Easily understood videos and witness testimony (including testimony from the prosecution witnesses) showed that Kyle, despite trying hard to avoid conflict, was attacked by a crazed child rapist, whom Kyle shot as the rapist was grabbing Kyle’s gun, at which point a mob went after Kyle. He then shot and killed a domestic abuser (snip) On Thursday, however, the court allowed prosecutors to enter into evidence a fuzzy photo from a late-produced drone, an image prosecutors argue shows Kyle “provoking” the attacks against him. Provocation destroys Kyle’s assertion that he acted in self-defense.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Californian 11/13/2021 3:36:50 AM (No. 976010)
What? Even when I zoom in I can't see anything. It's just a smear.
Well, the entire trial is a smear, so it makes sense in a way the "evidence" is smeary, too.
If I was the defense I'd want more info on the so-called enhancements and want to see the original unaltered pics as well as the frames before and after and want to know if a human modified (photoshopped) any pixels or it was pure AI creation.
40 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
BarryNo 11/13/2021 4:33:11 AM (No. 976020)
It's like those 'late arriving votes in recent elections. Its also probably fuzzy for a reason.
53 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
mifla 11/13/2021 4:46:25 AM (No. 976023)
Judge should have dismissed the case.
46 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
dickiedeeb 11/13/2021 4:54:03 AM (No. 976027)
The new variant Wish you would have run Kyle while you had the chance
4 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Toby Ten Bears 11/13/2021 6:10:23 AM (No. 976077)
One fuzzy image against a mountain of evidence to prove Kyle acted in self defense, only proves Andrea is wishful thinking. Conviction of first degree murder takes more than this... It's called. 'beyond a reasonable doubt', Andrea. You must not have been watching any of the trial... or you're just following George Soros' orders. What a stooge!
31 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Flyball Dogs 11/13/2021 7:01:12 AM (No. 976099)
#5 and I read different articles.
8 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
F15 Gork 11/13/2021 7:09:42 AM (No. 976101)
The system and the media have already found him guilty and he will likely hang. If found innocent, the cities will burn. He should have done us all a favor and killed as many of these animals as he could before he was over run.
16 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Highlander 11/13/2021 7:24:45 AM (No. 976110)
Like the Rodney King case: The media showed only the beating by the LAPD officers. It conveniently omitted King’s drug-induced aggression against the police. If the Rittenhouse prosecution wants to use this dubious “evidence,” it better show everything before and after.
13 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
PostAway 11/13/2021 7:48:05 AM (No. 976128)
The smart money goes to Widburg’s contention that the fuzzy image and minor charges are offered to provide frightened jurors with reasons to convict Rittenhouse of something - anything - to save themselves, their families and America’s cities. If they use the off-ramps to their safety to convict an innocent boy then they are, all put together, half the person Rittenhouse is. This case will then be about rescinding the 2nd amendment and patriots better figure out how to respond to a show trial conviction.
26 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
anniebc 11/13/2021 8:09:07 AM (No. 976141)
If one juror shared their fears about leftist retaliation with the judge, he might just go ahead and grant the mistrial. Why is he holding on to the petition and not acting on it anyway? Our side should take to the streets if this kid is convicted after the sham arrest, excessive charges, and in court shenanigans from the prosecutor. The prosecutor treats the judge like an underling. No way a fuzzy image wins out over sworn testimony. We do live in an upside down world; baby killers are our judges.
13 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Rinktum 11/13/2021 8:44:04 AM (No. 976176)
#9, I agree with you. This was exactly why these photos were introduced. Thank you for your insight.
13 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
bigfatslob 11/13/2021 8:45:17 AM (No. 976177)
Unicorn evidence showing up on the prosecution's doorstep doesn't prove jacksprat. Prove to me first it's Rittenhouse in the video and the timeline of the photo. In early footage I saw of the encounter before the first shooting a pistol is fired into the air that was shown on nation wide TV within two nights of the occurrence. It's natural reaction at such a sound on that night to look or observe where it came from. At that point Rittenhouse became aware there was a gunman while turning his firearm in that direction by instinct. Let's just say on that night Rittenhouse was 'wired' (having keen sense of the situation) more than his aggressors that's why he survived. I call this 'bull' the prosecution is in desperation mode hoping this evidence to stem the tide of the trial.
16 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Corndoggies 11/13/2021 8:59:37 AM (No. 976185)
This article didn’t age well at all.
6 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
red1066 11/13/2021 9:04:37 AM (No. 976186)
Two articles before on this site have a story about the prosecution tampering with evidence. Is this fuzzy photo a sample of all they have on Rittenhouse?
13 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
JackBurton 11/13/2021 9:50:38 AM (No. 976230)
Two words. Reasonable Doubt.
The vid showed up late, was enhanced, had the gun in the wrong hand. Can you be SURE it makes Kyle culpable? I couldn't be.
15 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
buckeye1 11/13/2021 10:25:29 AM (No. 976275)
It seems the author of this article is trying to say that the deck is stacked against Kyle, that the facts don't matter
8 people like this.
I cannot believe this author is so dense. She usually has her facts lined up nicely. This recently produced evidence is simply to muddy the waters and give the jury something to hang onto in case the intimidation is working.
4 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
DVC 11/13/2021 11:25:35 AM (No. 976365)
Images like this are literally useless for any sort of legitimate "fact finding". There are no facts in it to find.
Enhancing digital images is fine for an old family photo, but absolutely unacceptable as court evidence.
3 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
smokincol 11/13/2021 11:30:23 AM (No. 976375)
"One fuzzy drone image ... " may just be the primary point for their appeal, if he's found guilty on whatever one of the plethora of charges they've lodge against him, this pertains to in this ridiculous process. it might have been the demcommie press that applied the propane to get this fire going but it will be the jury that will extinguish this foolishness.
1 person likes this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
MickTurn 11/13/2021 1:37:46 PM (No. 976486)
The photo was altered!
See this site: https://defiantamerica.com/kyle-rittenhouse-prosecutors-caught-tampering-evidence-photos-video/
2 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
PrayerWarrior 11/13/2021 5:33:59 PM (No. 976601)
Once again the FBI's dirty little finger prints are all over this. THIS WAS A FBI FUZZY Drone photo, but they refused to give plane tail number of plane to i.d. who was behind it. The FBI is so dirty, that they would set up their own mother without a flicker of a conscience. SICK. BTW why was the FBI there and did nothing during those riots of 2020 in Wisconsin? They certainly had the authority and could have used that to stop with RICO and State crossing of criminals of Anti-fa and BLM, but they didn't. We know it's because Chris Wray wanted Trump to lose the 2020 election. Evidence of that? Biden kept him as his FBI Director. EVIL. REMOVE THE FBI, THEY ARE TOTALLY CORRUPT!
2 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Magnante"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)