Denial of Evolution Is a Form
of White Supremacy
Scientific American,
by
Allison Hopper
Original Article
Posted By: Ketchuplover,
7/11/2021 2:22:25 AM
After a year of lockdown, museums, libraries and bookstores across America are reopening. This cultural reawakening’s beginning coincided with both the Juneteenth holiday and the one-year anniversary of the one of the largest protests in American history against racial injustice. (snip) I want to unmask the lie that evolution denial is about religion and recognize that at its core, it is a form of white supremacy that perpetuates segregation and violence against Black bodies. Under the guise of “religious freedom,” the legalistic wing of creationists loudly insists that their point of view deserves equal time in the classroom.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
MissGrits 7/11/2021 2:41:14 AM (No. 841902)
Gads, what next! Surely she doesn’t think we all came from monkeys. One of the most racist implications ... because of evolution ... is comparing blacks to monkeys or apes. What could be more offensive, and yet her theory would perpetuate such a thing!
23 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Californian 7/11/2021 3:07:59 AM (No. 841905)
Belief or non-belief in evolution is not the point here. At all.
The point is she's just another Marxist idiot telling us that some random thing is yet another symbol of white supremacy. She bases it on nothing but her needs to fit into the current Narrative.
She could have said tuna fish is white supremacy. After all, we mostly eat white tuna. Right? See how that works?
Garbage senseless article from yet another me-too writer churning out junk on a deadline.
48 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Strike3 7/11/2021 3:08:09 AM (No. 841906)
“This false, fake, and unscientific drivel was written by Allison Hopper, ‘filmmaker and designer with a master’s degree in educational design from NYU…”
"Academics who use the term white supremacy are “borderline mentally retarded, literally brainwashed, and politically motivated by an Afrocentric agenda." - Robert Sepehr
"Hopper is a former instructor at NYU. She has worked for PBS."
Ouch, that hurts.
This silly woman says that Stone Age black people invented everything and are our ancestors. If so, what happened, did their evolution go in reverse? Did they bury their society and inventions so deep that archaeologists have never found evidence?
32 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
DVC 7/11/2021 3:54:59 AM (No. 841915)
Being a thinking person is apparently "white supremacy", now according to these racist loons.
Uh, exactly how many actual scientific discoveries in the last 2,000 years were made by other than white males? Is it 0.1% or is it less? Is that FACT proof of actual 'white supremacy'.....like white folks doing far, far more to make civilization than other groups?
Sorry, your brainless, racist BS has no traction, and is just stupid and ridiculous.
30 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
rfr46 7/11/2021 4:03:01 AM (No. 841921)
The big news here is that Scientific American printed this drivel. More evidence of the politicization of science by corrupt pretend scientists.
44 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
billa57 7/11/2021 5:47:27 AM (No. 841937)
Annnnnnnnnnd………………..there you have it! The Socialist dictatorship declares Christians are racist!
23 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
WhamDBambam 7/11/2021 6:28:44 AM (No. 841943)
"Scientific American" is neither.
41 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
KatieJo 7/11/2021 6:36:33 AM (No. 841945)
Satanism at work...
16 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
5 handicap 7/11/2021 6:39:21 AM (No. 841947)
I've never heard an answer to this question...If man evolved from apes, why are there still apes?
30 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Ming 7/11/2021 7:12:10 AM (No. 841960)
This was published in Scientific American? Every one of those editors who let this drivel go through should be horse whipped.
24 people like this.
Darwin himself had doubts about his own theory. There is nothing wrong with expressing doubts about any scientific theory, it is a constant learning process. When that ceases then there is no science only propaganda. And evolution does not conflict with God. No matter how we got here the beginning of all things still goes back to the Creator. And as far as I know evolution cannot deny a beginning.
24 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Catfur27 7/11/2021 7:19:29 AM (No. 841968)
...I was waiting...really waiting...for hopper to play the michelle obama card ...in closing support of her inane evolutionary claim.....????
5 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Jesuslover54 7/11/2021 7:25:56 AM (No. 841974)
But of course the Scientific American is now another leftist rag since Springer bought it.
And although AARP's Science magazine still has worthy scientific articles, the whole and rather large news and opinion front section is socialist nonsense rooting for the government teat.
And the last page essay is always about some poor gay person's anxiety about getting on in the scientific world, as if any scientist worth the name can't tell the difference between scientific rigor and social anxiety.
9 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
homefry 7/11/2021 7:39:09 AM (No. 841988)
Dont think so. Where is the missing link?
3 people like this.
Darwin was a white guy and he speculated that the "savage races" evolved differently.
So the "theory of evolution" has had racist overtones from its beginning.
God made Adam and Eve and we have no idea what shade of skin they had. But we do know that any race can give blood to any other race, so any racial separation is of our own doing.
13 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
philsner 7/11/2021 7:50:31 AM (No. 842003)
Unscientific leftists.
4 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
lakerman1 7/11/2021 7:57:01 AM (No. 842007)
If I acept her premise, she has to tel me why black, sub-saharan Africans didn't keep up with the rest of the world.
10 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
downnout 7/11/2021 8:08:49 AM (No. 842017)
I would expect a publication like Scientific American (once a respected magazine) to ignore the hideous use of Juneteenth and instead use the date of June 19th. Not only are the leftists ruining education, culture and the country but their corruption of language ranks near the top as well.
4 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
DHorne123 7/11/2021 8:32:30 AM (No. 842035)
This Rag is neither scientific nor is it American.
It used to be informative of many aspects of scientific investigations on a layman’s level. Now it’s just a dim rag like all the others.
SA delenda est!
7 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
franq 7/11/2021 8:56:14 AM (No. 842051)
Inflate your tires!
1 person likes this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Submariner 7/11/2021 9:03:16 AM (No. 842062)
No transitional life forms have been found in the fossil record. No biochemical pathway to the evolution of irreducibly complex life processes has ever been shown. No explanation has ever been put forth of how DNA arose and developed into to its current complexity in a random, entropic universe. “Science” still cannot define life, only describing some characteristics of living organisms.
Yet, the State and its agents like MS Hopper continue to try and enforce belief in the unseen (evolution) without benefit of evidence. Half of the population rejects evolution still, in spite of the Materialist religion’s monopoly power over philosophy in government, the culture and education. Rarely do people like the author attempt to address evolution’s crisis of evidence, and when they do it’s with unqualified sweeping statements that, again, lack supporting evidence.
7 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
SweetPea3 7/11/2021 9:05:16 AM (No. 842064)
Oh, for cryin out loud. Wiping my butt is a form of white supremacy for these perpetual whiners.
6 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
petrichor 7/11/2021 9:05:56 AM (No. 842067)
Now this is funny. Scientific American? What a joke. Clearly, the author has not thought about the implications of her assertions. She's saying white people are just more evolved than black people. I guess she has some old photos from the Olduvai Gorge.
2 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
jimboscott 7/11/2021 9:08:35 AM (No. 842071)
The existence of light is also more white supremacy. For that matter, vision itself is white supremacy.
2 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
skacmar 7/11/2021 9:18:39 AM (No. 842086)
Allison Hopper's bio at the end of the article is a liberal indoctrination checklist. She also ignores that many religions and ancient beliefs from people of all races also did not believe in evolution. This has been true in written and verbal history's of many indigenous people in jungles to the most modern cities. Her narrow racist view is not very "scientific" and is waste of paper and ink. I feel dumber for having read it.
2 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Ashley Brenton 7/11/2021 9:26:12 AM (No. 842096)
And yet the most murderous ideologies of the 20th Century, National Socialism and Communism, embraced Darwinism and evolution and rejected God. The result was millions of dead.
6 people like this.
Reply 27 - Posted by:
toddh 7/11/2021 9:28:59 AM (No. 842102)
Well, creationists are morons, and racists are morons, so maybe they sometimes get together at a moron club.
But this article's exegesis is execrable. "Adam" means "ruddy."
Seems the author is also a member of a moron club.
3 people like this.
Reply 28 - Posted by:
BarryNo 7/11/2021 9:29:54 AM (No. 842105)
I got halfway through the article and broke down in hysterical laughter!
What a pile of...
This is obviously from the pen of someone who parrots other 'science writers' interpretations of genealogy, and evolution.
First off... we don't know what skin color primitive pre-homo sapiens had. We assigned dark skin to them because the oldest remains (to date) have been found in Africa. The artists have assumed dark skin in the process of attempting to visualize the being represented by the fossil remains. It would be just as accurate to give any of the reconstructions Asian, Caucasian, or even psychedelic skin tones. We... don't... know...
Secondly, there have been fossil remains found other places in Asia and Europe, but their dating and positioning in the Human genome depends largely on the 'Out of Africa' model. I can recall several discoveries that challenged that model, that were 'shouted down' by the scientific community by the established voices. Politics plays a part in any field of study, as the previous generation of 'Experts' defends the validity of their 'turf'.
Thirdly, we don't even 'know the older primates assigned to the human lineage are actually human, or human-like. Its quite possible that many of these remains have no lineal descendants. Also there is a thing called convergent evolution, where creatures inhabiting similar niches develope similar characteristics. This is hard to explore because 1. It brings current 'accepted theories into question and 2. Remains of any animal as small or smaller than a human don't usually survive long enough to fossilized.
For perspective, we have thousands of genera and billions of species alive on Earth, today. Go back one era... we have perhaps, a few thousand or so species that are identifiable through the fossil record. Go back further, to the dinosaurs, and its even worse. Only the largest, sturdiest or most uniquely preserved (usually by drowning in a finely salted lake) specimens can be found and identified.
Archeology is like looking into a dark murky lake. What floats up in visual range only give a hint of what's really there.
7 people like this.
Reply 29 - Posted by:
TLCary 7/11/2021 9:31:09 AM (No. 842108)
Evolution, survival of the fittest; would have swept 'born this way' homosexuals right out of the gene pool as soon as that peculiar anomaly popped up. At least one of their hypotheses must be incorrect.
4 people like this.
Reply 30 - Posted by:
msjena 7/11/2021 9:33:46 AM (No. 842111)
I prefer white meat chicken. Does that make me a racist?
3 people like this.
Reply 31 - Posted by:
Lawsy0 7/11/2021 9:34:05 AM (No. 842112)
Clearly the fashion designer with a ''degree'' doesn't believe in intelligent design. She helps to heap scorn on her own pet project (going by the cartoon drawing). Her logic is amusing to scholars, I'll bet.
1 person likes this.
Reply 32 - Posted by:
EQKimball 7/11/2021 9:49:51 AM (No. 842126)
I believe that God created all creatures great snd small, including homo sapiens. It was therefore His choice whether to allow evolution, or if and when to endow any species with a human soul. The story of the humanly sentient Adam and Eve does not suggest their immediate progeny preceded Abraham by a million years of primitive tree or cave dwelling descendants. The contemporaries of the first Adamic-generated offspring seem to have been well advanced along the path of evolution.
4 people like this.
Reply 33 - Posted by:
jacksin5 7/11/2021 9:51:20 AM (No. 842127)
To think Allison has no power or following is a fool's errand. One only need look at Canada, and the Marxist's burning down of Catholic Churches to come to the realization that the Red Revolution is already underway.
3 people like this.
Reply 34 - Posted by:
federale 7/11/2021 9:51:42 AM (No. 842129)
More liberal B.S.
4 people like this.
Reply 35 - Posted by:
MickTurn 7/11/2021 10:00:29 AM (No. 842143)
The core question is this: If we evolved from apes why are there still apes?
It's pretty pathetic that Darwin saw adaptation and called it evolution.
2 people like this.
Reply 36 - Posted by:
Strike3 7/11/2021 10:30:57 AM (No. 842182)
Garbage like this gets published because it's now the popular thing with the educated elite. If you don't believe in the current racist propaganda and the many faults of evil, greedy white people you simply aren't informed and cool. Green Science, Clean Energy, Climate Change, Equality, Socialism, World Hunger, Normalcy of Homosexuality, Value of Endangered Species, all got their start in the very same way, some moron forms an idea that creates an imaginary problem and some publisher picks it up hoping to make a few dollars. Other morons think it would be great to teach it in schools instead of boring STEM class material and there you go.
0 people like this.
I’ll summarize for those too busy to read this drivel:
White skin bad. Black skin good.
4 people like this.
Reply 38 - Posted by:
paral04 7/11/2021 11:08:44 AM (No. 842223)
What Darwin came up with was a hypothesis. To be a theory you need to have proof and be able to predict and verify results. Nobody has proven evolution to be an absolute fact.
1 person likes this.
Reply 39 - Posted by:
usawatcher 7/11/2021 11:53:10 AM (No. 842278)
You are all wrong...we are the result of DNA manipulation by an alien species. Not the god thing, not darwin, none of that nonsense. Wait until they stop back by to check on their work....:)
2 people like this.
Reply 40 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 7/11/2021 3:45:16 PM (No. 842516)
Haha, Darwinism is entirely White Supremacy! Blacks were the next step up from Apes! And the racist British loved this explanation of life!
1 person likes this.
Reply 41 - Posted by:
local500 7/12/2021 3:25:41 PM (No. 843520)
Well count me a "White Supremacit" in this case.
I doubt the THEORY of evolution. There is literally no proof of that theory to explain how life started on earth. All ASSumptions, "it could have been" type stuff.
The mindless sheep who scream "science" and demand proof can't prove it, and have no problem with an unproven theory.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Ketchuplover"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
She believes that white and black people came from monkeys, but it's white supremacy if you promote that the white man evolved first from the monkey. In the meantime, she dismisses the Biblical account of Creation as fable.