Learn About Even More Trump Wins Against Lawfare

Maybe the MSM represent the Dims.

While the Trump wins are great, Chief Justice Roberts wants things to "go through the process" of judicial review. That works ONLY IF you have a judiciary respectful of the results of higher levels of review. Judge Chutkan obviously has NO such respect and the judicial system seems to have little hard ability to put her in her place. Thus, as with many of Robert's "solutions", they don't solve the problem. Arrogant judges can allow nuisance lawsuits to proceed, adjudicating the same idiocy over and over, until they are finally quashed by higher courts. Aggravating this is the District judges taking cases outside their districts (judge shopping) and issuing national injunctions which exceed their authority. All of this is judicial insanity and it mocks legal process and removes respect for the federal court system. This should be obvious to Roberts and others in the courts who should be taking what action they can and speaking out against it, even to requesting Congress, who has authority over court processes, to clarify the limits of the district courts and sanctions against judges that repeatedly violate those limits. If the SCOTUS has to slap you down repeatedly through emergency appeals, maybe you shouldn't be a judge. At a minimum it should automatically trigger an impeachment review, perhaps with a suspension until the review is completed. All this implies a simple concept that the Left has been steering courts away from for decades. Judges are in place to Follow The Law As Written, not make up new rules at whim to solve problems the way they see fit. Anything that steers the courts away from that guiding principle needs to be addressed and shut down.

Does the law allow 'judges' who deliberately overreach their authority to be strung up by their thumbs and whipped? No? Well, one can always wish!

The country needs a "three reversals and your out" rule for judges. If a judge has three reversal in three years they need to be automatically removed.

Thanks for posting. And kudos for Mr. Street. All in for three reversals, but no time limit IMHO.

It's interesting that these crooked judges twist the laws to the breaking point. There should be some kickback, like impeachment for incompetence when they use the Administrative Procedures Act as a rule on disbersal of money, when the law clearly does NOT permit the ADA dispute process to have any affect on MONEY being distributed. That's a whole different court, whole different law. These judges need to be impeached and removed for blatant disregard of the clear letter of the laws....or for incompetence if they argue that they didn't disregard, they just were too damned ignorant of the law to do a proper job.

I like the three reversals rule without time limits, too. I like everyone abiding by the Constitution most of all. We wouldn't have this judge mess if everyone had to prove what they do backed up by Constitutional authority. The three branches of government each have a role. Federal judges are making law and policy, and those are not their roles. The problem is the owners of the roles are not taking what's theirs by force.