Do We Need a Department of Transportation?
American Thinker,
by
Mac Madden
Original Article
Posted By: DW626,
1/12/2023 5:45:52 AM
Following yet another failure of government control of transportation -- the FAA system debacle -- Pete Buttigieg has been soundly thrashed again for his incompetence. The FAA failure is only one of many fiascos over the past year laid at the feet of the erstwhile secretary of Transportation. Recall when he and his “husband” were on paternity leave for nearly two months while the maritime shipping supply chain crisis was going on last fall. Next, he was AWOL during the railroad strike negotiations and really played no role in brokering a deal. As a matter of fact, he was on vacation in Portugal at the time.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Italiano 1/12/2023 6:42:54 AM (No. 1376645)
Probably not, but its performance with Tinker Belligieg in charge isn't exactly the acid test.
8 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
petrichor 1/12/2023 7:00:13 AM (No. 1376659)
Kill it, along with Dept of Education. Do we need Homeland Security when we've got the FBI for that? Hmmm. One should go.
14 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
tech10171968 1/12/2023 7:00:29 AM (No. 1376660)
Contrary to my feelings as a trucker, I'm going to say that we do indeed need a DOT - on the road level anyhow.
The reason is simple: you have 50 states in this country; basically, 50 different fiefdoms. Each one has its own state-level DOT, transportation and enforcement agencies. That means, as a long-haul driver, you often have to abide by 50 sets of regulations, each one slightly different from the next. If we're going to have efficient interstate travel and commerce then we're going to have to herd these 50 cats - otherwise interstate commerce gets entangled in this cluster[you-know-what]. It's bad enough as things go now; could you imagine NOT having ONE set of regulations which cover travel and commerce throughout the country? No more Amazon Prime 2-day shipping; that's going to take an extra week because a semi which was totally legal in one state may not be legal in the next. Trust me, it's happened to me before: I picked up a load in Texas and made it all the way to Florida before I found out I was in violation of Florida's bridge law (has nothing to do with "bridges", it's the legal distance between the kingpin and the tandems on the trailer). Imagine that: I was totally okay in 4 states but not okay in one.
That's probably why we need a final, "buck stops here" agency to oversee these things. 50 states under a common flag and government sharing interstate commerce; you'd think they could all agree to a common set of standards instead of shooting themselves in their collective feet by having (sometimes) contradictory regs.
13 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Rinktum 1/12/2023 7:06:36 AM (No. 1376666)
No. Every government agency has the potential for waste, fraud and corruption. Since we apparently do not have the will to do real independent audits and hold these agencies accountable for how they spend tax payer money, there is no justification for their existence. Any good they may do is cancelled our by their incompetence and corruption. Shut them down.
6 people like this.
The problems, of course, are an ever-increasing budget and 'scope creep' as in fuel taxes going to boondoggles like high speed rail - for which not even a shovel of dirt has been turned over.
Call a reduced agency 'the dept of roads' and eliminate it as a cabinet-level post.
6 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Bur Oak 1/12/2023 7:17:00 AM (No. 1376675)
No, we haven't had one in years. We only pay people to occupy positions on organizational charts in Washington DC. Our current DOT head was on "maternity" leave for months and no one missed him.
9 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Strike3 1/12/2023 7:19:21 AM (No. 1376677)
We don't need a gay baby momma, non-birthing person, who doesn't know anything and doesn't do anything.
10 people like this.
Who though that Pete BootyCall could be in charge of anything???
4 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
mean Gene 1/12/2023 7:55:15 AM (No. 1376727)
Has rear admiral Pete solved the problem of racist roads?
What's he going to do?
Move all the POC away from the existing roads (or) destroy all the roads in POC neighborhoods and put them in white neighborhoods?
(BTW, that's impossible. Even Watts, CA., in its worst days, was filled with white people among the black people. When the 710 Freeway was built, some of those towns it transected were literally all-white.)
5 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Rich323 1/12/2023 8:00:48 AM (No. 1376733)
If we had competent leadership in these departments that were facts driven and not politically driven, they might be ok. However, the Uniparty has turned everything into political based, taxation based and a control based operation. And they funded a lot of this department crap with our Social Security Trust Fund money!!
4 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
CivilServant 1/12/2023 8:38:24 AM (No. 1376769)
#3, only problem is, FEDDOT does none of those things.
None.
2 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Philipsonh 1/12/2023 9:23:06 AM (No. 1376824)
We do need a Dept of Transportation, but we must people running it that are SANE
and competent; on the other hand, the Dept of Education should be eliminated yesterday. It is a blight on our society.
7 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Sully 1/12/2023 9:25:23 AM (No. 1376828)
"Hochul’s plan would ban gas stoves, hot water heaters and oil furnaces in both new home and commercial construction by the end of the decade."
Um, there's only 2 ways to heat your home: oil or gas. Unless your're gonna bust wood in the city of NY. How can this be serious?
Who's gonna do it what has to be done? Which fuel seller or user who has heft is gonna tell the wokesters; All of this chaos, it is al for a lie. All of it. No truth. None. There is no climate disaster before us. Zero. I can prove it with data. I can prove it with evidence of fraud. I can prove it with reason and common sense.
BC so far the carbon fuel industry has been kowtowed. The Cow industry has been cowtowed. Nobody wants to stand up and defend themselves. Do it, sleepy. Push back. Do it. Crack that dam. Or we will never have peace as we will live in a nightmare world of Friedrich Nietzsche.
And it is cold in there.
1 person likes this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
red1066 1/12/2023 9:30:02 AM (No. 1376832)
There are about four or five government departments we could do without. We could start with the department of education, and the department of transportation. Talk about cutting government spending.
2 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
padiva 1/12/2023 9:59:53 AM (No. 1376879)
Put Education back to where it was before Jimmy Carter made it a separate dept to win the teachers' votes in 1976.
1 person likes this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
coldborezero 1/12/2023 10:05:18 AM (No. 1376889)
What we NEED is a federal government that OBEYS the limitations placed upon it by the Constitution. That would fix most of our problems.
4 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
felixcat 1/12/2023 10:09:31 AM (No. 1376895)
Agree with poster #3. I really cannot blame Pete for the SW fiasco. That's on the company, the CEO, etc. Although I do think that when we give billions in tax payer funds to an airline, they better be able to account for it such as 80% will be used to update out IT systems or whatever. Instead they get the money and that's it.
FHWA - they don't build highways others than those on federal lands like national parks. Otherwise, they're only purpose is reimbursing states for highway projects like expanding interstate ####
Many of these departments came into being decades ago and the reasons for their existence have either been accomplished or are no longer needed as technology has changed so much.
0 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Talk2 1/12/2023 10:09:32 AM (No. 1376896)
What we don't need is a department of education, a Carter administration nightmare.
0 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
MickTurn 1/12/2023 10:15:49 AM (No. 1376908)
Nope, that one and a host of others need to Sundown...roll over and kick your last lurch!
0 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
paral04 1/12/2023 10:22:52 AM (No. 1376928)
We need to hire based on ability not skin color or sexual identity. End of story. Bring back testing for entry and promotions.
0 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Jebediah 1/12/2023 10:44:37 AM (No. 1376964)
We surely don't need a mayor of a small town who had trouble taking care of potholes as our Secretary of Transportation. By the by, heard on The Five (Jessica Tarloff) the other night that the Butegeig took a particularly long maternity leave during a national crisis because one child was on a ventilator. Very sad but ask yourself, in a TWO person family, if YOU could take months off at a pivotal point in a lesser kind of job that didn't affect the nation, or if you would simply have to cede the full time watching and waiting to your partner.? Plus, how much pity do we have for a man who still has not managed decent supplies of infant formulas to mothjerds of tiny babies, who suffer asa. result.
0 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
DVC 1/12/2023 11:45:23 AM (No. 1377048)
We do not need ....
The Department of Transportation
The Department of Energy
The Environmental Protection Agency
and probably several other federal destructive, obstructive bureaucracies.
1 person likes this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
oldmagnolia 1/12/2023 11:47:42 AM (No. 1377054)
No we don't. There should be only 3 departments: State, Commerce, and Defense. Also NO alphabet agencies at all.
1 person likes this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
HonestDon 1/12/2023 12:32:57 PM (No. 1377093)
ABSOLUTELY NOT! What's their charter? What's their benefit? We got along fine with the CAB, prior to the engrandizing, and renaming to the FAA. The NTSB also has value. DOT should go, along with the DOE, (read the charter of the DOE,) HHS, HS, DOAg and, probably, the politicized FDA. READ THE 10th AMENDMENT!
1 person likes this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
judy 1/12/2023 12:56:39 PM (No. 1377115)
Pete is proving we do not need a Secretary of Transportation...he's been absent, out of country, on maternity leave, on on vacation since he was sworn in!
0 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
bigfatslob 1/12/2023 1:02:40 PM (No. 1377122)
It's not the department that's the problem it's that fraud Joe Biden had to please a wacky group in the LGBTQ+++ sickos with some appointments of mentally ill homosexuals, lesbians and transgender it didn't matter that they were stupid and useless like Joe Biden. FJB
0 people like this.
More important question: Do we need Buttboy? Do we need Buttboy in ANY taxpayer-supported government job?
0 people like this.
Reply 28 - Posted by:
rochow 1/12/2023 9:27:23 PM (No. 1377402)
What does it take to throw this piece of garbage out of office? He looks stupid when you look at this jerk, her proves how stupid he is every time he opens his mouth! As long as I have lived in this country, I never heard of a formula shortage, usually the US helps other countries out. Then we learned of containers piling up in California, followed by medical shortages, now the entire country is locked down because what? He could not stop diapering his kids, but he has time to fly private for a radio interview??? Did you hear about the 2 1/2-day train ride??? Call McCarthy and tell him to do something about dumping this trash vegetable!!!
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "DW626"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)