Down With Electric Vehicles!
PowerLine,
by
John Hinderaker
Original Article
Posted By: mc squared,
9/12/2022 12:32:17 PM
Posted on September 11, 2022 by John Hinderaker in Electric vehicles, Energy Policy, Environment
Down With Electric Vehicles!
Are people finally starting to catch on to the fact that electric vehicles are a terrible idea? I hope so. Bjorn Lomborg makes the case in accessible form in the Wall Street Journal. To begin with, EVs don’t even save much on CO2 emissions:
Over its lifetime, an electric car does emit less CO2 than a gasoline car, but the difference can range considerably depending on how the electricity is generated. Making batteries for electric cars also requires a massive amount of energy, mostly from burning coal in China.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
MDConservative 9/12/2022 12:46:08 PM (No. 1275475)
The market is the place for competing technologies to sort out which is better. VHS or Beta? The market is continually distorted by government subsidies and other favors granted by elected officials. I don't care what drives your car. If you want diesel, gasoline, LPG, steam, hybrid or EV...that's your choice with your money. And you buy the consequences and expense. The key is to STOP government from making that decision for you or anyone else by tilting the field in favor of one or another over any.
36 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
TLCary 9/12/2022 1:02:49 PM (No. 1275494)
It's a rather simple exercise to prove that in the vast majority of cases, EV's cause the release of more CO2, not slightly less. France, yeah... 60% of its electrical generation is nuclear. In the USA, it's not even close. It's not the dumpster fire of excessive CO2 produces in making and then burning ethanol compared to petroleum, but its still far worse than just burning gas to get to work.
7 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
bpl40 9/12/2022 1:07:24 PM (No. 1275497)
Point 0 before you even enter into this argument is that CO2 is primarily a nutrient. NOT a pollutant or a toxin. If you don’t understand that the rest is useless.
22 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
jeffkinnh 9/12/2022 1:20:51 PM (No. 1275504)
All this information has been known for a while now. It proves the absurdity of thinking that we could all use EVs and solar and wind power and nothing else. Frankly, if the earth is doomed if we don't do this, per Brandon, it is doomed. We CANNOT do this. It is IMPOSSIBLE.
Further, the ridiculously small impact on global temperatures, .0002 degree C, per the "standard United Nations Climate Panel model" makes "success" pointless.
Finally, even making the attempt to move exclusively to EVs & solar & wind is going to destroy the global economy and kill people.
The progressives have us working for IMPOSSIBLE goals, to NO PURPOSE, and significantly DAMAGING all humanity in the attempt.
Sounds like a definition of insanity.
14 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
stablemoney 9/12/2022 2:52:29 PM (No. 1275560)
I caught on when I saw the battery fires, and being perpetually late, being told a recharge could take hours.
5 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
DVC 9/12/2022 3:43:03 PM (No. 1275590)
The root of his argument is fallacious. He accepts the idea that reducing CO2 output by humans is a necessary or desireable goal.
IT IS NOT. There is not the slightest proof that the miniscule contribution to the increasing atmospheric concentration of CO2 by humans has the slightest negative impact on anything. In fact, we have lots of SOLID scientific proof that more CO2 in the atmosphere is very good for green plant growth, which is the foundation of all life on our planet.
The BASIS for the discussion is false. Whether EV's do or do not increase or decrease CO2 is meaningless.
They are expensive, crappy devices that do the job that is needed BADLY for a lot more money. And CO2 is irrelevant, should be dismissed immediately as a point to be discussed and have relevance.
12 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
janjan 9/12/2022 6:56:13 PM (No. 1275713)
The truth is coming out about the ridiculously stupid push for unaffordable electric cars. Gavin Newsom certainly helped when their new ‘law’ mandating electric cars was immediately followed by the State telling people that they didn’t have enough electricity to charge them.
2 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
thomthomp 9/12/2022 7:54:37 PM (No. 1275757)
#6 is spot on. 540 million years ago was a period (the Cambrian Period) that saw the greatest explosion of life in Earth's history. The oceans did NOT boil away and atmospheric CO2 was at 7000 PPM, SEVENTEEN TIMES WHAT IT IS NOW!
2 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
DrOstrow 9/13/2022 3:40:44 PM (No. 1276559)
I have long thought that somebody ( Big Al ) heard of or was taught the THEORY that -
Venus has a dense cloud cover and surface temperatures exceeding 800 degrees because it suffered
from 'runaway' CO2. This was caused by 'pick your favorite uncontrollable villain - proximity to
the sun, over population by squirrels, whatever ) and
horror of horrors, IT CAN HAPPEN HERE !!
Some group of zealots then ran with it and here we are today !
Ask someone 'what is the percentage of CO2 in our atmosphere ?' - take bets on getting
shrugged shoulders, puzzled looks, blank stares etc. Hint - it's a FRACTION of 1% !!!
This is ALL PROPAGANDA that survives because of flawed models / researchers taken as gospel,
a basically scientifically illiterate population and a hostile media !!
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "mc squared"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
No sentient being (sorry Joe) could believe that we can give up oil and gas as the energy source for the world economy. Unless they have nefarious ends.