Roe v. Wade is dead.
Substack,
by
Techno Fog
Original Article
Posted By: earlybird,
6/24/2022 10:53:49 AM
In 1973, the Supreme Court legalized abortion under the auspices of the “right of privacy,” which it held to “encompass a woman’s decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy.” While we do have rights that are guaranteed to us despite not being in the Constitution (those natural rights), abortion was never one of them. Not until Roe, at least.
It is estimated that more than 63 million babies have been aborted since Roe. That’s more than the combined population of Florida and California. Most recently CDC numbers show nearly 630,000 abortions in 2019 – meaning 195 abortions per 1,000 live births.
Abortion has never been a rare procedure since legalization,
Reply 1 - Posted by:
chance_232 6/24/2022 10:58:24 AM (No. 1195484)
Que up the hysteria, threats and violence.
Democrats will attempt to make the midterms about court packing and impeaching justices.
All they have is abortion, gun control, transsexuals and white supremacy. Not one position has majority support, but the will flog "democracy" and you white Republicans are a threat to it.
15 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
bpl40 6/24/2022 11:03:07 AM (No. 1195496)
Hallelujah!
21 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
earlybird 6/24/2022 11:03:10 AM (No. 1195498)
FTA:
Through these rationalizations, they reject personhood and love - those things which make us human and inform how we are to act towards the other. This spares their conscience the guilt of the violent end of this bodily and spiritual relationship. Eliminate or redefine motherhood, subject to the demands of abortion on demand, so the individual can thrive (or, as Janet Yellen prefers, for the benefit of the economy). What they fail to understand is the impossibility of their scheme: you are a parent no matter where your child may be.
This is the conflict of values. What is sacred is not the act of abortion or the right to abort. The sacred is the human form, with its inherent dignity, and the mother-child relationship, both of which were made in His image. The desecration is its destruction.
18 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Illinois Mom 6/24/2022 11:03:13 AM (No. 1195499)
It took us 50 years.
So many years work and prayers.
God Bless those 60 million tiny martyrs.
41 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
earlybird 6/24/2022 11:32:18 AM (No. 1195542)
This is a marvelous article that talks of the courage of those beleaguered Justices who knew Roe v. Wade was wrong and that they must correct. And the continuing weakness of Roberts, who would have put it off for another day.
In other words, Justice Roberts would prefer the Court correct its mistakes at another time. The present is inconvenient for him. The majority opinion recognized Roberts’ maneuvering, stating “the concurrence’s most fundamental defect is its failure to offer any principled basis for its approach.”
13 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
DVC 6/24/2022 11:33:24 AM (No. 1195544)
Like the Dred Scott decision over a century before it, Roe v. Wade was a totally political disaster and fundamentally WRONG according to the Constitution from it's origin.
Finally, the Constitution is restored. The US Constitution is entirely silent on abortion. Abortion is therefore, controlled by the States according to the Tenth Amendment's clear words.
The Tenth Amendment reads:
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
There is NO 'delegation of abortion control' in the Constitution. So, those powers "...are reserved to the States...".
Boom.
SImple reading of the words as written.
No 'unbras' or 'penumbras' and no looking to other countries' practices or legal documents.
READING the words written in the US Constitution is all it takes.
And 50 years to get a court filled with honest judges who can read plain English and not INVENT stuff from thin air.
23 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
earlybird 6/24/2022 11:42:41 AM (No. 1195558)
Re #4, so many babies. Human beings, given life and then having it taken from them by their mothers.
My Mother’s doctor recommended that I be aborted due to a condition that he believed threatened her life. She said No. She lived to have another child and had a good long life of kindness and service to her family, her parents, anyone in need. I miss her ever minute of every day
24 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
MDConservative 6/24/2022 11:56:08 AM (No. 1195581)
Let the games begin! There are a bunch of state legislators across the land having bladder tightness expecting to have to cast a vote in the near future.
11 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
danu 6/24/2022 12:10:42 PM (No. 1195602)
Ding. Dong..... Witches.
6 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Flyball Dogs 6/24/2022 12:15:40 PM (No. 1195610)
“ Then there’s Chief Justice John Roberts. He didn’t join his colleagues in the opinion, and instead concurred in the judgment.”
What is WRONG with him?
Seems to be more than pictures or a dossier. Something fundamental in his soul is missing….or skewed.
12 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
DVC 6/24/2022 2:36:34 PM (No. 1195774)
Justice Alito's comments ring so loud and so true.
"Roe was egregiously wrong from the start. Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences."
From the legal view, this is the simple truth.
There is much more truth from a moral view, of course. B
8 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
MrDeplorable 6/24/2022 3:52:05 PM (No. 1195833)
Stay tuned for the sequel to Roe v Wade, the "Revenge of Roe v Wade," which like many sequels, is far more destructive and far evil than the original. Of course you don't know what I'm talking about so put this on your refrigerator because you soon will understand that the Dobbs decision was not a victory but the prelude to a disaster.
0 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
MickTurn 6/24/2022 4:05:51 PM (No. 1195848)
Fair is Fair...for every unborn Baby, or BORN Baby that has been aborted, we Demand the Leftists Commit Suicide to make up for their loss!
2 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy 6/24/2022 4:44:20 PM (No. 1195901)
If CJ Warren Burger were still alive, would be good to know why he allowed the SCOTUS of 1973 to hear the R v W case in the first place. What did this case even have to do with the Constitution.
3 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
mifla 6/24/2022 4:53:17 PM (No. 1195910)
Roberts voted against this until he found out that he could not twist enough arms to change the verdict. Then he switched sides.
2 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
jeffkinnh 6/24/2022 7:31:47 PM (No. 1196065)
“the Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision.”
This is an enormous step toward a Conservative view of the law. The federal government can ONLY do things that the Constitution says it can do. The federal government has been overreaching for decades and has been supported in that overreach by an activist SCOTUS that decided their role is to "do the right thing" instead of to stay within the confines of the law, i.e. the Constitution. There can be a lot of things that might be reconsidered now, including intrusive federal environmental laws.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Techno Fog is an often-cited Conservative lawyer-researcher who digs deep into issues that matter to us