Booker: GOP’s KBJ Hearing Questions
Were ‘Insulting,’ ‘Demeaning,’ ‘Filthy’
Breitbart,
by
Pam Key
Original Article
Posted By: LoveYourCountry,
4/8/2022 9:30:20 AM
Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) said Thursday on CNN’s “Situation Room” that some Republican senator’s questions to judge Ketanji Brown Jackson during her nomination hearing for U.S. Supreme Court were “insulting and demeaning and degrading, or just plain filthy.”
Anchor Wolf Blitzer said, “How much more difficult was this process for Ketanji Brown Jackson as a black woman, especially during those totally and incredibly partisan times.”
Booker said, “There is a lot of hurt in America and a lot of private of people who were qualified who are competent and who were disrespected, disregarded or just plain dissed frankly.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
BarryNo 4/8/2022 9:36:01 AM (No. 1122983)
Her answers were dissembling and worse. The information about her is horrific. She empathizes with child predators?
She should not be a judge, must less a member of SCOTUS. It is your eternal shame to have advanced her.
45 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
earlybird 4/8/2022 9:44:49 AM (No. 1122993)
Booker made a fool of himself.
41 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Twinkle93 4/8/2022 9:47:37 AM (No. 1122995)
Is the Supreme Court going to have to change the tasks that are assigned to the least senior jurist since she is a black female?
12 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
PageTurner 4/8/2022 9:48:11 AM (No. 1122997)
Spartacus rises from his hole and waves his spear.
18 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
zephyrgirl 4/8/2022 9:50:45 AM (No. 1123004)
The hearings were nothing but theater for the rubes in flyover country. KBJ knew she'd be confirmed with 100% of Senate Democrats and Camel Toe breaking the tie, or more likely, support of a few RINOS so she just blew off any question she didn't like. The Republicans needn't have bothered. They didn't fool anyone paying attention. I knew for sure that the two RINO witches (Collins and Murkowski) would support her and suspected that Pierre Delecto would as well. Now we have two "wise" minorities on the SCOTUS with limited qualifications other than ethnicity.
23 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
RWPollock 4/8/2022 9:53:35 AM (No. 1123010)
What does he think the Democrats did to Kavenaugh? Comparatively Republicans treated her with kid gloves.
27 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
EJKrausJr 4/8/2022 9:53:51 AM (No. 1123011)
If Spartacus screams in the woods, does anyone hear him? Only those with common sense shut out the noise being emitted from that buffoon.
18 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Krause 4/8/2022 9:54:27 AM (No. 1123013)
This guy is such an emotional immature lightweight.
17 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Italiano 4/8/2022 9:56:03 AM (No. 1123015)
She was a joke and will be forever be known as the Token Justice. Live with it.
28 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
ussjimmycarter 4/8/2022 9:58:09 AM (No. 1123018)
Booker triggers me! Can I sue someone? Booker exudes toxic femininity!!!
13 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
cor-vet 4/8/2022 10:03:36 AM (No. 1123026)
One of the biggest faults of liberal dems, of the many they possess, is short or lack of memory. If AlGore hadn't invented climate change for them, the dems would surely have hung him out to dry by now, for inventing the internet. Nothing dies on the internet, it's forever, unless your an investigative journalist /reporter for the LSM, and the subject is a dem.
9 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
bighambone 4/8/2022 10:04:44 AM (No. 1123028)
Booker would say what he did slamming the Republican Senators if they only just had said hello to Ketanji Brown Jackson.
10 people like this.
Justice Clarence Thomas
Justice Cavanaugh
Justice Amy...(sorry, brain fa--s)
Seems to me that the dem. senators WERE ugly and filthy 1000% more evil and filthy to the above mentioned. This did not receive any bashing, filthy and ugly comments by the senators. Really. In comparison? Nothing. Booker waxed beautifully, kissing the nominee's whatever. Now that was truly disgusting, a true a donkey's behind. The Senator from Maine seems to have the same problem as Biden. Dementia? Pierre Delecto? Alaska senator? A dip you-know-what. Not good.
10 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
The Remnants 4/8/2022 10:11:10 AM (No. 1123036)
No, Senator Booker, you are confused. It is the actions of child predators on babies and children that are filthy, demeaning and insulting to their innocence. And I do not even know the specifics - nor would I want to - but you, Senator, had the opportunity to learn the specifics of the crimes committed against these innocent victims and, also, the opportunity to question the leniency Judge Jackson consistently showed to those who committed these crimes.
12 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Rich323 4/8/2022 10:12:31 AM (No. 1123038)
And now we find out a Harvard law classmate and friend she donated money to was part of the coverup to reduce the charges against Epstein and allow him to walk years ago.
13 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Pammie 4/8/2022 10:13:17 AM (No. 1123041)
The marxist democrat party and rinos are F@@@tards and now adhere to the color of your skin and not the content of your character! GEEZE!
9 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
bpl40 4/8/2022 10:16:19 AM (No. 1123047)
Exact epithets I would apply to the nomination and the nominee!
10 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
john56 4/8/2022 10:30:55 AM (No. 1123066)
Obviously, there are no mirrors in Corey Booker's office. Or home.
If asking a Supreme Court nominee simple questions on why she can't define a woman, or to explain light sentences for child pornography offenders is "insulting, demeaning, filthy," I guess we are guilty.
By the way, did Crazy Mamie ask her question that she asked to Justice Amy Barrett Comey that she said she asks all nominees, you know, "are there any sexual charges that you've settled out of court, etc."? I'm guessing that this nominee was spared that embarrassing question.
10 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
wilarrbie 4/8/2022 10:30:55 AM (No. 1123067)
Questioning ANY SC nominee is necessary. Bringing up their past performance is reasonable. Is Booker suggesting that as an Historic Black Woman she should have simply been rubber stamped in?
9 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
WhamDBambam 4/8/2022 10:35:00 AM (No. 1123072)
Fine, cupcake.
5 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
WV.Hillbilly 4/8/2022 10:49:41 AM (No. 1123087)
How is questioning a nominee about her judicial record “insulting and demeaning and degrading, or just plain filthy”?
He sounds like the pompous black lawyer Jackie Chiles on Seinfeld. "Lewd, lascivious, salacious, outrageous!"
9 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
padiva 4/8/2022 10:54:13 AM (No. 1123091)
Perhaps, Booker can not define 'What is a woman?' either.
6 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
coyote 4/8/2022 11:01:54 AM (No. 1123099)
Hey Booker, it's over, no more publicity to be had. Rap the gavel and close the curtains on this political theater.
4 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 4/8/2022 11:03:10 AM (No. 1123102)
Duplicitous moron... they could even make a 1970's era "Blaxploitation" film on the big dummy entitled, "That Man Dolt."
2 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
hershey 4/8/2022 11:05:17 AM (No. 1123105)
Yeah you wanker, like you didn't do it toBarrett and Kavanaugh did you..ok for me but not for thee....anything else I write will blacklist me...
6 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Highlander 4/8/2022 11:21:00 AM (No. 1123125)
He has a short, if not selective, memory
4 people like this.
Reply 27 - Posted by:
GustoGrabber 4/8/2022 11:32:33 AM (No. 1123137)
Hey Red Sox fans, Celtics Fans, Bruins fans, how about " Lets go Corey"!
2 people like this.
Reply 28 - Posted by:
broken01 4/8/2022 11:43:40 AM (No. 1123146)
Didn't Cry Baby Booger from New Joisey all but call Kavanaugh a rapist while his constituents wished death to him and his family. Didn't Booger say that ACB wasn't qualified and was trying with his limited intellect to try to trip her up with his own insulting, demeaning and filthy questions. Yes he did. So as far as I'm concerned Spartacus Booger can go pound sand on the nearest NJ shore.
5 people like this.
Reply 29 - Posted by:
moebellini3 4/8/2022 11:55:50 AM (No. 1123153)
Booker, just another democratic fool. A parasite living off the taxpayer dime. People like this are nothing more than racist bigots that push the race card. Remember, they are who they want you to hate. Got it...
4 people like this.
Reply 30 - Posted by:
DVC 4/8/2022 12:47:30 PM (No. 1123195)
I'd say that Booker is insulting, demeaning and filthy.
5 people like this.
Reply 31 - Posted by:
czechlist 4/8/2022 12:47:48 PM (No. 1123196)
As long as dim politicians exist the "N" and "C" words will not disappear from the common discourse.
3 people like this.
Reply 32 - Posted by:
Right Time 4/8/2022 1:30:37 PM (No. 1123236)
When is your trans surgery scheduled, Cory?
2 people like this.
Reply 33 - Posted by:
ironchefw 4/8/2022 3:29:44 PM (No. 1123306)
No doubt she is a robotic rubber stamp for the ultra radical left who never respected the Constitution. But we are where we are.
1 person likes this.
Reply 34 - Posted by:
rikkitikki 4/8/2022 3:45:12 PM (No. 1123312)
If society cannot use basic biological features to define a 'woman', then it cannot use basic biological features to define "black".
Therefore, using Brown-Jackson's own rationale, she cannot claim to be either a woman or a black.
After taking away those two justifications, the only one remaining to justify her selection is that she can be counted on to be the most liberal justice to ever mount the bench.
And if that's the only reason, it's yet one more push for America to slide over the edge into oblivion.
1 person likes this.
Reply 35 - Posted by:
Starboard_side 4/8/2022 3:58:42 PM (No. 1123318)
There is a real problem, particularly from the Left, whereas they claim all sorts of things simply because you don't agree with their opinion, idea or ideology.
Then, they demean you, chastise you, lie about you, and smear you.
I doubt any Democrat will find anything that was questioned about KBJ's record as false, unlike how they treated Kavanaugh and Barrett in their "questioning" which were more like unfounded accusations.
2 people like this.
Reply 36 - Posted by:
skacmar 4/8/2022 6:17:40 PM (No. 1123408)
Why does everything about KJB need to be framed as "first Black woman"? If she cannot stand on her own record as a competent attorney and judge, minus the first Black woman part, she should not be on the Supreme Court or any other court as a judge. If KJB is unable to answer the fairly tame questions she received about her judicial record, she should not be on the court. Her sex and race have nothing to do with her ability to do her job. Take that away and treat her like everyone else.
2 people like this.
Reply 37 - Posted by:
kono 4/8/2022 7:15:19 PM (No. 1123449)
#9: Not "the token justice", but "another token justice" -- The court already has Kagan and Sotomayor (wise token Latina and wiseass token bulldyke, respectively).
1 person likes this.
Reply 38 - Posted by:
24tea@Mag 4/9/2022 10:35:39 PM (No. 1124274)
Mr Showboat - get lost!
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "LoveYourCountry"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Spartacus, the same guy who accused Kavanaugh of being a rapist, is accusing the GOP of being 'fillthy?' LOL.