A partisan investigation into Trump seems
to have dead-ended
American Thinker,
by
Andrea Widburg
Original Article
Posted By: Magnante,
2/24/2022 3:29:45 AM
At least one criminal case that Democrat activists filed against Trump may be ending with a whimper. You may recall that there’s a criminal fraud case against Trump in Manhattan. To the New York Times’s manifest despair, it seems that there is no evidence of an actual crime. Things are so bad that two of the lead prosecutors on the case quit when the District Attorney expressed serious doubt in the case.
In 2018, Cyrus Vance, Jr., Manhattan’s then-District Attorney, charged the Trump Organization and its chief financial officer, Allen Weisselberg, with tax fraud allegedly related to overvaluing properties to obtain bank loans.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
planetgeo 2/24/2022 4:37:11 AM (No. 1081003)
What...they didn't finally get him? Again?
62 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Rama41 2/24/2022 5:26:25 AM (No. 1081023)
Well, there's always January 6th, which is now all they have, besides Fox News. Expect them to work extra hard when the trucks arrive next week.
41 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Rich323 2/24/2022 5:36:26 AM (No. 1081026)
Meep! Meep! Pachooooo!
29 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
judy 2/24/2022 5:53:58 AM (No. 1081029)
Don't count on it.... they will seek & try to find something..after all it's taxpayer $$$$ they are spending....
40 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Rinktum 2/24/2022 5:59:12 AM (No. 1081032)
Go after Trump and ignore the Biden and Clinton crime families. That sounds about right. Gheesh…. Another dead end, you say? Can President Trump sue for malicious prosecution?
70 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
ROLFNader 2/24/2022 7:01:32 AM (No. 1081081)
Yes, because valuing commercial property has ALWAYS been an exact science- right?
35 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
mobyclik 2/24/2022 7:04:48 AM (No. 1081085)
Trumps speech Saturday night should be interesting. You can bet the crazy libs have a worksheet of attacks to go after him with, each crazier than the last. They'll just throw this one in the round file and move on to the next. What's that description of insanity again?
25 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
5 handicap 2/24/2022 7:25:23 AM (No. 1081104)
Two new york Asst DAs proved their uselessness... must be acolytes of Cyrus Vance, a treasonous criminal just like dear ole dad.
28 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Venturer 2/24/2022 7:40:32 AM (No. 1081130)
The New York AG should be replaced.
28 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
udanja99 2/24/2022 8:25:04 AM (No. 1081182)
Just another witch hunt. Trump’s businesses get audited every year by the IRS. If there were any issues with his taxes, the IRS would have leaked them years ago, starting in 2015 when he announced his campaign. Ditto NY state tax department.
41 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Strike3 2/24/2022 8:34:24 AM (No. 1081205)
Like every incompetent dictator, tribal chieftain, mullah, king, warlord or wannabe tin-god emperor in history, the democrats must create a scary boogeyman and keep the fear going for the peons otherwise they would notice that the frauds are not wearing any clothes. If not for Donald Trump, everybody from Hillary to Biden would have to show some kind of leadership potential and that would be disastrous for them because they have nothing.
17 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Paperpuncher 2/24/2022 8:37:13 AM (No. 1081210)
Here is the problem the rats are running into trying to stick something. Brace yourself for it. Here it comes: TRUMP IS AN HONEST MAN!
They went after his tax returns. Do you think since he gets audited every year by the IRS that the IRS wouldn’t go after him if there was anything there? You have the Mueller investigation waste of $40,000,000 and found nothing. All of the moron Soros D.A.s that have been going after him have found absolutely nothing. There is no there there.
And yet neither the lame stream media or the DOJ, or any other DA have investigated Hunter and the big guy when there is evidence seeping out of every crack and crevice. LGB
33 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
NYbob 2/24/2022 9:03:03 AM (No. 1081256)
Cyrus Vance Jr. a chip off the pile known as Cyrus Vance.
18 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
john56 2/24/2022 9:08:46 AM (No. 1081268)
Well, I'll give a couple of these folks credit for knowing that their actions can go both ways. Better to jump off the purge wagon before the purge wagon comes to pick you up.
Plus getting into a tiff with Trump and his attorneys isn't fun. Maybe for Trump and his lawyers, but not if you're on the other side. As much as I've come to respect and admire Trump (and until about 2016, I never liked the guy), there are two things I would not want to do with Trump: Work for him (he's a pretty demanding boss) and sue him (see above).
13 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
qr4j 2/24/2022 9:44:09 AM (No. 1081312)
At what point can Mr. Trump sue for damages? We have the Russia-gate investigation. We have the hacking of Trump computer servers and WH servers when he was president. We have Impeachment 1 and Impeachment 2. And I cannot remember what else. It is all a blur.
At what point does this harassment warrant lawsuits against the legal harassers? Defending oneself in court is not cheap.
18 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Leathernuts 2/24/2022 10:16:50 AM (No. 1081354)
This is good news, but the other shoe, the returns, are in enemy hands. How long before we see leaked manipulated tax data being published as gospel. Then the crazies will start anew.
7 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
pensom2 2/24/2022 10:46:36 AM (No. 1081393)
Suing for malicious prosecution is a little like suing for libel. If you're a public figure, you have to prove a "mens rea" (intent) of actual malice. That's very hard to prove, and it's very hard to prove that prosecutors were operating solely on that basis when the offended party is as controversial a target as Donald Trump. Beyond that, any trial or pre-trial discover would turn over rocks under which crawl all kinds of loathsome creatures--creatures that would not be admissible in criminal trials but may be admissible in a civil malicious prosecution trial.
In other words, there's no way the President Trump is going to sue for malicious prosecution over wide-ranging cases like this. It would have to be a narrow little case addressing a discrete, limited issue.
3 people like this.
The next "insurrection" at DC should be a real one...and bloody
5 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
MickTurn 2/24/2022 11:46:02 AM (No. 1081472)
WHEN Trump becomes President again there are a whole lot of Commies to take care of...as in, PUT THEM IN PRISON to ROT!
3 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
pmcclure 2/24/2022 11:52:10 AM (No. 1081481)
However, there are many people still in jail from last January 6th with no bail or trial in sight.
3 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
NotaBene 2/24/2022 12:56:47 PM (No. 1081571)
I miss Donald the Great.
3 people like this.
Any idiot who has ever owned, bought or sold real estate can tell you that it is the bank who appraises the property. The first day I read about this I knew is was a bogus investigation the goal of which was to get Trump's tax filings so they could do some more digging.
5 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Omen55 2/24/2022 3:39:03 PM (No. 1081742)
This only makes Trump stronger.
Meanwhile all of dem keep proving insanity is dem.
0 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
rikkitikki 2/24/2022 5:38:29 PM (No. 1081834)
The kangaroo persecutions of DJT have never been about justice, in not one single case, but about distracting Americans from the non-stop parade of abject democrat failures, malfeasance, and criminal offenses.
0 people like this.
yet not one bank involved took legal action on their own?
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Magnante"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)