Why Chauvin Verdict
Disappointed Democrats
American Spectator,
by
David Catron
Original Article
Posted By: Garnet,
4/23/2021 4:47:05 AM
Tuesday afternoon the Democrats and the Left at large got exactly what they said they wanted from the trial of Derek Chauvin. The jury found him guilty of all three counts — second-degree murder, third-degree murder, and second-degree manslaughter — with which he had been charged in the death of George Floyd. Yet prominent Democrats who commented on the verdict seemed slightly bewildered and disappointed. Their collective response was captured in this statement from Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison: “I would not call today’s verdict justice, because justice implies restoration.” This is an odd assertion coming from the man who orchestrated Chauvin’s prosecution and secured an unequivocal conviction.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
udanja99 4/23/2021 7:26:36 AM (No. 764308)
The verdict was not enough. Nothing will ever be enough.
Besides, demonrats need to keep the natives restless in order to keep their votes.
I wish that blacks would understand that every cog in the system is run by democrats so systemic racism is the work and intention of democrats. I also wish that some Republican in DC would point that out to the likes of Ellison, AOC, Harris and the enemedia.
20 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Bur Oak 4/23/2021 7:41:16 AM (No. 764318)
I feel sorry for all the good law abiding citizens of Minnesota. Unfortunately they have voted for and allowed evil people to govern the state.
13 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
NorthernDog 4/23/2021 7:49:39 AM (No. 764322)
Despite the verdict most people just go about their own lives, once the spectacle is over. That's what infuriates the Left. They want constant, feverish devotion to their cause. Prosecuting the other 3 cops on hand when Floyd expired will not be as compelling. The MaKhia Bryant stabbing doesn't quite fit the narrative. It may be a long time before they can riot again.
16 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
bpl40 4/23/2021 8:10:56 AM (No. 764352)
I have to differ from #2 in my feelings. Looking at the way the people of Minnesota have been voting and the Ilhan Omar/ Keith Ellison garbage they are sending to Congress, they deserve not only what they are getting but what's coming.
15 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Venturer 4/23/2021 8:10:58 AM (No. 764353)
The charges all have different descriptions. No way can he be guilty of all 3.
Pick one charge and find him guilty of that , but he is not guilty of all 3.
Can the Judge sentence him on all 3 individually or consecutively, It's a farce.
But when you have a jury made up on bigots and frightened individuals this is the crap you get.
15 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
3XALADY 4/23/2021 8:40:32 AM (No. 764386)
AOC must have been talking to muzzie Ellison because she said basically the same thing: justice wasn't done because George Floyd didn't go home after the trial or something like that. Duh. If he was going home, there would have been no reason for a trial. They just try to wring every little bit of 'justice' out of everything and are never satisfied.
9 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Krause 4/23/2021 9:08:36 AM (No. 764434)
First off, there is no systemic racism. Just look at the stats. Second, the trial will be thrown out, as there was no sequestration, a juror saying they wanted to avoid riots, Ugly Maxine spouting off on TV demanding conviction. It was a typical democrat operation, poorly executed.
8 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
stablemoney 4/23/2021 9:47:21 AM (No. 764496)
The Democrats always pretend to be disappointed by their victories. They laugh a lot about it, when not on the camera.
6 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Melanie 4/23/2021 11:03:18 AM (No. 764613)
I'm not a lawyer, but how do you murder someone twice (Second and third degree) and then "slaughter" them once? Unless you can die three times, it seems to me whatever activity "caused" the death can only have "murdered/slaughtered" him once.
4 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
joew9 4/23/2021 11:15:03 AM (No. 764637)
Perhaps we choose a random innocent white guy every week. Run tons to media opinion about how terrible he is. Then execute him. No point in a trial since the outcome will already be predetermined.
2 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
mindsport 4/23/2021 12:05:18 PM (No. 764690)
They better be very careful of using the word restoration, BECAUSE there are a whole lot of BLM/ANTIFA etc. that if convicted have a lot of restoration to do themselves.
2 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
DVC 4/23/2021 12:41:23 PM (No. 764734)
Chauvin is innocent, and yet their hideous miscarriage of justice is still "not enough"? Sick, dangerous, dangerous people.
2 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
SALady 4/23/2021 3:19:01 PM (No. 764908)
So many Demon-Rats were secretly hoping for innocent verdicts, so that they could release their minions, the racist thugs of BLM and Antifa, to burn down a bunch of cities in the name of "protesting white supremacy".
Then Congress, and not-my-president Lyin' Joe biden, could pass a bunch of Communist-inspired laws to destroy our freedoms and outlaw conservative free speech.
It's coming. It will just take a little longer. And then it's secession or Civil War 2!!!!!!
1 person likes this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
David Key 4/23/2021 4:43:31 PM (No. 764978)
one assumes that burning would have satisfied them
0 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
bighambone 4/24/2021 1:44:04 AM (No. 765305)
What happens if the appeals court throws the trial out and they have to start over again? How could they ever select a non bias jury, at this stage, it would be impossible.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Garnet"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)