Are You Ready For Biden’s
Ban On Gas-Powered Cars?
Issues & Insights,
by
The Editorial Board
Original Article
Posted By: RockyTCB,
4/12/2021 7:08:58 AM
In the next couple of months, the Environmental Protection Agency will issue new fuel economy standards that could be impossible for carmakers to meet – without going electric. That, at least, is what President Joe Biden’s EPA Administrator Michael Regan is indicating.
In an interview with Bloomberg last week, Regan talked about imposing rules that meet
“the urgency of the climate crisis,” and “did not rule out future emissions requirements that create a de facto ban on new conventional, gasoline-powered automobiles, like an explicit phase-out ordered by California Gov. Gavin Newsom.”
Regan could, for example, require automakers to sell cars that
Reply 1 - Posted by:
rbruce20 4/12/2021 7:20:59 AM (No. 751802)
Lead my example and get rid of all federally controlled gasoline and diesel powered vehicles. Beast should be the first one to go.
12 people like this.
All based on the false religious beliefs of the global warministas.
Talk about anti-science.
26 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
F15 Gork 4/12/2021 7:28:04 AM (No. 751813)
It’s about time to ride north and put things right.......
9 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
planetgeo 4/12/2021 7:38:59 AM (No. 751823)
The Democrats have become the party of Magical Thinking...you can be any gender you imagine yourself to be, and mandating (OK, persondating) that you can only drive electric cars with a maximum 200-mile range in order to (maybe) bring down the amount of CO2 by .002%.
I think I liked America better when you didn't have to be around crazy people if you didn't want to or be legally required to follow rules set up by crazy people AND forced to say you believed their craziness.
26 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
bpl40 4/12/2021 7:50:21 AM (No. 751838)
Always follow the money. Who is laying heavy bets on green alternative energy. As posters here have pointed out this is not about the climate, clean air or any of those things. Just as opposition voter id has nothing to do with fairness in voting. We must all learn to look for the man behind the screen.
12 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
LanceLink1 4/12/2021 8:08:14 AM (No. 751858)
The UK did a study to determine if going all electric by 2035 was feasible. They found out there wasn't enough lithium and mining in the world to make that happen. If I remember correctly the US is slightly larger than the United Kingdom so how is this going to work? A new battery source? Like ground unicorn horn? Bigfoot scat?
22 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Red Jeep 4/12/2021 8:14:50 AM (No. 751863)
What environmentalist would want coal powered electric cars?
15 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Mizz Fixxit 4/12/2021 8:18:16 AM (No. 751869)
As stated above, follow the money, which leads to leftist tyrants. The dark, primary motivation for “zero emissions” is that elitists want cars off the road, and to cram the subjects into crowded cities.
11 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Cardsfan 4/12/2021 8:25:43 AM (No. 751878)
The answer is simple - just put sails on cars. It works for boats. Instead of windmills that generate electricity, cut out the middleman. Of course, the closer you are to DC and all the hot air the better it will work.
6 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Peach1 4/12/2021 8:28:38 AM (No. 751883)
Gee, why don’t we just go back to horse & buggies! /s
7 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Rather Read 4/12/2021 8:39:21 AM (No. 751895)
They are having unusually cold weather in part of Europe. Must be that nasty global warming - oops climate change. That excuses everything.
8 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
udanja99 4/12/2021 8:46:39 AM (No. 751910)
Electrical engineers have already stated that there is no way our grid can handle even a fraction of the electric cars being promoted by the left. This is even more about controlling us than about globull warming.
18 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
oldmagnolia 4/12/2021 8:50:07 AM (No. 751912)
Make the Beast and AF One a plug in vehicle. Let see how that goes. Idiots.
11 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
zephyrgirl 4/12/2021 9:03:11 AM (No. 751929)
And just where do they think the electricity will come from? It takes years to build power plants, so they'd better get cracking on construction.
11 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
iraengneer 4/12/2021 9:36:34 AM (No. 751964)
Sigh. Once again, PLEASE, can someone point out the SPECIFIC language in our Constitution that empowers the *Federal* government to have such powers. It's conspicuously absent from my copy. And, hence, under the 10th Amendment, such efforts are illegal! "High crimes and misdemeanors" sounds about right.
But then, the very existence of the federal EPA also constitutes such a violation. Foisted upon us by the loathsome Statist creep, Nixon. A Republicrat.
Torches and pitchforks time.
13 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
bad-hair 4/12/2021 9:44:05 AM (No. 751979)
Thank God I have mechanic skills. There's going to be a huge market in maintaining existing gas cars. We'll look like Cuba 10 years from now. A driving antique car collection. They'll have to flat out ban gasoline.
7 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
MDConservative 4/12/2021 10:03:38 AM (No. 752006)
Fact is that the major makers are more than happy to move to electric cars (or other alternative fuels), Why? Bigger margins for everyone involved. There's money to be made here.
7 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Phantomll 4/12/2021 10:19:05 AM (No. 752022)
:What these idiots never consider - let's say a hurricane hits a wide area and power is out for weeks - how are you going to charge your crappy electric car? Or what if during a hurricane evacuation, there's a typical traffic jam - EV batteries start to die and you're stuck in the middle of nowhere. Good grief.
9 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
red1066 4/12/2021 10:25:46 AM (No. 752038)
There are some electric vehicles that can go 400 miles between charging, but like all electric vehicles, they're expensive. Volvo advertises it's new electric car, it looks nice, but it only has a range of 200 miles. Until there are as many charging stations as gas stations and until one can charge that vehicle as fast as one can put gas in the car, electric vehicles for me are out of the question.
10 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
bighambone 4/12/2021 11:49:12 AM (No. 752154)
The problem for Biden is that the cost of electric vehicles are so high that most of his voters will not be able to afford them. They showed one on TV the other day that when it hits the showrooms will MSRP out at $80,000.00. Besides what is Biden going to do with all the millions of gas powered vehicles now on the road?
3 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Marzon 4/12/2021 11:50:40 AM (No. 752157)
China loves this. They control the market on rare earth metals needed for batteries and magnets required by EV's.
5 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
kono 4/12/2021 12:26:38 PM (No. 752204)
The fuel consumed by power plants to generate the electricity for charging those vehicles has to be counted, or the entire 'fuel economy' equation will give a dishonest comparison. Electric vehicles are NOT "emissions free"...
4 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
RuckusTom 4/12/2021 12:41:53 PM (No. 752230)
Better start building a lot more nuclear power plants. By the way, where does all that plastic in those electric cars come from (and that's not to mention synthetic tires)?
3 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
DVC 4/12/2021 1:20:29 PM (No. 752286)
#6, when I was an engineering grad student, working on hybrid electric vehicle design, the best known batteries at the time were the upbiquitous lead-acid batteries, still a staple, and nickel-cadmium batteries, which were used in some aircraft batteries because they are lighter for the power.
A quick bit of research showed that the availability of nickel and cadmium to be mined would make it impossible to supply batteries for large scale hybrid electric vehicle development, let alone large scale electric vehicles.
Since nickel-cadmium has been shown to have some significant technical drawbacks, lithium cells have become the primary battery technology being used, when cost is no limitation, and when weight must be minimized. When cost is important and weight less important, lead-acid batteries are still the choice. I use lead-acid batteries to store solar power for my remote mountain cabin in the southern Rockies.
Limitations on raw materials is a very real issue in some of these pipe dream fantasies of the totalitarian left.
Be worried that they aren't just after your cars to "save the planet". They are convinced that the root problem is too many people. And if you think they won't do something to "correct the problem", you have a very limited imagination.
5 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
JHHolliday 4/12/2021 1:46:31 PM (No. 752307)
#24 is correct. I am afraid we are governed by fools. There is not enough power available to go all-electric. Like other posters, I might consider an electric if it would go 500 miles and re-charge in ten minutes but not before, Back when I was racing sports cars, I would occasionally buy a lightweight aircraft battery from our local battery store. The guy that owned the store had outfitted a little Morris Minor with an electric motor and filled the back seat and trunk with car batteries. It ran but he told me he could only get a few miles before it needed a re-charge. This was 60 years ago and technology has certainly advanced but not enough for me yet.
5 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "RockyTCB"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)