Lefist Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson
Says She is ‘Prepared’ to Rule on
a Disputed Presidential Election
Gateway Pundit,
by
Ben Kew
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
8/27/2024 6:35:57 PM
Supreme Court Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson has said she is preparing herself to rule on the outcome of a disputed presidential election.
In an interview with CBS’s Norah O’Donnell, Jackson said the court must be prepared for such an outcome.
“I think there are legal issues that arise out of the political process,” Jackson said during an interview with CBS’s Norah O’Donnell. “And so, the Supreme Court has to be prepared to respond — if — if that should be necessary.”
O’Donnell then asked Jackson point blank whether she was personally prepared for a Supreme Court ruling.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
MindMadeUp 8/27/2024 6:38:25 PM (No. 1785949)
She's so prepared that she's already made her decision in favor of whatever the Democrat position is.
42 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
kdsils60 8/27/2024 6:40:30 PM (No. 1785950)
Kamala Harris does NOT have standing... how do I know? Donald Trump did NOT have standing in 2020... so, the moment demons come before the court, begging to overturn the election - we will remind them... in 2020, Donald Trump was never able to get any court to even look at his arguments or facts he wanted to present... precedent has been set, lady (sorry, she doesn't know she is a woman)
37 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
janjan 8/27/2024 6:43:30 PM (No. 1785951)
How can she be prepared to rule on a dispute that hasn’t happened?
43 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
DVC 8/27/2024 7:02:29 PM (No. 1785957)
Anxious to put her big fat thumb on the scale.
27 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
chillijilli 8/27/2024 7:02:34 PM (No. 1785958)
Wow. This sounds like she's throwing down the gauntlet? I thought you only do that if you intend to FIGHT, which I thought SCOTUS doesn't do?
20 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
ladydawgfan 8/27/2024 7:04:22 PM (No. 1785959)
If she doesn't know what a woman is, how will she know who wins??
30 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
nwcudagal 8/27/2024 7:05:08 PM (No. 1785961)
Is she the most dim-witted SC Justice ever. . .
31 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
itsonlyme 8/27/2024 7:28:36 PM (No. 1785980)
There's one and only one reason she made it to the Supreme Court - dawgess
13 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 8/27/2024 7:59:32 PM (No. 1785995)
The Democrats will steal the presidential election (as well as state and local elections). The Supreme Court will perform their special version of see no evil, speak no evil, hear no evil and bless the results. Jackson is 'prepared'? They are all 'prepared'. Fraud so blatant and obvious, everyone will see it, but nobody in authority will acknowledge it.
10 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Quigley 8/27/2024 8:21:26 PM (No. 1785999)
#6, under the principle that “the woman always wins,” she’ll wing it and go with the Dim.
6 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Socio 8/27/2024 9:42:05 PM (No. 1786027)
Sounds like she is projecting, she has been given instructions on what to do when, not if there is a disputed presidential election.
6 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Starlifter Nav 8/27/2024 10:04:11 PM (No. 1786032)
I just wanna know who misspelled her name in the headline.
4 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
mifla 8/28/2024 5:42:15 AM (No. 1786101)
A black, female judge is prepared to rule on an election featuring a black, female candidate.
Got it.
5 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
WhamDBambam 8/28/2024 6:40:13 AM (No. 1786138)
Not yours to resolve, sweetie.
0 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
hershey 8/28/2024 7:01:51 AM (No. 1786157)
Has she got her hand out????
0 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
anniebc 8/28/2024 7:54:05 AM (No. 1786211)
You won't be ruling by yourself, stupid girl.
2 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Strike3 8/28/2024 8:08:47 AM (No. 1786231)
She's a DEI leftist so... It was unwise of her to even mention this because the democrats are in a position now where they have to cheat.
2 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
lynngirl122 8/28/2024 2:54:03 PM (No. 1786448)
Just seeing her stupid name on the list of Supreme Court justices repulses me.
0 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
skacmar 8/28/2024 3:57:05 PM (No. 1786477)
I heard her interview where she commented on how she was ready to take on a contested election if necessary. During her interview, Jackson also commented on how she disagreed with the courts immunity ruling as it only affected one person (Trump), and the laws should apply to everyone. I was amazed how blinded she is by her dislike for Trump as this ruling just affirmed immunity for the President, all Presidents, and not just Donald Trump, for official acts taken as President. She acted as if it only covered Trump. If she really believes this, she should not be a Supreme Court Justice. If she eblieves this, her bias shou disqualify her from any lawsuit relating to the election.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)