Nathan Wade's divorce lawyer Terrence
Bradley says 'I do not recall' MULTIPLE
times as he's grilled on if his prosecutor
client started dating Fani Willis before
she hired him to investigate Trump
Daily Mail (UK),
by
James Gordon
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
2/27/2024 10:05:33 PM
Nathan Wade's divorce lawyer Terrence Bradley tied himself in knots on the stand on Tuesday as he said 'I can't recall if I lied' and claimed he was 'speculating' when he claimed in a bombshell text message that his prosecutor client started dating Fani Willis before she hired him.
Bradley insisted he couldn't remember when his former law partner began his relationship with Willis during a grilling in the hearing that could see the Fulton County District Attorney thrown off the Donald Trump case.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
itsonlyme 2/27/2024 10:25:38 PM (No. 1666606)
He should have said, "I don't recall when I lied".
21 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
marlon 2/27/2024 10:29:34 PM (No. 1666608)
Three affirmative action hire on the stand lying their asses of.
46 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
DVC 2/27/2024 10:34:48 PM (No. 1666612)
Lying lawyer.
31 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
snakeoil 2/27/2024 11:22:51 PM (No. 1666620)
I don't recall is a safe answer. No one can prove that you are lying. Surprised he ever got into specifics.
20 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Miceal 2/28/2024 12:31:48 AM (No. 1666625)
Question...: If he cannot recall, why the attorney-client privilege claim earlier...?
19 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Trigger2 2/28/2024 3:27:08 AM (No. 1666643)
"I do not recall." It's the Hildebeast's response. It's obvious this jerk was outright lying by the silence immediately following the question, as if he's thinking about how to speculate.
19 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Rinktum 2/28/2024 3:27:12 AM (No. 1666644)
While this is juicy soap opera-ish titillation for many, this democrat driven lawfare is attempting to destroy a former President and the present front runner opposition to the most corrupt politician in the country’s history, Joe Biden. This is deadly serious warfare couched in legalese and is the most underhand and scurrilous political strategy we have ever seen played out. What has shocked and disappointed me is the fact that so many influential republicans are silent. Cowards in our political class look on never dreaming that this strategy could be turned on them. This unprecedented plan will be the choice of action going forward for anyone who is a threat to democrat power structure. While it may be focused on Trump at the moment, it will hone in on whomever threatens democratic hegemony. Bank on it. It is the worst kind of action a political power can wield and we have the most lawless cabal perfecting it for future use. It truly is a weapon fired in the pits of Hades.
30 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Lawsy0 2/28/2024 4:15:44 AM (No. 1666663)
I just saw the rerun of that exchange on Newsmax rerun about midnight. It was very enjoyable.
9 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
mifla 2/28/2024 5:14:25 AM (No. 1666672)
"I don't recall" is legal speak for "you got me".
Judge is not stupid. He knows what is going on.
18 people like this.
Another hood rat with a degree. These frauds are everywhere in the DEI dystopia especially Atlanta.
20 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
FJB 2022 23 24 2/28/2024 6:49:28 AM (No. 1666718)
He was sweating bullets the whole time he was on the stand, while lying his ass off.
I hope the judge questions his credibility "bigly", because he has none. Those texts and his trying to squirm out of them saying he was speculating was just BS!
13 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
BarryNo 2/28/2024 7:06:13 AM (No. 1666730)
The Hillary defense.
9 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
skacmar 2/28/2024 7:51:10 AM (No. 1666762)
Seems that most liberal Democrats don't recall, can't remember, my memory is unclear about that, or some other lying excuse to not answer a question where their fuzzy memory response is clearly an "I'm not going to tell you what I know " response.
6 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Rama41 2/28/2024 8:05:23 AM (No. 1666766)
Quick summary: "When I told her she was absolutely correct that they were messing around before he hired her, I was speculating."
5 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
red1066 2/28/2024 9:01:12 AM (No. 1666791)
Hunter Biteme is to testify before Congress soon. Expect a lot of, "I do not recall" responses to questions. In Hunter's case however, since he was drugged up most of the time, it might be true.
8 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
jinx 2/28/2024 9:23:36 AM (No. 1666806)
It worked for Hillary.
8 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
3XALADY 2/28/2024 9:24:00 AM (No. 1666807)
Judge called him an 'adverse witness.' It is obvious to me that if you are a democrat, you lie.
5 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
curious1 2/28/2024 10:56:31 AM (No. 1666857)
He must have called Shrillary for advice.
2 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
MickTurn 2/28/2024 12:04:53 PM (No. 1666925)
It is very clear he is LYING. Fanny's handler got to him.
I'm sure the conversation went like this.....Mr. Bradley, if you say one word that is bad for Fanny OR Wade we will Take care of your funeral.
1 person likes this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
rochow 2/28/2024 9:38:42 PM (No. 1667235)
Another POS who should hang up his 'robes' and be disbarred for eternity. I guess he got his law degree because he was black.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)