Oberlin College asks court to reject Gibson's
Bakery cross appeal
Chronicle-Telegram [Elyria, OH],
by
Dave O'Brien
Original Article
Posted By: Harlowe,
7/14/2022 11:52:08 AM
There is "no substantial constitutional question" for Ohio Supreme Court justices to consider when reviewing Gibson's Bakery's appeal over limits on monetary damage awards, attorneys for Oberlin College argued in a court filing Wednesday. The Gibsons and their attorneys are "distorting" the court record so their arguments will be heard, the college told the state's highest court in a memorandum. The bakery and its owners' arguments also are not "an issue of public or great general interest worthy of this court's review," the college's attorneys argued.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Harlowe 7/14/2022 11:53:36 AM (No. 1216152)
Oberlin College’s “arguments” in this current appeal bring to mind a reaction a corporate executive made decades ago, “weasel words.” The “arguments” presented in this current appeal appear to further besmirch the Gibson family and now their attorneys.
FTA: “Oberlin College has argued it was protecting students' First Amendment rights to protest and questioned "whether Oberlin is liable at all" for alleged damages to the bakery and its owners' reputations.
“The Gibsons' cross-appeal is "a 15-page polemic laced with record distortions, designed solely to discourage this court from accepting review of Oberlin's appeal" among other reasons, the college argued.
“Attorneys for the Gibsons also "inflamed" jurors at a trial in Lorain County Common Pleas Court in 2019 by equating the words used in student chants with "weapons" and saying the college was "bullying" and engaging in "cruel attacks."
...
“Attorneys for the college argued in Wednesday's filing that "$33 million for emails and texts never sent to the Gibsons is exactly the kind of grossly excessive and arbitrary punishment the cap is designed to limit."”
9 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
LeeBertie 7/14/2022 12:07:50 PM (No. 1216169)
The report states that "Oberlin College has argued it was protecting students' First Amendment rights to protest and questioned 'whether Oberlin is liable at all' for alleged damages to the bakery and its owners' reputations."
The accurate wording should be that "Oberlin College has argued it was protecting students' First Amendment rights to claim that anyone they wish to defame are racists worthy of being boycotted and driven out of business and questioned 'whether Oberlin is liable at all' for alleged damages to the bakery and its owners' reputations.
14 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
cThree 7/14/2022 12:15:55 PM (No. 1216175)
Oberlin is still digging their hole, in a disgusting mire they chose to enter.
Recall that Oberlin chose to advertise itself as the most liberal of liberal colleges. They'd made headlines regularly for instances of silly excess, like getting offended at common names of Chinese cuisine dishes. But here they heedlessly went out to destroy an innocent family and their business.
True justice would have everyone involved fired who had anything to do with this. Start with the college president, then with the lawyers, then the staff who supported the lynching.
Shut up and pay the money.
Get a neutral party to run required seminars for students (and staff I think) to understand the crime and the punishment.
Kudos to Legal Insurrection, on it from the beginning.
35 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
WhamDBambam 7/14/2022 12:17:04 PM (No. 1216176)
I'd be interested in looking at Oberlin's application/admission figures since this fiasco has been going on.
33 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
DVC 7/14/2022 12:24:01 PM (No. 1216184)
Oberlin deserves to be destroyed for their corruption, hate, racism, just rotten nature. What a horrible, just rotten group of people make up this hideous "institution".
Keep you children away from this horrible place.
40 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Venturer 7/14/2022 12:41:05 PM (No. 1216208)
Put a lien on the joint.
15 people like this.
So glad Gibson's won this case. It is just what we need -- fighting back in court -- to stop this insanity. The left needs to know they can't walk all over people and defame people with impunity.
21 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
john56 7/14/2022 12:48:51 PM (No. 1216222)
Oberlin: WRITE THE GIBSONS THEIR CHECK!
19 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
stablemoney 7/14/2022 12:52:39 PM (No. 1216225)
The article presents Oberlin College's arguments, but none of Gibson's. Oberlin has been ordered by a court to pay Gibson, and has not done so for 3 years. Ruling for Gibson. Punitive damages allowed for Oberlin College's flouting the law.
18 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Jethro bo 7/14/2022 1:08:10 PM (No. 1216241)
One can only look on in awe and admiration for Oberlin College. Oberlin knows there is one safe place were laws are never considered and that is in a courtroom in the US. Judge shop long enough and Oberlin will get a ruling where the Gibsons' will owe Oberlin 38 million dollars.
8 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
JunkYardDog 7/14/2022 1:12:10 PM (No. 1216248)
It's long overdue for someone or some legal entity to bit-ch slap Oberlin and force them to pay as per their legal obligation. They come off as just a bunch of whiny brats saying 'nyaah nyaah you can't make meee'. They need their comeuppance and they need it yesterday.
15 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Quigley 7/14/2022 1:13:10 PM (No. 1216250)
Boboberlin seems to suffer from Noble Cause Corruption. They are so convinced in their self righteousness that they become corrupt in their enthrallment to it. How righteous are we!! We can destroy the sinners to serve our righteousness!!! Sweep them away to make room for a more pure world!!
4 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Flyball Dogs 7/14/2022 1:14:25 PM (No. 1216253)
Maybe tack on penalties and interest for each month beyond the original judgment where they don’t pay.
What slime buckets
10 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
planetgeo 7/14/2022 1:24:13 PM (No. 1216263)
Vile, deadbeat college. Solution: dismiss their case and award treble punitive damages over the original award to finally put this place out of business...then restart it as "Gibson University".
10 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
joew9 7/14/2022 3:18:56 PM (No. 1216374)
Considering interest and court costs and lawyer costs are continuing to mount for Oberlin it seems Oberlin doesn't care much about those charges and really doesn't have any financial concern about paying the lawsuit. So they are just holding out to prove a point in court.
And eventually they hope to get friendly judges to throw out everything.
Just like ABC vs Food Lion. The jury came in with a 1 billion dollar judgement. But ABC had the money and time to keep fighting and hunting for judges. Eventually using left wing judges everything got thrown out except the fraud committed by the undercover "journalists" who lied on the application for employment. So that left only a few thousand dollars to be paid. But instead of paying that ABC kept spending money to get it thrown out. And they did. Their false report was done with the purpose of damaging Food Lion because they made their employees so happy that they didn't feel the need to vote the union in. Over 1 billion dollars in damages. The stores in my area all closed down. ABC news should be a company owned by Food Lion.
8 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
john56 7/14/2022 3:23:22 PM (No. 1216379)
By the way, Oberlin's endowments are estimated at $937 million as of 6/30/2020. Let's say that Oberlin lost a bit in the market last year (I know I did), so let's say a 10% drop -- they might be worth $843 million now.
Pay the Gibsons their $36 million, and they still have over $800 million left. They say they earn 4.9%-6.0% on their investments. Let's be conservative and say 4%. That's $32 million in earnings. They can still run the Women's Basket Weaving and Gender Fluid Studies program with that kind of loot.
7 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
ronniethek 7/14/2022 4:14:59 PM (No. 1216420)
Oberlin's complicity and deliberate harm done by them to the Gibsons is nauseating. This needs to come to a speedy resolution for Gibson's.
3 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Rinktum 7/14/2022 4:24:57 PM (No. 1216423)
#15, I believe you hit upon Oberlin’s legal strategy. They are saying to the little guy, make me! I bet somehow the decision is overturned and Gibson’s get nada which would be a terrible shame. I absolutely loathe most everyone in the legal profession. Too many attorneys come out of law school morally compromised, not all, but far too many.
5 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Ruhn 7/14/2022 7:21:43 PM (No. 1216575)
Oberlin is just stalling the inevitable by throwing any legal appeals on the wall. It’s lose-lose for them. The longer they delay payment to Gibson’s, the more interest they owe them + legal costs. Unfortunately this costs Gibson’s as well.
2 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
JimBob 7/14/2022 10:38:52 PM (No. 1216734)
Want to see Oberlin pay up?
I want to see a Judge determine which of the Oberlin administration was either guilty to begin with, or is delaying payment, SUMMON THEM TO COURT and PUT THEM IN JAIL UNTIL THE GIBSONS ARE PAID IN FULL!
Until then, it's all just lawyers bickering, and the Oberlin crooks continue to live their luxurious life.
Put their backsides in the CAN!
THEN see how FAST they Pay!
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Harlowe"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
The absolute audacity and hubris of liberals never ceases to amaze.