Fauci Makes Surprising Concession Regarding
COVID-19 Vaccines
Epoch Times,
by
Jack Phillips
Original Article
Posted By: earlybird,
7/14/2022 11:32:19 AM
White House COVID-19 adviser Anthony Fauci conceded Wednesday morning that COVID-19 vaccines don’t protect “overly well” against the virus.
Speaking during a Fox News interview, Fauci told host Neil Cavuto that “one of the things that’s clear from the data [is] that … vaccines—because of the high degree of transmissibility of this virus—don’t protect overly well, as it were, against infection.”
But Fauci said later that the vaccines “protect quite well against severe disease leading to hospitalization and death” before he made note of his recent COVID-19 diagnosis.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
stablemoney 7/14/2022 11:45:22 AM (No. 1216143)
Hospitalizations and death occur more frequently with the "vaccinated" than with the unvaccinated. Dr. Fauci has done NO tests comparing the "vaccinated" to the unvaccinated, and neither has Pfizer, who admits that is the case.
19 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Quigley 7/14/2022 11:47:14 AM (No. 1216145)
That’s why you need more more more shots!
His royalties are based on doses sold, not effectiveness! And mandates take the guess work out of whether people will get “less effective” vaccines and hence the guesswork out of royalty streams.
You may not be able to take it with you, but watching the secret bank account balances receive large wires gives him unending pleasure, and makes him want to light one of his fauxshe prayer candles- that were gifted to him.
9 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Golden Goose 7/14/2022 11:47:46 AM (No. 1216146)
He really had no choice. Everyone can easily see that the effective half of Safe and Effective™ simply isn't as advertised. And The Ministry of Truth can only censor and censure truth-tellers for so long before everyone can readily see that the safe part doesn't apply, either.
11 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Mofongo 7/14/2022 12:12:45 PM (No. 1216172)
But we’re still not allowed in theaters, cruises or Canada?
12 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
broken01 7/14/2022 12:12:46 PM (No. 1216173)
To me the little garden gnome Tony Faustus lost any shred of credibility during the last year of the PDJT Administration. Anything he says is garbage period. End of quote. Repeat the Line. FJB, FAF, FPFIZER, LET'S GO BRANDON!
12 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
DVC 7/14/2022 12:28:35 PM (No. 1216193)
I don't know what police state you live in #4, but there is nothing going on in Kansas or Missouri that I can see related to the Wuhan virus other than a few medical facilities still with their foolish "masks required" rules.
8 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
mc squared 7/14/2022 12:40:34 PM (No. 1216207)
He admitted that the unproven 'shot' did not protect against the virus. So, what is it they put in (some) people's bodies and cost people their jobs?
We need a Nuremberg-like trial here.
11 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
formerNYer 7/14/2022 12:45:13 PM (No. 1216212)
Fauci " I was vaccinated 4 times and got Covid again."
Fauci "vaccines don’t protect “overly well”
Fauci "older folks need to get a booster."
Fauci " Like President Poopy Pants I have no idea what I'm talking about!"
15 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Jethro bo 7/14/2022 12:45:51 PM (No. 1216214)
Fauci laying ground work for 2023. He can read the polls. Nothing like a little CYA 6-7 months in advance. This ring little squirmy toad has know this all along. And he knows he can proclaim the vaccine prevents worse infection cause it is impossible to prove a negative or non occurrence. Fauci is everything we have come to expect from years of goobernment employment.
12 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
GoodDeal 7/14/2022 1:05:38 PM (No. 1216236)
How surprisingly surprising. Like we didn't know this already.
9 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
EQKimball 7/14/2022 1:07:17 PM (No. 1216238)
And what do masks protect against other than lip bites by butterflies?
14 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Birddog 7/14/2022 1:10:36 PM (No. 1216245)
"don’t protect overly well" = No Bueno por Caca
8 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Safari Man 7/14/2022 1:22:09 PM (No. 1216259)
So why is Novax Djokovic still persona non grata? (While unvaccinated illegals are given the red carpet treatment)
8 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
padiva 7/14/2022 1:26:52 PM (No. 1216266)
weasel words!
6 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
planetgeo 7/14/2022 1:32:41 PM (No. 1216273)
#13, I believe you have solved Djokovic's dilemma...change his last name to Gonzalez, come across the border illegally, and have Homeland security chauffeur him directly to the US Open so he can play.
8 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
DVC 7/14/2022 2:05:56 PM (No. 1216315)
These mRNA shots have been totally ineffective at preventing infection. I know a number of people who took the shots and then got the disease, several then rushed out and got another booster, sadly.
I know of one person who did not take the shot who go the disease, and got over it pretty easily with HCQ, ivermectin and more from a Good Doctor, where my wife and I got the same drugs, in advance, and have never needed them, also mRNA shot-free. That unvaxed, but infected person was a 64 year old male with good vitamin D3 levels, too.
One acquaintance told me that his mid-40s sister died a week after the mRNA shot, sudden severe back pains, docs couldn't figure out what was going on, were doing tests when she suddenly died. No other direct info on adverse reactions, but the VAERS info is horrible.
Worse "vaccine" ever, and definitely a bad idea for any younger person. It is possible that there might be benefit for the elderly, like me, but my choice is to avoid the mRNA and uncontrolled doses of deadly spike proteins and be ready to treat if we get the disease.
The huge issue is whether there are long term harms from this vaccine for everyone. Clearly it harms many in the short term, so how many in the long term?
6 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
lakerman1 7/14/2022 2:10:16 PM (No. 1216322)
When Fauci, just a year ago, said that the two shots of Moderna or the other RNA vaccine meant that you would not get Kung Flu, what was he basing that promise on?
When this entire Kung Flu ends, I predict that tjhe conclusion about Kung Flu was that it was a bad flu situation, much like 1957, 1967. In addition, the medical treatments in NYC, early on, which included ventilators, represented over-treatment, which killed patients.
And when Cuomo of NY, Murphy of NJ, Wolf of Pa, as governors who ordered nursing homes to readmit Kung Flu patients, were murderers.
Finally, the fact that the federal government obstructed the creation of treatment protocols for Kung Flu, mocking those who do, may have been the biggest sin of all..
6 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
paral04 7/14/2022 2:22:56 PM (No. 1216332)
How does he know any of this? He can't prove that someone who is seriously ill would have been better off had they taken the shot, vs the seriously ill person who had the shot. Would the latter be dead but the shot prevented that or he just got better despite the shot. One thing we know, he did get richer during this plague.
5 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Golden Goose 7/14/2022 2:27:57 PM (No. 1216334)
It's important to help Mark Steyn and countless victims get the word out about the dangers of these vaccines. Watch this, and share it with your friends and relatives, since they won't hear about it from their regular news sources: https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=H0YhwBJRreU
6 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Birddog 7/14/2022 2:48:05 PM (No. 1216346)
Apr/May England numbers...288 unvaccinated deaths vs 4200 Vaxed/died.
Todays infection numbers here: 289 last year...vs 125,000 same day this year.
(Deaths are barely double last years numbers)
1 person likes this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
jasmine 7/14/2022 2:56:03 PM (No. 1216351)
Despite doctors successfully treating covid patients with cheap drugs like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, the Biden administration threatened American doctors with loss of their medical licenses (livelihoods) if they dared prescribe those well studied drugs for "off label" use in treating covid. Forbidden TREATMENT was the Biden administration's version of "following the science."
Americans got sicker and died by the tens of thousands without treatment. They took their last breaths waiting for Fauci's "vaccines." Had Biden and his Democrats enablers not stuck their big noses between doctors and patients to ensure patients could NOT access cheap drugs their doctors were WILLING to prescribe, we would be in a different place today. Democrats and the MSM told us off label treatment with drugs our doctors wanted to prescribe was"too dangerous." Powerful Dems, including unelected ones, stood by while Americans were allowed to die for lack of treatment. I'll be going into the voting booth in November carrying a picture of my late brother, who died while we all waited for vaccines, that "don't protect overly well."
6 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
cor-vet 7/14/2022 3:14:31 PM (No. 1216369)
Every Wednesday (We call it whiskey Wednesday) 6 to 8 old fellows get together for lunch, cards and then a few to more than a few good bourbons! About half of the guys are vaxed and half have resisted. The youngest is 69 and the oldest is 83. No one belittles the vexed and no one hassles the un-vaxed. If, as the article states, the virus has a high transmissibility rate, someone in our group should have gotten it. But, we've only been doing whiskey Wednesday for the past 4 to 5 years, so maybe we haven't given it a chance to infect us. We play a game called Piedro (sp) and everyone has to shuffle the cards and handle the cards, and no one has gotten the Wuhan flu. Our ladies started playing dominoes years and years ago, leaving the men home alone, so that's why we started our Wednesdays. Also, none of the women, and there's 12 to 14 of them, some vaxed and some un-vaxed, in the same age bracket and none of them have caught the dreaded Wuhan either! Faux-chi is flat out a liar!
5 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 7/14/2022 4:01:13 PM (No. 1216409)
Hang him up.
4 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Faithfully 7/14/2022 9:20:38 PM (No. 1216686)
Who is the unelected Fauci to make any concessions about anything?
1 person likes this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
Muguy 7/15/2022 7:42:52 PM (No. 1217418)
A cheap and weak attempt to "fess up" before being called out????
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Catching the bug himself gave him a credibility gap?