Defense Department Pulls a Bait and Switch
on Vaccines
American Greatness,
by
Benjamin Braddock
Original Article
Posted By: earlybird,
10/23/2021 5:17:01 PM
On August 24, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin issued a memo to senior Pentagon leadership announcing that he was implementing a mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policy for all military service members. The day before, the FDA had issued full authorization to Pfizer for their Comirnaty COVID-19 vaccine product(snip). At first glance it would seem that the mandatory vaccination policy, while scientifically unsound and strategically foolish, was at least a policy being implemented according to both the letter of the directive and in accordance with the law. But a further examination of the facts(snip)makes clear that the military’s implementation of this order is illegal and highly unethical.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Urgent Fury 10/23/2021 5:49:11 PM (No. 955483)
The writer calls on "Senate Republicans to draw the line". HA!
78 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Anti_democRAT 10/23/2021 5:49:30 PM (No. 955484)
Wa state doh is doing the same. Their covid jab infomercial starts saying it is fully fda improved. It even implies that the moderna and j&j r too. And of course the jab is safe and effective.
Fact Check: according to viral expert Dr McCullough the jab is ineffective and unsafe. And according to vaccine expert Dr. Malone and also as noted in this article, the approved vaccine has not been manufactured yet.
50 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
rochow 10/23/2021 6:21:19 PM (No. 955517)
Austin, not the smartest knife in the drawer to begin with, is doing what he was told by the first vegetable who had to get out of town after a stressful 10 hour week !
72 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
caljeepgirl 10/23/2021 7:06:28 PM (No. 955563)
Wow.
19 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Heil Liberals 10/23/2021 10:08:57 PM (No. 955679)
This is a known but unspoken and unwritten story. I saw an opinion posted about six weeks ago by a naval officer making this exact argument. No one in the United States of America can be compelled to take the Pfizer EUA mRNA therapy drug, period. I keep seeing all kinds of hand-wringing laments written by “conservatives” claiming everything but the very legal foundation for flat out refusing to take an experimental drug therapy.
Of course Pfizer is happy since the EUA drug comes with ABSOLUTELY ZERO CONSEQUENCES. Zero, none, nada, zilch, zip. Every f’ning person involved in this unprecedented human biomedical drug therapy experiment has no liability criminal or civil EVER. When in the hell has anyone ever seen or heard of any such thing?
In the end, the people associated with this will have accountability before God. They will have to justify the people they harmed, permanently injured, or outright killed with their Great Experiment that made them tens (hundreds?) of billions of dollars with absolutely no consequences.
67 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
EJKrausJr 10/24/2021 5:10:03 AM (No. 955770)
Relying on Austin is a recipe for disaster. His head is so far up his keester that he can't even see his navel button.
25 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Trigger2 10/24/2021 6:23:46 AM (No. 955791)
Illegal and unethical. What else is new with the new "woke" military?
38 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Kitty Myers 10/24/2021 6:28:58 AM (No. 955795)
“A vaccine is a biological preparation that provides active acquired immunity to a particular infectious disease.”
If vaccinated people are getting COVID, then they didn’t get a vaccine; they got a shot – but of what?
59 people like this.
These vaccines are not “approved” by the FDA.
“Approved” is a very important legal distinction, and this is not a word that the FDA uses as synonymous with any other word (especially authorized).
Approved means they have been determined safe after extensive clinical trials, which these shot have not!
For proof, please listen to this 3 minute recorded conversation with Pfizer. The Pfizer vaccines are NOT FDA APPROVED in either the name Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 or Comirnaty.
Please cut and paste this into your computer search line to hear these words from Pfizer for yourself:
https://gab.com/a/posts/107075532123265514
“It has to be approved first.” “The Comirnaty has not been approved”. So what was approved? “Nothing”.
“The emergency uses of the vaccine have not been approved or licensed by the FDA, but have been authorized by the FDA under emergency use authorization…” So was the old vaccine approved under the other name? “NO, nothing has been approved”
So we have no FDA approved covid vaccine in the United States under any name? “Correct”.
21 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
LLAMA 10/24/2021 8:28:23 AM (No. 955873)
The Democrats are hell-bent to destroy the most effective military force in the world, both by mandating illegal injections that many elite troops will not take, and by the "continuous vetting" process designed to identify and root out military members whose political views differ from the leadership's.
It is a race between the expiration of Biden's term and near-total evisceration of our military capability.
29 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Red Jeep 10/24/2021 8:48:48 AM (No. 955888)
Who in politics is financially benefiting from the Covid shot?
25 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Otis Gill 10/24/2021 9:13:30 AM (No. 955901)
All across America the best and brightest from the rank and file of our military and law enforcement are being removed from key positions, and the rest will be subject to endless boosters
I'm not sure who I hate more, the passive, limp-wristed Republicans or the evil diabolical Democrats.
30 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
privateer 10/24/2021 9:58:54 AM (No. 955939)
FTA: 'Among active duty service members, those declining to comply with this illegal order are disproportionately concentrated among tip-of-the-spear combat units. If dismissed from service, the impact to our military’s operational capabilities would be catastrophic.' All the better to facilitate the take-over of the USA by the CCP. Zhou Bite Dung serves his master well. Austin is merely a stooge.
15 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Zigrid 10/24/2021 10:02:25 AM (No. 955944)
Does anyone think Washington DC will do anything to benefit the military...after all general milk toast milley is in charge????
11 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
PCMM 10/24/2021 10:33:03 AM (No. 955969)
Much like the gay crisis in the late ‘90’s (when you could get discharged from the Army within 72 hours if you come out of the closet and declare living in fear), there will also be substandard soldiers using this as an excuse to leave. Just expect the media to find Privates to interview rather than the career military who are making a brave decision.
8 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Bassman1911 10/24/2021 10:49:20 AM (No. 955977)
Why would anyone enlist in our military right now? We don’t have a commander in chief. There’s no leadership.
12 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Kitty Myers 10/24/2021 11:15:01 AM (No. 955998)
#9 WOW!! Thank you for posting that link.
7 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
GardenGal 10/24/2021 12:07:17 PM (No. 956033)
The Pfizer/Bio-tech original vaccine was approved in August and once approved, it got the Brand name of Comirnaty because vaccines aren't named for pharmaceutical companies. They can't be by the rules of naming medications. There is no EAU for getting the first two vaccines, those ones are available and have full approval. The EAU is for newer developments like booster shots because those required a whole new study. So the military cannot force anyone to get Moderna or J and J since they have no full authority, They cannot force anyone to get a booster. But they can require military members to get Comirnaty, as the old Pfizer/Bio-tech shot was called. The children's shot also is an EAU, And just for information, the booster shot of Comirnaty that people get is the same as the ones that people who have never been vaccinated get.
3 people like this.
#18 seems to be correct based on the FDA website on 8/23/21.
"Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty (koe-mir’-na-tee), for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older. The vaccine also continues to be available under emergency use authorization (EUA), including for individuals 12 through 15 years of age and for the administration of a third dose in certain immunocompromised individuals."
I don't understand why the comirnaty could be approved so quickly because "according to the formulation comparison sheet, the Comirnaty vaccine product has a very different formulation than the Pfizer BioNTech product—on a per 30 μg dose basis for instance, it contains 25 percent more SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein mRNA, 34 percent more polyethylene glycol, 1070 percent more potassium chloride, as well as an ingredient listed only as “Redacted Ingredient.” That last item is alarming. Informed consent is required by both federal and international law under the Nuremberg Code. It is impossible to give informed consent to receive a medical ingredient that is shrouded in secrecy behind a redacted label. "
2 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Speedypetey 10/24/2021 1:34:45 PM (No. 956113)
Pfizer Comirnaty was so called FDA approved but the insiders claim it existed in only a small numbers of vials. So how did the FDA perform Phase II and III trials? The Pfizer EUA ia all that is available with no approval but has liability protection.
1 person likes this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
danu 10/24/2021 3:28:33 PM (No. 956248)
Shakespeare and his king in the 'Scottish Play' knew: *Double double toil and trouble. Fire burn and cauldron bubble.
Round about the cauldron go. In the poison'd entrails throw.*
As far as the 3 evil witches in MacBeth are concerned, eye of newt and toe of frog IS a biological preparation; regrettably, it is not for the purposes of immunity--only death. I
In no way is it meant by the sinister threesome to be safe or therapeutic.
True, it may be dressed up to mimic some highly-touted new-age super saviour.
Impliedly however, it is assumed that the punters are too stupid and undeserving to receive it.
Well. at least Shakespeare gives us the recipe for his pollyjuiceposhun.
From what we've heard reported, neither the Bait nor the Switch comes with safety data pages and ingredient list for the consumer.
Japan has filed FOIA requests and has blocked importation of these brews-- due to concerns of contamination.
To that point, we think we saw saw bizarre pictures on twtr posted by a doctor [[?]] which were meant to show strange foreign objects seemingly floating in the solution.
TBH, they looked more like microscopic 'portraits of the night sky, peppered with UFO's and spy satellites 2021' --by an unknown artist, not called Hunter.
Nevertheless, this art work pushed off the board several generic remedies-long used, and highly trusted as reliable.
These literary creations make it onto the board, albeit thinly-papered with a technocratic 'emergency' label.
AFAIK, at no time have these oddly-titled formulae achieved the govt's required testing and approval.
But as in Russian fairy stories, names change; though the 'quality' remains the same-- rather like the kgb/fsb.
A new super hero is invented, named, and somehow pre-approved for production and approval-due years from now.
There's a seat reserved at the banquet for that rescuer, complete with elegant place card....and a monstrous fake at table, guzzling the caviar.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Our military deserve far better than Austin. He will never stand up for them, nor will Joebama, whom I will not call their CIC.