Shots fired at National Guard
members in Minneapolis; two injured
Minnesota Public Radio,
by
Staff
Original Article
Posted By: NorthernDog,
4/18/2021 12:44:17 PM
Two Minnesota National Guard members on duty in the Twin Cities were injured early Sunday after being fired at in what authorities said was a drive-by shooting in Minneapolis. The Guard said the injuries were minor. One Guard member was transported to a hospital for treatment of injuries from shattered glass; the other was treated at the scene for superficial wounds. The Guard says the two were part of a "neighborhood security team" deployed in Minneapolis for Operation Safety Net, a multi-agency effort to provide security amid the ongoing Derek Chauvin trial. Operation Safety Net also has responded to protests
Reply 1 - Posted by:
TXknitter 4/18/2021 12:54:12 PM (No. 758541)
There is little information given in the article. Questions I have are the NG members armed and allowed to defend themselves or not? If so, what are they armed with? If they are just being used to walk round & look mean, I am against them being there as sitting ducks.
The city is being ruled by heavily-armed anarchists intent on violent lawlessness. Its just a matter of time until the bad guys decide to pick off the PC-named “Neighborhood Security Team.”
21 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
bad-hair 4/18/2021 12:56:10 PM (No. 758543)
How many trials of how many people in how many cities for whatever crimes are going on right now ?
Minneapolis requires military protection. Why ? Hey Minnesota Nice. You've turned into Somalia. That's why. Keep voting Democrat.
27 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
udanja99 4/18/2021 1:08:47 PM (No. 758556)
Does our illustrious AG still believe that this is not an insurrection?
The guardsmen should have returned fire.
27 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Geoman 4/18/2021 1:38:35 PM (No. 758576)
Guardsmen and more police aren't needed to quell the riots and neutralize murderers. 145 years ago, the citizens of Northfield, MN decided that they would not allow a criminal gang to rob and pillage their town. The criminal gang was the James-Younger gang and they picked the bank in Northfield to rob while diversionary gang members rode through town firing their weapons to prevent any response from the townspeople and local constabulary but they miscalculated. A 19 year old medical student killed the first gang member, Clel MIller, followed by the owner of the hardware store, firing his new Remington repeating rifle (the AR-15 of the day) into Bill Chadwell, mortally wounding him. The citizens who rose in defense of their community, using deadly force against criminals, were not prosecuted of harassed by the pro-criminal, gun-grabbing faction of Northfield. There were no marches against citizens being armed with Remington repeating rifles, nor did President Grant issue a passel of stupid executive orders, trying to get around the 2nd amendment. Perhaps it was the case in 1876 that politicians were kept largely in check by the very spirit and actions taken by regular citizens of a regular Minnesota town. Did that spirit dry up in MN or simply move south to TX?
24 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Ida Lou Pino 4/18/2021 1:38:49 PM (No. 758577)
Only flesh wounds - - no big deal.
Now - - about those trespassers - - - - - - - -
3 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
bighambone 4/18/2021 1:49:43 PM (No. 758585)
As other posters have commented, are National Guard members deployed in and near the Twin Cities armed while out on the streets, do they carry live ammunition? Are there rules of engagement in force that allow those National Guard members to defend themselves when attacked and can they use deadly force against the attackers?
11 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
TXknitter 4/18/2021 1:52:10 PM (No. 758587)
Well #4, it isn’t like we in TX are seeing an abundance of that spirit you talk about with OUR officials/businessmen/politicians as we are invaded by drug cartels, professional and armed human sex traffickers across our border... We the People in MN and TX are gonna have to do this ourselves....
14 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
dst4life 4/18/2021 2:02:16 PM (No. 758596)
And so there is another shooting in Austin, Texas. We are being bombarded on a daily basis with shootings.
If you still think all this mayhem is merely a coincidence, I have a bridge to sell you.
This constant chaos and violence is necessary so that Xiden can issue executive orders for massive gun confiscation and for the expansion of "red flag" laws.
15 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
ThreeBadCats3 4/18/2021 2:08:40 PM (No. 758603)
Are the National Guard people near the Twin Cities even armed? Not knowing for certain, but I gather that the kids keeping Ms. Pelosi safe from little old ladies who might again “assault” the capital don’t even have bullets for their scary looking weapons. Good thing, because who wants to shoot Grandma by mistake. Not like the brave man who murdered Ashlie Babbitt.
15 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Ribicon 4/18/2021 2:18:09 PM (No. 758610)
The trustworthy and patriotic agencies allow and even encourage "gun violence" because they want the public to be disarmed, for our own good. "A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government." — George Washington
11 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
DVC 4/18/2021 3:47:04 PM (No. 758690)
If the Guard is out there, they should be armed and able to immediately return fire, with RIFLES.
7 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
clipped wings 4/18/2021 3:49:34 PM (No. 758692)
For all L Dotters reading this disturbing post, but especially for posters #1, #3, #6 and #9.
It is very likely that the NG troops are carrying standard service weapon hardware -- but are not allowed to have ammunition. If ammunition has been issued (big *maybe*) it would be handled by senior NCOs, to be issued to the troops only upon command from higher HQ.
Sound silly? Consider that the thousands of military men and women in Saigon, at the beginning of Tet, in 1968, were all "officially" unarmed. True. The theory was, that if Americans were armed it would reflect badly on our hosts (the South Vietnamese) indicating that we didn't believe that they could insure our safety in the capitol city.
They couldn't.
Some people had *unauthorized* weapons. I was one of them. Not fair, but welcome—when the green tracers (theirs) in the sky matched the red tracers (ours).
I had to help a couple of field-grade Navy officers load and *unload* 12 gauge riot guns--belatedly issued.
The Viet Cong and North Vietnamese troops that hit Saigon and environs were armed with AK-47s of the full-auto warfighting type. With lots of ammunition. They were opposed, at first, only by the gutsy 716th MP battalion. That unit stood tall and suffered heavy casualties until units from American Infantry divisions and S. Vietnamese Airborne overmatched the Communists.
No, folks, the National Guard troops of the "neighborhood security team,"are likely to be targets, rather than combatants.
6 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
happywarrior 4/18/2021 4:01:20 PM (No. 758706)
Trust me, they’re not armed.
4 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
GO3 4/18/2021 4:09:16 PM (No. 758720)
They were wounded damn it, not injured.
7 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Venturer 4/18/2021 6:42:41 PM (No. 758840)
I would bet there isn't a bullet among them unless some of them brought their own.
3 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "NorthernDog"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
A reminder that the Guardsmen are putting their lives on the line. Someone could have been killed.