Judge Not
American Thinker,
by
Clarice Feldman
Original Article
Posted By: Hazymac,
4/27/2025 6:09:45 AM
Another week where America turns its attention to a rotten judiciary which is fast erasing any respect we once had for it.
As the prior outrageous injunctions by numbers of (judge shopped) District Courts make their way up the judicial ladder, even more of them were issued this week. I think everything the President has done is the object of at least one District Court injunction. In the meantime, corruption of the judiciary has become so overt that two judges were placed under arrest this week.
The case that particularly caught my attention this week unsurprisingly is once again from the District of Columbia.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
privateer 4/27/2025 7:14:41 AM (No. 1940791)
PDJT et al need to start throwing around that favorite old DNC/racialist dog whistle: disenfranchisement. That is, blast the fact that every time an illegally cast ballot is counted, it disenfranchises---cancels out,---the voice of an American citizen's legally cast ballot.
54 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
bpl40 4/27/2025 8:06:49 AM (No. 1940820)
Having judges like this is a calamity. The fact they are just the tip of the iceberg is a disaster.
52 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Jethro bo 4/27/2025 8:23:21 AM (No. 1940830)
Please stop referring to Inferior Court Black Robed Activist as 'judges'. They are not. Chuckie Schumer himself admitted that his Democrat Senate approved 235 'Progressives' to the courts. Not judges, progressives. Not rule of law but activist. And Bush Superior Court Black Robed Activist Roberts can cobble together at least 4 other votes on the Supreme Joke to keep the activist court system ringing like a finely tuned machine.
24 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Phantomll 4/27/2025 8:28:30 AM (No. 1940835)
I've always wondered how a judge who went to East Podunk School of Law have the knowledge to deal with the many factors affecting national safety and security?
25 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Strike3 4/27/2025 8:34:49 AM (No. 1940841)
Being appointed a judge is a great gig for someone who could not think but could memorize the heck out of law books while in school but soon forgot what the law actually is. Now we have too many of them and the quality has gone way downhill.
33 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 4/27/2025 9:28:45 AM (No. 1940866)
Judges breaking the law and getting arrested for it. Judges know the law and know exactly what they are doing. There is no excuse for this. We all get to witness our government and all its corruption. It's in plain sight now. Never forget that corruption never serves the general public and should never be tolerated.
24 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
john56 4/27/2025 10:19:16 AM (No. 1940894)
As a good friend, a successful but liberal attorney well known for his legal acumen, told me ... too many judges today are lawyers who couldn't cut it in private practice. Often, he has to explain the law to the judge.
21 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
earlybird 4/27/2025 11:12:25 AM (No. 1940920)
Clarice gives a full description of the Wisconsin judge's actions. Surreal.
12 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
EJKrausJr 4/27/2025 11:50:34 AM (No. 1940943)
The infatuation of Deep State judges with illegal immigrant gang members is astonishing. Roland Freisler is smiling, as he could not have done it better than the Deep State judges.
4 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
rikkitikki 4/27/2025 12:14:04 PM (No. 1940960)
With judges legislating from the bench, who needs a Constitution, POTUS, or Congress?
7 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
rikkitikki 4/27/2025 12:18:47 PM (No. 1940968)
And, all this time, I thought judges took an oath to uphold the Constitution...as written, not as they wish it were written.
Either these legislating judges did not understand the oaths they took, or they are choosing to ignore them...so they're either too stupid to be judges, or they cannot be trusted to issue fair rulings. Either way, they should be removed from office.
14 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
sunnyday 4/27/2025 3:40:37 PM (No. 1941111)
Does anyone else when they see Clarke's name connected to an article, say her name like Hannibal Lector would. Just saying
3 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
sunnyday 4/27/2025 3:42:27 PM (No. 1941116)
Post #12 was supposed to read Clarice, not Clarke.
2 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Hazymac 4/27/2025 8:45:32 PM (No. 1941279)
Re #12 and #13: Clarice's name should properly be pronounced the way Anthony Hopkins would pronounce it to Agent Starling. There's no other way, is there?
3 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Strike3 4/28/2025 7:30:42 AM (No. 1941449)
Democrats can not win future elections without this illegal alien population. The President needs to confront their activities and these criminal judges with one statement, "You and whose army?" Americans decided that we have had enough with the results of the November 2024 election so get over it.
5 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy 4/28/2025 7:59:00 AM (No. 1941465)
FTA - "Democrats thought they were clever -- they adopted the Cloward-Piven strategy devised by two Columbia professors, imagining that if our borders were left wide open, our social welfare system would be bankrupted and the people would force a redistribution of income through the government. Instead, the open border policy endangered and impoverished the middle class, costing the Democrats at the ballot box. This judicial intransigence is the last gasp of a sure-to-fail strategy of keeping illegal aliens here, on the welfare rolls, and encouraging them to vote."
This is what it is all about. No surprises here.
7 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
chillijilli 4/28/2025 9:10:44 AM (No. 1941514)
The Dems aren't shy about saying they will only enforce the laws they want to enforce and blatantly just ignore what they don't agree with. Since we allow them to get away with this it appears we think that's acceptable behavior. If it's acceptable behavior, why don't WE do the same thing? When Judge X decides blah blah blah, just announce we don't agree and therefore will ignore her ruling. Just do it and don't look back. Stop wasting energy trying to convince Dems to listen to reason. They don't think the way we do. Period.
4 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
The Remnants 4/28/2025 9:18:19 AM (No. 1941520)
We wonder why some judges make the decisions they do.
Read recently online that some judges might have connections with the cartels.
So something that makes no sense, makes sense. (or makes motives more clear)
3 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Vaquero45 4/28/2025 10:31:22 AM (No. 1941598)
We used to tell an old joke in the insurance claims business:
Q. What do you call a lawyer with an IQ of 80?
A. “Your Honor”….
3 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
PrayerWarrior 4/28/2025 11:39:12 AM (No. 1941668)
What is shocking is the number of people (are they citizens?) turning out to support/protest the arrest of the Wisconsin judge. This morning I was reading Romans chapter 13 where we are to support the legal authorities, including police, for they are sent by God. What has happened to these protesters? Do they not support law and order? Did they ever? What/where is their moral compass? Don't they want a safe community, safe from criminal illegal aliens like the one that the judge spirited out of her chambers to the back door? What has happened to our country? We wake up one morning and democrats are supporting/rallying for illegal aliens over American citizens.
1 person likes this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
preciosodrogas 4/28/2025 12:01:46 PM (No. 1941682)
#s 12, 13, and 14, I'm no expect in pronunciation however I do have an inside track. My wife's name is Clarice and it is pronounced with a double "ee" at the end. So there doesn't seem to be on specific way of saying its. She does not correct someone who says it differently unless it would make a difference, e.g., friends, legal.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Hazymac"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)