Post New Article

Who Judges The Judges?

Original Article

Posted By: Judy W., 2/12/2025 8:30:12 AM

Let us start by saying that the US Constitution is very clear on the role of judges. A judge is not there to assume the powers of the executive. The US system is designed with a separation of the powers which is there to prevent tyranny and arbitrary and unaccountable rule. Separation of powers is designed to prevent a Presidential tyranny. But it’s also designed to prevent a judicial tyranny, or an administrative or a bureaucratic tyranny. It exists so that nobody can be in the position of making up the rules as they go along and that nobody is drafting the law, enforcing the law, judging the law all

Comments:

I'm sure Trump and his staff are devising a way to stop these judges who are trying to take over executive powers, and to give them a big slap in the face. I can't wait.

Post Reply

Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”

Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.


Reply 1 - Posted by: Alecto2 2/12/2025 9:06:42 AM (No. 1894647)
Under Article 3, section 1, Judges do not need to be removed for an impeachable offence, requiring a supermajority vote in the Senate. They can be removed for bad behavior for failing to uphold their code of conduct by simple majority votes in the House and Senate. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMY92Sa69tw
41 people like this.

Reply 2 - Posted by: anotherctyankee 2/12/2025 9:18:39 AM (No. 1894659)
Then I would much appreciate it if both houses would get to work and do their jobs. Senators and representatives seem to be under worked and over paid. Get rid of these low life judges!
49 people like this.

Reply 3 - Posted by: Newtsche 2/12/2025 9:41:28 AM (No. 1894677)
Who coordinates the judges? Who pulls the judges' strings? Activist judicial overreach does not just spontaneously generate. Not just like-minded folks "doing the right thing" on their own.
32 people like this.

Reply 4 - Posted by: stablemoney 2/12/2025 10:17:19 AM (No. 1894708)
These leftist judges are ruling without hearing from both parties. This is not judicial review. This is proclamation by judges. Removal by impeachment takes a 2/3 majority in the Senate. How many judges have been removed from office? In the nation's history, the answer would be in the single digits. Congress needs to act, because we have some judges that require removal from office, and a prison sentence.
35 people like this.

Reply 5 - Posted by: cor-vet 2/12/2025 10:18:58 AM (No. 1894709)
In the meantime, as approved by the dems and the media when FJB ignored the Supreme Courts rulings on student loans, PDT should just ignore those local federal judges that try to rule the whole country. If it was OK to disobey the supreme law of the land, I think it's OK to ignore some biased judge handpicked in a blue state.
24 people like this.

Reply 6 - Posted by: jeffkinnh 2/12/2025 10:41:02 AM (No. 1894730)
I believe that Trump KNEW the judges would act this way. Their egregious behavior will FORCE the SCOTUS to take corrective action. This court has already made strong decisions on the rights of a President to run the Executive branch as they see fit. None of these judges can ground their decisions in law. None of these judges can justify their intrusion into the Executive branch, something they are Constitionally proscribed from doing. This should be an easy decision for the SCOTUS and it is necessary.
38 people like this.

Reply 7 - Posted by: Jethro bo 2/12/2025 10:58:30 AM (No. 1894738)
There is actually one entity with more powerful and totally unanswerable to anyone or anything. Even more powerful and unanswerable to the All Mighty. And that is inferior US judges.
18 people like this.

Reply 8 - Posted by: thethirdruffian 2/12/2025 1:04:40 PM (No. 1894827)
#1 I do not believe that to be correct. Removal requires 2/3 of the Senate.
10 people like this.

Reply 9 - Posted by: Strike3 2/13/2025 4:51:32 AM (No. 1895286)
The two judges involved are Obama pansies who should just be slapped and sent home.
8 people like this.

Reply 10 - Posted by: RobbyDeal 2/13/2025 7:32:39 AM (No. 1895367)
We need a "3 Strikes and You're Out" law for federal judges. If a judge is overturned 3 times, he is automatically and summarily removed from office. Let's see how often they will risk their own career with these activist rulings.
11 people like this.

Reply 11 - Posted by: Amoeba 2/13/2025 7:58:18 AM (No. 1895386)
I know a higher court can rule against this easily. I am sure that will happen. But a higher ourt can also slap this judges face with their opinion of his 'bad behavior' as out lined in the Constitution article 1. Bad behavior is a lesser degree of punishment than impeachment.
8 people like this.

Reply 12 - Posted by: LadyVet 2/13/2025 11:59:49 AM (No. 1895541)
Rapid fire at the Trump Admin start-up will cause the libs to run to their favorite activist judges. Trump should hold off for a while to let all the judges to be identified. Then he should take action against them ALL. Get started because it will take the remaining 3.5 years to handle the aftermath of appeals, decisions, and more appeals. By the time he leaves in 2029, maybe, just maybe, the judges will be off the court benches and off the U.S. payroll. I really hope Bondi has a good aggressive plan to get rid of the activists.
4 people like this.

Reply 13 - Posted by: czechlist 2/13/2025 1:12:18 PM (No. 1895643)
I've noticed that dim cases are never thrown out for: "LACK OF STANDING" Streets are named for dim judges : ONE WAY
2 people like this.

Reply 14 - Posted by: jerrodmason 2/13/2025 3:02:57 PM (No. 1895725)
We need an emergency hearing before SCOTUS, seeking a broad ruling that forces lower courts to honor the separation of powers.
2 people like this.

Reply 15 - Posted by: Sunhan65 2/13/2025 4:11:26 PM (No. 1895767)
Let's clear something up: The U.S. Congress could abolish the entire current Federal District court system by simple majority vote right now. Today. The U.S. Constitution requires only that a supreme court exist. It does not require that federal district courts exist. Both were created by simple legislation passed by Congress after the Constitution was ratified and the Executive and Legislative branches were already in place. Congress has adjusted the size, scope, and jurisdictions of the Federal courts, including the supreme court, by majority vote legislation signed by the executive many times over the years. (The first supreme court created by Congress had 5 judges and no--repeat no--authority to review the constitutionality of laws passed by Congress.) Congress could abolish the current federal district courts and replace them with something else--or replace them with nothing--by simple majority vote. They pass the law; President Trump signs it. That's it. All it takes is for Congress to have the political will. So they won't.
0 people like this.

Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Judy W."
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Most Recent Articles posted by Judy W."
Thank You and Goodnight 10 replies
Posted by Judy W. 2/17/2025 7:07:09 AM Post Reply
I confess it's a wee bit demoralising to find JD Vance has stunned Europe with a speech that contains nothing that would be remotely surprising to any reader of this website for the last quarter-century. Of course, he's the Vice President of the United States and I'm a "niche Canadian". And in fairness JD was still in high school back when I started boring on about this stuff. Nevertheless, the German defence minister Herr Großer von Wich ser spoke for the entire European establishment when he magisterially pronounced Mr Vance's remarks "not acceptable". Germany, France and the rest of Western Europe are dying before our eyes, but it remains "not acceptable"
The American Bar Association Should Probably
Be Disbarred
11 replies
Posted by Judy W. 2/16/2025 6:27:19 PM Post Reply
Just a very short note on the circular money flow of pure corruption behind lawfare 2.0 and the judicial fight against the Trump administration spending freezes. (Snip) It is the American Bar Association which sets the ethical rules for lawyers, the code lawyers are supposed to follow to remain within professional ethical guidelines. But the American Bar Association is not a neutral guardian of ethics, especially when it comes to judicial lawfare waged in support of the vast fraud that is USAID. The American Bar Association has itself been a major recipient of USAID funding then dutifully issued a scathing denunciation of DOGE activities and the USAID spending freeze.
The Zen Stage of Populism 3 replies
Posted by Judy W. 2/15/2025 7:13:57 AM Post Reply
The other side liked to say that they were ‘the adults in the room’. For a long time we have known what a laughable inversion of reality that is, as divorced from objective reality as many of the sickest sexual fetishes they also support. If there was anything ‘adult’ about them it wasn’t the adult that means mature, experienced, responsible and informed. It was the ‘adult’ used in the porn shop sense. What they invoked to convey that they were more responsible, more informed, more wise than the rest of us, was actually a flickering neon light in a seedy backstreet. But for some people this didn’t fully register.
Ohio Dems' Latest Act Again Shows That
This Party Doesn't Get Why They Lost in 2024
22 replies
Posted by Judy W. 2/14/2025 7:38:41 AM Post Reply
What the hell is this? I get why Ohio Democrats are doing this, trying to be cute with the whole ‘regulate our bodies’ narrative that no one cared about in 2024. Abortion and female voters did not save Democrats, who obsess over the weirdest issues that will keep this party in the political wilderness. (Snip) A bill proposed to the Ohio statehouse will make male ejaculation without intent to have a baby, a fineable offense of up to $10,000. The bill has been proposed by State Representatives Anita Somani and Tristan Rader, who wrote it to point out what they see as the absurdity of rules that control women's bodies
The dismantling of a malevolent empire 7 replies
Posted by Judy W. 2/14/2025 7:23:09 AM Post Reply
In the past couple of weeks, devastating information has erupted into the public domain detailing the malign activities of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The Trump administration has effectively shut USAID down by freezing its existing foreign assistance programs (Snip) Far more alarming information has now surfaced suggesting that USAID has been a major contributor to extremist and subversive activity. The Washington Free Beacon reports current and former US officials who worked closely with the aid group, saying they watched for years as it funnelled millions of dollars to bodies engaged in anti-Israel advocacy and that were linked to terrorism.
J.D. Vance In Munich: A Lesson To Elites 2 replies
Posted by Judy W. 2/14/2025 6:21:01 AM Post Reply
Nearly one year ago, I met my friend at a table streetside at Andechser am Dom, a restaurant in the heart of Munich, for beer and conversation. (Snip) We had had dinner the night before. My friend, J.D., skipped out a dinner at the event he was in town attending — the Munich Security Conference, the annual gathering of military heavyweights that bills itself as the “world’s leading forum” to discuss security policy. What was the point, he had told me? He was a first-term US Senator from Ohio who was getting cold-shouldered by the Good and the Great at the conference. Why? His views on the Ukraine War
Swamp Apocalypse 7 replies
Posted by Judy W. 2/12/2025 11:21:53 AM Post Reply
The Trump Team fooled everybody, including me. As last week’s various lawsuits sprouted restraining orders like early buds emerging all over the willow trees in springtime, most commenters expected Trump to take a necessary pause for defensive retrenchment.Surely, we all thought, it would take Trump’s anti-bureaucrats some time to clear the judicial logjam. (Snip) Instead, yesterday Trump tripled down, jamming the battle tank’s accelerator into overdrive and smashing ahead in a whole different direction.His new battlefield banner unfurled yesterday afternoon in the form of one executive order plus three separate press conferences, which together sent a just-relaxing Deep State enemy racing for the bunkers with its trousers still half off.
Who Judges The Judges? 15 replies
Posted by Judy W. 2/12/2025 8:30:12 AM Post Reply
Let us start by saying that the US Constitution is very clear on the role of judges. A judge is not there to assume the powers of the executive. The US system is designed with a separation of the powers which is there to prevent tyranny and arbitrary and unaccountable rule. Separation of powers is designed to prevent a Presidential tyranny. But it’s also designed to prevent a judicial tyranny, or an administrative or a bureaucratic tyranny. It exists so that nobody can be in the position of making up the rules as they go along and that nobody is drafting the law, enforcing the law, judging the law all
Death Match: China's CCP vs. America's Democracy 4 replies
Posted by Judy W. 2/12/2025 6:14:36 AM Post Reply
President Trump, according to reports, wants to go to Beijing in his first hundred days and reach a bargain with China. Unfortunately, an enduring accommodation with the Chinese regime is not possible. China is not done killing with disease. Driven by these beliefs [replacing the Westphalian order of sovereign states with the Chinese imperial-era system], the Chinese regime has always thought it had the right to do whatever it wanted to others. Try as Americans might, they will never have amicable relations with China as long as it is ruled by the Chinese Communist Party. There can be only one survivor, either the People's Republic
America (and Canada) Need ALL Their Land
Back In Order to Flourish
8 replies
Posted by Judy W. 2/8/2025 8:41:46 AM Post Reply
Temp’s Sovereign Wealth Fund seems like a good idea, depending on who controls it. Trump says the U.S. will, but does that devolve to bureaucrats? We can’t do anything without a sucker-bureaucrat supervising every move. (Snip) So to me, right now, the Rothschilds are more an exemplar of how Big Big Money behaves. And that is very very Lizardy. Or Reptilian. Not Human. When I use the term Rothschild, I mean also BlackRock, Larry Fink, Gates, the European families, the Black Nobility, the Windsors, etc. It is the nature of Big Money to loot. To steal from the weak. It’s almost impossible for it to act ethically.
The CIA Is Broken – It Will Take More
Than A New Director To Fix It
11 replies
Posted by Judy W. 2/7/2025 4:00:54 PM Post Reply
This article is intended as a response to the recent article by Dan Hoffman in the Washington Times entitled “Some Leadership Lessons for New CIA Chief Ratcliffe to Ponder”. The premise of that article appears to be that a change of leadership at the top of CIA will be sufficient to put it on the right track. With all due respect for Mr. Hoffman, who I know personally, he is wrong. CIA needs major reform from top to bottom. The twin cancers of politicization and bureaucratization have rendered it effectively incapable of doing its job. (Snip)Long ago senior leaders at CIA began to involve themselves inappropriately in American domestic politics.
Donald Trump, the libertarian president? 4 replies
Posted by Judy W. 2/6/2025 6:12:05 AM Post Reply
Trump the libertarian? Yes. And how. (Snip) It’s true that Trump’s instincts, particularly in his first term, weren’t especially libertarian. Oh, the claims that he was an authoritarian, possibly a Fascist, maybe even a Nazi, were obvious bullshit from the beginning. But he showed no particular enthusiasm for limited government. Still, by that point I saw the government apparat as deeply corrupt and dysfunctional, and dangerously close to making its position so entrenched as to be unassailable through ordinary politics. Anyone promising to shake it up looked good to me, and in 2016 Trump had the added advantage of not being Hillary Clinton. I knew what her instincts were.
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Volodymyr Zelenskyy: “I will never accept
any decisions between the USA and Russia”
About Peace in Ukraine
40 replies
Posted by earlybird 2/17/2025 10:51:21 AM Post Reply
Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy appears on Meet the Press to discuss his position toward ending the conflict with Russia. Within the conversation [04:11], Zelenskyy said, “I will never accept any decisions between the United States and Russia about Ukraine.” President Zelenskyy represents the interests of the European Union, multinational corporations, various elements of NATO memberships, the World Economic Forum, the CIA division within the U.S. State Dept., western banks and a confab of various western intelligence operations. After that, he represents the interests of Ukrainians. This is why he will not permit elections. (Video)
‘Star Trek’ Actor Robert Picardo:
‘Let’s Cancel Presidents’ Day’
Since Trump Has Canceled ‘Our Justice System’
30 replies
Posted by Imright 2/18/2025 3:16:39 AM Post Reply
Actor Robert Picardo, who played The Doctor on Star Trek: Voyager, said that America should cancel Presidents Day due to Trump allegedly canceling “our justice system” and other causes. Picardo issued his decree on the social media platform Blue Sky.“Being that papers straws, The Gulf of Mexico and our justice system have been recently cancelled, let’s cancel Presidents’ Day,” he said. Being that papers straws, The Gulf of Mexico and our justice system have been recently cancelled, let’s cancel Presidents’ Day. — Robert Picardo (@robertpicardo.bsky.social) February 16, 2025 at 8:15 PM
DOGE discovers $4.7 trillion in Treasury
payments were missing critical code: ‘Traceability
almost impossible’
29 replies
Posted by Imright 2/18/2025 2:39:38 AM Post Reply
The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) announced Monday that some $4.7 trillion in payments from the Treasury Department were missing a critical tracking code which made tracing the transactions “almost impossible.” The transactions were reportedly missing the Treasury Account Symbol, or TAS, an identification code which links a Treasury payment to a budget line item, according to DOGE, which described the use of such code as a “standard financial process.” “In the Federal Government, the TAS field was optional for ~$4.7 Trillion in payments and was often left blank, making traceability almost impossible,” read an X post from DOGE.
Not Many Americans Are Going to Tolerate
What These Federal Workers Had to Say
Last Night
28 replies
Posted by Imright 2/17/2025 7:32:55 AM Post Reply
CBS News was a dumpster fire on Sunday. Face the Nation’s Margaret Brennan thought the Nazi Holocaust occurred because there was too much freedom of speech and the press in Germany. Then, 60 Minutes decided to produce a segment about Germany waging a total war on freedom of speech, taking offenders away…on a train ride. Finally, there is this pity segment on government workers who are lost after getting fired.
Rush: Four Years On 24 replies
Posted by mc squared 2/17/2025 2:29:34 PM Post Reply
Four years ago today, just about this time, I was pottering about getting ready to guest-host The Rush Limbaugh Show when the telephone rang. It was Kraig Kitchin, his longtime friend (and head of the network that distributed his show), calling to break the news that Rush had died earlier that morning. Post-Limbaugh talk radio seems smaller to me than it once did - not just because Rush had a big personality, but because he managed to fit the flotsam and jetsam of the news cycle into the big picture.
David Hogg Took Just Days to Wear Out
His Welcome at the DNC As He Makes It
All About Himself
23 replies
Posted by mc squared 2/17/2025 2:51:31 PM Post Reply
You know how the Democrats have been whining about the youthfulness of the Department of Government Efficiency staffers, claiming that Elon Musk’s DOGE team couldn’t possibly understand what they’re doing because some are in their early twenties and at least one is in his late teens? Yeah, well that same bunch voted in early February to make 24-year-old liberal activist David Hogg the vice chairman of the Democratic National Committee. Hypocrisy, much? As our friends at PJ Media reported, Hogg’s already wearing out his welcome because he seems to be using his new position as a giant personal piggy bank:
Half of NYC’s deputy mayors dramatically
resign in wake of Eric Adams’ controversial
reprieve from Trump DOJ
22 replies
Posted by mc squared 2/17/2025 6:00:50 PM Post Reply
Half of New York City’s deputy mayors dramatically resigned Monday in the wake of Eric Adams’ controversial reprieve from his historic corruption case by President Trump’s Justice Department. The resignations of Adams’ four senior aides — led by First Deputy Mayor Maria Torres-Springer — thrusts City Hall even deeper into uncharted territory as the mayor faces mounting questions about whether he can govern the city. The four deputy mayors — Torres-Springer, Deputy Mayor for Operations Meera Joshi, Deputy Mayor for Health Human Services Anne Williams-Isom and Deputy Mayor for Public Safety Chauncey Parker — resigned as a rally in support of Adams unfolded in Rehoboth Cathedral in Brooklyn.
I wish Trump were right about birthright
citizenship, but he’s probably not
21 replies
Posted by Big Bopper 2/17/2025 12:58:35 PM Post Reply
In determining citizenship, the United States has a very unusual approach. You’re a citizen if you were born here. (You’re also a citizen if you were born abroad under certain circumstances, but that’s a different issue.) That’s a bit crazy, because it means that if a woman (aren’t you glad we don’t have to refer to them as “child-birthing persons” anymore?) makes it into the United States, legally or illegally, in time to give birth – right on the north bank of the Rio Grande, for example – her baby is an American citizen. The mother doesn’t magically become an American citizen by giving birth in America,
Here’s the Latest Left-Wing Myth Circulating
About Trump and Trump Voters
21 replies
Posted by Hazymac 2/17/2025 10:22:17 AM Post Reply
Jessica Tarlov, one of the liberal voices at Fox News, made a hilarious claim on a podcast last week that I couldn’t help but laugh at. According to her, the “chaos” of the Trump administration is already turning off his voters. Her proof? She shared a conversation she supposedly had with a 20-year-old college student from the Midwest who comes from a conservative, pro-Trump family. The student, who had previously reached out for career advice, recently emailed Tarlov to express his changing perspective on Trump. “I’ve really appreciated hearing what you have had to say the past week on ‘The Five’ and your podcasts with Scott,”
Racist Judge Jack McConnell, Who Halted
President Trump’s Temporary Spending
Freeze, Received Over $100 Million in
Government Funding for His NGO
21 replies
Posted by Imright 2/17/2025 12:08:25 AM Post Reply
Well, this is interesting. What a surprise. Dirty Judge Jack McConnell, who believes he was recently elected US president, halted President Trump’s current spending freeze. But Judge McConnell is not some innocent bystander. Judge McConnell’s organization has received $117.6 million in government funding in total (ending in 2023). Maybe that’s why he wanted the money to keep flowing. He’s expecting several more million this year!
CRY MORE, Michael Steele: Fmr. RNC chair
takes TDS rage to new level with entertaining meltdown
20 replies
Posted by Hazymac 2/17/2025 5:26:56 PM Post Reply
The former chair of the Republican National Committee (RNC) delivered an insulting on-air fit of rage over Elon Musk and his presence at the White House. Michael Steele’s drama-filled meltdown on MSNBC included calling on Democrats to “get off your fat ass” and do something about President Donald Trump’s power and Musk’s work with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). “What would you have us do?” Symone Sanders Townsend asked Steele on “The Weekend.” The former RNC chair erupted in his response. (X) “I would like you to show that you give a damn!” Steele replied. “That you got a little emotion about the fact that people are losing their jobs indiscriminately!
Acting head of Social Security Administration
resigns after dispute with Elon Musk’s
DOGE: report
18 replies
Posted by FlyRight 2/18/2025 5:16:42 AM Post Reply
The Social Security Administration’s acting commissioner reportedly resigned over the weekend after a dispute with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) over the Elon Musk-headed group’s efforts to access sensitive government records. Michelle King, a career federal worker who had been with SSA since 1994, quit over the DOGE disagreement Saturday and was replaced by Leland Dudek, the Washington Post reported on Monday. Dudek, who has been supportive of DOGE’s efforts to root out waste, fraud and abuse in the federal government, will serve as acting commissioner of SSA until President Trump’s pick to lead the agency, Frank Bisignano, is confirmed by the Senate, according to the outlet.
Post New Article