Who Judges The Judges?
Substack,
by
Daniel Jupp
Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.,
2/12/2025 8:30:12 AM
Let us start by saying that the US Constitution is very clear on the role of judges. A judge is not there to assume the powers of the executive. The US system is designed with a separation of the powers which is there to prevent tyranny and arbitrary and unaccountable rule.
Separation of powers is designed to prevent a Presidential tyranny. But it’s also designed to prevent a judicial tyranny, or an administrative or a bureaucratic tyranny. It exists so that nobody can be in the position of making up the rules as they go along and that nobody is drafting the law, enforcing the law, judging the law all
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Alecto2 2/12/2025 9:06:42 AM (No. 1894647)
Under Article 3, section 1, Judges do not need to be removed for an impeachable offence, requiring a supermajority vote in the Senate. They can be removed for bad behavior for failing to uphold their code of conduct by simple majority votes in the House and Senate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMY92Sa69tw
41 people like this.
Then I would much appreciate it if both houses would get to work and do their jobs. Senators and representatives seem to be under worked and over paid. Get rid of these low life judges!
49 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Newtsche 2/12/2025 9:41:28 AM (No. 1894677)
Who coordinates the judges? Who pulls the judges' strings? Activist judicial overreach does not just spontaneously generate. Not just like-minded folks "doing the right thing" on their own.
32 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
stablemoney 2/12/2025 10:17:19 AM (No. 1894708)
These leftist judges are ruling without hearing from both parties. This is not judicial review. This is proclamation by judges. Removal by impeachment takes a 2/3 majority in the Senate. How many judges have been removed from office? In the nation's history, the answer would be in the single digits. Congress needs to act, because we have some judges that require removal from office, and a prison sentence.
35 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
cor-vet 2/12/2025 10:18:58 AM (No. 1894709)
In the meantime, as approved by the dems and the media when FJB ignored the Supreme Courts rulings on student loans, PDT should just ignore those local federal judges that try to rule the whole country. If it was OK to disobey the supreme law of the land, I think it's OK to ignore some biased judge handpicked in a blue state.
24 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
jeffkinnh 2/12/2025 10:41:02 AM (No. 1894730)
I believe that Trump KNEW the judges would act this way. Their egregious behavior will FORCE the SCOTUS to take corrective action. This court has already made strong decisions on the rights of a President to run the Executive branch as they see fit. None of these judges can ground their decisions in law. None of these judges can justify their intrusion into the Executive branch, something they are Constitionally proscribed from doing.
This should be an easy decision for the SCOTUS and it is necessary.
38 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Jethro bo 2/12/2025 10:58:30 AM (No. 1894738)
There is actually one entity with more powerful and totally unanswerable to anyone or anything. Even more powerful and unanswerable to the All Mighty. And that is inferior US judges.
18 people like this.
#1
I do not believe that to be correct. Removal requires 2/3 of the Senate.
10 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Strike3 2/13/2025 4:51:32 AM (No. 1895286)
The two judges involved are Obama pansies who should just be slapped and sent home.
8 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
RobbyDeal 2/13/2025 7:32:39 AM (No. 1895367)
We need a "3 Strikes and You're Out" law for federal judges. If a judge is overturned 3 times, he is automatically and summarily removed from office. Let's see how often they will risk their own career with these activist rulings.
11 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Amoeba 2/13/2025 7:58:18 AM (No. 1895386)
I know a higher court can rule against this easily. I am sure that will happen. But a higher ourt can also slap this judges face with their opinion of his 'bad behavior' as out lined in the Constitution article 1. Bad behavior is a lesser degree of punishment than impeachment.
8 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
LadyVet 2/13/2025 11:59:49 AM (No. 1895541)
Rapid fire at the Trump Admin start-up will cause the libs to run to their favorite activist judges. Trump should hold off for a while to let all the judges to be identified. Then he should take action against them ALL. Get started because it will take the remaining 3.5 years to handle the aftermath of appeals, decisions, and more appeals. By the time he leaves in 2029, maybe, just maybe, the judges will be off the court benches and off the U.S. payroll. I really hope Bondi has a good aggressive plan to get rid of the activists.
4 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
czechlist 2/13/2025 1:12:18 PM (No. 1895643)
I've noticed that dim cases are never thrown out for:
"LACK OF STANDING"
Streets are named for dim judges :
ONE WAY
2 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
jerrodmason 2/13/2025 3:02:57 PM (No. 1895725)
We need an emergency hearing before SCOTUS, seeking a broad ruling that forces lower courts to honor the separation of powers.
2 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Sunhan65 2/13/2025 4:11:26 PM (No. 1895767)
Let's clear something up: The U.S. Congress could abolish the entire current Federal District court system by simple majority vote right now. Today.
The U.S. Constitution requires only that a supreme court exist. It does not require that federal district courts exist. Both were created by simple legislation passed by Congress after the Constitution was ratified and the Executive and Legislative branches were already in place.
Congress has adjusted the size, scope, and jurisdictions of the Federal courts, including the supreme court, by majority vote legislation signed by the executive many times over the years. (The first supreme court created by Congress had 5 judges and no--repeat no--authority to review the constitutionality of laws passed by Congress.)
Congress could abolish the current federal district courts and replace them with something else--or replace them with nothing--by simple majority vote. They pass the law; President Trump signs it. That's it.
All it takes is for Congress to have the political will. So they won't.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Judy W."
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
I'm sure Trump and his staff are devising a way to stop these judges who are trying to take over executive powers, and to give them a big slap in the face. I can't wait.