Trump proven unfit for power again
The Washington Examiner,
by
Washington Examiner Editorial Staff
Original Article
Posted By: Solid_Oak,
6/29/2022 10:53:07 AM
Former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson’s Tuesday testimony ought to ring the death knell for former President Donald Trump’s political career. Trump is unfit to be anywhere near power ever again.
Hutchinson’s resume alone should establish her credibility. The 25-year-old had already worked at the highest levels of conservative Republican politics, including in the offices of Sen. Ted Cruz (TX) and House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (LA), before becoming a top aide for former Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
curious1 6/29/2022 10:56:36 AM (No. 1200746)
Guess their news cycle is behind the times as two SS agents are willing to testify under oath Cassidy is a liar. Or they hope not everyone has heard about that.
106 people like this.
Keep dreaming Numbnuts.
78 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
JackBurton 6/29/2022 10:58:38 AM (No. 1200750)
Cassidy's 'testimony' was rose fertilizer. The President was supposed to be able to lunge thru a bullet-proof security barrier?
And, BTW, what's the choice? Biden or Trump? Trump, of course, wins. Hell, I voted for Bush when the alternatives were Gore (the sex crazed poodle) or (ketchup) Kerry.
69 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
5 handicap 6/29/2022 10:59:46 AM (No. 1200753)
Two Secret Service Agents and the Driver of the Limo( Beast) said she is lying!!!!!
99 people like this.
Well, there's one website I no longer will go to. They should be totally embarrassed by this, as should the Brit Hume clone Bret Baier.
93 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Scottyboy 6/29/2022 11:03:02 AM (No. 1200755)
This is all part of an ongoing (and not very successful) attempt to ‘memory hole’ the overwhelming and irrefutable evidence that the 2020 election was stolen and Donald Trump and all engaged Americans were (and are still) really wizzed off about it as they should be. . . . and shame on the Examiner for being part of the attempted cover up.
86 people like this.
I have to question the credibility of any 25-YEAR-OLD woman who has already worked her way to a position as a top aide to the White House Chief of Staff. A real up-and-comer, that Cassidy.
79 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Vaquero45 6/29/2022 11:09:43 AM (No. 1200765)
Well, so much for the Washington Examiner. Never again.
78 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Cindiana 6/29/2022 11:12:04 AM (No. 1200767)
The New York Post is likewise rolling in the hay with Cassidy's reports (firsthand, secondhand, thirdhand).
39 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Ditto1958 6/29/2022 11:13:54 AM (No. 1200769)
The author of this piece has a right to state his opinion, but that doesn’t mean he’s not an idiot
66 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Pinkpanther 6/29/2022 11:17:58 AM (No. 1200775)
😂😂😂 oh wait, he was serious…
32 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Bmoc 6/29/2022 11:23:28 AM (No. 1200781)
Wow. For a moment, I thought this was a Babylon Bee ripoff article, but the more I read, the more I realized it only takes one 'mistake' to reveal the soul of a website. The last two paragraphs tell me they are not worthy of another click from me.
50 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Flyball Dogs 6/29/2022 11:23:32 AM (No. 1200782)
It doesn’t take a lot of thought to think her testimony is unbelievably false.
Unless you live in New York, you know The President gets into the Beast, and there is a partition between him and the agents in front. (No first hand knowledge: but I assume the partition is bullet-proof and protocol demands that it be closed —most especially in a potentially volatile situation.)
And the idea that PDJT would hurtle across and grab the wheel (if that were even an option) is laughable in its entirety.
The WE has moved to the Do Not Read list.
50 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
vesparado1 6/29/2022 11:26:30 AM (No. 1200783)
Examiner has lost all credibility. Her testimony is 2nd and 3rd degree hearsay and now two SS agents are willing to testify under oath Cassidy is a liar. Her credentials alone make her credible? I don't think so.
53 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Scottyboy 6/29/2022 11:36:18 AM (No. 1200796)
Global pandemics will come & go, but the emotional instability that comes with the TDS virus is a permanent condition.
46 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 6/29/2022 11:36:52 AM (No. 1200797)
Another anonymous hit piece. No thanks. Why should I believe something where the author declines to put their name on it?
36 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Mofongo 6/29/2022 11:38:00 AM (No. 1200798)
That’s it for The Examiner. We thought we knew ye.
39 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
GoodDeal 6/29/2022 11:38:35 AM (No. 1200799)
They jumped out of a crashing airplane with no parachute. Make up an outrageous story, swear under oath it's truth, and know that 33% of the imbeciles listening to it will believe it. You can lie on a witness stand but you can't lie to God. Lying is a sin so just know the wages of sin is death. Wait in line with all the rest of the lynch mob to take a swim in the lake of fire followed up by a bungee jump into the bottomless pit.
26 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Speedy2 6/29/2022 11:43:57 AM (No. 1200802)
Just another liar wanna be
26 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
MDConservative 6/29/2022 11:45:14 AM (No. 1200807)
When did Bezos buy the Examiner?
25 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
The Remnants 6/29/2022 11:47:21 AM (No. 1200810)
I believe:
1. The Washington Examiner is NOT a conservative publication.
2. THE WASHINGTON TIMES is a conservative publication.
3. The young lady was an INTERN in Trump's and Cruz's offices.
4. She was not a top aid to anyone.
5. She was "misremembering".
47 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
planetgeo 6/29/2022 11:47:53 AM (No. 1200812)
It's really unbelievable how quickly certain usually sane media outlets have fallen for the "Cassidy Gambit" and now are locking in to a completely false narrative (based on the reactions of first-hand parties to the asserted events!). It's beyond disgusting.
The correct title of this piece is: "Washington Examiner Proven Unfit for Reliable Reporting. Again."
34 people like this.
Unfit for power? Take a look at the post above this one about Biden's avoidance of questions from reporters.
18 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
terrywhite 6/29/2022 11:50:45 AM (No. 1200820)
I'll find the Washington Examiner Editorial Staff credible when they start writing editorials on the unfit for power status of Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Kamala Harris, Adam Schiff, Eric Swalwell, and every Democrat up there for their incompetence, dereliction of duty such as with border security, corruption with insider trading and deals with the communist Chinese, blatant and incessant dishonesty, promotion of violent riots and the like. Until then, the Washington Examiner can go pound sand.
26 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
ARKfamily 6/29/2022 11:51:23 AM (No. 1200822)
Donald Trump even commented. If she was so bothered about what he did, how she wanted to follow the team to Florida? A question that she should answer. . .
27 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
ARKfamily 6/29/2022 11:52:02 AM (No. 1200825)
Oops, how come she wanted. . .
11 people like this.
Reply 27 - Posted by:
FormerDem 6/29/2022 11:53:53 AM (No. 1200831)
More like death knell for the Examiner. This is journalistic malpractice, given what has happened since this lady testified.
25 people like this.
Reply 28 - Posted by:
Quigley 6/29/2022 11:54:02 AM (No. 1200833)
FTA: "Hutchinson’s resume alone should establish her credibility. The 25-year-old had already worked at the highest levels of conservative Republican politics, including in the offices of Sen. Ted Cruz (TX) and House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (LA), before becoming a top aide for former Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows."
Omitted re her resume- she was president of the French club in High School; she made an "A" in introduction to Algebra in university; and did a semester in London. So SHE MUST BE BELIEVED!! Believe the woman! No matter what!!
And of course, don't forget that Trump hired prostitutes to wee wee on a Moscow hotel bed - do you need to see Christopher Steele's resume to confirm that Truth?
21 people like this.
Reply 29 - Posted by:
mean Gene 6/29/2022 11:58:53 AM (No. 1200835)
At least Hot Air's Allahpundit had the honesty to admit he ASSUMED all sorts of things about her testimony.
And all of those assumptions were unfounded.
15 people like this.
Reply 30 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 6/29/2022 11:59:43 AM (No. 1200836)
Never found the Washington Examiner to be consistent in what they say. Some stuff I liked. Some stuff I did not like (this article). Lots of stuff in between that did not hold my attention. All over the place.
11 people like this.
Reply 31 - Posted by:
faceincrowd 6/29/2022 12:09:26 PM (No. 1200843)
Nevermind the fact that she is a lying bee itch.
12 people like this.
Reply 32 - Posted by:
snowoutlaw 6/29/2022 12:27:08 PM (No. 1200864)
So when is Cassidy going to be handcuffed and indicted for perjury?
27 people like this.
Reply 33 - Posted by:
jeffkinnh 6/29/2022 12:39:16 PM (No. 1200878)
The poor Washington Examiner. Almost as fast as as she testified, Cassidy was proven by multiple witnesses to be a bitter liar. The Examiner Never Trumpers are so desperate to attack Trump they will jump on ANYTHING, no matter how absurd. They are left with handfuls of manure. They stink.
The J6 farce keeps getting worse. They are getting NO traction with the public. They have NO evidence, only whining "testimony". Every time they claim that they have important news, they do a face plant. Their incompetence in this echoes their incompetence in guiding the economy. They are a gross embarrassment. It is delightful to see the few RINOs in attendance tied to this boat anchor.
19 people like this.
Reply 34 - Posted by:
sterling431 6/29/2022 12:41:42 PM (No. 1200882)
Trump unfit for power? What about the great pretender Joe Biden? He doesn't even know where he is and is supposedly the current President. At least Trump took a cognitive test when the media talked about his state of mind, which Biden refuses to do. I am just salivating at the thought of the public opinion poll that asks "Do you believe President Biden should take a cognitive test?" Yeah, right.. That's one you will never see for sure. If they did such a poll it would be 90% yes.
12 people like this.
Reply 35 - Posted by:
RedWhite&Blue2 6/29/2022 12:46:38 PM (No. 1200887)
The "examiner" needs to examine itself!
Do you have any respect for this "media"?
Or any respect for ANY democrat "leader"?
I don't.....
11 people like this.
Reply 36 - Posted by:
Hermit_Crab 6/29/2022 12:47:34 PM (No. 1200891)
With the publication of this idiocy, The Washington Examiner Editorial Staff has proven itself unfit for publication ever again.
9 people like this.
Reply 37 - Posted by:
DVC 6/29/2022 12:49:10 PM (No. 1200896)
OP, the Examiner has been NeverTrumper forever. Always lies about Trump.
14 people like this.
Reply 38 - Posted by:
udanja99 6/29/2022 12:56:34 PM (No. 1200908)
OP, the Washington Examiner is staffed with Never Trumpers. Looking forward to their retraction of this article.
10 people like this.
Reply 39 - Posted by:
Zeek Wolfe 6/29/2022 12:57:10 PM (No. 1200912)
From what I can understand about the events of January 6, what this kangaroo committee heard from the witness is a pack of lies...hearsay and lies. Won't help RINO Chaney. Wyoming voters will soon take the rubbish to the dump.
7 people like this.
Reply 40 - Posted by:
mjwall69 6/29/2022 12:58:07 PM (No. 1200916)
But it has to be true if they want to believe it, right? Pathetic.
6 people like this.
Reply 41 - Posted by:
broken01 6/29/2022 12:59:15 PM (No. 1200920)
So the Washington Examiner has chosen to jump into the raging dumpster fire that is the J6 clown show. Cassidy Hutchinson is turning out to be nothing but a fool fledged liar. I've ridden in limos and "The Beast" is of course a special kind so unless PDJT can shrink to the size of Ant Man and have the speed of Spider Man there's no way in Ted Kennedy's eternal home that he could've done what she said he did. This whole thing has become an even bigger farce that the Mueller Investigation where he didn't even know what was in his own report. The democrats are so desperate to prevent PDJT from sitting in the Oval Office again that they will try anything. I plan on doing my part starting in a few short months to make sure they regret it.
10 people like this.
Reply 42 - Posted by:
Jesuslover54 6/29/2022 1:02:40 PM (No. 1200927)
My bile is spilling over. I guess one of the people from the Washington Examiner was caught at Epstein's Island, so the editorial position has changed completely
4 people like this.
Reply 43 - Posted by:
paral04 6/29/2022 1:24:39 PM (No. 1200939)
What she stated was hearsay and not admissible. What is more powerful is that the people who were actually in the limo said her testimony was wrong. This newspaper better start reading what they write about people and be prepared to be sued when they print false information.
9 people like this.
Reply 44 - Posted by:
TJ54 6/29/2022 1:38:35 PM (No. 1200944)
I guess the Washington Examiner has a death wish. I will not look at their articles anymore.
2 people like this.
Reply 45 - Posted by:
thekidsmom66 6/29/2022 1:54:11 PM (No. 1200956)
Written by the "editorial staff". Someone must have serious dirt on the lot of them if they were able to make them put together this embarrassing piece.
4 people like this.
Reply 46 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy 6/29/2022 2:02:31 PM (No. 1200966)
Nothing to see here.
1 person likes this.
Reply 47 - Posted by:
rochow 6/29/2022 2:03:06 PM (No. 1200967)
One needs to wonder how much Soros paid this rag! They most certainly do not strike me as being conservative. Conservatives listen to one side only?? Since when? If she is such a credible witness and has to rattle off all her lies in public about this 'unfit' man, how come she wanted to follow him down to Florida???? This rag mounts a stout defense for her without hearing even a scintilla of opposing views that shred her trashy testimony!
2 people like this.
Reply 48 - Posted by:
Luke21 6/29/2022 2:24:19 PM (No. 1200983)
Washington Times and Examiner are just like the Post these days.
1 person likes this.
Reply 49 - Posted by:
BarryNo 6/29/2022 2:26:19 PM (No. 1200985)
sheesh! These Never-Trumpers are deranged. One thing our present times are showing us, is the very worst and most spiteful of human nature.
3 people like this.
Reply 50 - Posted by:
AltaD 6/29/2022 3:04:18 PM (No. 1201014)
At the end of the article there are links for various social media sites with a tag that says: Share your thoughts with friends. Out of curiosity, I went to their Facebook page but it appears they haven't posted this editorial on the FB page. Could it be they fear the response?
1 person likes this.
Reply 51 - Posted by:
sanspeur 6/29/2022 3:04:32 PM (No. 1201015)
i have seen the prezzy wasn’t in The Beast , rather the SUV .
0 people like this.
Reply 52 - Posted by:
ussjimmycarter 6/29/2022 3:44:11 PM (No. 1201044)
Wow! Some dame gets up and lies like a hound dog and these morons buy into it? MAGA!
2 people like this.
Reply 53 - Posted by:
Right Time 6/29/2022 4:07:54 PM (No. 1201063)
Maybe the Examiner can explain how an obese 75 yo Trump can reach through the privacy partition behind the driver’s seat to reach the steering wheel of a stretch limousine…from the back seat. And just how was Trump going to operate the accelerator?
Anyone who believes the Cassidy BS is beyond stupid.
She is as much of a liar as Christine Blasey Ford.
4 people like this.
Reply 54 - Posted by:
Nimby 6/29/2022 4:18:37 PM (No. 1201072)
It proven within hours that she LIED!! Do y’all want to apologize to all the conservatives who supported Trump NOW?
1 person likes this.
Reply 55 - Posted by:
mean Gene 6/29/2022 4:22:21 PM (No. 1201076)
Cannot wait to vote for Trump again. All of the talk about his influence slipping is just crap.
The instant he formally announces, he blows away the rest of the field. In my opinion (are you listening Trump?)
he should announce immediately after the new Rep majority is sworn in in Jan. 2023.
3 people like this.
Reply 56 - Posted by:
Venturer 6/29/2022 4:31:03 PM (No. 1201084)
Cassidy was an up and comer, but I would imagine she might have a tough time working for any Republican after this. Cannot understand why she would make up such an obvious easily proven false story.
3 people like this.
Reply 57 - Posted by:
Kate318 6/29/2022 5:16:08 PM (No. 1201120)
Get some help, OP.
#52, can you show us on the doll where The Bad Orange Man hurt you?
5 people like this.
Reply 58 - Posted by:
stablemoney 6/29/2022 5:49:11 PM (No. 1201154)
The Washington Examiner staff should be no where near a newspaper ever again, having violated every rule of their business. Instead of investigating, or verifying their story, they took as gospel the hearsay testimony of a witness that had been let go by Trump. That alone should raise some questions, but not for the Washington Examiner, who even has the credulity to believe Trump would take the wheel of the limousine, or shove a SS agent, for not taking him to the Capitol. Trump was President. If he wanted to go to the Capitol, he merely had to tell his driver to take him there.
1 person likes this.
Reply 59 - Posted by:
passchendaele 6/29/2022 6:11:16 PM (No. 1201178)
The Examiner just lost a reader.
1 person likes this.
Reply 60 - Posted by:
cThree 6/29/2022 7:52:29 PM (No. 1201240)
Something's not right here.
And the problem has NOTHING to do with President Trump.
1 person likes this.
Reply 61 - Posted by:
cThree 6/29/2022 8:33:39 PM (No. 1201264)
An unsigned editorial represents the whole paper, and this silly bit of scribbling is an indelible stain on the lot of them. A glance at their précis [ www.washingtonexaminer.com/staff ] shows blemishes on the resumes of a number of them, but most have solid conservative cred.
Managing Editor Chris Irvine, just for example: Chris Irvine is managing editor of the Washington Examiner. He began his career across the pond at the Daily Telegraph in London in 2007, working on both the home news and foreign desks. He subsequently moved to the Daily Mail Online, before shipping across the Atlantic with them, and most recently served as the senior news editor at Fox News's digital arm. He graduated from the University of St. Andrews in Scotland with a degree in international relations.
On the other hand, Senior Editor David Mark sticks out: David Mark is a senior editor at the Washington Examiner. Previously, he served as a senior editor at Politico for six years and at CNN Digital Politics, among other roles. He is an author of two books, one on negative campaigning and one on political language co-authored with Chuck McCutcheon. David appears regularly as a political analyst on television. . .
Who knows. It's a lazy, unprofessional piece, and should be signed. And should have been scrapped: That falls on Editor-in-Chief Hugo Gurdon.
1 person likes this.
Reply 62 - Posted by:
judy 6/29/2022 8:35:29 PM (No. 1201266)
Is Washington Examiner owned by NY Times??
1 person likes this.
Reply 63 - Posted by:
cheeflo 6/29/2022 8:45:04 PM (No. 1201272)
Is this some kind of joke?
0 people like this.
Reply 64 - Posted by:
TCloud 6/29/2022 9:16:11 PM (No. 1201291)
It is now *Hands Off* Examiner!
0 people like this.
Reply 65 - Posted by:
Goose 6/30/2022 6:28:40 AM (No. 1201479)
Now do Joe Biden.
0 people like this.
Comments:
The Washington Examiner is a conservative publication. I'm surprised that they would take such a strong stand based on Jan 6 Committee testimony that had no cross examination.