Kyle Rittenhouse Violated the Safari Principle
Conservative Treehouse,
by
Sundance
Original Article
Posted By: earlybird,
11/21/2021 11:08:01 AM
A good article outlining why Kyle Rittenhouse was considered a specifically purposeful target for the regime is written at Powerline Blog by Paul Mirengoff [SEE HERE].
(Snip)we called it “The Safari Principle” narrative; and it surfaced in its most modern form during the George Zimmerman case.
In essence, the underlying elements of the Safari Principle narrative begin with a pretense that victims of the mob, any mob or individual predator, have no one except themselves to blame because they did not follow the rules of the safari. When in the proximity of any person, event or situation that is engaged in an unlawful act supported by the political left, you are
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Knotwyrkin 11/21/2021 11:18:38 AM (No. 984485)
I am sure that safari travelers are protected by back-up staff that have guns (although they are not clearly displayed.) There will come a time when these back-up staff will need to start "taking care" of the animals.
11 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
DVC 11/21/2021 11:24:21 AM (No. 984493)
Blame the victim of a violent leftist mob for 'traveling there', or 'getting out of the car'.....as if violent people have some right not to be looked at, followed or interfered with by normal people.....and if those normal people get hurt or killed by the violent leftist mob, 'it serves them right, he should never have been there'.
But it's perfectly normal, acceptable and even good for a bunch of violent leftists to be breaking laws, rampaging through the area and attacking anyone that dares be in a public space where the rampaging, violent left wants to destroy and harm.
It's a totally wrong, backwards and destructive concept. It's been pushed forward by the leftist street thugs and their media enablers to try to intimidate us all and blame any of us who try to protect ourselves or our communities from these violent mobs.
I won't be seeking them out, but if they come to my neighborhood, I won't hide and I won't run and I will be armed to defend myself and my property.
21 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Birddog 11/21/2021 11:36:54 AM (No. 984514)
It actually predates the Zimmerman case..."Reginald Denny should have stayed in his truck"
At least this "New" version of the Safari Principle...yet again another "Principle" stolen by the Left and turned on it's head.
The Original "Safari Principle" was stated by Robert Ruark in 1952, via "Safari Press"
It was and still is..."Bring enough Gun"
12 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Birddog 11/21/2021 11:37:44 AM (No. 984515)
And in THIS case, Kyle Rittenhouse followed that Rule...it saved his Life.
13 people like this.
Interesting terminology that comes from Sundance sometimes. The young man was visiting his family in Kenosha, what excuse do the rioters have? He also proved during the trial that he knows the laws regarding weapons better than the idiot DA did during the trial. This is an attack on America's right to defend their homes, property, communities from the rioters running amok. That is what this is, and always has been, and shame on the media and the Left for supporting violence against decent citizens.
There is another term I recall they came up with to excuse all the destruction of black owned businesses. It is called ''skin folk, not kin folk'', for they do not consider any minorities who have successful lives to be minorities any longer.
9 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
pearlyjo 11/21/2021 12:06:19 PM (No. 984557)
Well, that helps clear up some questions I have had with recent events in the news. A woman is raped on a train and no one steps up to stop it. Everyone was following the Safari Principle. An elderly Asian woman is knocked to the ground and no one comes to her aid. Safari Principle. School kid gets the crud beat out of them by thugs while a crowd videos it. Safari Principle.
Good to know the name of our national shame.
10 people like this.
What an excellent piece. I'd never heard of the safari principle before, but it's spot on. Great job.
8 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
bad-hair 11/21/2021 12:19:50 PM (No. 984580)
Or as the saying goes "I don't have to outrun the lion. I just have to outrun YOU."
6 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
MDConservative 11/21/2021 12:26:36 PM (No. 984590)
This principle stretches way back, to the security officer at a store who cannot stop shoplifters, the pizza delivery girl who hands over the cash without a word, the convenience store clerk who stands back on company orders while the cash register is cleaned out. The property or money, regardless of value, isn't worth a human life - either that of the perp, bystander or employee/victim. They ought to put stickers up in door windows saying "Help Yourself to the Till" next to the one that disallows firearms in this establishment...unless you're robbing it.
8 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Kumoan 11/21/2021 1:00:15 PM (No. 984634)
Kyle Rittenhouse looks like a kid, and by his age he still is a kid, but he is more man than most and definately has the right stuff.
15 people like this.
Cyanide gas should be the weapon of choice to combat these primitive beasts. This way, yuo just get rid of them all.
4 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
bigfatslob 11/21/2021 1:31:58 PM (No. 984667)
There are options to 'stay in your car don't get out' run over the 'safari participants'. Here's my take on the safari principle 'get off my lawn or you will risk being harvested like a safari animal. You can do anything you want but you can't do it here I stand my ground. Kyle Rittenhouse went 'safari hunting' that's it in a nutshell. The left just loves labels and pretzel twisted wording to make their violence sound lawful and right. I all cases destruction of any kind of property is not lawful or civil it's breaking the law by any excuse they get what they deserve as in the Rittenhouse case. Safari principle be damn it's wrong by any definition.
2 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
JrSample 11/21/2021 1:58:22 PM (No. 984690)
There are exceptions to the Safari Principle; We have the riots in Austin where rioters surrounded the car containing Sgt. Daniel Perry and started beating on it, because he had the temerity to drive down a city street that the animals had claimed as their exclusive habitat. The mob included at least one warped, belligerent cretin with an AK-47 who pointed it at the driver, most likely to force him out of the vehicle to face retribution for violating their claimed territory of a public thoroughfare. The driver's use of deadly force was certainly reasonable.
10 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Strike3 11/21/2021 5:54:16 PM (No. 984856)
However young, naive and inexperienced Rittenhouse was, he DID NOT break the law through any of his actions. The three animals who attacked him DID break the law and they paid a fair price. Self defense is a right of man as much as it is the law of the jungle.
4 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Zarin 11/21/2021 6:18:18 PM (No. 984865)
It is the same as this: the woman who was raped - her skirt was too short.
1 person likes this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Omen55 11/21/2021 10:09:22 PM (No. 985027)
Stay in the car & watch the animals.
0 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
homefry 11/22/2021 8:10:22 AM (No. 985285)
Reply 3 - Posted by: Birddog 11/21/2021 11:36:54 AM (No. 984514)
It actually predates the Zimmerman case..."Reginald Denny should have stayed in his truck"
In that case, he SHOULD have stayed in his truck, and he should have not stopped.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
This was almost impossible to edit into the Intro word limit. We all remember those who said “he should never have gotten out of the car” (George Zimmerman). Now we hear “he should never have gone to Kenosha” (Kyle Rittenhouse). Sundance has interesting things to say about this...