The Obsolete Science Behind Roe v. Wade
Wall Street Journal,
by
Grazie Pozo Christie
Original Article
Posted By: Beardo,
10/29/2021 5:35:05 PM
The Supreme Court will soon reconsider the decision in Roe v. Wade (1973), which made abortion legal in America through all nine months of pregnancy. At that âpoint in the development of manâs knowledge,â as Justice Harry Blackmun put it in Roe, there was simply no consensus about when life begins. In other words, the fetus could not be said with any certainty to be alive and therefore wasnât worthy of legal protection.
As a diagnostic radiologistâwhose youngest patients are fetuses, who are very much aliveâI submitted a friend-of-the-court brief in Dobbs v. Jackson Womenâs Health Organization urging the justices to rethink Roe, a case premised on a claim about science.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
stablemoney 10/29/2021 6:00:07 PM (No. 961031)
15 weeks seems more accurate. Look at any ultrasound. It's not your body after that. There is another body. And the father should have a say.
16 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
mathman 10/29/2021 6:07:34 PM (No. 961044)
Wow. Wow. Again I say WOW.
Is it human? SCOTUS has said, conclusively, that a fetus is not human, and thus has no human rights. This is from a penumbra of an emendation of one of the articles in the Bill of Rights. So the issue cannot be litigated; like Dred Scott and Separate but Equal, the issue has been adjudicated.
So taking the life of the unborn is not murder. And a premium is a tax. And a person who is 15/16 white is actually black. Anyone can make a mistake, but it takes 9 persons in black robes to really mess things up.
SCOTUS has messed up. Their error needs to be corrected.
Life begins at conception.
19 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
udanja99 10/29/2021 6:34:57 PM (No. 961081)
I hope that Blackmun is sitting alongside Splash Kennedy in the Lake of Fire. I also hope that he hears the screams of 60 million (and counting) murdered infants for all eternity.
10 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Vesicant 10/29/2021 6:45:41 PM (No. 961091)
What if we told the libterds that they were aborting future transgenders, and being prochoice was trans exclusionary?
13 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Flyball Dogs 10/29/2021 7:02:51 PM (No. 961102)
My dad has turned very liberal. (Years in the DC suburbs will make you woke.)
He gives liberally to Planned Parenthood and other like-minded organizations.
His granddaughter is pregnant, due in days. A few months ago, I mentioned the baby and called his name. Several hundred miles away, I could feel my dad gaspâŚ. And THINK about what I said. Just letting him know the baby is not âtissue,â but a human and part of our family.
13 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Trigger2 10/30/2021 1:14:45 AM (No. 961266)
Science doesn't matter. The demonrat commies have spoken and they've already manipulated science with Covid.
2 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
LaVallette 10/30/2021 6:34:08 AM (No. 961325)
The entire Abortion edifice is built on a fraudulent scientific assertion from which all the other fraudulent unscientific assertions flow. No dear, at no time, from the very moment of conception until the moments of birth is the child a constituency part of the woodman's body!!!!!!! As to the moment life begins, why at the very beginning of course: the moment of conception.(DUH!!!!!) That is not new science. I learnt that 75 years ago. It is even in the Old Testament. Furthermore. from the moment of conception aprt from providing sustenance and shelter. there is NOTHING, ZERO, NADA that the mother can deliberately add or subtracts from the physical destiny of the new human fixed at the very moment comes into being. The entire IVF Industry is based on that very concept.
2 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
joew9 10/30/2021 8:40:41 AM (No. 961399)
I used to support abortion only during the first trimester. But no longer. I've come to realize the first and foremost function of a civilization is to reproduce at the replacement rate. We aren't even vaguely near the replacement rate. We are on a serious downward trend. The Japanese are in an even worse situation. It looks like it will be the end of the Japanese by about 2050. So now I not only oppose abortion completely but I also oppose all forms of birth control. I still support abortion for women with serious medical conditions to be judged by a panel of experts. Over 40 qualifies as a medical reason. Being a depressed 18 year old does not.
1 person likes this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
snowoutlaw 10/30/2021 9:59:38 AM (No. 961491)
When does life begin? Well from the POV of the future baby it has to be at time of conception. Stopping it any time after conception is taking away that person's one chance to live. Unless you believe that everyone has a Sole and the Sole joins the mass of cells at some time later. Of course the abortion side is not very religious so that isn't their motive.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Beardo"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)