Powerline,
by
Scott Johnson
Original Article
Posted by
unionriverman2316
—
12/15/2019 8:17:10 PM
Post Reply
In a February 2018 memo that earned him noting but opprobrium and abuse, Rep. Devin Nunes laid out the truth of the FISA abuse underlying the Obama administration’s surveillance of the Trump campaign. Rep. Adam Schiff disputed the Nunes memo with a competing memo of his own. Following the Department of Justice Inspector General report issued last week by Michael Horowitz, however, Schiff has been incapacitated from keeping up this particular ruse.
We have come to know Schiff as something of a pathological liar. Nunes now seeks to conduct an intervention.
Town Hall,
by
Katie Pavlich
Original Article
Posted by
unionriverman2316
—
12/4/2019 5:15:44 PM
Post Reply
Speaking during a House Judiciary Committee hearing Wednesday morning, George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley called out Democrats and fellow members of the panel for moving forward with impeachment because "everyone is mad." “I get it. You're mad. The president's mad. My Republican friends are mad. My Democratic friends are mad. My wife is mad. My kids are mad. Even my dog seems mad and Luna is a golden-doodle and they don't get mad. Wide headline split *
Powerline,
by
John Hinderaker
Original Article
Posted by
unionriverman2316
—
12/3/2019 7:31:17 AM
Post Reply
A sign of the times, that historians one day will puzzle over: Psychiatrists Organize Campaign to Declare Trump ‘Dangerous,’ Back Impeachment. The campaign involves the usual suspects:
Psychiatrists with the World Mental Health Coalition are soliciting signatures in a campaign to support the impeachment of President Donald Trump predicated on claims that he is mentally unstable.
Or, put another way, on the ground that he is a Republican.
In an email forwarded to PJ Media, three psychiatrists with the coalition ask other psychiatrists to sign on to a petition to the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee to include a statement on Trump’s supposed mental instability into the official record of the impeachment inquiry.
Rush Limbaugh.com,
by
Rush Limbaugh
Original Article
Posted by
unionriverman2316
—
12/3/2019 6:55:33 AM
Post Reply
RUSH: Did you see that the Drive-Bys actually fired a reporter? I didn’t even know Newsweek was around. I guess Newsweek is a Web only thing now since magazines are in such dire straits. But there was an infobabe for Newsweek. What’s her name? Jessica Kwong, K-w-o-n-g. Jessica Kwong tweeted on Wednesday, “How is Trump Spending Thanksgiving? Tweeting, Golfing, and More.” Of course, how did Obama spend holidays? He golfed, and he golfed, and he hung around liberals on Martha’s Vineyard, and then he golfed — and with Obama golf?
Rush Limbaugh.com,
by
Rush Limbaugh
Original Article
Posted by
unionriverman2316
—
11/27/2019 7:57:31 AM
Post Reply
RUSH: So given that this is happening, yesterday I offered Pelosi a way out of this. I gave her a philosophical way out, and that is to say that, while the evidence is overwhelming and we all know that Trump is scum and we know that he attempted to meddle and we know that he attempted to investigate his own opponent, we know, we know, we know, we know, we still have to deal with partisan Republican bigots who happen to run the Senate. And there’s no way that they’re going to join us in agreement that Trump needs to go.
In fact, he’s gonna be acquitted.
Powerline,
by
Paul Mirengoff
Original Article
Posted by
unionriverman2316
—
11/20/2019 9:45:32 AM
Post Reply
House Democrats reportedly are considering whether to pursue in their impeachment inquiry matters arising from the Mueller investigation. Specifically, they are looking at whether President Trump lied to Robert Mueller.
The Washington Post’s report on this development is based on representations made by House Democrats to the federal appeals court in Washington, D.C. The Dems told the court that they need secret grand jury evidence from the Mueller probe to be released in order to consider, as part of their impeachment inquiry, whether Trump lied to Mueller.
Salem Media,
by
Tom Knighton
Original Article
Posted by
unionriverman2316
—
11/18/2019 8:41:01 AM
Post Reply
With Santa Clarita not even a distant memory, anti-gun voices are already using it to demand more gun control. Even before the facts were known, Sen. Dick Blumenthal demanded the Senate capitulate to his whims and pass a universal background check bill that wouldn’t have done anything to prevent the shooting as far as anyone can tell.
This is normal for anti-gunners. They routinely prattle about how we need more gun control after a mass shooting.
However, Santa Clarita is in California, the most gun controlled state in the nation.
Powerline,
by
Steven Hayward
Original Article
Posted by
unionriverman2316
—
11/18/2019 8:18:05 AM
Post Reply
The New York Times today took after FedEx for the sin of having a low corporate tax bill. Sample:
FedEx reaped big savings [from the Trump tax cut], bringing its effective tax rate from 34 percentin fiscal year 2017 to less than zero in fiscal year 2018, meaning that, overall, the government technically owed it money. But it did not increase investment in new equipment and other assets in the fiscal year that followed, as Mr. Smith said businesses like his would. . .
Fred Smith, the founder and CEO of FedEx, decided to punch back twice as hard:
Powerline,
by
Paul Mirengoff
Original Article
Posted by
unionriverman2316
—
11/15/2019 9:40:57 AM
Post Reply
In an unflattering column about President Trump called “Incompetence is not an impeachable offense,” Marc Thiessen writes:
What we saw on display Wednesday were two dedicated, experienced career foreign policy officials who had been desperately trying to figure out what the president wanted — and inferring his intentions based on snippets of information from others. But their efforts to divine Trump’s desires presume that the president knew what he wanted.
It’s not clear he did. His handling of Ukraine seemed less the execution of an intelligible plan than a chaotic mishmash of constantly changing urges and demands.
Powerline,
by
Paul Mirengoff
Original Article
Posted by
unionriverman2316
—
11/13/2019 10:04:34 PM
Post Reply
I was able to watch the first hour and a half of today’s impeachment hearing until a prior, far more enjoyable commitment took precedence. I saw the opening statements of Adam Schiff and Devin Nunes, plus the opening statements of today’s two witnesses, George Kent and Bill Taylor.
Here are my impressions:
Schiff devoted his opening statement to a summary of what he says the evidence will show. He presented his statement in measured-sounding tones, a welcome departure from his previous attempt to put words in President Trump’s mouth.
Most of the facts Schiff presented are supported by documents and/or testimony.
Powerline,
by
Scott Johnson
Original Article
Posted by
unionriverman2316
—
11/13/2019 8:18:38 AM
Post Reply
Today the House Intelligence Committee holds its first public hearings in the Schiff show. The Schiff show is a sort of preface to the impeachment article(s) that the House will send over to the Senate before the end of the year. Something’s happening here. Why is the House Intelligence Committee holding impeachment hearings in search of a high crime or misdemeanor?
The structure of the production has struck me from the beginning as a variation of the Russia hoax that consumed the first two-plus years of the Trump administration. The Ukraine matter is to usher in the end of the Trump era by hook or by crook.
Town Hall,
by
Kurt Schlichter
Original Article
Posted by
unionriverman2316
—
11/11/2019 8:48:05 AM
Post Reply
Name the Democrat who is super-excited to have Michael Bloomberg barge into the Dem primaries like some nutty ex-girlfriend who gave you crabs popping in at your wedding. Where is the groundswell of support behind this pint-sized presidential aspirant? Perhaps the Democratic consultants who didn’t sign up with one of the other goofy candidates are happy. The micro-zillionaire may not have charisma or a vision or actual human support, but he’s got endless bucks to squander on electoral parasites.
Comments:
WaPo has moved beyond childishness......into the utterly ridiculous!