2020 Dems warm to expanding Supreme Court
Politico,
by
Burgess Everett
&
Marianne Levine
Original Article
Posted By: NorthernDog,
3/18/2019 12:09:49 PM
After watching Mitch McConnell transform the judiciary over the past four years, liberals are demanding a bold response. And Democrats are listening. Sens. Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren and Kirsten Gillibrand told POLITICO they would not rule out expanding the Supreme Court if elected president, showcasing a new level of interest in the Democratic field on an issue that has until recently remained on the fringes of debate. The surprising openness from White House hopefuls along with other prominent Senate Democrats to making sweeping changes — from adding seats to the high court to imposing term limits on judges and
FDR tried to enlarge it to 12. Demonrats are always trying to game the system
26 people like this.
Real American “normals” (of any race/ethnicity/whatever) basically don’t vote Democrat anymore ... so Dems have to play tricks and move goalposts to hold onto their ever eroding power. Maybe they should just rein in their left-flank instead? Oh right, that’s all they seem to have left!
13 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Ben Around 3/18/2019 12:29:20 PM (No. 4818)
Oh I see, Trump is a dictator by exceeding his Constitutional powers. The democrats would expand the Supreme Court by executive fiat. The hypocrisy just keeps growing beyond anything I ever thought possible.
13 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
dman 3/18/2019 12:31:09 PM (No. 4816)
The "silent coup" / "cold" civil war rages on.
What will be the trigger that turns this cold war .. hot?
Pray for our country.
20 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
curious1 3/18/2019 12:33:02 PM (No. 4805)
#4, buy stock in rope manufacturers and ammo makers, as well as their upstream suppliers.
9 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
WV.Hillbilly 3/18/2019 12:34:22 PM (No. 4814)
And for those still butthurt about Garland, their sainted Senator Robert Byrd (D-KKK) once said, "There is no stipulation in the Constitution as to how the Senate is to express its advice or give its consent. President Bush incorrectly — incorrectly — maintains that each nominee for a federal judgeship is entitled to an up or down vote. The Constitution itself does not say that each nominee is entitled to an up or down vote. The Constitution doesn’t say that, it doesn’t even say that there has to be a vote with respect to the giving of its consent. The Senate can refuse to confirm a nominee simply by saying nothing and doing nothing."
15 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
JunkYardDog 3/18/2019 12:37:47 PM (No. 4823)
The Democrats are desperate to regain power-so desperate that they have abandoned all pretense and have exposed themselves for the totalitarians they have always been. They claim they are working in everyone´s best interests, but their end game is a reduction in individual freedoms and elimination of 1st and 2nd Amendment rights. To hell with the Democrats-MIND YOUR OWN DAMN BUSINESS.
16 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Condor44 3/18/2019 12:51:54 PM (No. 4815)
Unbelievable. I have never seen a reaction like this from a party that lost an election. They have been and are, acting like kindergartners.
17 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
trackman999 3/18/2019 1:10:42 PM (No. 4812)
#1 Actually , FDR tried to get 6 more justices for a total of 15.
10 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
GoodDeal 3/18/2019 1:12:46 PM (No. 4824)
Another attempt to take control of something to stack the deck in their favor. Sorry, not gonna happen.
9 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Ida Lou Pino 3/18/2019 1:16:44 PM (No. 4813)
Any moonbat leftist who wants to be a Supreme Court justice - - should be a Supreme Court justice.
It´s not fair to deny them their desires.
11 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
DVC 3/18/2019 1:19:52 PM (No. 4809)
Very, very unlikely to get off of square one. Tried by FDR, will not happen.
6 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Eagle4ever 3/18/2019 1:30:44 PM (No. 4807)
Let´s do it first. Then see the Dem´s reaction.
9 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Eagle4ever 3/18/2019 1:32:42 PM (No. 4822)
Sorry #8, didn´t read all commentary.
7 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
SALady 3/18/2019 1:58:02 PM (No. 4808)
President Trump needs to say that that is a great idea that the Demon-rats came up with, and do it now!!!!
Appoint 6 more pure conservative justices and watch the lie-berals have a mass suicide!!!!!
Then the new Supreme Court could declare this action to be unconstitutional, and then the Demon-rats couldn´t pull this stunt again in the future!!!!
22 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
bighambone 3/18/2019 6:34:24 PM (No. 4806)
Whatever the Democrats propose to do, you can bet your boots that the change will benefit the Democrat political chances of succeeding legislatively, through their lawfare initiatives, and on Election Day. As ridiculous as it sounds, you can also safely bet that there are bound to be some wimpy Republicans (RINOs) who would be pleased as punch to go along.
7 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
bad-hair 3/18/2019 6:58:42 PM (No. 4821)
Like it #16. Expand SOTU to 225 justices and appoint 205 of them for life!
6 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
red1066 3/18/2019 7:22:18 PM (No. 4817)
If it´s anti-American and anti-Constitution one can count on the demosluts being all for it.
7 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "NorthernDog"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
As if their naked Partisan power-play won´t be noticed. Yeah - just add 6 more - if a Democrat wins in 2020.