House passes election law overhaul in
response to Jan. 6
Associated Press,
by
Mary Clare Jalonick
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
9/21/2022 5:43:48 PM
WASHINGTON— The House has passed legislation to overhaul the rules for certifying the results of a presidential election as lawmakers accelerate their response to the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection and Donald Trump’s failed attempt to remain in power.
The bill, which is similar to bipartisan legislation moving through the Senate, would overhaul an arcane 1800s-era statute known as the Electoral Count Act that governs, along with the U.S. Constitution, how states and Congress certify electors and declare presidential election winners.
While that process has long been routine and ceremonial, Trump and a group of his aides and lawyers unsuccessfully tried to exploit loopholes in the law
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Bmoc 9/21/2022 6:01:31 PM (No. 1284137)
Right. This is a move to crucify Republicans.
FTA:
Hoyer called the Republican opposition a “rationalization of what I believe is treason. ... It was rationalized then, and sadly it is being rationalized now.”
18 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
formerNYer 9/21/2022 6:05:16 PM (No. 1284142)
Uniparty rides again
28 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Right Time 9/21/2022 6:07:36 PM (No. 1284144)
I bet the law says “Only Democrats and Tame RINOS Shall Be Certified as Having Won ANY Election.”
29 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Birddog 9/21/2022 6:09:33 PM (No. 1284146)
An "arcane" outdated Law that should have KEPT them from doing what they did, illegally, in 2020(at least a dozen states have already passed laws, and made rulings to insure it never happens again), and one that provided a way to challenge their attempts... and still does , unless they over rule and replace it.
They keep calling the Trump team "challenges" to the Unprecedented changes and privatization of elections, balloting, even the counting of ballots that had NOT been approved by State Legislatures..."Unprecedented and debunked election lies"...but the constitution itself describes the process, and those that wrote it predicted "Someone" would make attempts to pervert elections, and provided for the means and methods to sort out multiple lists of electors sent from any individual or several states..
If what they did was "LEGAL", they would not NEED to be changing the laws after the fact.
27 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
GoodDeal 9/21/2022 6:13:11 PM (No. 1284150)
What a load of lies and propaganda. Whatever they are passing now can be repealed later, or be found unconstitutional. That arcane Constitution needs to be done away with too while they are at it. The country is being destroyed in front of our very eyes in broad daylight. No one can stop it.
19 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
kono 9/21/2022 6:46:43 PM (No. 1284168)
AP shows, yet again, why they've earned the satirical nickname, "American Pravda", promoting the Left's narrative instead of reporting factual material. Distorting the workings of our Constitutional Republic, along with the intentions behind those and the nature of the changes that the Left pathologically pursue.
13 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Venturer 9/21/2022 6:47:44 PM (No. 1284169)
Steny Hoyer is merely a mouthpiece for Nancy Pelosi. he never had an original thought in his life and has been sucking the Government teat forever. Th Democrats want to change the law so they can run roughshod over republicans. If anyone is guilty of treason it is the democrats and their party which destroyed the legal votes in America.
By the way the Associated Press is another Democrat owned faction and biased as it gets. Just another part of the corrupt media.
14 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Heil Liberals 9/21/2022 7:00:11 PM (No. 1284177)
Gotta get everything in place for Steal the Election, Part Dux.
18 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
FunOne 9/21/2022 7:01:28 PM (No. 1284178)
Nothing on restricting voter pool to US citizens?
Nothing on voter ID--one person, one vote.
Protection against voter fraud?
13 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
BluesClues 9/21/2022 7:02:21 PM (No. 1284179)
Seems they are actually saying January 6 was totally legal. If the process around certification of electoral college needed to be "clarified", it means that there was nothing illegal or "treasonous" by following the process as previously defined. Can't have it both ways.
12 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
davew 9/21/2022 7:04:16 PM (No. 1284181)
This law appears to be unconstitutional because it violates the Elections clause.
Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors.
It directs the Legislature to only accept the popular vote count in all cases and without exception to determine the number of electors. This makes the clause moot since the Legislature no longer has the power to direct how the electors are determined as proscribed in the Constitution.
12 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
udanja99 9/21/2022 7:04:57 PM (No. 1284183)
I won’t click on anything by AP. Did they happen to mention Hillary’s campaign to get electors to change their votes in 2016? No, didn’t think so.
9 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
leonardo 9/21/2022 7:05:23 PM (No. 1284184)
Nothing unexpected here in the biased reporting from American Pravda.
No firearms were detected by authorities yet AP and Captain Demento still call it an "insurrection." Remember that the Party responsible for all the "insurrection" name-calling, and the FAKE committee, is the Party of Slavery.
6 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
BarryNo 9/21/2022 7:06:51 PM (No. 1284185)
Liars will always lie. This doesn't trump the Constitution. We will repay treachery.
3 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
TJ54 9/21/2022 7:13:59 PM (No. 1284188)
LOL - I remember 2016 when Hildabeast was searching for Faithless Electors to turn on President Trump. She’s still an election denier!
9 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 9/21/2022 7:32:30 PM (No. 1284194)
No, Mary Claire, President Trump and the MAGA Party were victims of election FRAUD and that "arcane" law provides a simple remediation of the issue through due process within the Congress. Hardly as bad as you and scared leftist, anti-America Demonrats think it is.
5 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 9/21/2022 8:59:57 PM (No. 1284239)
All they do is protect themselves. In the end there will be no way to challenge an election. In the end we lose our representative government.
1 person likes this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
sterling431 9/21/2022 9:25:46 PM (No. 1284249)
How about adding this simple rule- “Every President will have a cognitive test administered as part of his/her annual physical, of which the results will be publicly released.” Makes sense since many elected presidents are elderly.
1 person likes this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Jesuslover54 9/21/2022 10:02:52 PM (No. 1284265)
The real insurrection.
1 person likes this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
doctorfixit 9/21/2022 10:37:51 PM (No. 1284272)
Fake News Ass Press Propaganda Anything that Congress does is to enhance the corruption and illegitimacy of US elections.
1 person likes this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
curious1 9/22/2022 9:07:08 PM (No. 1285251)
And bring suit in SCOTUS to have it overturned as unconstitutional. The state legislatures set the rules, per the constitution, not the feddies.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)