Report: Facebook Suppressed Breitbart
News Traffic by Twenty Percent
Breitbart,
by
Allum Bokhari
Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought,
10/25/2021 1:16:13 AM
The Wall Street Journal has published internal material from anonymous sources at Facebook revealing that the company introduced tools that suppressed the traffic of Breitbart News by 20 percent, and other conservative publishers by double-digit margins.
The company introduced two tools after the 2016 election that disproportionately harmed conservative publishers. The Journal highlights internal Facebook research showing that if both tools were removed, it would increase traffic to Breitbart News by 20 percent, the Washington Times by 18 percent, Western Journal by 16 percent, and the Epoch Times by 11 percent. Facebook eventually removed one of the tools while keeping the other
Reply 1 - Posted by:
DVC 10/25/2021 1:22:01 AM (No. 956558)
It's FAKEbook....
25 people like this.
All revelations that should result in the breakup of the company, except of course that Fakebook is a data collection arm of the FedGov. Just one of many tentacles that the NSA and a hundred other agencies use to collect every conceivable piece of data on the peasantry.
26 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Otis Gill 10/25/2021 6:43:16 AM (No. 956625)
So the woke Wall Street Journal is reporting on Marxist Facebook's censoring and manipulation. That's not much of a story.
How about a story about who gave the order forbidding Breitbart from covering voter fraud and why?
30 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
TCloud 10/25/2021 8:46:27 AM (No. 956702)
Facebook, the super highway for coms for Liberal Coms. They booted me off two years ago for *gun talk*!
9 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
qr4j 10/25/2021 9:40:22 AM (No. 956754)
Only 20 percent? FB programmers must be falling down on the job. Too many latte breaks or too many naps in their office nesting pods.
5 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Analyn 10/25/2021 9:54:00 AM (No. 956772)
Not a surprise. Facebook's gonna Facebook.
4 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 10/25/2021 10:04:21 AM (No. 956784)
Always knew there were certain Conservative news sites that would never appear in searches. You had to specifically go to them. This is proof. Don't support criminal organizations. Shun Fakebook and all others of their ilk. That includes our government.
6 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
thehutchcom 10/25/2021 10:10:16 AM (No. 956794)
Excuse me, but aren't all of these companies for-profits seeing 20% of their profits being destroyed by an external company that claims it is not doing that? This isn't some whimsical "oh, look how biased" subject for discussion, this is "file a lawsuit for damages" time. Those facial-pierced, blue-haired vegans may think it's funny to turn off the traffic to someone they don't like, but maybe the loss of millions of dollars in a settlement may cause them to realize there are consequences.
4 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
ROLFNader 10/25/2021 10:21:44 AM (No. 956810)
Is this act NOT out-and-out theft?
3 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
mizzmac 10/25/2021 10:27:26 AM (No. 956817)
"Faceblock" is nothing more than the unofficial deep state censor/propagandist/spying system. There is no other reason for its existence.
8 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Zigrid 10/25/2021 10:27:53 AM (No. 956819)
Well this is interesting...another of my posts eliminated by lucianne...looks like Jonah has hired a spy to cancel our posts he/she/whoever doesn't like...keep it up...I'll be going to President Trump's social media site at Truth.com...you are going to lose your posters....
1 person likes this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
clayusmcret 10/25/2021 10:34:02 AM (No. 956826)
If you've got a current FB account, whether you use it or not, you support their efforts to censor conservatives and conservative media. Simply having the account confirms acceptance of its intolerance and using the account confirms active support. There's no such thing as having an open account but disagreeing with their policies. Same goes for the other leftist social media platforms.
3 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
cor-vet 10/25/2021 10:38:11 AM (No. 956832)
I'm 78+ and grew up without farcebook, tweeter and the whole social media thing. I'm still surviving without them, so NSA/ the government will have to spy on me through my TV, which is on less than 30 min a day or listening in on the phone conversation or reading my texts/ emails. The fact that I frequently forget my phone, means they get a lot of ear fulls of nothing. Unfortunately, my middle age kids and teen grandkids are addicted. The addiction to social media is as harmful as an opoid addiction, in my opinion.
8 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
MickTurn 10/25/2021 6:29:45 PM (No. 957274)
SUE Fakebook...20% surpression, 20% of revenue lost...
0 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
broken01 10/26/2021 5:26:14 AM (No. 957565)
Breitbart banned me after I called the ex-FLOTUS Michelle Obama Han Solo’s co-pilot. This was a response to a fool calling then FLOTUS the very beautiful and gracious Melania Trump another name for a prostitute. I even pleaded my case but to no avail. The site has went downhill since Andrew died. Now as far as Farce Broke is concerned. It’s a garbage site and it turns out that Priscilla Chan’s jerk husband paid millions from the earning of that platform to help FJB become president. That site, the owner and his Chicom wife can GTH.
0 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Muguy 10/26/2021 5:37:25 AM (No. 957571)
Fakebook IS "BIG BROTHER"
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)