A Time for Courage on the
Supreme Court
Ethics and Public Policy Center,
by
Cárter Snead
Original Article
Posted By: Moritz55,
5/23/2021 8:56:14 AM
On May 17, the United States Supreme Court reconsidered a prior precedent that for nearly six decades shamefully denied the equal protection of the law to an entire segment of the human family. The year was 1954, the case was Brown v. Board of Education and the precedent overruled was Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), which for 58 years had allowed states to engage in “separate but equal” discrimination on the basis of race. On May 17, 2021, the Court agreed to hear a dispute regarding a younger line of precedents—namely, Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)
Reply 1 - Posted by:
mathman 5/23/2021 9:57:23 AM (No. 794231)
There will be no courage from SCOTUS. Forget it.
SCOTUS is composed of nine lifetime career bureaucrats. They are not about to give up their lives for some abstract idea of truth. The truth is that they are set for life, answer to no one, and can do as they please. The locations of their homes are known to the Mob. Antifa and BLM will end their lives and the lives of their families if they step out of line.
Democratic "Leaders" will not intervene. No troops will protect them. They have no defense.
A summer of burning, looting, and murdering has resulted in no indictments, no trials, no jail time, no justice.
There is no hope in SCOTUS. None.
The nine fools in black robes will simply not issue a ruling.
They will pass.
16 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Maggie2u 5/23/2021 10:04:22 AM (No. 794238)
On the road to destroying Western Civilization, the destructors probably thought the hardest thing they could do was to convince women to kill their children. It turned out that was the easiest. The rest was downhill all the way. That homosexuality was normal, that anyone could change their sex and the next will be removing all laws that protect children from people we now call sexual predators and pedophiles. I'm sure the slogans to make this normal are all ready to print out to attack those who will fight against it.
16 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Buzzman 5/23/2021 10:08:12 AM (No. 794243)
There will be no courage on the Supreme Court until John Roberts is replaced. He's a coward.
18 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
MDConservative 5/23/2021 10:24:10 AM (No. 794260)
Those three "originalist" Trump justices now means it's in the bag, right?
Can't wait to hear McConnell say if the GOPe had the Senate, House and White House he could do something...
2 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Cindiana 5/23/2021 11:37:58 AM (No. 794366)
Okay, ACB, this is your moment to shine. I just wish I knew which camp she's more interested in supporting. Talk is cheap, Missy.
2 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
WhamDBambam 5/23/2021 11:58:20 AM (No. 794393)
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
1 person likes this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
SkeezerMcGee 5/23/2021 12:24:44 PM (No. 794429)
TRUE: "First, the right to abortion has no grounding in the text or history of the United States Constitution or the American legal tradition."
TRUE: "Later, the Court in Casey significantly modified the rule and rationale of Roe, but to date it has still refused to uphold the constitutionality of any restriction on abortion as such. Instead, the Court has permitted only very minor side constraints, such as informed consent, waiting periods, mandatory parental involvement and bans on particularly grisly and controversial procedures (e.g., “partial-birth abortion“)."
FALSE: "States remain confused about the scope of their authority, given the muddled state of abortion jurisprudence, and any restriction on abortion becomes tied up in years-long litigation before it receives an ultimate answer from the Supreme Court."
Some State legislatures that dislike abortions purposely ignore the Supreme Court's abortion decisions, and they are NOT CONFUSED by Roe and/or Casey.
TRUE: Second, Roe and Casey have been corrosive of the rule of law, blurring the distinction between interpreting and making law, . . ."
TRUE: "And the Roe/Casey jurisprudence has recently been applied to preclude the adoption of even very modest and popular restrictions on abortion, such as the law at issue in Dobbs, which bans abortions after 15 weeks."
PREDICTION: The Court is going to do the same in the current case by holding that some of the abortion restrictions in the subject Mississippi statute violate the U.S. Constitution.
1 person likes this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Bur Oak 5/23/2021 1:14:12 PM (No. 794479)
The Supreme (not of the USA) Court will confirm their cowardice and give their approval of the continued killing of human life.
2 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Zeek Wolfe 5/23/2021 1:19:51 PM (No. 794487)
The American judiciary has essentially become an arm of the Democrat Party not unlike the ACLU, Antifa and BLM. Important decisions are preordained. So, if you are a conservative or simply a straight thinking person, logical and a believer in true American values, you already know how the court will rule. It will not be in your favor.
1 person likes this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Philipsonh 5/23/2021 2:39:16 PM (No. 794540)
The Supreme Court has little to NO credibility, after the Obamacare decision and the fact they refused to take on the stolen election litigation. A few of the justices are fantastic, the rest scum.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Moritz55"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)