ODNI LINK 53 HPSCI Transcripts
DNI.gov,
by
The United States Intelligence Community (IC)
Original Article
Posted By: Daydreamer20,
5/7/2020 9:21:17 PM
53 HPSCI Transcripts
The United States Intelligence Community (IC), at the bipartisan request of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), reviewed 53 transcripts for classification. The IC made appropriate redactions, lowering the classification level of all 53 transcripts to UNCLASSIFIED. Each transcript can be accessed by clicking on the names below.
Posted with permission of Staff.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Evocatus 5/7/2020 9:59:42 PM (No. 404435)
This is amazing! An end run around Adam Schiff! It's good to see that someone has the testicular fortitude to release these.
75 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
earlybird 5/7/2020 10:33:59 PM (No. 404455)
Ric Grenell wrote Schiff several days ago saying they had been cleared for release. He added a note that if Schiff wasn’t prepared to release them, he would do so.
I am crazy about Ric Grenell!!!
98 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
curious1 5/7/2020 11:06:24 PM (No. 404477)
Looking at the Hope Hicks interview, why would the committee chairman's name be redacted in the interview?
39 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Axeman 5/8/2020 12:53:42 AM (No. 404528)
This is a lot of reading, I am only half way through Susan Rice, but the connections to what we now know are getting much more clear already.
34 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
weejun 5/8/2020 6:42:24 AM (No. 404676)
I started with Rice as well, #5. Besides trying to not retch every time her lawyer interrupts, I loved this little gem:
"Gowdy: When did you first learn of Russia efforts to interfere with or influence the 2016 election cycle?
Rice: My recollection is that my first indication of that was through press reporting in June of 2016 when the first reports came out of the DNC hacks."
And based on that, Rice asked the Intelligence Community to provide their best understanding of what this was about. That the NSA would use press reporting to energize the IC is somewhat scary, but, hey, we're talking Democrat hacks here, so why am I surprised?
33 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Judy W. 5/8/2020 7:06:37 AM (No. 404693)
I'm reading Brad Parscale's interview. It is hilarious. The questioners don't know anything about business and he has to explain every little detail. They can't even keep his name straight. They can't figure out why Trump would choose him, not knowing Trump is a first-rate talent-spotter. Parscale is a really smart, quick guy, but he's basically a country boy, so they have exchanges like this: Q: Did you ever have discussions about having Cambridge come and work with the campaign in toto in your office?
Parscale: I don't know, what is toto?
Q: In toto, t-o-t-o.
Parscale: I think toto, I think of Kansas. So I don't know what you mean by that.
Then there are the frequent questions about Russia, which Parscale expects since he has read everything, but had no idea of at the time. And attempts to get him to say the campaign targeted specific groups like white men, but they didn't so he just says no to each one. And then says the RNC did all the targeting. I'm only a fraction through this. Wish I had time to read them all. Impression: the Dems are morons.
36 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Paperpuncher 5/8/2020 7:32:32 AM (No. 404720)
Went straight to the Roger Stone interview. Stopped at page 50 due to time. All I can say is wow. Stone was sharp and concise and as expected the dems were doing their best to twist his straight up answers. I will go back to it later.
18 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
3XALADY 5/8/2020 7:45:31 AM (No. 404739)
@8 Roger Stone was on Coast to Coast radio with George Noory a couple of nights ago. I intended to listen to the interview but fell asleep until 1/2 hour before it was over. You can help him by signing the petition at freerogerstone.com. I want to get the book Stone wrote on the Kennedy assassination, GN said it was the best one he'd seen on that subject.
11 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
GO3 5/8/2020 8:03:08 AM (No. 404765)
#6, you know what else is scary? That one of the alphabets used press reports to build a case for Obama's Fast and Furious. Think about that one.
20 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
hurricanegirl 5/8/2020 8:11:18 AM (No. 404786)
#6 and #11: Apparently using the press as "evidence" and "reliable witnesses" is par for the course for these corrupt fools. They report on reporters reporting on other reporters and then someone says, "Aha! We need to investigate these reporters reporting on what these other reporters said!"
And then there's the whole thing about the NYT and the WaPo being extensions of corrupt government agencies, so all in all, it's like a "secret" way to communicate between government officials--all in plain sight! SPIT!!!
33 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
gone2pot 5/8/2020 8:45:54 AM (No. 404845)
I would REALLY like to know what they had prepared to destroy Bob Harwood, had he said yes to the national security adviser position before Flynn, because those preparations EXIST and it matters. Someone like Stzrok has it somewhere and there are also illegal plans the deep state has right now, waiting to spring load on any person at all times. That is what these 53 documents reveal beyond the criminal activities of Rice, et al. WHERE is the deep state vault, file cabinet, server, whatever where a whole lot more plans are waiting to be launched against others because one thing is for certain, THEY EXIST and they WILL launch them whenever they want. Why? Because there are no consequences and never will be for the now open and revealed criminal activity of these 53 deep state members, only rewards.
15 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
rsgonner 5/8/2020 8:57:41 AM (No. 404856)
I may be naive, but it seems that the actions of many of these people fit the definition of sedition. It is not enough that they be disbarred or lose their pension. They need to be tried and if convicted serve prison time.
43 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Arby 5/8/2020 9:00:40 AM (No. 404860)
Justice and fortitude and tenacity have a new name: Grenell. My new main man. Look at what can be accomplished when you have the stones to do it. Go get 'em, baby. Let justice reign though the heavens fall.
29 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Lawsy0 5/8/2020 9:15:56 AM (No. 404869)
Are the orange jumpsuits on special order for the short fat cons and the tall skinny ones? I know a jailhouse provider in North Carolina that will do you proud on the quality of items NOT made in the United States instead of China.
8 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy 5/8/2020 9:16:54 AM (No. 404870)
Holy croak. There's a lot of stuff here to read. I started with the McCabe testimony. Wow. Definitely painted himself into a corner.
9 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
tyshab 5/8/2020 9:26:14 AM (No. 404880)
Keep reading and while you are at it — take pix of interesting parts and post to whatever social media you are on! We must get this out to the public who won’t take time to read all of these.
20 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
ussjimmycarter 5/8/2020 11:44:43 AM (No. 405050)
Glad these are finally in public and we don't have to rely on the Lamestreams to find out what happened. I, for one, will be reading everything!
6 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
bad-hair 5/8/2020 12:51:38 PM (No. 405144)
Why is Grennell a stand-in and NOT up for the permanent job. Could it be that he's gay and the Democrats would attack him for that ? Keep releasing this stuff and firing swamp people as long as you can Mr. Grenell and thank you for your service.
3 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
NotaBene 5/8/2020 12:57:47 PM (No. 405153)
Roger Stone was convicted of lying to Congress. Could we do some od the Socialist-Democrats now?
2 people like this.
I want to be invited to the
NECKTIE PARTY!
Not a lynching..justifiable hanging!
That’ll put an end to this coup!
3 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
joew9 5/8/2020 8:25:36 PM (No. 405465)
Bi-Partisan? From the House? No way. Something's fishy. There's no way a Democrat would agree unless there is nothing there. Don't get your hopes up. This sounds like it's going to be bull. The redactions are probably going to make this unreadable junk and the Dems will spin what's behind the redaction to mean something other than what is really there.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Daydreamer20"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
ALL, please. We want them all!