Trump raid not about classified documents
— it’s about Jan. 6
New York Post,
by
Andrew C. McCarthy
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
8/10/2022 9:35:23 AM
The court-authorized search of former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate is another unmistakable signal that the Justice Department is trying to build a criminal case against him arising out of the Capitol riot.
Ostensibly, the search relates to a long simmering dispute between the former president and the government over Trump’s potentially illegal retention and mishandling of classified information. But don’t be deceived.
National Archives officials alerted the Justice Department months ago regarding missing records and possible classified information violations.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
FJB 2022 23 24 8/10/2022 9:49:38 AM (No. 1243729)
Yeah I believe it is about J6. Liz C more or less gave it away when she said there would be even more evidence to come when their next session starts. Yep, had to get the FBI to manufacture more crap so she can pursue her persecution obsession of Trump. Well it is NOT going to work, you witch, it is already backfiring "bigly"! FLC!!!
23 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
MDConservative 8/10/2022 9:57:02 AM (No. 1243742)
And one can opine that the battle at Gettysburg was all about the town, too. J6 is not what any of this "is about". It's about '24 and the potential return of FPDT to the White House - and the (mythical) UNIPARTY won't have that. This is a political cage match to the death, a real life Armageddon. Whatever it takes will be done. That (mythical) UNIPARTY invested heavily in removing PDT in '20, even fixing "upset" election results in SIX REPUBLICAN STATES without significant legislative review BEFORE electors were certified. That investment will not be allowed to circle any drain - it wasn't cheap.
11 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Highlander 8/10/2022 9:59:50 AM (No. 1243750)
I read this 55 years ago when I was in college. Ayn Rand was a huge influence on my budding political development and still is.
"When you see that in order
to produce, you need to
obtain permission from men
who produce nothing - When
you see that money is flowing
to those who deal, not in
goods, but in favors - When
you see that men get richer
by graft and by pull than by
work, and your laws don't
protect you against them, but
protect them against you -
When you see corruption being rewarded and
honesty becoming a self-sacrifice - You may
know that your society is doomed."
Ayn Rand,
Atlas Shrugged, 1957“
41 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Quigley 8/10/2022 10:15:51 AM (No. 1243767)
Would you believe the dog ate my homework? No? How about the wind blew it out of my back pack? No? What about a squirrel grabbed it out of my hand and ran up a tree with it?
There is no plan, no principle, just scorched earth. Burn down everything possible and then see if anything sticks. Maybe they’ll find a dress in Melania’s closet by a Russian designer.
They have nothing other than complete control of law enforcement- no evidence, no crime, no theory- and they won’t stop shooting until they are pulled out of their positions.
14 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
winmag 8/10/2022 10:43:50 AM (No. 1243799)
I don't think they ever want a trial where discovery would expose Pelosi, Epps, mayor of DC, thousands of hours of video yet unseen and a lot of exculpatory testimony.
8 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
john56 8/10/2022 10:48:38 AM (No. 1243806)
Reports say that Biden's Stasi (FBI goons) only allowed the Trump lawyers to "see" the warrant after some prodding (and may not have left a copy and if so, only a very basic boilerplate version with few details), did not allow representatives (lawyers) of Pres. Trump to observe the search, even requiring that surveillance cameras be turned off, and not leaving a detailed inventory of the documents stolen during the Stasi theft.
It will be easy to "salt" these documents with fake incriminating documents. And unlike Dan Rather's sources, I expect this crew might know how to use the proper font and equipment (remember the 60s military memo about Pres.Bush 43 written on Microsoft Word).
8 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
kono 8/10/2022 1:51:26 PM (No. 1244007)
It's about the J6 Committee.
And the J6 Committee is all about N2024, not about J6.
The hysteria over Trump became unrelentingly dishonest from the get-go. Fake News, fraudulent charges, illegal wiretaps and searches, et al. The Dems and NeverTrumpers have become the new Soviets, under the pretense of trying to prevent another Hitler.
4 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
The Remnants 8/10/2022 2:00:16 PM (No. 1244019)
Poster #5 - I agree with you completely.
The only way Liz Cheney and others can get a guilty verdict is if we were living in a banana republic where the innocent have no rights. Unfortunately, many of those imprisoned because they were in D.C. on January 6 must believe that THEY are living in a third-world country without the protection of our Bill of Rights.
3 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
paral04 8/10/2022 4:42:32 PM (No. 1244179)
It is about the fact that they are scared to death that Trump is going so much power. They have to stop him anyway they can.
1 person likes this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Strike3 8/10/2022 5:04:28 PM (No. 1244192)
I believe that J6 is the most likely event that they would like to nail Donald Trump on but anything will do that puts him in a bad light. If the feebs can plant a letter from Kim Jong Un inviting him to a tea party in the presidential palace in Pyongyang, the power-mad anti-Trumpers will use it and claim collusion.
0 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
ussjimmycarter 8/10/2022 5:10:56 PM (No. 1244195)
They are going to charge Trump with something! They want him in court for the next two years! Bet on it!!!
0 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
bad-hair 8/10/2022 5:59:42 PM (No. 1244216)
FTA ... As previously explained, I believe it would foolhardy for the Biden Justice Department to indict a former president on such debatable non-violent crime charges.
Foolhardy ??? Biden ??? no, really???
0 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
PrayerWarrior 8/10/2022 6:28:18 PM (No. 1244246)
I have never liked Andrew C. McCarthy. He appears to straddle the fence between conservative and liberal. What he does is makes everyone mad. State your position McCarthy. Not either it's this or it's that. I hate swishy politicians and Andrew, you are one of those. One day, we love you, and the next day, you stink. Are you related to Lindsey Graham?
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)