A Message From Lucianne  

S-CR-TEO

NM05






   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Advertisement-Free Options | Register
Rules & FAQs | Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


B-CR-TEO
Trump tweets he wants to deport illegal
immigrants ´with no Judges or Court Cases´ —
a move that would violate due process

Business Insider, by Ellen Cranley

Original Article

Posted By:LittleHoodedMonk, 6/24/2018 1:03:17 PM

President Donald Trump tweeted Sunday morning that the US should deport immigrants who enter the US illegally with no legal process. Trump said once "somebody comes in" the country, they should be removed with "no Judges or Court Cases" — a move that would violate the long-established legal precedent for immigrants´ rights to due process. (Snip) The US Constitution´s Fifth Amendment guarantees the right to "due process of law" in criminal proceedings. In 1953, the Supreme Court clarified this right extended to non-US citizens. The Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding case concluded that the Attorney General "did not have the

Comments:
This should definitely set the dRATS hair on fire. The SCOTUS case cited seems to imply that deportation was in reference to a "lawful permanent resident". Illegals stepping over the border from Mexico to here aren´t or am I incorrect? Bueller? This seems to be at odds with the fact that they are a criminal by doing so. The problem with activist judges rears its ugly head to someday destroy our culture.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Attila DiMedici, 6/24/2018 1:07:11 PM     (No. 11674362)

It is important to note that there is a difference between what someone wants to do and what they actually do.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: GW_Rider, 6/24/2018 1:08:50 PM     (No. 11674364)

hussein also wanted to rule without any checks from that pesky Constitution.

So?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    17 persons like this.


   

 


.New_S.
  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: judy, 6/24/2018 1:10:56 PM     (No. 11674367)

60% are against Illegal immigration.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    34 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: judy, 6/24/2018 1:11:41 PM     (No. 11674368)

Immigrants who enter the country illegally are illegals.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    44 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: MMC, 6/24/2018 1:16:07 PM     (No. 11674372)

If they are here illegally, do they have due process?

#askingforafriend

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    48 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: valinva, 6/24/2018 1:17:18 PM     (No. 11674377)

Did the write even read what they wrote? "The Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding case concluded that the Attorney General "did not have the authority to order the permanent exclusion and deportation of a lawful permanent resident of the United States without providing notice of the charges against him and the opportunity to be heard." LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENT are the operative words. No where in the president setting court ruling does it speak of UNLAWFUL BORDER CROSSERS. These illegal immigrants do not have due process rights. They should be put back across the border immediately upon capture. They certainly are not entitled to representation by an attorney. Representation by an attorney is something they should have done while on the other side of the border.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    100 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Toledo, 6/24/2018 1:17:39 PM     (No. 11674378)

Isn´t due process for those here legally or born here not invaders?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    56 persons like this.


   

 

R-TA-Wide_2
  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: montwoodcliff, 6/24/2018 1:19:30 PM     (No. 11674381)

I don´t see the problem here. How do they get rights as immigrant? they are here illegally and thus criminals. We have every right to send them back without due process. It´s another story if they are here legally. Didn´t Obama deport people like this, or did they get a hearing? Somebody refresh my memory.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    41 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Mackrand, 6/24/2018 1:20:07 PM     (No. 11674382)

The Government seems to forget these people coming in over the southern border are not immigrants.

They are wholly Illegal Aliens!!

There is a difference and PDJT is entirely correct to get them out of the country immediately. These Illegal Aliens have no rights in the United States of America!!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    68 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: earlybird, 6/24/2018 1:24:18 PM     (No. 11674387)

I’m sure this will be worked out satisfactorily without Ellen’s hysteria.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    20 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: dvc, 6/24/2018 1:24:23 PM     (No. 11674388)

Why do foreigners jump over our border illegally and suddenly they get all these damned rights to due process?

To heck with that. Pick them up, dump them over the border, same day. Only time to do DNA and fingerprints so you can prosecute them as felons the next time they come back.

Of course the problem with prosecuting them as felons is they may like the inside of our prisons better than running free in their stinkhole countries.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    53 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: sw penn, 6/24/2018 1:29:59 PM     (No. 11674392)

So...

10,000 year old marriage law can be changed,
but 65 year old inapplicable immigration law can´t?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    54 persons like this.


   

 


.LockDme.


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: earlybird, 6/24/2018 1:30:43 PM     (No. 11674394)

(hit submit too soon)

Ellen is no lawyer, writes for a so-so publication, and doesn’t understand what she has purportedly written:

First she says:

President Donald Trump tweeted Sunday morning that the US should deport immigrants who enter the US illegally with no legal process.

As soon as they step inside our country they are illegal migrants, not immigrants.

And then she goes on to cite as her authority SCOTUS´s case interpretation, which she also does not understand:

The Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding case concluded that the Attorney General "did not have the authority to order the permanent exclusion and deportation of a lawful permanent resident of the United States without providing notice of the charges against him and the opportunity to be heard.”

A “lawful permanent resident of the United States” is a Green Card holder.

Ellen should find something else to do with herself.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    55 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Nevadadad46, 6/24/2018 1:35:20 PM     (No. 11674399)

Yes, illegals can be deported sans Due Process:
From Politifact-

“The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Zadvydas vs. Davis (2001) that "once an alien enters the country, the legal circumstance changes, for the due process clause applies to all persons within the United States."

In a Texas case, Plyler vs. Doe, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1982 that non-citizen children must get a free K-12 education.

But undocumented immigrants don’t share all of the rights held by citizens -- for example, they can’t vote in state and national elections.

And Fordham law professor Jennifer Gordon said that some undocumented immigrants get almost no due process in removal proceedings.

In 1996, {Bill Clinton’s Presidency}, Congress created expedited removal for undocumented immigrants without a hearing. Initially it only applied at the U.S. border. Then it was expanded to within 100 miles of a border for undocumented immigrants who had been in the country less than 14 days.”


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    34 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: earlybird, 6/24/2018 1:35:29 PM     (No. 11674400)

Oh, for Pete’s sake! Ellen Cranley is the BI’s “Weekend News Intern”…

http://static1.thisisinsider.com/image/5ada18cf42e1cc6d7d23b5b2/ellen-cranley.jpg

She knows from nothing.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    26 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: harleynyc, 6/24/2018 1:39:52 PM     (No. 11674403)

They are not simply illegals but they are invaders, and are coming here to conquer us, whether they know that or are just pawns. This is a matter of national security. A matter of OUR survival. Left unchecked we become a one party dictatorship being that all the invaders will vote democrat and eventually elect only latinos.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    43 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: MDConservative, 6/24/2018 1:40:11 PM     (No. 11674404)

Due Process may consist of nothing more than a five minute hearing. This isn´t a criminal trial with a "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard of proof.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    28 persons like this.


   

 


.R-LJ.
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Bighambone, 6/24/2018 1:43:47 PM     (No. 11674409)

In keeping with the US Constitution, the US Congress has the sole authority to say what the immigration laws will be and how those immigration laws will be administered and enforced.

So Congress through specific legislation could severely limit the immigration court hearing and appeal process for illegal aliens caught unlawfully crossing the borderline into the USA which is the instant question at hand. Right now because of the esoteric complications placed in the process through the liberalization of the current laws by the liberal Democrats, activist federal judges, and some cheap labor loving Republicans, the immigration court deportation hearing and appeal process for one illegal alien caught unlawfully crossing the borderline could easily take five years or more, when the only issues that have to be determined for the issuance of an order of deportation is that the respondent in a deportation hearing is an alien who entered the USA across the borderline without being inspected and admitted to the country in accordance with the immigration laws.

The reason for that is that the about 330 administrative immigration judge immigration courts now have a backlog of over a million pending cases, including cases relating to hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens set free in the USA in accordance with Obama Administration so-called “catch and release” policies, who have absconded in percentages of up to 90% evidenced by them not showing up for previously scheduled deportation hearings..


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    17 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: earlybird, 6/24/2018 1:48:42 PM     (No. 11674413)

The writer is an intern who doesn’t understand her own writing.

She is wrong.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    33 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: bpl40, 6/24/2018 1:51:06 PM     (No. 11674414)

The very idea that the rest of the world is entitled, fully, to all the protections and rights guaranteed by the US Constitution to CITIZENS, should be revisited and thoroughly reexamined. We now live in a shrunken dynamic world where the US needs to protect itself with defenses not thought necessary a century ago.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Emmajustin, 6/24/2018 1:51:19 PM     (No. 11674416)

It would be nice if Pres Trump could say that illegals are committing an act of war and then we could go to battle stations.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    36 persons like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: sunhan65, 6/24/2018 1:57:52 PM     (No. 11674418)

Looks like this goofy article has been duly dealt with.

I have a related problem: I´m running several resource-intensive tasks on my computer right now, and clicking "like" on all of earlybird´s replies today is slowing down my processor.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    28 persons like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: doctorfixit, 6/24/2018 2:14:31 PM     (No. 11674421)

Invaders have no rights. They are not entitled to any process other than removal. If the federal courts disagree, they need to be removed. Federal tyrants can´t force us to commit national suicide. Get rid of the judges. Get rid of the illegals.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    237 persons like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: dvc, 6/24/2018 2:28:20 PM     (No. 11674438)

OK, then I agree with #14 and #17. 3 minute limit, any sort of a lawyer can be assigned as an administrative judge for this kind of BS case. Get 20% of all the military lawyers in the Air Force, Navy, and Army assigned to this.

Get 300 courts set up, in trailers or defunct motels or whatever. Insist they process 15 per hour. 8 hour day moves 120 per court, 300 courts is 36,000 per day processed. At 5 days per week, and 4 weeks per month, that is 720,000 illegals processed. This is perfectly doable, if we get somebody in there with some real authority who wants to do it, not trying to obstruct everything, gum up the works.

If you can put 360 on a B747, fly them on chartered to somewhere in southern Mexico and turn them loose. That will take 10 flights per day. Charter five aircraft, two flights each day moves 36,000 out per day. That means you can have five different hubs for them to depart from, less ground transport. We are spending far more housing them here. These numbers are very tractable, nothing at all impossible about this. You just need some funding, and an organized group who actually wants this to happen.

Turn this into an assembly line. Accept no excuses why "It can´t be done." Just Do It!

When they pay $3000 to get here, takes weeks of travel, and spend 36 hours in the country, end up broke, back in Mexico, they won´t want to repeat, won´t be able to come up with the money quickly. Guaranteed failure is how we make them stop coming here.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    27 persons like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Amereagle-redux, 6/24/2018 2:39:10 PM     (No. 11674447)

How exactly does the Constitution that our ancestors wrote and fought and bled and died for apply to foreign nationals who enter our country illegally?? I must’ve missed that class.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    25 persons like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: Rumblehog, 6/24/2018 2:43:38 PM     (No. 11674450)

Due Process, B.S. All we hear are the cries of lawyers wanting their cut of Government Cheese. If we catch these invaders, send ´em back, it´s a lot better than putting them in camps waiting for trial. Libertard lawyers want these Latrinos to get free stays in 5-Star hotels and appeal after appeal until the lawyers have their kids´ college tuition paid for.

If you can´t speak English, you need to leave this country. It´s just that simple.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    20 persons like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: tnorling, 6/24/2018 3:11:09 PM     (No. 11674480)

Illegals have rights... in their own country, not ours.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    38 persons like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: toodles3956, 6/24/2018 3:42:35 PM     (No. 11674505)

Do it, do it, do it!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: SALady, 6/24/2018 3:52:29 PM     (No. 11674521)

What we are doing now clearly isn´t working!!!

So I say lets try it President Trump´s way, and let the Supreme Court decide if it violates due process or not...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: volksford, 6/24/2018 4:02:06 PM     (No. 11674535)

I guess it´s a damn good thing the Japanese didn´t invade the west coast during the war.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: Bighambone, 6/24/2018 4:10:54 PM     (No. 11674543)

The US Constitution gives the US Congress the authority to say what the US immigration and nationality laws will be. So when Congress passes an immigration law, how can politicized immigration lawyers and activist federal judges thereafter claim and adjudge that provisions of an immigration law passed by Congress are unconstitutional?

Clearly in the immigration court process today, justice delayed is justice denied, both to illegal aliens who are being detained for long periods of time awaiting final orders of deportation, and to US citizens who are becoming the crime victims of dangerous criminal illegal aliens who are being allowed to walk the streets all over the USA, and especially in Democrat invented so-called Sanctuary Cities that were designed to defend and protect illegal aliens, solely for political purposes, until the Congress passes another big general amnesty, with the vast majority of the would be legalized aliens then being put of a path to be molded into socialist oriented Democrat voters by the millions.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.


Reply 32 - Posted by: BarryNo, 6/24/2018 4:13:32 PM     (No. 11674546)

I don´t recall soldiers giving VC or Norks, in those undeclared wars, Due Process when they shot them in ´Police Actions´.

Since these are invaders, perhaps similar rules can apply?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    16 persons like this.


Reply 33 - Posted by: Lazyman, 6/24/2018 4:13:34 PM     (No. 11674547)

Due process is mentioned after, "We the people of the US, not " We the people of the earth.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.


Reply 34 - Posted by: davew, 6/24/2018 4:22:33 PM     (No. 11674566)

Due process occurs when someone enters the country with a valid passport with photo-id. This is the administrative process that is used universally around the world and is recognized by international treaties. Without a passport or diplomatic equivalent a person can be legally and immediately denied access to cross a sovereign border.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.


Reply 35 - Posted by: earlybird, 6/24/2018 5:29:56 PM     (No. 11674645)

Illegals who have crossed and then requested asylum have been given hearings at the border. That is what PDJT is talking about. A huge judicial and logistical clog, very expensive, very controversial (fodder for the media), no law to support it.

Asylum is to be requested at any American embassy or consulate in their home country or at the lawful U. S. points of entry from the other side. They are not to cross into the U.S. first.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    15 persons like this.


Reply 36 - Posted by: Ribald1, 6/24/2018 5:42:18 PM     (No. 11674658)

These are not immigrants.
They are criminal trespassers, and yes, they should be escorted off the property without delay.
If they want to contest the situation they can visit the US embassy in Mexico. that is what it is there for.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    15 persons like this.


Reply 37 - Posted by: Robinhood, 6/24/2018 5:48:19 PM     (No. 11674664)

the ruling also stated "the attorney general" does not have the right.... the president has the right!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.


Reply 38 - Posted by: Bighambone, 6/24/2018 6:08:47 PM     (No. 11674678)

Why don’t they establish USA asylum centers at the US Consulates throughout Mexico. Then aliens from wherever can go to those offices and file for asylum without unlawfully jumping the borderline. In any case that action would take away the excuse that aliens have to jump the borderline to file for asylum. Since well over 80% of the asylum claims received from illegal aliens who jumped the border are bogus or do not establish the legal requirements to receive asylum in the USA, such asylum centers would serve to keep a lot of illegal aliens out of the country who are coming to the USA unlawfully for economic reasons, like to get a job and send money home to relatives in a home country. No doubt a lot of aliens whose asylum applications had been denied at the asylum centers would still try to get into the USA by jumping the borderline, but their cases would not be complicated by unadjudicated asylum claims and they could quickly be deported. The only problem is that the leftist Democrats whose political agenda is to get as many poor and uneducated illegal aliens into the USA, who most likely would eventually become dependent on taxpayer provided social welfare services, and would in very high percentages, once legalized, become socialist oriented Democrat voters would no longer get a head start into the USA.. Clearly the leftist Democrats would not like that.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.


Reply 39 - Posted by: hershey, 6/24/2018 6:15:05 PM     (No. 11674686)

Why do illegal fence jumpers have Constitutional Rights???? Something smells about that...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.


Reply 40 - Posted by: arcady, 6/24/2018 9:10:26 PM     (No. 11674797)

And this is why No to DACA or any other backdoor path to amnesty or green card, or anything. As soon as that´s granted and the chain migration kicks in, that will in essence grant them some standing and hence due process rights. Illegals are illegals. There should be no special privileges for any illegal group. Because we all know the Dems and GOP-e if given an inch, will try to steal a mile or more.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.


Reply 41 - Posted by: Udanja99, 6/24/2018 9:27:31 PM     (No. 11674810)

Since when do illegal invaders get Constitutional guarantees of ANYTHING????? Those guarantees are reserved for AMERICAN CITIZENS.

(Please forgive the shouting, but I’ve had enough of this idiocy.)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.


Reply 42 - Posted by: dvc, 6/25/2018 12:26:46 AM     (No. 11674930)

Correction to my calcs above, need 100 flights per day, significant increase in aircraft required, but still doable. Need 50 aircraft leased, not 5.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 946313




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "LittleHoodedMonk"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "LittleHoodedMonk"



U.S. senators want ban on
China´s ZTE, despite Trump action
Reuters, by Patricia Zengerle    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 7/12/2018 8:01:54     Post Reply
Washington - Republican and Democratic U.S. senators said on Thursday they want the government to reinstate penalties on ZTE Corp, despite a Trump administration agreement paving the way for an end of a ban on the Chinese telecommunications company. (Snip) Many U.S. lawmakers, including some of Trump’s fellow Republicans as well as Democrats, view ZTE as a national security threat, worrying that the use of its technology in the United States could make it easier for China to steal secrets. Commerce on Wednesday said it signed an agreement with ZTE, China’s No. 2 telecommunications maker, paving the way for it to

UN official says N. Korea
needs food, medicine, clean water
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 7/12/2018 12:06:34     Post Reply
Tokyo - About 20 percent of North Korean children are stunted because of malnutrition, and half the children in rural areas are drinking unsafe water, a senior U.N. official visiting the country said. Much progress has been made compared to 20 years ago but "significant humanitarian challenges" remain, Mark Lowcock, the undersecretary general for humanitarian affairs, said Wednesday at a news conference in Pyongyang, the capital of North Korea. The U.N. issued a transcript of his remarks. The United Nations is trying to raise $111 million to meet health, water and sanitation and food security needs for about 6 million people

The job market is apparently so hot
people are ghosting potential employers
CBS News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 7/12/2018 11:32:12     Post Reply
The much-maligned habit of ghosting has apparently made its way into the workplace. According to a recent LinkedIn article, "People are ´ghosting´ at work and it´s driving companies crazy." Ghosting is when a person abruptly goes silent or disappears without explanation. The article goes on to explain that candidates who have agreed to job interviews fail to show up without any notice or further communication and, in some cases, accept jobs only to not appear for their first day of work. "This job market is so hot right now. Unemployment is at a 18-year low. You´ve got more job openings than candidates,

Pfizer Said It´s Postponing Drug Price
Increases After Meeting With Trump
BuzzFeed News, by Blake Montgomery    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 7/10/2018 9:11:09     Post Reply
Pharmaceutical giant Pfizer said Tuesday that it is deferring recent drug price increases until the end of the year after an "extensive discussion" between the company´s CEO, President Trump, and Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar. The announcement came after Trump tweeted Tuesday that he had met with Pfizer CEO Ian Read to discuss his "drug pricing blueprint" — his plan to fulfill a campaign promise to lower drug prices across the board — and that the company would reverse the recent price hikes as a result. Pfizer confirmed the meeting in a statement, adding that it plans to defer the

Questions are being raised about Facebook´s
decision to give a Russian internet company
temporary special access to its user data
Business Insider, by Rob Price    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 7/10/2018 9:00:45     Post Reply
Facebook is facing fresh scrutiny over its data-sharing practices following the publication of reports highlighting how a Russian internet giant with ties to the Russian government gained access to user data. On Tuesday, CNN and Wired published reports exploring how Mail.Ru built apps that were able to access Facebook user data after the social network locked down its platform in 2015. Facebook recently disclosed in written testimony to US Congress that Mail.Ru had built apps that integrated with its platform — and that it was one of a select group of app makers that was given an extension beyond the formal 2015 cut-off date.

Government Told Immigrant Parents to
Pay for DNA Tests to Be Reunited
With Kids: Advocate
Daily Beast, by Justin Glawe, Adam Rawnsley    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 7/10/2018 8:19:23     Post Reply
Dallas - The government recently told four immigrant women that they must pay for DNA tests to prove they are related to the children they were separated from in order to be reunited, according to the shelter that housed the women. (Snip) The Trump administration isn’t the first to use DNA tests to verify relationships between immigrants or refugees. Under the Obama administration, the Department of Homeland Security and State Department initiated a DNA testing pilot program for refugees from certain African countries in the “Priority Three” program that reunited refugees already inside the U.S. with relatives still

´Jews and Arabs should
be allowed to live anywhere´
Arutz Sheva [Israel], by Hezki Baruch    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 7/10/2018 8:05:33     Post Reply
MK Jamal Zahalka (Joint List) vehemently opposes the Nationality Law being promoted by MK Avi Dichter (Likud), who in the past served as head of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet). The Nationality Law would establish the status of the State of Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people and the right of the Jewish people to self-determination in its homeland as a unique right for the Jewish people. It would also anchor the symbols of the state, Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, the Jewish calendar as the country´s official calendar, and the Hebrew language as the official language. Speaking to Arutz Sheva on Tuesday,

Trump launches new tariffs on China
CNN, by Julia Horowitz    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 7/10/2018 7:48:32     Post Reply
New York - The Trump administration is readying another round of tariffs on Chinese goods worth $200 billion. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer on Tuesday released a list of additional goods that could face 10% tariffs after a public comment period. It includes seafood, fruit and vegetables, yarn, wool, rain jackets and baseball gloves. The move comes after the United States imposed tariffs on Chinese goods worth $34 billion last Friday. Beijing immediately responded with its own tariffs on US goods worth $34 billion. Tuesday´s action makes good on a threat President Donald Trump made last month,

Trump´s private meeting with Anthony
Kennedy reportedly helped him focus
on Brett Kavanaugh as a replacement
Business Insider, by Pat Ralph    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 7/10/2018 1:46:52     Post Reply
After meeting with retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy to discuss his retirement from the highest court in the US, Trump came out of it focused on replacing him with Judge Brett Kavanaugh, according to Politico. Even though he was considering other judges such as Thomas Hardiman, Amy Coney Barrett, and Raymond Kethledge for the nomination, Trump was zeroed in on Kavanaugh, who was Kennedy´s former law clerk. Trump has credited Kennedy for giving him the opportunity to transform the Supreme Court and give it more of a conservative bend, according to Politico. That will now happen if the 53-year-old

Cristiano Ronaldo leaving Real
Madrid to join Italian club Juventus
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 7/10/2018 1:23:57     Post Reply
Cristiano Ronaldo is leaving Real Madrid to join Italian club Juventus, bringing to an end a glittering nine-year spell in Spain. Madrid said Tuesday it has reached an agreement with Juventus after a request by Ronaldo. The 33-year-old Ronaldo is on vacation in Greece after Portugal´s elimination from the World Cup. Juventus President Andrea Agnelli flew out Tuesday to meet the five-time Ballon d´Or winner. Ronaldo joined Real Madrid in 2009 from Manchester United and was the Spanish club´s all-time leading scorer with 451 goals in 438 matches. He helped the club win four Champions League titles — beating Juventus in the

Brett Kavanaugh Likely to Bring
Pro-Business Views to Supreme Court
New York Times, by Matthew Goldstein    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 7/10/2018 1:12:26     Post Reply
President Trump’s nomination of Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, his second nominee, could further cement the high court’s pro-business tilt. In his dozen years as a federal appellate court judge, Judge Kavanaugh has tended to side with business interests in resolving regulatory issues and employment disputes in cases involving the environment, consumer protection and technology. (Snip) “Judge Kavanaugh protects American businesses from illegal job-killing regulations,” the memo reads. Business groups, for now, were careful not to strike an overly celebratory note in commenting on the nomination.

NFLPA files grievance challenging
NFL´s new anthem policy, claims it
´infringes on player rights´
CBS Sports, by Ryan Wilson    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 7/10/2018 12:53:12     Post Reply
The NFL Players´ Association announced on Tuesday that it has filed a grievance on behalf of the players challenging the league´s controversial anthem policy, which was introduced in May. "The union´s claim is that this new policy, imposed by the NFL´s governing body without consultation with the NFLPA, is inconsistent with the collective bargaining agreement and infringes on player rights," the NFLPA said in a statement. "In advance of our filing today, we proposed to the NFL to begin confidential discussions with the NFLPA Executive Committee to find a solution to this issue instead of immediately proceeding with



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Royal family ´snub´ Trump: Prince Charles and
Prince William forced the Queen to meet the
US president alone after they refused to
take part in his four-day-tour of Britain

65 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by Jessica Green    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 7/15/2018 6:19:07 AM     Post Reply
Prince Charles and Prince William reportedly ‘snubbed’ the US President during his visit to Britain - leaving the Queen to meet Donald Trump alone at Windsor Castle. The royal father and son apparently shared their desire to not take part in the arrangements during informal discussions regarding the president’s four-day tour. Trump’s trip was not a state visit and so only the Queen greeted the president and his wife Melania. However even on working trips dignitaries expect to see more members of the royal family than only the Queen. When deciding which royals to include in the meeting, senior courtiers shared concerns about

Maxine Waters: It Is Very Clear That
Trump Is ‘Jealous of Obama’

49 replie(s)
Breitbart Video, by Pam Key    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 7/15/2018 1:10:27 PM     Post Reply
Saturday on MSNBC, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) said President Donald Trump criticizes former President Barack Obama because “he’s jealous of Obama and his administration.” When asked about Trump tweeting that President Obama should have done more about Russian’s interfering in our elections, Waters said, “First of all, let me say this: If the president wrote out at some point and said the sky is falling and it is Obama’s fault, and everybody knows he likes to blame Obama for any and everything that he can come up with. And in addition to that, it is very clear that he’s jealous

Strzok Says FBI Agents Are Permitted
to Engage in Some Adulteries

38 replie(s)
Cybercast News Service, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 7/14/2018 3:03:52 PM     Post Reply
FBI Agent Peter Strzok, who worked on the Hillary Clinton email investigation and the investigation of possible ties between Russia and the Trump campaign testified under oath in a congressional hearing on Thursday that FBI agents can engage in some types of adultery. Strzok was asked “what action” he would take if he found out one of his subordinates was conducting an “extramarital affair.” “It depends,” said Strzok. “If it was against the FBI’s regulation in terms of if it was somebody in their chain of command, above or below them, which is inappropriate or not allowed by regulation, I would

Meghan Markle is faking her
smile, says her father

38 replie(s)
Page Six, by Tamar Lapin    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 7/15/2018 11:45:23 AM     Post Reply
Meghan Markle‘s smile is hiding fear, stress and the pressure of adjusting to her new royal duties, her father said in an interview published Sunday. “I think she is terrified,” Thomas Markle told The Sun. “I see it in her eyes, I see it in her face and I see it in her smile.” “I’ve seen her smile for years. I know her smile. I don’t like the one I’m seeing now,” he added. “This is a pained smile.”The newly-minted Duchess of Sussex, 36, is struggling to cope with the transition from TV actress to a member of the royal

Russian Hackers Kept DNC Backdoor
Longer Than Anyone Knew

36 replie(s)
Daily Beast, by Kevin Poulsen    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 7/14/2018 5:04:50 AM     Post Reply
The indictment Friday of 12 Russian military officers for the election hacks against the DNC and Hillary Clinton’s campaign lends a surprising new detail to the 2016 election interference timeline: The Kremlin’s hackers apparently still maintained a foothold in the DNC’s network four months after the Democrats announced that they’d locked the intruders out. Until today, the story of the DNC hack ended promptly on June 14, 2016, when the Democrats went public with the intrusion in the pages of the Washington Post, and Crowdstrike, the security firm hired to respond to the breach, published a detailed technical account. Today’s indictment confirms

‘Art of the Deal’ co-author says
Trump is losing his mind

36 replie(s)
New York Post, by Nikki Schwab    Original Article
Posted By: AltaD- 7/15/2018 7:45:16 PM     Post Reply
The man who co-wrote “The Art of the Deal” said Sunday he believes President Trump’s faculties are diminishing — and that he feels obligated to sound the alarm. “We are in a true emergency,” Tony Schwartz said on CNN Sunday. “And the accelerated rate at which his breakdown or decompensation is occurring is cause for us, and certainly for me, to come on to TV more often, to tweet more often.” Schwartz told CNN’s Brian Stelter that he felt comfortable making that assessment because he had “spent an enormous time with [Trump] over a period of 18 months.”(snip)Stelter pointed out that Schwartz

Recycling: Another environmental
scam goes bust

34 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Colin Flaherty    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 7/14/2018 6:36:41 AM     Post Reply
Anyone who has ever been to a recycling plant is invariably surprised at how dirty and nasty America’s favorite green activity really is. Trucks dump the material on a long conveyor belt, where a few dozen people pick through by hand what is supposed to be recyclable material, but more and more often is just plain old dirty trash. The recyclables used to be worth something more than bragging rights about liberal moral superiority. Plastic bottles, newspapers, and cardboard, were just a few of the favorites you could ship to China by the ton and make a few bucks along the

McDonald´s, tossed salad, and toilet paper
28 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Jeannie DeAngelis    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 7/14/2018 7:25:36 AM     Post Reply
Americans are encouraged to embrace diversity and be culturally sensitive to those who have flouted our laws and invaded our nation. Meanwhile, illegal aliens arriving in America have no such requirement. Instead, trespassing tribes relocate, and when they do, rather than assimilate, they transfer habits and activities indigenous to the countries from whence they migrated. Thus, Americans suffer from illnesses that are easily traceable to third-world bathroom habits (TWBH) and lack of hygiene in the developing world. It´s not news that illegals work in restaurants as food-handlers. These restaurant workers migrate from

Peter Strzok’s arrogance is
the product of a corrupt FBI

28 replie(s)
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 7/15/2018 5:04:59 AM     Post Reply
Watching FBI agent Peter Strzok battle with Congress, my initial reaction was pure anger. His repeated, arrogant insistence that he had done nothing wrong despite tons of evidence to the contrary convinced me he deserved immediate firing — if not the firing squad. Gradually, though, anger gave way to amazement as Strzok grew increasingly combative and condescending. Given his predicament, the sneering and smirking were stupid, and yet he persisted. Who is this jerk, I wondered, and how in the hell did he get to be a big shot at the FBI? And why are taxpayers still paying for the privilege of

Left-Wing Antifa Terrorists ‘Freaking
Out’ over Proposed ‘Unmasking’ Law

27 replie(s)
Breitbart Big Government, by John Nolte    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 7/14/2018 7:00:28 AM     Post Reply
The left-wing terrorist organization that calls itself Antifa is “freaking out” over a proposed law that would enhance penalties for anyone who “injures, oppresses, threatens, or intimidates any person” while wearing a disguise or mask. Throughout our country, and for a number of years now — and primarily because the establishment media fantasizes about, promotes, enflames and approves of the violence committed against the right (naturally, HuffPo opposes the unmasking law) — Antifa has been allowed to run rampant, committing countless acts of violence against everyday, peaceful supporters of President Donald Trump.

White House Correspondents’ Association
rushes to Jim Acosta’s defense

27 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Joe Simonson    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 7/14/2018 7:29:11 AM     Post Reply
The White House Correspondents’ Association released a statement defending CNN from President Donald Trump’s refusal to take a question from the network on Friday. “In response to the President lashing out at NBC, CNN and The Sun: Asking smart, tough questions, whether in a presidential press conference or interview, is central to the role a free press plays in a healthy republic,” said WHCA president Margaret Talev. “Given that the president took a question from a CNN reporter in his NATO news conference just a day earlier, maybe he was letting off steam today rather than expressing an official stance

Drug traffickers ´BEHEADED a special
needs girl, 13, in Alabama because she
saw them stab her grandma to death over
her links to El Chapo´s Sinaloa Cartel´

25 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK] and Associated Press, by Keith Griffith and Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Ribicon- 7/14/2018 11:11:14 PM     Post Reply
A 13-year-old girl in Alabama was beheaded because she saw her Sinaloa Cartel-associated granny stabbed to death by drug traffickers, authorities have said. Mariah Lopez, 13, and her grandmother Oralia Mendoza, 49, were killed on June 4 in Moon Cemetery outside of Huntsville, Alabama, prosecutors revealed in court on Thursday. The new details in the case came in a hearing for 26-year-old Yoni Aguilar, who along with 34-year-old Israel Palomino is charged with two counts each of capital murder in the slayings. At the hearing, investigators testified that the grandmother Mendoza had ties to the Sinaloa Cartel,


Post Reply   Close thread 946313





Recommended Trending videos


Sek-Float


Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Advertisement-Free Options | Register
Rules & FAQs | Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2018 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS