A Message From Lucianne  

S-CR-TEO

S-ADI-01






ST-GC
   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


B-CR-TEO
Rand Paul: ´We don´t have money to
spend´ for Trump´s border wall

The Hill, by Brett Samuels

Original Article

Posted By:zoidberg, 1/11/2018 9:14:15 AM

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said Wednesday that while he supports additional barriers at the U.S.-Mexico border, he believes some of the estimated costs for President Trump’s border wall are too high to justify. "I remain a fiscal conservative, even on the wall, so I’m not excited about spending $20, $30, $40 billion on a wall. I’m still a believer that we don’t have money to spend. We’re $700 billion in the hole,” Paul said on CNN.  “And while I will vote for money for barriers, I’m not voting for $40 billion for barriers,” Paul added.  A report last week detailed Trump’s

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: earlybird, 1/11/2018 9:29:20 AM     (No. 11506690)

I don’t really care about whether little Rand finds it exciting or not. We need the wall. The expense has been justified. And there are still ways to get Mexico and any country to which remittances are wired by their citizens living here to pay for the wall.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    64 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: OBX Pete, 1/11/2018 9:31:29 AM     (No. 11506694)

Somebody please tell Rand that perhaps they could take the money being spent to take care of the illegals to build the wall.

It is insane that our tax money is being spent for medical care, food and God knows what else to make sure they are comfortable.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    74 persons like this.


   

 

    
R-LU-C1-New-Sek
R-LU-C1-New-Sek
  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Thos Weatherby, 1/11/2018 9:31:37 AM     (No. 11506695)

By keeping out 1/2 of the people the savings from medical and education alone would pay for the wall in 2 years.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    45 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: jinx, 1/11/2018 9:32:28 AM     (No. 11506697)

How about getting rid of ALL the slush funds the government uses!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    47 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: slab, 1/11/2018 9:33:51 AM     (No. 11506699)

A user fee on international Western Union transfers will pay for it as it´s built.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    39 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: joew9, 1/11/2018 9:41:48 AM     (No. 11506706)

Rand Paul doesn´t want it. He couldn´t "find" enough money to buy a shovel.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    20 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: mc squared, 1/11/2018 9:47:27 AM     (No. 11506710)

Pay it now or pay it forever.

I thought Congress approved a wall in ´86 under Reagan.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    35 persons like this.


   

 

R-TA-Wide_2
  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: JansGraphix, 1/11/2018 9:48:48 AM     (No. 11506711)

Which is cheaper Paul? $40B for a wall? Or $4T for illegals? And these guys are supposed to be so smart??

Apparently ´smart´ needs to be redefined. Doesn´t it, Paul?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    43 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Clinger, 1/11/2018 9:50:36 AM     (No. 11506712)

So Rand let me tell you how we little people decide what we have money to pay for and what we do not.

First we start with priorities, shelter, water, food, transportation to a job. Then we decide what to do with the left overs, more shelter than essential survival needs, better food, a car vs taking the bus, then we look at even lower priorities, like entertainment.

This shouldn´t come as a shock to you sir but your job is to do the same. The constitution will prove helpful in removing any confusion regarding the priorities. Defense and border security are in that top tier. For example all the federal government has accomplished with the department of education is to make education worse so don´t tell me we can´t afford top priority when we spend billions on things not in the constitutional purview of the federal government.

Here´s a little tidbit to consider; what is one third of the cost of the federal prison system? One third of the inmates are illegal intruders. What´s cheaper a wall or all of the associates costs of not having a wall?

Mr. Paul, I have at times thought of you as a true representative of the people. Perhaps I was wrong, way wrong.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    64 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: save America, 1/11/2018 9:54:59 AM     (No. 11506720)

If a bridge falls down or another storm like Sandy hits,18 billion would appear out of nowhere.Overnight,probably with him leading the charge of we have to do something.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    25 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: citizen, 1/11/2018 9:55:19 AM     (No. 11506721)

Stop bringing "migrants" here to leech off our systems..stop generational welfare.
Those two items alone would pay for the wall, actually many walls.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    32 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Rumblehog, 1/11/2018 10:01:13 AM     (No. 11506733)

Take it from Department of Education, Arts, and Federal welfare.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    25 persons like this.


   

 

Lock-17


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: stablemoney, 1/11/2018 10:19:19 AM     (No. 11506764)

Yes we do, besides Mexico is going to pay for it. Shut up, Paul. Quit being a wrench in everything. No wonder your neighbor got tired of you.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    21 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: dvc, 1/11/2018 10:20:56 AM     (No. 11506770)

Bullhockey. Pocket change, and very important.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: lostinmassachusetts, 1/11/2018 10:31:48 AM     (No. 11506780)

Senator Paul can solve this problem by proposing legislation to pay for the wall by eliminating foreign aid to our enemies, e.g., the Palestinian Authority.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    29 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: bighambone, 1/11/2018 10:33:30 AM     (No. 11506783)

If you add up all the decentralized government benefits at all levels being paid out, the government law enforcement costs to deal with the massive illegal alien population, and all the illicit drugs that illegal aliens in the employ of the international cartels are smuggling into and are transporting across the country, the total clearly exceeds $40 billion every year. So even if an effective borderline barrier will look to be expensive at the front end, once completed, the country will no longer have to pay out tens of billions of dollars each year to millions of illegal aliens and for all levels of government to deal with them.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    21 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: curious1, 1/11/2018 10:40:45 AM     (No. 11506795)

And even Trump has said it shouldn´t take anywhere near 7 years and it shouldn´t ermotely cost as much as they´re estimating - since he´s ´been in the business´ for decades, I´d trust his gut-check estimates over federal bureaucrat ´experts´ any day of the week.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    22 persons like this.


   

 

R-LJ
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: rochow, 1/11/2018 11:05:00 AM     (No. 11506823)

Memo to Paul: it costs more to take care of these illegals than building a wall!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    23 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Cor-Vet, 1/11/2018 11:09:50 AM     (No. 11506830)

But you congress-critters think you can find enough money to return earmarks? Pork, especially government pork, is very expensive!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    22 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: dman, 1/11/2018 11:36:36 AM     (No. 11506858)

We "didn´t have the money" for the Manhattan Project, either.

Sell "Wall Bonds" and make this a similar effort. Count me in.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: enemyofthestate, 1/11/2018 11:47:51 AM     (No. 11506871)

More Jheri Curl logic from R. Paul.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    17 persons like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: stencil, 1/11/2018 12:33:30 PM     (No. 11506923)

Paul is correct and there will be no "Wall", never was going to be. POTUS himself yesterday admitted as much: "...I´ll take the blame...". He used the imagery to get elected.

We don´t need an literal, continuous, impractical "Wall" (see China). What we do need are sections of barriers, with surveillance, and armed reinforcements to handle the problem.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    20 persons like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: Shucky, 1/11/2018 1:48:01 PM     (No. 11507005)

It´s either that, or billions and billions more for the ever increasing demand for social services. The nation can´t afford NOT to build a wall and ship all illegals out.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: Penney, 1/11/2018 2:15:12 PM     (No. 11507038)

The cost for the wall is but a small amount of the total national budget funding for its countless projects, -in fact it is hardly noticeable, but it is vital to national & America´s unique cultural security. Rand Paul is wrong on this!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: danvillebill, 1/11/2018 2:21:19 PM     (No. 11507043)

quixotic (adj)

= idealistic but impractical

= Rand Paul


With thanks to Cervantes who predicted this loon back in 1605.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: earlybird, 1/11/2018 2:22:34 PM     (No. 11507045)

Re #22,

Paul is correct and there will be no "Wall", never was going to be. POTUS himself yesterday admitted as much: "...I´ll take the blame...". He used the imagery to get elected.

Link to original source, please. This sounds like a wee bit taken out of a larger whole. Context.

Conventional wisdom re tidbits of Trump utterances: "If it doesn’t fit, something is usually missing…"

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Chuzzles, 1/11/2018 2:45:04 PM     (No. 11507068)

If memory serves, it was funded way back in 1986 but democrats would not follow through. Then there are all the other many ideas that come to mind for funding, like cutting back on spending, cutting foreign aid to Mexico, installing serious fees for all wire transfers to locations south of our border, etc.

Plenty of ways to fund the border Sparky Paul, and you just better get used to the fact that you aren´t going to get your amnesty. The nation´s voters have spoken when they elected Trump, not YOU.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: nimby, 1/11/2018 2:57:26 PM     (No. 11507079)

Neither do we have money to support these illegals Rand!! And stop giving these people free education, healthcare, social security and child credit!!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: jerseytomato, 1/11/2018 2:59:50 PM     (No. 11507082)

WELFARE REFORM.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: P51dmustang, 1/11/2018 3:16:26 PM     (No. 11507091)

You do not need brick and mortar along the border. You need 24/7 drone surveillance and clamor mines.

Illegals stepping into a live mine field is a death on them. Stay out of the US and be safe.

Lets start thinking out of the box Senator Paul.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    20 persons like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: steph_gray, 1/11/2018 6:21:49 PM     (No. 11507263)

Tsk, tsk Rand. You are falling into your personal purist trap again. Try to get it right this time, please. Remember your libertarian economics. The tax cuts will end up in more revenue. JFK knew it. Milton Friedman knew it. You certainly ought to know it. Unintended consequences of statist nonsense will decrease and liberty/prosperity/revenue will increase under Trump.

Besides we need you more than ever to fight against the FISA surveillance issue and the danger to all of our liberty. I mean that sincerely. Please look over there and stop with the line-item squirrel stuff. Trump’s got this.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.


Reply 32 - Posted by: mickturn, 1/11/2018 7:36:26 PM     (No. 11507327)

BS, it is an investment that will pay us back a million to 1, get over it Rand!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 932538




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "zoidberg"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "zoidberg"



Comey to teach course on ethical
leadership for College of
William & Mary
Washington Post, by Nick Anderson    Original Article
Posted By: zoidberg- 1/19/2018 8:10:19     Post Reply
Former FBI director James B. Comey is joining the faculty of his alma mater, the College of William & Mary, and plans to teach a course on ethical leadership at the school’s Washington center starting in the fall. Comey, whom President Trump fired last year, will have a nontenured position as an executive professor in education, the school announced Friday. His course will be offered through the W&M Washington Center to students of the public college based in Williamsburg, Va. Comey will teach the course in fall 2018, spring 2019 and summer 2019 with executive assistant professor Drew Stelljes.

Does the California Model
Really Work?
Tribune Content Agency, by Jonah Goldberg    Original Article
Posted By: zoidberg- 1/19/2018 7:54:36     Post Reply
The alleged success of the California model is one of the more intense controversies in the nerdier corners of public-policy debate. For many progressives, California’s metastasizing liberalism proves you can have Scandinavian-style social policies and tax rates and still have robust economic growth. For conservatives, California is like a bumblebee. On paper, the damn thing shouldn’t be able to fly — and yet it does. Thus the cottage industry on the right of prophesizing California’s inevitable demise. What’s always bothered me about the whole argument is how it leaves out important factors. For me, the biggest one was always geography

Rand Paul: ´We don´t have money to
spend´ for Trump´s border wall
The Hill, by Brett Samuels    Original Article
Posted By: zoidberg- 1/11/2018 9:14:15     Post Reply
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said Wednesday that while he supports additional barriers at the U.S.-Mexico border, he believes some of the estimated costs for President Trump’s border wall are too high to justify. "I remain a fiscal conservative, even on the wall, so I’m not excited about spending $20, $30, $40 billion on a wall. I’m still a believer that we don’t have money to spend. We’re $700 billion in the hole,” Paul said on CNN.  “And while I will vote for money for barriers, I’m not voting for $40 billion for barriers,” Paul added.  A report last week detailed Trump’s

America´s Whiniest Ex-Sheriff
Announces Senate Run
Reason, by C.J. Ciaramella    Original Article
Posted By: zoidberg- 1/9/2018 2:13:43     Post Reply
A bit more than a year after voters booted him out of office, former Maricopa County sheriff Joe Arpaio has announced he´s running for the U.S. Senate. The 85-year-old Arizonan—an unrepentant birther, nativist, and whiny baby—told the Washington Examiner that he will run on a platform of supporting the agenda of President Donald Trump, who pardoned Arpaio last year after a federal judge held the ex-sheriff in criminal contempt. "I have a lot to offer. I´m a big supporter of President Trump," Arpaio told the paper. "I´m going to have to work hard; you don´t take anything for granted.

Rebellious Jurors Make the World
a Better Place
Reason, by J.D. Tuccille    Original Article
Posted By: zoidberg- 12/12/2017 10:20:32     Post Reply
After criticism by some local officials of a new program that refers people caught with four ounces or less of marijuana for fines and community service, El Paso, Texas, Police Chief Greg Allen turned out to be a surprise defender of bypassing the usual criminal justice rigmarole of booking, mug shots, and jails. While careful to emphasize that he´s no fan of drug legalization, Allen says it´s a waste of his officers´ time to put hours into an "an arrest that has no end result of a conviction because of jury nullification."

Trump Puts Fact Ahead of
Fiction in Israel
Tribune Content Agency, by Jonah Goldberg    Original Article
Posted By: zoidberg- 12/8/2017 9:11:29     Post Reply
The most exhausting thing about the Middle East — except for the bloodshed, poverty, tyranny, etc. — is that it refuses to conform to how it’s described in the West. It’s like journalists, diplomats, and politicians want to announce a football game, but the players keep insisting on playing rugby. The field looks similar. The scoring isn’t all that different. It’s just a different game. But don’t tell the gang in the booth. (Snip)Jerusalem is the capital of Israel. The Knesset, Israel’s parliament, convenes there. Israelis call it their capital for the same reason they claim two plus two equals

Global Temperature Increases Are
Lower and Slower, Says New Study
Reason, by Ronald Bailey    Original Article
Posted By: zoidberg- 12/5/2017 10:55:05     Post Reply
A new study using more than 38 years satellite and weather balloon temperature data hypothesizes that global temperatures are going up more slowly than projected by most climate models. And right on time, these results were challenged by other researchers who defend the scientific climate consensus as embodied in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports. The new study done by University of Alabama in Huntsville climatologists John Christy and Richard McNider published in the Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Science argues consensus models may not have accurately captured how storms in the tropics expel excess heat back into space and/or that they have failed to

Taming the Imperial Presidency
National Review, by Jay Cost    Original Article
Posted By: zoidberg- 12/4/2017 9:05:38     Post Reply
I have a new ritual on Sunday mornings. I wake up, get my coffee, fire up Twitter, and check in on the mental health of the pundit class. More often than not, President Donald Trump has tweeted something that outrages a whole mess of people, and the fallout can last for hours on end. Part of me is amused by this. It is pretty clear that one of the purposes of Trump’s Twitter feed is to drive people crazy, and for the life of me, I don’t know why people rush to take the bait.

A Bipartisan Tradition of Enabling
Spendaholics
Reason, by Veronique de Rugy    Original Article
Posted By: zoidberg- 11/30/2017 10:58:35     Post Reply
Our national debt is $20.5 trillion and heading to $30 trillion by 2030. You´d think that this would be a wake-up call for Republicans, who control all three branches of government, to finally take spending seriously. Instead, they want to get rid of the spending caps meant to constrain lawmakers´ uncontrollable appetite to spend. The spending caps were implemented as part of the Budget Control Act of 2011. The deal itself was the result of a vigorous debt ceiling battle between those who wanted the unconditional ability to raise the debt limit and those who called for fiscal discipline going

Yes, Deficits Still Matter
National Review, by Kevin D. Williamson    Original Article
Posted By: zoidberg- 11/22/2017 9:12:24     Post Reply
There’s a lot not to like about the current Republican tax proposal, beginning with its effect on the debt, to which it will add about $1.3 trillion according to current estimates. It is becoming something of an unfortunate tradition in American politics that deficits only matter to the party out of power. Republicans wailed and moaned about the Obama-Pelosi-Reid deficits and, to their credit, reduced them when they came to power in Congress. But having whiffed on health-care reform and much else toward which they have turned their increasingly addled, muddled, and unample attention, they are desperate to pass some

Trump’s ‘Great Relationship’ With
a Vicious Drug Warrior
Creators Syndicate, by Jacob Sullum    Original Article
Posted By: zoidberg- 11/16/2017 1:55:49     Post Reply
When Maximo Garcia heard that he was on a list of local drug suspects in Mayombo, he tried to clear his name with the police chief, explaining that he no longer used drugs and had never sold them. Four days later, the Philippine news site Rappler reports, a masked gunman shot up Garcia´s house as he and his family were eating lunch, wounding him and killing his 5-year-old granddaughter. So it goes in Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte´s war on drugs, which has claimed somewhere between 7,000 and 13,000 lives since he took office in June 2016. Although Duterte´s bloody crusade

Praying for a Sessions Write-In
Candidacy
National Review, by Ben Shapiro    Original Article
Posted By: zoidberg- 11/14/2017 5:18:19     Post Reply
Was a 14-year-old girl molested by Alabama Senate Republican candidate Roy Moore, or is she lying? It’s a yes-or-no question. Was a 16-year-old girl sexually assaulted by Moore, or is she lying? Again, it’s a yes-or-no question. Finally, do you believe that there are conditions under which a child molester should sit in the United States Senate? Again, this question is binary. Yet many conservatives seem to be seeking a third answer to all three of these questions, mostly to avoid giving straight answers. Let’s begin with the first question: Did Roy Moore molest a 14-year-old girl?



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



How Did the FBI Lose Five Months of Text
Messages Between Two Trump-Hating Employees?

40 replie(s)
Weekly Standard, by Andrew Egger    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 1/23/2018 4:51:00 AM     Post Reply
You’ve got to feel for Robert Mueller. The man overseeing the special investigation into Russian election meddling is by all accounts a non-partisan straight shooter, the model image of a public-minded civil servant. Drafted to lead politically polarizing investigation, working under the beady eyes of distrustful congressional Republicans, Mueller has striven to keep his team’s conduct as unimpeachable as possible by bringing on some of America’s sharpest legal minds to check his own work and keeping public comments to a minimum. Imagine how Mueller feels, then, to have to answer so frequently for the partisans and incompetents surrounding him. The special counsel’s biggest

Black racists enraged by
Malia Obama´s white boyfriend

37 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Ed Straker    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 1/22/2018 8:52:20 AM     Post Reply
Malia Obama, who is studying at Harvard University, has boyfriend! But some black people on Twitter have questioned her choice in men, because Malia´s new homey, Rory Farquharson, is white. (5 tweets) This racism on the part of some in the black community, who are bruddas and sistas to us all, is very sad. Most white people want us to grow together as a community. I just wish everyone of all races felt the same way. Questions for discussion: After years of Obama´s race baiting, President Trump is the first "post-racial" president to follow him. What do you think President Trump

What´s next in the investigation
of those missing FBI texts

36 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Byron York    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 1/23/2018 5:06:27 AM     Post Reply
Congressional investigators believe they are barely beginning to answer the questions raised by the text messages between the FBI´s Peter Strzok and Lisa Page. For several reasons: 1) Strzok and Page were more prolific texters than anyone knew. In a statement late Monday, Attorney General Jeff Sessions said FBI investigators have found "over 50,000 texts" in their review of Strzok-Page communications. 2) Even with all those texts, the FBI says it cannot find the couple´s messages between Dec. 14, 2016, and May 17, 2017 — a critical time in the Trump-Russia affair. It´s probably safe to say there is not a single

Breaking: New Texts From Anti-Trump FBI
Agents Mention A ´SECRET SOCIETY´

31 replie(s)
Daily Wire, by Ryan Saavedra    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 1/22/2018 10:46:17 PM     Post Reply
New text messages from anti-Trump FBI agents reviewed by investigators reportedly make reference to a "secret society," in what could be the nail in the coffin for special counsel Robert Mueller´s Russia investigation. Investigators have reviewed 50,000 text messages on FBI servers looking for all exchanges between anti-Trump FBI agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page during the 2016 election, Fox News reported. The revelation comes as investigators are seeking the whereabouts of approximately five months´ worth of text messages between Page and Strzok. House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy told Fox News on Monday that one

America Slips in the Eyes of the World
31 replie(s)
US News & World Report, by Kevin Drew    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 1/23/2018 12:29:00 PM     Post Reply
The mood on the international conference call at the beginning of this month was somber as Ian Bremmer, president of the political risk consulting firm Eurasia Group, prepared to list off top global dangers in the coming year. Bremmer began with a show-stopping line:"If we had to pick one year for a big unexpected crisis — the geopolitical equivalent of the 2008 financial meltdown — it feels like 2018." The reasons are many, Bremmer cited, but the most prominent causes for global insecurity stem from U.S. President Donald Trump´s move away from global leadership, and China´s eagerness to fill the

Schumer withdraws offer on Trump´s wall
28 replie(s)
Politico, by Burgess Everett & Seung Min Kim    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 1/23/2018 12:33:01 PM     Post Reply
Chuck Schumer is taking his big spending boost for Donald Trump’s border wall off the table. The Senate minority leader, through an aide, informed the White House on Monday that he was retracting the offer he made last week to give Trump well north of the $1.6 billion in wall funding Trump had asked for this year, according to two Democrats. And now they say Trump will simply not get a better deal than that on his signature campaign promise. Schumer “took it off,” said Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), the No. 2 Senate Democrat. “He called the White House yesterday and said

California Democrats want some businesses
to fork over half tax-cut savings to state

26 replie(s)
Fox News, by Edmund DeMarche     Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 1/22/2018 12:27:25 PM     Post Reply
Calling the Trump administration’s tax reform plan a “middle-class tax increase,” two California lawmakers introduced a bill that would force large companies to fork over half of their expected savings to the state. Assemblymen Kevin McCarty and Phil Ting, both Democrats, introduced Assembly Constitutional Amendment 22, which calls for a 10 percent surcharge on companies with a net earnings over $1 million. The plan could potentially raise billions for the state´s social services programs. “It is unconscionable to force working families to pay the price for tax breaks and loopholes benefiting corporations and wealthy individuals,” Ting said in a statement,

Chuck Schumer: ´We will vote
today to reopen the government´

26 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Susan Ferrechio    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 1/22/2018 12:36:55 PM     Post Reply
The Senate on Monday was set to hold a successful vote to reopen the federal government, after Senate Democrats agreed to let the bill through even though it doesn´t include immigration language they are seeking. "We will vote today to reopen the government to continue negotiating a global agreement," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said on the floor. Under the bill up to be called up, the government would be fully funded through Feb. 8, and it would fund the Children´s Health Insurance Program for six years. It would also reopen the government, which has been partially closed since midnight

´It´s time to address the "poor me"
routine´: Megyn Kelly RIPS Jane Fonda for
her outrage over a plastic surgery question
before attacking ´Hanoi Jane´ for still ´not
being proud of America´ as she brings*

26 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Chris Spargo    Original Article
Posted By: zephyrgirl- 1/22/2018 12:56:56 PM     Post Reply
It has been four months since Megyn Kelly earned the wrath and ire of Jane Fonda for asking the 80-year-old actress about her plastic surgery, and the NBC host is now responding to the backlash. That moment occurred during Kelly´s third episode when she asked the Oscar-winner about what work she had done in the past, which prompted a steely Fonda to stare Kelly down and ask: ´We really want to talk about that now?´ Since then Fonda has complained about the question to a number of outlets, and even mocked Kelly´s question on Today last week during an interview

#ReleaseTheMemo Update: RINO
Republicans Help Democrats
To Keep Memo Locked Up

25 replie(s)
DCWhispers, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 1/22/2018 7:55:10 AM     Post Reply
While the Establishment Media continues its fabricated government shutdown hysteria through the weekend, some Republicans continue to demand the public be allowed to see a memo which apparently shows a shocking abuse of power during the Obama administration that, among other things, attempted to unduly influence the 2016 Election outcome.(Snip)(ABOVE: RINO Republican Peter King is now advocating a memo on Deep State/Obama administration abuses NOT be released due to concerns over “national security”) Members of Congress like Peter King are right when they say the memo might very well be a threat to security – namely THEIR security as millions of

Dick Durbin Claims Amnesty Is
‘Civil Rights Issue of Our Time’

25 replie(s)
Breitbart.com, by Neil Munro    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 1/22/2018 9:37:50 PM     Post Reply
Democratic Senators believe amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants is the “civil rights issue of our time,” declared Sen. Dick Durbin, just before he voted January 22 to end the 2018 budget filibuster. Durbin’s promotion of illegal immigrants above African-Americans and other Americans spotlights the party’s decision that Americans’ deficits in wealth, job opportunities, and education are subordinate to the party’s strategy of allying with business to import foreign voters via the nation’s mass-immigration laws. Durbin spoke just before the vote began, saying: So many of you cast a vote that was very hard and very difficult because you believed — as I

NFL to highlight players´
work on equality issues

25 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington, DC], by John Bowden    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 1/23/2018 2:21:12 PM     Post Reply
The National Football League (NFL) announced Tuesday it would establish a council of players and owners to highlight league members´ work on issues of racial justice and equality. A press release on the NFL´s website details the "Let´s Listen Together" campaign, which includes five current NFL team owners and five current or former players and plans to "focus on supporting programs and initiatives that reduce barriers to opportunity, with a priority on supporting improvements in education and economic development, community and police relations, and the criminal justice system." "The collaboration between the NFL and its players should be celebrated, as


Post Reply   Close thread 932538





Recommended Trending videos


Sek-Float


Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2015 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

NQ