A Message From Lucianne  



Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google

Justices Sharply Divided
in Wedding Cake Case

New York Times, by Adam Liptak

Original Article

Posted By:Drive, 12/5/2017 12:27:04 PM

WASHINGTON — Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, who almost certainly holds the crucial vote in the case of a Colorado baker who refused to make a wedding cake for a gay couple, sent sharply contradictory messages when it was argued Tuesday at the Supreme Court. He asked a lawyer for the Trump administration whether the baker, Jack Phillips, could put a sign in his window saying, “We don’t bake cakes for gay weddings.” The lawyer, Noel J. Francisco said yes, so long as the cakes were custom made. Justice Kennedy looked troubled and said the administration’s position was an affront to the dignity


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: thomthomp, 12/5/2017 12:33:34 PM     (No. 11471294)

It´s the New York Times. Believe nothing.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    46 persons like this.

Reply 2 - Posted by: Cliff, 12/5/2017 12:36:54 PM     (No. 11471300)

Any of the supremes who are against the baker are too stupid to be on the court!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    60 persons like this.




Reply 3 - Posted by: killerbee, 12/5/2017 12:42:39 PM     (No. 11471306)

Hm. That doesn´t sound good from Kennedy. I´m waiting for the decision to simply read: Muh Feelz!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.

Reply 4 - Posted by: zephyrgirl, 12/5/2017 12:45:46 PM     (No. 11471315)

What goes unsaid in the coverage of this case is that the two gays were activists who targeted the shop, made a scene in the shop, and triggered (perhaps coordinated) hundreds of abusive and threatening phone calls to the shop. It was so bad that Jack Phillips wouldn´t let his employees answer the phone.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    48 persons like this.

Reply 5 - Posted by: Boston Federalist, 12/5/2017 12:49:01 PM     (No. 11471322)

This will be another perfect opportunity for Kennedy to get on his moral high horse and issue a pompous, holier-than-thou opinion that will be legally and logically incomprehensible.

The baker will lose and Kennedy will write the opinion. Then he will go up to the New York Times´ editor´s office (might as well bring McCain and Flake with him for good measure) to get the good-little-boy pat on the head, and he´ll drool like a puppy.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    41 persons like this.

Reply 6 - Posted by: rinohunter, 12/5/2017 12:50:24 PM     (No. 11471325)

Along with BLM, the case of the faggolas is a case to FORCE businesses to do things that proclaiming this a "free country" precludes.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    21 persons like this.

Reply 7 - Posted by: Whamdbambam, 12/5/2017 12:58:53 PM     (No. 11471334)

Our self-appointed arbiter of all things moral needs to be removed from the Court.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    34 persons like this.




Reply 8 - Posted by: wilarrbie, 12/5/2017 1:08:08 PM     (No. 11471339)

Can he put a sign in the window that says We specialize in hetero wedding cakes?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.

Reply 9 - Posted by: web, 12/5/2017 1:11:33 PM     (No. 11471340)

Freedom of Religion is guaranteed to American citizens in our Constitution. Freedom of Perversion is not. What´s so hard about it? We have had enough of crazy people suing and trying to force us to endorse and take part in their perversions. Government has no authority or right to force us to endorse things we do not wish to take part in.

I will not read the article, since it comes from a Fake News site, but I assume the last line refers to "the dignity" of homosexuals. You cannot affront something that does not exist.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    43 persons like this.

Reply 10 - Posted by: Maggie2u, 12/5/2017 1:14:23 PM     (No. 11471341)

Put a sign in the window declaring this is a sanctuary business. We obey the laws we like and ignore the laws we don´t like.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    80 persons like this.

Reply 11 - Posted by: NorthernDog, 12/5/2017 1:24:35 PM     (No. 11471354)

Can´t wait to see Muslim meat shops being required to offer Kosher products.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    37 persons like this.

Reply 12 - Posted by: cheeflo, 12/5/2017 1:31:48 PM     (No. 11471360)

And Justice Kennedy´s decision in this matter was/is an affront to the dignity of the institution of marriage. Dignity is hard to find in sexual activity as it´s characterized these days (homosexual or heterosexual). Let´s face it, it is about as base an impulse as it gets, not to say it´s not ennobled when love and procreation are part of the picture.

Selling a cake off the shelf is one thing. Baking a custom cake is quite another. No one in the private sector should be forced by the government to provide any service.

Can he not see that compelling someone to act against his/her conscience is unconstitutional? Apparently not.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    36 persons like this.




Reply 13 - Posted by: Patchy Groundfog, 12/5/2017 1:33:02 PM     (No. 11471362)

The top level court in the land dealing with wedding cakes is an affront to liberty and sanity.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    24 persons like this.

Reply 14 - Posted by: luandir, 12/5/2017 1:34:22 PM     (No. 11471363)

Mr. Kennedy cannot retire soon enough.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    36 persons like this.

Reply 15 - Posted by: horacer, 12/5/2017 1:45:28 PM     (No. 11471383)

This whole matter is ridiculous. The shop owner never discriminated. He would have sold the couple anything in his shop, he would have made them any type of custom cake except one that went against his religious principles. How is this even an issue. What is wrong with us. Don´t all religions deserve respect. Certain Native American sects are allowed to smoke illegal substances, peyote, in their ceremonies. It´s religious freedom. How can you force a man to express support of something that goes against his religious beliefs.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    31 persons like this.

Reply 16 - Posted by: ilovedogs, 12/5/2017 1:51:19 PM     (No. 11471392)

And the practical point is there were many other bakers just walk out and shake it off and go find one that would bake you the best one ever.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.

Reply 17 - Posted by: greggojo, 12/5/2017 1:54:03 PM     (No. 11471398)

In addition to #4´s informative post, the media is careful not to show the custom cakes created by this baker. His cakes are as close to art, or are art, as a decorated cake could be. They are extremely unique and quite beautiful. No doubt in addition to not allowing the point that they are art to be made, the media also wants to avoid giving any free positive publicity to the baker. (PS I hate the American press. Their bias is so downright blatant. And they have given us nothing but rotten advice for as long as I can remember. We certainly have the press (who strongly supports Dem politicians) to thank for the absolute wretchedness in our inner cities. And the millions of poorly educated, non-English speaking illegal aliens who have burdened our schools, hospitals and welfare systems).

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    24 persons like this.




Reply 18 - Posted by: southernboy, 12/5/2017 2:13:21 PM     (No. 11471429)

The point completely ignored, which is the whole point of contention, is what the decoration was they wanted on the top of the cake.

It was something lewd and indecent having to do with Gay lifestyle. That´s where the baker drew the line!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.

Reply 19 - Posted by: uno, 12/5/2017 2:17:07 PM     (No. 11471437)

Let´s all chug on over to Moe´s Muzlim restaurant and demand BLT´s!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    23 persons like this.

Reply 20 - Posted by: avanti1, 12/5/2017 2:21:35 PM     (No. 11471443)

This case is not about baking a cake, it is about the gay couple´s demand that the baker be forced to dedicate his talent, time and effort in a fashion desired by the couple.

It appears as though the baker did NOT discriminate by refusing to sell them a standard, premade cake, only that he declined to make a custom cake for them.

No one is dictating or demanding a particular pattern of behavior of the couple, why are they demanding a particular pattern of behavior on the part of the baker?

Are some people more equal than others?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.

Reply 21 - Posted by: avanti1, 12/5/2017 2:26:07 PM     (No. 11471448)

FTA: "Kristen K. Waggoner, a lawyer for Mr. Phillips, said her client was an artist, one who created a sort of sculpture.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor appeared unpersuaded. “When have we ever given protection to a food?” she asked."

I seem to recall that protections were given to a bottle of urine deemed to be "art."

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    23 persons like this.

Reply 22 - Posted by: msjena, 12/5/2017 2:30:30 PM     (No. 11471458)

When Justice Kennedy mentions "dignity," it´s not a good sign. That said, religious freedom is a express Constitutional right. Can a state or city´s anti-discrimination law trump it?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.



Reply 23 - Posted by: rubberneck, 12/5/2017 2:40:57 PM     (No. 11471470)

I´ve had a hard time smiling about this case... but #10 gave me a smile. THANKS!

Are there cake shops in big cities (you know, where people are "open minded"), that have a big assortment of wedding cake toppers?...
- man in tux, woman in beautiful white gown (traditional)
- two men in tuxes
- two women in white gowns
- man with two brides
- bride and groom both in leather with whips and handcuffs
- man and young girl
- man and young boy
- man and sheep with fishnet stockings
... etc?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.

Reply 24 - Posted by: msjena, 12/5/2017 2:41:25 PM     (No. 11471471)

Sorry to post again, but the questio about race is different because the baker´s religion doesn´t approve of racial discrimination. It is consistent with the law so there is no infringement on the baker´s rights. And the baker here isn´t refusing to deal with gay people; he is only refusing to make a cake for something he doesn´t believe in. They can still buy a cake or even ask for a cake with specific flavors,etc. The baker is saying he will not create and decorate a cake that celebrates gay marriage.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.

Reply 25 - Posted by: judy, 12/5/2017 2:48:14 PM     (No. 11471477)

They will not allow conservatives to speak at colleges, yet they want them to bake their cakes.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.

Reply 26 - Posted by: Felixcat, 12/5/2017 2:52:40 PM     (No. 11471483)

But "no shoes no service" is legal?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    15 persons like this.

Reply 27 - Posted by: wilarrbie, 12/5/2017 3:23:34 PM     (No. 11471519)

Good point #11. Will butcher shops be required to provide halal meats?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.

Reply 28 - Posted by: Me_Opinionated_Nah, 12/5/2017 3:40:18 PM     (No. 11471536)

Point of Order (or something)!

I just heard Sarah Sanders say "As I said..."
I heard her say it twice. Not "Like I said..."
"AS I SAID..."

I´m so proud.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.

Reply 29 - Posted by: anonymous, 12/5/2017 4:07:06 PM     (No. 11471556)

Wedding cakes come from the same batter. There´s no difference between the flour or the eggs or the sugar between wedding cake A and wedding cake B. If a same-sex couple insisted on the baker using sugar imported from Burundi, the baker would be within his rights to refuse their request but not otherwise.

Unusual requests can always be denied by a baker but this case before the Supreme Court is about whether a baker can refuse to serve a product that is run-of-the-mill for his business.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.

Reply 30 - Posted by: Muguy, 12/5/2017 4:40:07 PM     (No. 11471573)

Whenever Kennedy speaks, foolishness begins.

Some of the members of the Court need to actually realize that the Constitution guides them, not their own views.

We are not governed by pop culture or what a justice thinks is "fair".

There were other persons who could have made a cake, but to compel someone to do it when there are others to do it, strikes at the heart of our most basic values.

For the court to FORCE someone to do it in order to RUIN them for their convictions is wrong.

What if the baker was a moooooslim? We that person be compelled to do it?

What should be an issue of how one conducts his business is the issue, not promoting a gay agenda over a conscientious refusal.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    27 persons like this.

Reply 31 - Posted by: zephyrgirl, 12/5/2017 5:07:41 PM     (No. 11471602)

Here´s another tidbit - they´ve cleaned up the gay couple and made them look respectable. Earlier pictures make them look like the wierdos they really are.

#17 is correct about Jack Phillips´ cakes. I´ve had him make several for me. Every cake was a work of art, even when I said, "just put some nice colorful flowers on the top..."

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    17 persons like this.

Reply 32 - Posted by: bobgray2, 12/5/2017 5:20:19 PM     (No. 11471613)

Wedding cakes are art. Imagine going up to any artist no matter what the medium and demanding that they perform for you to your specifications, and if they don´t, they will be sued. Dance monkeys, dance.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.

Reply 33 - Posted by: snakeoil, 12/5/2017 5:33:08 PM     (No. 11471624)

Am ambivalent about this. Anyone should have the right to refuse anyone as a customer. All those restaurants that say: "No Shoes, No Socks, Noe Shirt, No Service" certainly have the right. I would have just baked a kitty litter cake and charged them $ 5k and if they didn´t pay charge them with breach of contract.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.

Reply 34 - Posted by: Rumblehog, 12/5/2017 5:56:36 PM     (No. 11471647)

Life, Liberty, and the PURSUIT of Happiness. Them sick homos can ´pursue happiness´ at another bake shop then another then another...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.

Reply 35 - Posted by: Udanja99, 12/5/2017 6:33:04 PM     (No. 11471671)

If I had been the baker I think I would have simply said, “Wedding cakes like mine take a great deal of time. Let me check my schedule... Oh, sorry, I’m completely booked for that month”.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.

Reply 36 - Posted by: Harlowe, 12/5/2017 10:01:19 PM     (No. 11471803)

First Amendment, U. S. Constitution: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,…” The “law” is clear, no “prohibiting the FREE EXERCISE thereof (religion).” The text does not include “dignity.” “Dignity” is an innate, inherent value and worth as human beings. “Law” consists of rules recognized and enforced by judicial decisions (U.S.Constitution). The bottom line is does anyone have the right to exercise their freedom of religion (law), yes or no. Reality Check: The U. S. Constitution makes allowance for conscientious objectors based on religious beliefs.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    22 persons like this.

Reply 37 - Posted by: saguni, 12/5/2017 10:36:06 PM     (No. 11471824)

I wish there were a storing religious freedom (or some such) law, that stated if an activist must drive past a business that would provide the service as requested in order to (1) reach the business of a religious person and (2) be denied the service requested in order to (3) file a complaint, then the penalty due the business will be doubled and charged to the activist complainant.

But, then, I do have an active fantasy life.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.

Reply 38 - Posted by: Charactercounts, 12/6/2017 12:21:21 AM     (No. 11471869)

#23, Years ago, there was a bakery in New York that was famous for selling cakes with the most lewd decoration. People would avert their eyes when they passed the window.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.

Reply 39 - Posted by: ColonialAmerican1623, 12/6/2017 12:28:50 AM     (No. 11471873)

I heard these two girly men on the radio today. Little over the top. When gays demand Muzlims bake a cake for them or cater a BBQ for the reception, we will know they tried everybody.
Not happening.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.

Reply 40 - Posted by: 49 Ford, 12/6/2017 4:00:17 AM     (No. 11471911)

My gut feeling is that #5 is right. The decision will be filled with sanctimonious fluff and bereft of fealty to the Constitution.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    17 persons like this.

Post Reply   Close thread 929729

Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Drive"


Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)

Most Recent Articles posted by "Drive"

Congress seeks answers after FBI
claims texts missing in Trump-Russia probe
Washington Examiner, by Byron York    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 1/21/2018 10:58:14     Post Reply
Investigators in both House and Senate were stunned late Friday when, receiving a batch of newly-released texts between FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, they also received notice from the bureau that the FBI "failed to preserve" Strzok-Page messages from December 14, 2016 through May 17, 2017. Given the amount of texting that went on between Strzok and Page, who were having an extramarital affair, that probably meant thousands of missing documents. A number of critical events in the Trump-Russia affair occurred between December 2016 and May 2017, including: Conversations between Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn and Russian ambassador Sergey

Megyn Kelly staffer fired after reporting
‘toxic and demeaning’ work culture
New York Post, by Emily Smith    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 1/19/2018 7:44:16     Post Reply
A top staffer on Megyn Kelly’s show has been fired after claiming there is a “toxic and demeaning” environment on set, rife with bullying and “abusive treatment.” Kevin Bleyer was fired as a writer from “Megyn Kelly Today” this week after complaining that Kelly’s two top execs, Jackie Levin and Christine Cataldi, were bullying lower level members of staff. He was fired even though Kelly has made fighting abuse her personal crusade. Plus, in the wake of Matt Lauer’s firing, NBC ordered all staff to report workplace bad behavior, supposedly without fear or reprisal.

Government shutdown looking
more likely by the minute
New York Post, by Bob Fredericks    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 1/19/2018 7:37:55     Post Reply
Senate Democrats said Thursday they had enough votes to block a GOP short-term budget deal — increasing the likelihood of a government shutdown as Friday’s midnight deadline loomed. A senior Senate Democratic aide told The Washington Post it was “almost certain” that a spending extension does not have the votes to pass the upper chamber. The Democrats want the bill to include relief for the Dreamers — immigrants brought here illegally as children and who were protected by the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. But President Trump and immigration hard-liners in Congress want to deal with DACA at a later date. With the

Trump’s ‘Fake News’ award winners are…
New York Post, by Laura Italiano    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 1/18/2018 7:00:21     Post Reply
First place in Trump’s touted awards went to the Times’ Paul Krugman, who “claimed on the day of President Trump’s historic, landslide victory that the economy would never recover,” according to the list of awards posted on the RNC’s website. ABC News placed second for Brian Ross’ error that caused a brief stock market crash, and CNN placed third, sixth, seventh and ninth. President Trump announced in a tweet Wednesday night that the winners have been chosen. “And the FAKE NEWS winners are…” Trump tweeted, along with a link to the results. But that link — promptly swamped by web traffic — connected users

Sources: Rupert Murdoch Was Hospitalized
With Serious back Injury
Vanity Fair, by Gabriel Sherman    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 1/18/2018 6:34:28     Post Reply
Rupert Murdoch suffered a serious back injury while vacationing on his son Lachlan’s yacht in the Caribbean earlier this month, three sources familiar with the incident told Vanity Fair. The 86-year-old media mogul was helicoptered off the boat and was, until recently, recovering in a Los Angeles hospital, one of the sources said. The incident is said to have happened shortly after the New Year’s holiday. Last Friday night, Murdoch sent an email to his senior management informing them of the accident: "I hope you all are having a great start to 2018. I suspect it has been better than mine,"

“Harvey’s Concern Was Who Did Him In”:
Inside Harvey Weinstein’s Frantic Final Days
Vanity Fair, by Adam Ciralsky    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 1/18/2018 6:05:27     Post Reply
On Monday, October 2, 2017, Harvey Weinstein arrived at work earlier than usual. As was his custom, he barked orders and moved from room to room inside his spacious office suite at 375 Greenwich Street, the New York City headquarters of the Weinstein Company (T.W.C.), a beautiful old red-brick factory building that had been converted into a center of the film universe. The producer had formed the enterprise some 12 years earlier after he and his brother and partner, Bob Weinstein, exited their fabled Miramax operation, home to such critical and commercial successes as Shakespeare in Love, Pulp Fiction, and Sex,

How Michael Wolff Got Into the White
House for His Tell-All Book
Bloomberg, by Jennifer Jacobs    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 1/17/2018 12:24:45     Post Reply
Author Michael Wolff’s pitch to the White House to win cooperation for his book included a working title that signaled a sympathetic view, a counter-narrative to a slew of negative news stories early in Donald Trump’s presidency. He called it “The Great Transition: The First 100 Days of the Trump Administration.” And in part due to that title, Wolff was able to exploit an inexperienced White House staff who mistakenly believed they could shape the book to the president’s liking.

White House official: House intel
panel broke an agreement on limiting
scope of questions for Bannon
CNBC, by Eamon Javers    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 1/17/2018 12:21:44     Post Reply
The White House believed it had an agreement with the House Intelligence Committee to limit questions for Steve Bannon only to events on the presidential campaign, and not during the ousted former chief strategist´s time in the Trump administration, an official told CNBC. According to the White House official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, staffers for the committee and the White House on Friday discussed the parameters of Bannon´s testimony. The White House emerged from that conversation believing it had an agreement to limit the questioning of Bannon just to events during the campaign, and not during the

Lawmakers vow to force
answers from Bannon in
Russia probe after he defies subpoena
Politico, by Kyle Cheney    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 1/17/2018 6:33:01     Post Reply
Lawmakers investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election vowed Tuesday to force answers from Steve Bannon after the former senior strategist to President Donald Trump stonewalled their inquiries — even after the committee issued a subpoena with bipartisan support. Lawmakers in both parties attributed Bannon´s silence to the White House, which they said told him to refuse to discuss his time in the West Wing or on Trump´s transition team. Bannon´s refusal to speak clearly angered lawmakers on the House Intelligence Committee, who vowed to make him speak.

U.S. warned Jared Kushner
about Wendi Deng Murdoch
Fox Business, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 1/16/2018 7:48:19     Post Reply
U.S. counterintelligence officials in early 2017 warned Jared Kushner, President Donald Trump´s son-in-law and senior adviser, that Wendi Deng Murdoch, a prominent Chinese-American businesswoman, could be using her close friendship with Mr. Kushner and his wife, Ivanka Trump, to further the interests of the Chinese government, according to people familiar with the matter. U.S. officials have also had concerns about a counterintelligence assessment that Ms. Murdoch was lobbying for a high-profile construction project funded by the Chinese government in Washington, D.C., one of these people said. The project, a planned $100 million Chinese garden at the National Arboretum, was deemed a

Trump dossier probes now include
possible State Department involvement
Washington Examiner, by Byron York    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 1/16/2018 7:03:00     Post Reply
Congressional investigations into the Trump dossier have so far been focused on the FBI and Justice Department. They still are, but now investigators are also looking into a possible Obama State Department role in the collection and dissemination of sensational and still-unverified allegations against candidate Donald Trump gathered by a former British spy working for the Hillary Clinton campaign. In addition to having contacts in the Obama Justice Department and FBI, that former spy, Christopher Steele, was also well-connected with the Obama State Department. A book published in November by a correspondent at the Guardian, "Collusion: Secret meetings, dirty money, and

Condoleezza Rice on #MeToo:
´Let´s not turn women into snowflakes´
CNN, by Alexandra King    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 1/14/2018 7:47:50     Post Reply
Former US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said that while she believes the #MeToo movement is "a good thing," people need "to be a little bit careful" about how they respond to it. "Let´s not turn women into snowflakes. Let´s not infantilize women," Rice insisted during an interview with CNN´s David Axelrod on "The Axe Files," which airs at 7 ET Saturday night. Rice said she didn´t want "to get to a place that men start to think, ´Well, maybe it´s just better not to have women around.´ I´ve heard a little bit of that. And it, it worries me," she told

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)

´Piece of Garbage´: Michael Dukakis
Rips Tax Law, Blasts Wall Proposal

65 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 1/20/2018 1:53:19 PM     Post Reply
1988 Democratic presidential nominee Michael Dukakis ripped President Trump´s new tax law and offered optimism for Democrats ahead of the midterm elections. Dukakis, a former governor of the Bay State during the so-called economic "Massachusetts Miracle," said Republicans have lost their way when it comes to supporting fiscal responsibility. He questioned why they would champion a tax plan that may have costly ramifications for the national deficit. (Snip) "We just passed a tax bill, which I think is a piece of garbage," Dukakis, who lost his presidential bid to then-Vice President George Bush, said. "Look at these companies, though, that are

Romney 2020? Republicans speculate
that Romney´s likely Senate run is
the start of something much bigger

38 replie(s)
Business Insider, by Allan Smith and Eliza Relman    Original Article
Posted By: tisHimself- 1/21/2018 2:16:43 PM     Post Reply
It´s no secret that Mitt Romney is, in all likelihood, going to run for a Senate seat in Utah. What´s less clear, however, is why the man who was the 2012 Republican presidential nominee and is now retired and occupying an elder-statesman role in a party torn into warring factions would want to serve as a junior senator. Once elected, Romney would find himself embroiled in day-to-day congressional fights and less free to voice his criticisms of the White House, while losing some of the deference he´s been shown by members of his own party. But listen to any number of Republicans and

Schumer: ´Next to Impossible´ to Negotiate
With the WH or ´Hard Right´

36 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 1/20/2018 9:33:24 PM     Post Reply
Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer of New York pinned the government shutdown on President Donald Trump, saying it has become "next to impossible" to negotiate with the White House.In a press availability, Schumer said he and Trump have been close to a deal to fund the government at least once.But, he said the "hard right" in the Republican Party later convinces Trump not to strike a deal with him."[Trump] won´t take yes for an answer," Schumer said. (Tweet) Schumer said that he does not know whether Trump´s apparent waffling on a deal is the work of adviser Stephen Miller, a

FBI Mysteriously “Loses” Five Months
of Text Messages Between Peter
Strzok and Lisa Page…

34 replie(s)
Conservative Treehouse, by Sundance    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 1/21/2018 5:42:49 PM     Post Reply
The Daily Caller journalist Chuck Ross has some extremely interesting information released today surrounding former top FBI Counterintelligence Agent Peter Strzok and DOJ/FBI liaison attorney Lisa Page which includes a disclosure by top FBI officials that text messages between Strzok and Page have gone missing. (Snip) According to information relayed to Senator Ron Johnson, the period of time the FBI has “lost” is from December 14th, 2016 to May 17th, 2017, the exact day that Special Counsel Robert Mueller was assigned to lead the Russia collusion probe. As CTH has previously outlined the same “small group” inside the DOJ and FBI,

Hillary Lost, but the Future Is Hers
31 replie(s)
New York Times, by Gail Collins    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 1/21/2018 5:00:14 AM     Post Reply
Question: Do you think Donald Trump spends more time thinking about Hillary Clinton than Hillary Clinton spends thinking about Donald Trump? Sure does seem like it. The other day, President Trump was discussing Russia at a press conference with the prime minister of Norway, when he suddenly announced that Clinton “was not for a strong military and Hillary, my opponent, was for windmills, and she was for other types of energy that don’t have the same capacities at this moment certainly.” Yeah, it didn’t make any sense. But he really can’t seem to get past her. Recently while promoting tax

Paul Ryan on Trump Ad Attacking Dems:
‘I Don’t Know If That’s Necessarily Productive’

31 replie(s)
Breitbart Video, by Pam Key    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 1/21/2018 8:10:13 PM     Post Reply
Sunday on CBS’s “Face the Nation,” Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R-WI) questioned President Donald Trump’s new campaign ad saying Democrats “will be complicit in every murder committed by illegal immigrants” if they continued the shutdown. Ryan said, “They are certainly not helping us keep the government open. They are certainly not helping us get to a solution on immigration. When you shut down the government you stop negotiating on immigration reform. They’re complicity with not getting things done.” He added, “I’m not going to comment. I just saw that. I don’t know if that’s necessarily productive. It’s no

Illegal Aliens Quietly Being Relocated
Throughout U.S. on Commercial Flights

30 replie(s)
Judicial Watch, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 1/20/2018 9:35:27 AM     Post Reply
Immigrants entering the United States illegally through the southern border are quietly being relocated to different parts of the country on commercial flights, high-ranking Homeland Security officials told Judicial Watch this week. In the last few days alone, groups of illegal aliens boarded planes at airports in Texas and Arizona accompanied by a taxpayer-funded government escort in civilian clothes to avoid drawing attention. The first flight originated at Valley International Airport in Harlingen, Texas and was bound for Minneapolis. (Snip) The illegal aliens wear red HHS wrist bands and receive “the gold glove treatment,” according to a veteran federal official,

House Intelligence Committee Will Vote
To Release FISA Corruption Memo…

30 replie(s)
Conservative Tree House, by Sundance    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 1/21/2018 1:21:29 AM     Post Reply
According to Representative Dave Joyce (R-OH14) the House Intelligence Committee will hold a vote on the release of the four-page Nunes memo that reveals systemic corruption within the DOJ and FBI; including the unlawful use of FISA-702(16)(17) data searches which were part of an elaborate DOJ-FBI surveillance program on the political campaign of Donald Trump. (Tweet) Additionally, Chad Pergram reported that Chairman Devin Nunes met with Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte to discuss the best process to release the memo. There are generally two ways it could be done, the HPSCI vote is the most likely.As more people have become aware

Earth’s Relentless Warming Sets
a Brutal New Record in 2017

29 replie(s)
Bloomberg, by Tom Randall and Blacki Migliozzi    Original Article
Posted By: IowaDad- 1/20/2018 7:19:31 AM     Post Reply
The burn continues. What follows are 138 years of scientific records tracing the human transformation of Earth’s climate. The bold pink line up top represents 2017, the third-hottest on record. The only years to exceed it—2015 and 2016—occurred amid a powerful El Nino weather pattern that ripped heat from the Pacific Ocean into the atmosphere. In the absence of El Nino, the swelter of 2017 was unprecedented.

Elizabeth Warren’s Native American
problem goes beyond politics

29 replie(s)
Boston Globe, by Annie Linskey    Original Article
Posted By: IowaDad- 1/20/2018 6:32:18 AM     Post Reply
There’s a ghost haunting Elizabeth Warren as she ramps up for a possible 2020 presidential bid and a reelection campaign in Massachusetts this year: her enduring and undocumented claims of Native American ancestry. Warren says now, as she has from the first days of her public life, that she based her assertions on family lore, on her reasonable trust in what she was told about her ancestry as a child. “I know who I am,” she said in a recent interview with the Globe. But that self-awareness may not be enough, as her political ambitions blossom.

Every GLAAD-Nominated Marvel
Comic Book Has Been Axed

28 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Ian Miles Cheong    Original Article
Posted By: konocti95- 1/20/2018 2:15:55 PM     Post Reply
Comic book readers are apparently not fans of progressive politics—a fact no more evident in Marvel’s decision to cancel every single one of its comics that has been nominated by the LGBTQ advocacy group, GLAAD. In December, the publisher announced its decision to cancel many of its comics, citing poor sales. LGBTQ, feminist, and social justice-themed comics involving stories that revolved around Black Lives Matter, illegal immigration, and LGBTQ issues were among those to end up on the chopping block.

Adam Schiff: Keep the #Releasethememo secret
because Americans wouldn´t understand

28 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 1/21/2018 11:17:16 AM     Post Reply
Adam Schiff, reputedly a champion leaker from the House Intelligence Committee when it came to Russiagate material, suddenly thinks Ignorance is Bliss when it comes to the FISA warrant used to spy on the Trump campaign. Appearing on CNN, he tried to justify keep the 4 page memo that reportedly exposes the individuals who acted as part of a cabal to undermine the Trump campaign with help from NSA spying, and then pushed the “Russia collusion” conspiracy theory as part of the “insurance policy.” Americans are too ignorant, you see. Do you think Democrats are starting to panic? (Video) Rush

Post Reply   Close thread 929729

Recommended Trending videos


Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google

© 2015 Lucianne.com Media Inc.