A Message From Lucianne  



Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google

Congress’s Dress Code May
Bar Some Professional Wear,
But That’s Not The Point

The Federalist, by Jordyn Pair

Original Article

Posted By:Harlowe, 7/13/2017 11:29:53 PM

Let’s start with the obvious: wearing sleeveless dresses and open-toed shoes is not necessarily unprofessional, depending on one’s profession and workplace rules and norms. But blatantly ignoring rules then announcing your transgression is. (Snip) Update: Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) has announced he will be working with the Sergeant-at-Arms to update the congressional dress code. Ryan noted the dress code was not something he created, before saying it should be modernized.

Constant assault in one form or another on tradition and/or traditional values has transformed and diminished American culture to the point of serious concern by traditionalists. Now, the dissatisfaction is with the House Dress Code; the female snowflakes are melting because they cannot wear sleeveless dresses. Speaker Ryan would do well to seriously consider what the trend of “casual” dress has done to sartorial standards and the ensuing dilution and/or disregard for the rule of law, for professional authority—especially in the public school system.


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Lalo, 7/13/2017 11:52:27 PM     (No. 11318380)

It´s pretty awkward to tell women they can´t enter Congress in a sleeveless dress when First Ladies beginning with the Mooch have been representing the country there and everywhere sans sleeves.

The open-toed shoes rule is pretty draconian, too.

That said, I´m glad Congress is striking a blow for decorum and I hope they don´t relax their standards too much.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    25 persons like this.

Reply 2 - Posted by: earlybird, 7/13/2017 11:58:58 PM     (No. 11318382)

Members of Congress are not the First Ladies. That bit of relativism just won’t fly. For the members of Congress, the dress code rules are there. They should abide by them.

It is interesting that the author of this excellent piece is a junior at Hillsdale College.

It is also interesting that Rep. McSally looks sloppy in her protest attire. Very, very unprofessional. She looks and sounds like a fool. These times are far too serious for that.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    45 persons like this.




Reply 3 - Posted by: droopydog, 7/14/2017 12:00:51 AM     (No. 11318383)

They have to do everything in their power to keep Pelosi out of her mini-skirt.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    28 persons like this.

Reply 4 - Posted by: earlybird, 7/14/2017 12:01:54 AM     (No. 11318385)

For those who don’t recall, here’s a memory refresher on what Melania Trump wore to her husband’s speech to Congress:


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    25 persons like this.

Reply 5 - Posted by: jmkotow, 7/14/2017 12:09:25 AM     (No. 11318388)

Jobs, Health Care, Reduce Taxes, Infrastructure, Wall, Budget, lets do these First then Dress Code !!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    44 persons like this.

Reply 6 - Posted by: earlybird, 7/14/2017 12:10:09 AM     (No. 11318389)

McSally’s idea of “open-toed shoes” appears in the photo of her that is shown in the main photo.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    25 persons like this.

Reply 7 - Posted by: MeiDei, 7/14/2017 12:37:27 AM     (No. 11318413)

They can scream/discuss/complain about the dress code when they work 5 days a week, 48 weeks a year!

Even in regular businesses the Friday casual day is often abused - mostly by females.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    23 persons like this.




Reply 8 - Posted by: JustCause, 7/14/2017 12:40:31 AM     (No. 11318414)

Reply 5 says it all.

I guess they have to fill the time (reduced August recess) with something inane, rather than doing the work promised.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    30 persons like this.

Reply 9 - Posted by: Rumblehog, 7/14/2017 1:06:15 AM     (No. 11318421)

Go back to powdered wigs, stockings, coats, ruffled shirts, and vests.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    26 persons like this.

Reply 10 - Posted by: pchristopher, 7/14/2017 1:54:41 AM     (No. 11318445)

Doesn´t surprise me....she doesn´t look particularly bright. It´s another attempt to downgrade standards.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    26 persons like this.

Reply 11 - Posted by: jerrodmason, 7/14/2017 2:48:21 AM     (No. 11318472)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.

Reply 12 - Posted by: jerrodmason, 7/14/2017 2:56:41 AM     (No. 11318476)

Sorry for the fumblefingered blank comment.

I am a big fan of my congresswoman McSally, but I think she is wrong here, very wrong.

Don´t dismiss this lady as a fool, though (as did #10). She is a USAFA grad and the first female fighter squadron commander, and fought successfully against the sharia-approved dress code for US military females serving in the mideast. She´s also a triathlete champion and frequent singer of the national anthem at sporting events.

All that said, she´s still wrong. But at least she´s standing up for the second amendment! (Think about it.)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    43 persons like this.




Reply 13 - Posted by: Ozwestie, 7/14/2017 3:13:51 AM     (No. 11318480)

Thank your lucky stars bare arms are all you have to worry about, we have a Senator here is Australia who stands on the Senate floor breastfeeding her baby :-(.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.

Reply 14 - Posted by: ColonialAmerican1623, 7/14/2017 4:27:53 AM     (No. 11318493)

That was totally inappropriate dress for Congress. I don´t care what point you are making.

When Obola was prez, MOOoochelle showed up sleeveless and out of season clothing to draw attention to her, not the occasion.

There was a time in this country where we dressed as well as the Royal Family and we didn´t look like orphans digging worms.

If you don´t care enough about yourself to dress appropriate when you leave home, why should I respect you?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    28 persons like this.

Reply 15 - Posted by: Rinktum, 7/14/2017 6:08:50 AM     (No. 11318507)

I agree that this issue should not be addressed until Congress gets serious about its work ethic and actually performs at a professional level. Seems to me that everyday is casual Friday around there.

Frankly, I am appalled by the professional attire I see coming from most workplaces. Why don´t they all just wear scrubs and be done with it? How you dress matters and whether you like it or not, you are judged by how you present yourself. Like the dumbing down of America, this pathetic idea of wearing clothes you wear to the grocery store in a professional setting is just shameful. Buck up, people. Decorum matters. Don´t even get me started on the attire I see people wearing at church, funerals and weddings.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    40 persons like this.

Reply 16 - Posted by: Jacksin5, 7/14/2017 6:56:57 AM     (No. 11318557)

So this is how Paul Ryan spends his time.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    17 persons like this.

Reply 17 - Posted by: lakerman1, 7/14/2017 7:36:37 AM     (No. 11318589)

Back in the 1970s, the sgt at arms, I believe, was ´Fishbait´ Miller. (operating from memory here)
A new congresswoman from NYC, Bella Abzug, appeared at the door of the House, wearing a hat. (her trademark)
Fishbait stopped her, and said, ´no hats allowed.´
Abzug responded, "F... you, Fishbait!"
Things have never been the same since.
(As a postscript, Jimmy Carter hired Bella to be his ´women´s issues´ aide. He had to fire her pretty quickly, because Bella had to be Bella. She was remarkably obnoxious - moreso than Lizzie Warren, by a factor of 10.)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    28 persons like this.




Reply 18 - Posted by: mc squared, 7/14/2017 7:36:50 AM     (No. 11318590)

I´m pleased that The House is getting things done.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    16 persons like this.

Reply 19 - Posted by: rolfnader, 7/14/2017 7:38:45 AM     (No. 11318593)

I couldn´t be prouder of our ´Policy Wonk´. Don´t you ever say that he isn´t getting anything done!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    20 persons like this.

Reply 20 - Posted by: F15 Gork, 7/14/2017 7:42:48 AM     (No. 11318600)

Republicans should all be required to wear yellow to match the color of the stripe running up their backside.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    26 persons like this.

Reply 21 - Posted by: NorthernDog, 7/14/2017 8:02:16 AM     (No. 11318614)

How long before Dems show up dressed in 1969 ´Woodstock´ attire, replete with roach clips for earrings?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.

Reply 22 - Posted by: Felixcat, 7/14/2017 8:17:32 AM     (No. 11318625)

When this story first broke a couple of weeks ago because some reporter was denied entrance because of her sleeveless, one of the arguments (on local talk radio) to liberalize the dress code was the heat and humidity here in DC. I had to laugh because, yes, it is hot and humid here but we have AC now so the idea that the heat is too much when you´re mostly just walking to and from a building for a few minutes is intolerable is pathetic.

And just like now most women do not wear any hose* and even if you have a nice tan and legs, it just looks tacky especially when wearing a professional dress or suit.

* -Yes, I know, FLOTUS does not wear hose.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    26 persons like this.



Reply 23 - Posted by: jackie, 7/14/2017 8:23:32 AM     (No. 11318630)

I wonder if the Congress person from AZ used her own idea of dress code while in the Academy or flying.. I think not or she would have had her butt thrown out. This just shows how much she respects the people that voted her in and the rules she should be following. It is not a high school and she is not 15 years old. Grow up and act responsible Congress person.
She looked like a bag lady..

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.

Reply 24 - Posted by: earlybird, 7/14/2017 8:51:30 AM     (No. 11318652)

A look at her idea of “open toed shoes” reveals clunky strap sandals over bare, rather unattractive feet. Sort of Birkenstocky.

They need to be specific and say “no sandals”.

The young writer’s point was that the existing rules need to be obeyed.

As for McSally, a look at her photos over time show a woman who dressed very appropriately for business when she was running for election, and now wants to let her hair down and look rather sloppy.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    15 persons like this.

Reply 25 - Posted by: earlybird, 7/14/2017 8:52:49 AM     (No. 11318654)

(hit submit too soon)

Had McSally worn while she was campaigning the kind of stuff she wants to wear now, she’d not have been elected.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    16 persons like this.

Reply 26 - Posted by: dwa, 7/14/2017 9:54:54 AM     (No. 11318722)

I guess if McSally wrote a law that was eventually passed, she would have no problem with people ignoring that law.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    17 persons like this.

Reply 27 - Posted by: cny, 7/14/2017 10:50:11 AM     (No. 11318778)

That McSally person looks very smug for someone who is 100% wrong.

Reply 24 reminded me of how hillary´s minions cleaned her up for her stint as First Lady, but remember how she looked after she became Senator? Awful - she let everything go. It was shocking.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.

Reply 28 - Posted by: kono, 7/14/2017 1:27:56 PM     (No. 11318975)

Sleeves? Dress codes? Sexist!

Let everybody around Congress today treat the setting with the kind of dignity it deserves... TANK TOPS for all.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    15 persons like this.

Post Reply   Close thread 917480

Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Harlowe"


Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)

Most Recent Articles posted by "Harlowe"

Oberlin professor dies of apparent suicide
Chronicle Telegram [Elyria, OH], by Jodi Weinberger    Original Article
Posted By: Harlowe- 7/25/2017 12:00:46     Post Reply
VALLEY VIEW — An Oberlin College professor died in an apparent suicide Sunday morning. According to Valley View police, Timothy Hall, 48, of Oberlin, jumped off the Interstate 480 overpass about 6 a.m. Sunday. He was pronounced dead at the scene. (Snip) Hall also contributed to the college through his service as chair of philosophy, a member and chair of the law and society committee, faculty adviser to the Oberlin College Republicans and Libertarians, supervising the Ronald Reagan Political Lectureship Series and was a committee member of the Oberlin Debate Series.

Vice President Mike Pence: Trump´s
triumphs are many after only six months
and he´s just getting started
Fox News, by Mike Pence    Original Article
Posted By: Harlowe- 7/23/2017 10:31:28     Post Reply
In the first six months of this administration, President Donald Trump has fought every day to deliver on his promises to the American people. At a historic pace, this president has taken bold action to restore prosperity, keep Americans safe and secure, and hold government accountable. President Trump has signed more than 40 bills and nearly 40 executive orders on everything from health care to energy, infrastructure and more. While the previous administration turned to federal agencies to enact its agenda, President Trump has signed more laws to slash through federal red tape than any president in American history and

The clock may have just run out
on the White House press corps
The Washington Post, by Jennifer Palmieri    Original Article
Posted By: Harlowe- 7/23/2017 5:34:24     Post Reply
When I was White House communications director for President Barack Obama I would warn the White House press corps that they were living on borrowed time. (Snip) Spicer was a vestige from the initial era of the Trump White House when Washington regulars joined hoping to “professionalize” this very unconventional president. It was immediately apparent that Spicer would fail in that endeavor as he was forced by the president to so famously lie about the crowd size at the inauguration. It has been a long, slow, painful slog to the inevitable moment when Spicer would quit. For his sake, I

Trump-inspired ´Make America Great
Again´ swimsuit stirring online craze
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Harlowe- 7/16/2017 3:59:40     Post Reply
A Trump-inspired “Make America Great Again” swimsuit is making a big splash this summer. The metallic blue one-piece is by far this summer’s most popular choice for Trump supporters, the Daily Mail reports. It’s also creating a social media craze, the paper reports. "Make America Great Again" was the slogan of Donald Trump´s campaign for president. The swimsuit retails online for $40. There’s a Babe For Trump Instagram page featuring women in the swimwear, according to the paper. The images are recent postings. “History is written by the dreamers not the doubters,” is the caption, accompanying one of the images.

McCain’s surgery puts
Obamacare repeal vote in doubt
Politico, by Seung Min Kim    Original Article
Posted By: Harlowe- 7/15/2017 10:54:21     Post Reply
Sen. John McCain underwent surgery to remove a blood clot above his left eye and will stay in Arizona to recover next week – denying Republicans a key vote in their push to repeal Obamacare, where the GOP already has no room for error. (Snip) Doctors used a minimally invasive craniotomy to remove the 5-cm blood clot, and McCain, 80, is “resting comfortably at home and is in good condition.” Tissue pathology reports are expected within the next several days, according to the hospital.

Congress’s Dress Code May
Bar Some Professional Wear,
But That’s Not The Point
The Federalist, by Jordyn Pair    Original Article
Posted By: Harlowe- 7/13/2017 11:29:53     Post Reply
Let’s start with the obvious: wearing sleeveless dresses and open-toed shoes is not necessarily unprofessional, depending on one’s profession and workplace rules and norms. But blatantly ignoring rules then announcing your transgression is. (Snip) Update: Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) has announced he will be working with the Sergeant-at-Arms to update the congressional dress code. Ryan noted the dress code was not something he created, before saying it should be modernized.

EPA-funded lab faked research results on
respiratory illnesses, whistleblower
lawsuit claims
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Harlowe- 7/5/2017 12:48:09     Post Reply
Duke University has admitted that one of its lab technicians falsified or fabricated research data on respiratory illnesses that were used to get large grants from the Environmental Protection Agency. The admission came Sunday in legal filings that respond to a federal whistleblower lawsuit, which the school tried to get dismissed, by former lab analyst Joseph Thomas, according to the Durham Herald-Sun. Thomas claims in his lawsuit that the allegedly fake research data of Erin Potts-Kant, who worked eight years at a Duke medical school lab, was used by the prestigious university and some of its professors to fraudulently obtain

Melania stuns in a yellow floral-print
crepe $2,160 gown to greet Indian
Prime Minister Modi at the White
House with her husband
Daily Mail (UK), by Regina F. Graham    Original Article
Posted By: Harlowe- 6/26/2017 11:08:14     Post Reply
First Lady Melania Trump stepped out Monday wearing a bright yellow Emilio Pucci gown to greet Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi during his visit to the White House. The mother-of-one stunned in the floor-length dress that retails for $2,160, as she walked alongside the president before stepping out to greet Modi, who is visiting the US for his first face-to-face meeting with the new first family. The former Slovenian model effortlessly wore the belted floral-print crepe gown and was all smiles once Modi arrived outside the South Portico of the White House.

EXCLUSIVE: Soros, Clinton-Linked
Teneo Among Donors to McCain Institute
Daily Caller, by Richard Pollock    Original Article
Posted By: Harlowe- 6/20/2017 12:21:47     Post Reply
Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain in 2012 turned over nearly $9 million in unspent funds from his failed 2008 presidential campaign to a new foundation bearing his name, the McCain Institute for International Leadership. The institute is intended to serve as a “legacy” for McCain and “is dedicated to advancing human rights, dignity, democracy and freedom.” It is a tax-exempt non-profit foundation with assets valued at $8.1 million and associated with Arizona State University. Conservative and liberal critics, however, believe the institute constitutes a major conflict of interest for McCain, The Daily Caller News Foundation’s Investigative Group has learned.

Judicial Watch seeking documents
‘unlawfully removed’ by Comey
Fox News, by Brooke Singman    Original Article
Posted By: Harlowe- 6/17/2017 8:54:09     Post Reply
Conservative watchdog Judicial Watch is calling on Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe to recover and release federal records and memos it claims were “unlawfully” removed by former Director James Comey, threatening the FBI with a lawsuit should the bureau not comply. Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, penned a letter to McCabe on June 14 warning of a potential violation of the Federal Records Act, which is the basis for the federal government’s policies regarding the “creating, maintaining, and disposing” of federal records. (Snip) The FBI told Fox News that they have no comment on the letter from Fitton.

The ugly question: What if the Russia
Russia Russia story was nothing?
Hot Air, by Jazz Shaw    Original Article
Posted By: Harlowe- 6/14/2017 3:05:29     Post Reply
Everyone has been busily trying to parse the Jeff Sessions testimony since the Attorney General took the stand but there doesn’t seem to be a lot to work with. Allahpundit talked about the number of times that Sessions declined to answer certain questions about private conversations he had with the president, but that’s some fairly thin gruel to build a presidency-ending scandal out of. (More on that below.) But the one question which seems to still be off limits for most of the MSM is the really ugly one: what if this turns out to be a dry hole?

Melania Trump Wants to Make Donald’s
Birthday One He’ll ‘Never Forget’
Yahoo!, by Elise Solé    Original Article
Posted By: Harlowe- 6/10/2017 11:20:43     Post Reply
Melania Trump and 11-year-old son Barron are moving to the White House on Wednesday — also President Trump‘s birthday — and the first lady wants the occasion to be one he’ll “never forget.” In advance of Trump’s 71st birthday on June 14, Melania reportedly sent a mass email to his supporters that read, “I need your help to make it a birthday my husband will never forget. Our celebrations always include family and close friends. You have certainly proven yourself to be a loyal friend of my husband through your support of his positive vision to Make America Great Again

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)

She was a historic first lady, but
Michelle Obama says some never
saw past ‘my skin color’

48 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Cleve R. Wootson Jr.    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 7/26/2017 9:51:42 PM     Post Reply
The moderator lauded Michelle Obama for her achievements over the past eight years and touched on the former first lady’s plans, but Tuesday’s conversation also veered into uncomfortable territory. It was Obama’s largest public appearance since the 2016 election — speaking in front of more than 8,000 people at the Women’s Foundation of Colorado’s 30th anniversary celebration — and she touched on personal attacks that she faced again and again. Many had the same theme. “The shards that cut me the deepest were the ones that intended to cut,” Obama said, according to the Denver Post. “Knowing that after eight

Hillary Clinton to call her new memoir
´What Happened´ - and she will FINALLY
admit she made ´mistakes´ before defeat by Trump

48 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by Nikki Schwab    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 7/27/2017 8:42:46 AM     Post Reply
Hillary Clinton is to call her new memoir about being beaten by Donald Trump ´What Happened´, her publisher announced Thursday. Her photograph will not feature on the cover - and she will call herself Hillary Rodham Clinton. She ran as Hillary Clinton. The memoir, published by Simon & Schuster promises to deliver the story of her defeat ´now free from the constraints of politics´. It will finally break the pattern of months by containing details of her ´mistakes´ - but firmly blame James Comey and the Russians. One friend of Clinton told The Hill it would be a ´bombshell´. The

Senators on hot mic: Trump
is ‘crazy,’ ‘I’m worried’

41 replie(s)
Washington Post [Washington D.C.], by Philip Bump    Original Article
Posted By: JoElla Bee- 7/26/2017 10:15:56 AM     Post Reply
At the end of a Senate subcommittee hearing on Tuesday morning, someone sitting near Chairman Susan Collins (R-Maine) didn’t switch off a microphone. Collins was recorded discussing the federal budget and President Trump’s lack of familiarity with the details of governing with a colleague — apparently Sen. Jack Reed (R.I.), the ranking Democrat on the Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies subcommittee.

Transgender Navy SEAL slams
Trump for banning servicemembers:
´Let´s meet face to face and
you tell me I´m not worthy´

38 replie(s)
New York Daily News, by Christopher Brennan    Original Article
Posted By: PageTurner- 7/27/2017 1:46:59 AM     Post Reply
A transgender former Navy SEAL has spoken out against President Trump’s ban on transgender military members, saying he is preventing soldiers from doing their service. “Let´s meet face to face and you tell me I´m not worthy,” Kristin Beck, a retired SEAL Team 6 member who has fought in Iraq and Afghanistan, told Business Insider. Beck was awarded the Bronze Star, the Purple Heart and the Meritorious Service Medal during her time in the service, when she kept her gender identity a secret, according to a 2015 profile in GQ. The President said that transgender service in the military causes

Anthony Scaramucci Called Me to
Unload About White House Leakers,
Reince Priebus, and Steve Bannon

38 replie(s)
New Yorker, by Ryan Lizza    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 7/27/2017 6:58:21 PM     Post Reply
On Wednesday night, I received a phone call from Anthony Scaramucci, the new White House communications director. He wasn’t happy. Earlier in the night, I’d tweeted, citing a “senior White House official,” that Scaramucci was having dinner at the White House with President Trump, the First Lady, Sean Hannity, and the former Fox News executive Bill Shine. It was an interesting group, and raised some questions. Was Trump getting strategic advice from Hannity? Was he considering hiring Shine? But Scaramucci had his own question—for me. “Who leaked that to you?” he asked. I said I couldn’t give him that information.

Trump´s Transgender Ban Is
a Legal Land Mine

35 replie(s)
Politico, by John Culhane    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 7/27/2017 7:27:13 AM     Post Reply
President Donald Trump’s Wednesday announcement on Twitter that transgender men and women will not be allowed to serve in the military “in any capacity” was not a complete surprise: Last month, Defense Secretary James Mattis announced that the military was hitting the pause button on an Obama-era plan to welcome openly transgender people into the military. But the announcement was a legal land mine. The Trump administration may soon learn that singling out a class of people for exclusion violates the constitutional guarantee of equal protection under the law. And as to those transgender soldiers already serving openly, any effort

There’s No Shakeup That Can
Fix the Trump White House

34 replie(s)
National Review Online, by Jonah Goldberg    Original Article
Posted By: danvillebill- 7/26/2017 8:02:38 PM     Post Reply
Let’s review a few recent developments. Last week, Sean Spicer, the White House press secretary, resigned. This was part of a “White House shakeup” to get the Trump administration back on track. The new communications director, Anthony Scaramucci, would fix the White House’s “messaging problem.” Within 24 hours of Scaramucci’s appointment, the president returned to Twitter and unloaded another torrent of political bombshells, including talking about his power to pardon, even as his attorneys were denying that Donald Trump was thinking about pardoning anyone.

Graham Warns Trump of
´Holy Hell´ if President Gets
Rid of Sessions or Mueller

33 replie(s)
PJ Media, by Bridget Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: Hazymac- 7/27/2017 5:30:36 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON -- Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) today warned President Trump against firing either Attorney General Jeff Sessions or special counsel Robert Mueller, saying he plans to introduce bipartisan judicial review legislation to protect the former FBI director and future special counsels. Graham told reporters on Capitol Hill that he´s "100 percent behind Jeff Sessions," who´s been the target of various slings from Trump over the past week, and referred to a Wednesday tweet from Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa): Everybody in D.C. Shld b warned that the agenda for the judiciary Comm is set for rest of 2017. Judges first

What if the Trump-Sessions feud is one big charade?
31 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Brian C. Joondeph    Original Article
Posted By: my stars 22- 7/27/2017 2:42:47 AM     Post Reply
President Donald Trump has been attacking his attorney general, Jeff Sessions, daily. There have been brutal attacks on Twitter, in media interviews, and during speeches. Conventional wisdom is that Trump is getting ready to fire Sessions or hoping Sessions resigns. Conventional wisdom also assured everyone that Hillary Clinton would win in a landslide, the only question being by how large a margin. Trump´s complaint is that his attorney general should not have recused himself from the Russia hacking hoax and that he is dragging his feet on long overdue investigations and prosecutions: Deep State leaks; unmasking; DNC and Clinton collusion

Filmmaker Michael Moore says he phoned up
Hillary Clinton´s team before the election to warn
them about danger in Wisconsin and Michigan

30 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by Kelly Mclaughlin    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 7/27/2017 3:50:40 PM     Post Reply
Filmmaker Michael Moore says he tried to Hillary Clinton that Michigan and Wisconsin voters might lean toward Donald Trump before the 2016 presidential election but claims no one would listen. Moore appeared on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert on Wednesday night to promote his upcoming one-man Broadway show, The Terms of My Surrender. But the Michigan resident took time to discuss the current political climate, saying he ´never wanted to be more wrong in my life´ when warning people about Trump voters. ´I was trying to warn the rest of the country, out here, people who voted for Obama

Debbie Wasserman Schultz “Absolute
Wreck–Barely Able to Function” Since
Imran Awan Arrest

30 replie(s)
Gateway Pundit, by Christina Laila    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 7/28/2017 12:32:37 AM     Post Reply
Debbie Wasserman Schultz employed Pakistani IT staffers and brothers who were paid over $4 million dollars over the course of their employment even though they were accused of a cyber-security breach. Imran Awan was arrested as he attempted to flee the U.S. after wiring approximately $300,000 to Pakistan. Fox News is the only cable network covering this huge scandal. When Imran Awan was arrested he was carrying $12,000 in cash on him. His wife was carrying $12,000 of cash when she fled the country too. Imran and his Muslim brothers, Abid and Jamal accessed unauthorized computers while acting as IT

Donald Trump’s ‘Transgender’ Declaration
Preserves Americans’ Two-Sex Society

29 replie(s)
Breitbart Big Government, by Neil Munro    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 7/26/2017 12:42:24 PM     Post Reply
President Donald Trump’s dramatic decision to exclude so-called “transgender” people from the military is a direct rejection of the progressives’ revolutionary demand that Americans’ society should be remade to eliminate all civic recognition of the two different-and-complementary male and female sexes. (Tweets) The Wednesday decision was greeted with anger from the left, which had hoped that the military’s 2016 endorsement of the transgender ideology would push the Supreme Court and legislators nationwide to impose and establish the unpopular claim that a person’s changeable choice of “gender” is more legally important than their biological sex. If endorsed by the courts, that

Post Reply   Close thread 917480


Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google

© 2015 Lucianne.com Media Inc.