A Message From Lucianne  

S-CR-TEO

S-G1-LC






   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


B-CR-TEO
Trump Is Wrong: Germany Does Not
Owe ‘Vast Sums of Money to NATO’

Daily Beast, by Allison Graves

Original Article

Posted By:Drive, 3/20/2017 6:32:55 AM

Less than 24 hours after meeting with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, President Donald Trump took to Twitter to criticize Germany for not keeping up with its defense payments to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and the United States. “Despite what you have heard from the FAKE NEWS, I had a GREAT meeting with German Chancellor Angela Merkel,” Trump wrote in a tweet March 18. “Nevertheless, Germany owes vast sums of money to NATO & the United States must be paid more for the powerful, and very expensive, defense it provides to Germany!” Trump has repeatedly called on NATO member countries to contribute

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: uno, 3/20/2017 6:47:00 AM     (No. 11195329)

Protecting Europe is a very expensive proposition. Presenting a bill is an excellent way to get the point across! Getting paid is not really the point.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    58 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: GardenGal, 3/20/2017 7:07:56 AM     (No. 11195343)

Why I wish that Trump would stop tweeting. The article is correct that Germany is not spending the required amount on defense and thus shirking responsibilities but they do not pay directly for US forces. They do pay indirectly in letting us have bases in Germany and in various other ways. The United States military is not a mercenary force. As to how much Germany is paying to NATO and how much they are supposed to be paying (not their defense budget but the Nato budget) I don´t know.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    28 persons like this.


   

 

R-G6-LC
  
R-LU-C1


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: thelmalou, 3/20/2017 7:20:09 AM     (No. 11195357)

If only five for tries paid and Germany isn´t one of them, then they owe.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    51 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: thelmalou, 3/20/2017 7:20:40 AM     (No. 11195358)

Five countries paid...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    24 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Muguy, 3/20/2017 7:25:30 AM     (No. 11195362)

If someone wants to really make an account, we are still owed money for saving Europe a SECOND time, and and then helping to pay for the damage done in rebuilding Europe after WW II.

IF we enter into an agreement like NATO, everyone has to help pay the bill.

When something like the United Nations is formed and we end up paying more than our part while others nations don´t do their part, it ends up being something where we spend a lot of money to help others and it becomes expected.

Whenever there this a crisis or disaster somewhere in the world, we are there to help.
We still have a military presence in Germany, but it is shrinking.

Germany became an economic power because she was rebuilt. Merkel is sowing the seeds of destruction by allowing an invasion of people who do not want to be German citizens. They need us more than they know.




  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    75 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: god of irony, 3/20/2017 7:27:02 AM     (No. 11195364)

#2, Having served 3+ years in the Army stationed in Germany I can assure they don´t "let us have bases". We are there to provide them protection and it is very expensive.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    187 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: IowaDad, 3/20/2017 7:28:53 AM     (No. 11195367)

Germany agreed to spend 2% of its GDP on defense. It actually spends 1.19%. Most other European nations are similarly way below target, and have been for two decades. The is no legally binding contract enforcing 2%, but there is undoubtedly an agreed political statement of intent.

The base question is why should the US pay for the military defense of nations who don´t maintain their own forces? We are shielding them from aggression, while they are raking in the cash.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    83 persons like this.


   

 

R-TA-Wide_2
  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: uno, 3/20/2017 7:34:04 AM     (No. 11195370)

I should say: Getting paid for the past is not really the point. Getting them to contribute in the future is.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    37 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: steveW, 3/20/2017 7:38:16 AM     (No. 11195377)

President Trump is of course right. And it´s far from just Germany that freeloads off (and profits from) American military protection and the American nuclear umbrella. Add to that the grudging unwillingness of much of Europe to side with the US on the War on Terror (shouts to convict W as a "war criminal" were loudest from Europe), and I´d say "vast sums" is pretty much accurate.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    100 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: chillijilli, 3/20/2017 7:46:32 AM     (No. 11195382)

Trump´s tweets seem to be a constant problem. Many understand that he´s a businessman who just wants to get the bottom line out there and figures his people will straighten out his words for him, later if necessary...BUT... some wish that this very smart negotiator would learn that his words matter and he´d have a lot less resistance if his people did some tweet-tweaking prior to hitting submit.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    53 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: M-79, 3/20/2017 8:05:39 AM     (No. 11195399)

I was stationed in Germany in the mid-90´s. As the US began to "draw down" after the Wall came down I remember a German asking me, "If the Americans leave who will protect us?"
Most of the Western European countries didn´t have to pay for their own national defense b/c the US military was in Europe. They could spend all that extra money on socialist programs and lecture us on how great Socialism is.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    175 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna, 3/20/2017 8:10:41 AM     (No. 11195402)

Trump´s Twitter habits might be embarrassing to a mere mortal politician but The Donald is largely immune to the muttering of the ´mean girls´.

That´s the beauty of Trump.

He may blow through the details like a bull in a china shop but he has proven to be much more of an honest enthusiast than a lying politician.

There is a huge well of forgiveness and a soft place in the hearts of nice people for those who speak the truth without fear or favor.

It´s the Trump effect.

It´s like riding on the roof as you go through the car wash !

Dangerous....exciting....cleansing...and...

Refreshing !!!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    98 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1-LC


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: kate318, 3/20/2017 8:24:19 AM     (No. 11195415)

Trump´s "constant tweeting" is only a problem to those who take everything he says literally. He is a grandiose NYC street brawler who frequently indulges in hyperbole. It´s his style, and I, personally, get a kick out of it. I always understand the point he is trying to communicate. It´s a new day, people. Get with the program, or you are going to be miserable for the next four years.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    79 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: greggojo, 3/20/2017 8:44:58 AM     (No. 11195440)

I like Mr. Trump´s tweets especially as I watch the hysterical blow back from the msm as they go scattering like roaches from the beam of a flashlight.

And for all of you doubters, consider the alternative. Can you imagine how disheartened and disgusted all of us would be had the "inevitable" HRC been elected? Think about the exponential govt. corruption and progressive/federal govt. expansion. OMG

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    53 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Miss Lamb Chop, 3/20/2017 9:04:08 AM     (No. 11195456)

Trump is correct in asking for Germany to pay what is previously owed. It would be like only payimg part of the tax bill. What happens, interst & penalties. Trump is only asking for the original dept.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    33 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: CharlyG, 3/20/2017 9:08:00 AM     (No. 11195460)

Why is it so many people know better than the man in charge.

This play by play is not necessary to our existence and just muddies the water.

WAIT TIL THE END RESULT. listening to the MSM, and reacting to every detail is a fool´s errand. WE may have a right to know how the sausage is made, but we really don´t have a need to know the process inside and out.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    32 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: gone2pot, 3/20/2017 9:35:14 AM     (No. 11195506)

This is really simple and NEVER addressed; and the reason why so many nations can be socialist yet continue to afford their free handouts in spite of their extend and pretend debts; WE provide the free world´s national security, period. The EU, Canada, Japan, India, Australia pay almost nothing in comparison to us and WE provide for their defense, PERIOD (Total dollars spent per nation is more realistic and accurate than spending percentage of GDP, btw). Free health care in Canada and most EU nations and it´s supposedly great? They have NO defense bills relative to the USA because WE defend them and we have been doing so since WW2, PERIOD. It´s something our Marxists ignore when they compare us to the "great socialist nations of the EU" where the government provides everything for "free" and therefore so should we. Need proof?

https://www.nationalpriorities.org/campaigns/us-military-spending-vs-world/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_expenditures

https://armscontrolcenter.org/u-s-defense-spending-vs-global-defense-spending/

So yes, Germany as well as every NATO nation owes vast sums of money to NATO.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    46 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: earlybird, 3/20/2017 9:56:36 AM     (No. 11195537)

Germany and the fact-checkers are once again splitting hairs over President Trump’s rhetoric. The truth is that they, like the other members, are not paying their share, a share that was set forth and agreed to by all of them.

Here is an article just posted that they and everyone else need to read carefully.

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/us-pays-2214-nato-budget-germany-1465-13-allies-pay-below-1

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    23 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: mickturn, 3/20/2017 10:17:28 AM     (No. 11195568)

Germany is USING the US to watch their back (and it costs a fortune)...and we just keep doing it!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    26 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: TexasRose, 3/20/2017 10:27:05 AM     (No. 11195583)

Plus, there´s that little thing called GRATITUDE. Just sayin´.

Americans have big hearts, but when we´ve been taken advantage of and then repeatedly slapped in the face... well, there´s just so much we´ll take!!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    23 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Adam, 3/20/2017 10:34:36 AM     (No. 11195589)

From the article, "NATO, formally the North Atlantic Treaty Organization…" Formally? Currently. While not all the countries in it are North Atlantic nations, the name has never been officially changed. Based on that egregious gaffe, I don´t think I will be taking this reporter´s word for it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Thos Weatherby, 3/20/2017 10:45:03 AM     (No. 11195601)

#2 If you look at the entire expense that Germany benefits, they do owe us a lot of money. We don´t necessarily need the bases in Germany. They could be elsewhere at an tremendous savings to the US. Trump knows what he´s saying. He hasn´t been wrong yet.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    29 persons like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: TOOTALL, 3/20/2017 11:51:39 AM     (No. 11195657)

If Germany has been paying slightly over half of what they COMMITTED to pay, and that was added up over the years, and interest applied, do you think that would constitute a lot of money?

The article says they owe money to NATO....more like they owe money to those who paid for them in Nato, which would be mostly the US!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    20 persons like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: dvc, 3/20/2017 12:05:39 PM     (No. 11195674)

It is very, very simple math. Germany has been paying less than their agreed 2%, only a bit more than half, actually, so they are shirking and they owe NATO billions. Perhaps not actually to the USA, but to NATO - via their own military.

Pay up! Even 1.99% is not OK.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    52 persons like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: bighambone, 3/20/2017 12:07:03 PM     (No. 11195676)

Germany is a highly developed and rich country that would be nowhere near where it is today in economic terms if it were not for the USA, the Marshal Plan, and the large numbers of American troops who have been stationed in Germany since the after the Second World War to defend Germany. There is no question that Germany should ante up their annual 2% of GNP for defense, and also pay the freight for all American troops stationed in Germany to defend that country.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    24 persons like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: arkfamily, 3/20/2017 12:17:03 PM     (No. 11195691)

Over the weekend, I read that Trump said Germany owes the United States. Now it is Nato? Maybe they can´t get their story correct.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    21 persons like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: kono, 3/20/2017 12:21:32 PM     (No. 11195697)

The image of NATO as some sort of shared wall surrounding the membership is fallacious, as there is no tangible structure defending against their shared threats. So there isn´t some sort of thing that is provided and needs to be paid for, for which a member´s share can be quantified and billed. The missile defense shield that is often proposed and debated would be one, if it were ever actually implemented.

But members keeping up their own defenses IS that "wall", and a weak country represents a weak spot in that "wall", which compromises the security of that country and makes her neighbors more vulnerable to flank attacks. Itemizing what is missing due to that shortfall seems like it would require a much larger shared bureaucracy than is present or desired. That´s where other members of NATO have shirked; but that doesn´t really seem quantifiable for the purpose of monetary compensation.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: Rumblehog, 3/20/2017 12:24:14 PM     (No. 11195701)

Why is the U.S.A. still funding the "Keep Europe Free" movement??
Shouldn´t the Euros be taking care of their own business by now?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    20 persons like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: Hermit_Crab, 3/20/2017 12:29:35 PM     (No. 11195715)

Wish I could find the link.

I read yesterday that the ´welfare´ money Demona Merkel pays to her muzzie invaders, she considers as being part of her defense spending, So from her ´calculations´ she is spending more than required

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    25 persons like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: little guy, 3/20/2017 12:32:10 PM     (No. 11195722)

Excuse me but Germany was supposed to spend $77 billion a year helping NATO (by spending that amount on its military) but Germany only spends $48 billion a year. That´s $29 BILLION less --- PER YEAR! Work that out since 9/11 and you get a $464 billion shortfall.

Every bullet fired by NATO, every gallon of gas, every gun, every uniform and every gallon of paint is supposed to be shared on a pro rata basis. Germany has been coming up short for decades and enjoying the free ride and protection from Uncle Sap.

Pay up, Angela, instead of giving welfare to people trying to slit your people´s throats!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: Chuzzles, 3/20/2017 12:34:39 PM     (No. 11195726)

Uncle Sam´s footing of the bill for defending Europe for the past number of decades has allowed the Europeans to indulge in their failed and stupid social engineering programs.

Now Trump wants to recoup some of that cost, along with expectations that Europe will start paying their own way.

Boy are the addicts of all the social benefits programs going to throw an Epic hissy if this comes to pass.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    21 persons like this.


Reply 32 - Posted by: chicodon, 3/20/2017 12:48:52 PM     (No. 11195748)

That´s right. They only owe considerable amounts of money. Not vast.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    23 persons like this.


Reply 33 - Posted by: O.G.´s Mom, 3/20/2017 1:13:47 PM     (No. 11195772)

I read the entire Daily Beast article. And when I got down to the end, I agreed, Germany does owe money. If they are supposed to pay 2 percent of their GDP to NATO and Merkel pays less than that, whether it´s 1.5 percent or less, and for how long have they been shorting the fund, then guess what folks as usual Trump is 100 percent correct. Germany needs to pay up, now.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    17 persons like this.


Reply 34 - Posted by: hoosiergirl71, 3/20/2017 2:26:58 PM     (No. 11195834)

Just to put a finer point on this discussion, I would remind you all that "The Government" has NO money of its´ own. Those billions are monies the citizens of America earn by working for it, for the most part. The US citizens are paying unholy tons of money to "defend" the freedom of other countries while piling up trillions!!! of debt here.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    23 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 907255




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Drive"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Drive"



Maybe America Wasn’t
Crazy to Elect Donald Trump
New York Magazine, by Andrew Sullivan    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/28/2017 3:40:01     Post Reply
A confession: I’m much less afraid of Trump than I was a year ago. His rhetoric, his unfettered far-right agenda, his love of violence, and his loathing of constitutional limits during the campaign were indeed things to be terrified by. They still are. But those of us who were worried that the Constitution might not hold, and that liberal democracy was teetering on the edge of implosion, have so far, mercifully, been proven wrong. The Founders turn out to have constructed a system designed to confront exactly this kind of despotic figure — and it has held up well, even with

What the Press Still
Doesn’t Get About Trump
Politico, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/28/2017 2:52:44     Post Reply
There was lots of hand-wringing after the election about how the media had messed up. Were we too quick to believe the polls? Did we have any idea what real Americans actually thought? Did we give Donald Trump too much attention—or not enough? Now that journalists have spent a few months covering President Trump, we asked a range of media critics, political operatives, historians and more: What does the press still get wrong about Trump, and what do we just not get at all? 1. We forget what has always driven Trump. Gwenda Blair, author of The Trumps: Three Generations of Builders

Exclusive: Trump says ´major, major´
conflict with North Korea possible,
but seeks diplomacy
Reuters, by Stephen J. Adler, Steve Holland*    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/28/2017 8:40:39     Post Reply
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Thursday a major conflict with North Korea is possible in the standoff over its nuclear and missile programs, but he would prefer a diplomatic outcome to the dispute. "There is a chance that we could end up having a major, major conflict with North Korea. Absolutely," Trump told Reuters in an Oval Office interview ahead of his 100th day in office on Saturday. Nonetheless, Trump said he wanted to peacefully resolve a crisis that has bedeviled multiple U.S. presidents, a path that he and his administration are emphasizing by preparing a variety of new economic sanctions

Why can´t House repeal Obamacare? Because
a lot of Republicans don´t want to
Washington Examiner, by Byron York    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/28/2017 7:46:33     Post Reply
"We´re going to go when we have the votes," Speaker Paul Ryan said Thursday when asked when the House will pass a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare. Lawmakers will not be constrained by any "artificial deadline," Ryan declared. On March 24, when the Speaker pulled the GOP Obamacare bill before what would have been a sure defeat, he said, "We´re going to be living with Obamacare for the foreseeable future." But why? Republicans have 238 seats in the House. Repealing Obamacare will require 217 votes. Even with unanimous Democratic opposition, Republicans could lose 21 votes and still prevail on repeal. Why

The Strange Psychological Power
of ‘Fox & Friends’
Politico, by Joanna Weiss    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/28/2017 7:43:56     Post Reply
It was a typical Tuesday in March, and President Donald Trump was getting hammered by the press. One of his signature campaign promises, repealing Obamacare, had just collapsed. The Republican co-chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, investigating ties between Trump associates and Russia during the 2016 campaign, was under fire for a secret meeting on the White House grounds. And Gallup’s recent poll numbers showed Trump at 36 percent approval, a historic low for a new president. But Trump was starting his day, as usual, with “Fox & Friends,” where the world looked decidedly sunnier.

Chelsea Clinton Gets Another Award
For Doing Nothing Special
Heat Street, by Emily Zanotti    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/27/2017 5:33:59     Post Reply
Like her mother before her, Chelsea Clinton appears to be creating a cottage industry for herself in receiving random awards for her unparalleled contributions to society, scintillating takes on current events, and incredibly generous heart. Not content with just her Variety-sponsored “achievement award,” Chelsea on Tuesday night accepted the annual City Harvest Award for Commitment in fighting hunger in New York City, as reported in Mail Online. Before we claim that she’s done nothing to earn a major award, aside from sitting in a privileged position atop her family’s namesake foundation, or say that she has few actual commitments aside from spending

The Celebrity We Need
National Review, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/27/2017 12:58:28     Post Reply
Here’s the cover of the new issue of National Review, which comes out Friday, featuring David French’s cover story on Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson. An excerpt: As polarization brings with it the politicization of everything, celebrities are expected to toe their respective political lines. The GOP has a celebrity in the White House, he brings in celebrity friends for photo ops, and, outside the White House gates, progressive celebrities spew vitriol at their hated former entertainment-industry colleague. The Rock, however, has followed a different path. Rather than self-seriously viewing his career as secondary to his activism, Johnson clearly aims to

Daniel Halper joins Drudge Report
Politico, by HADAS GOLD and DANIEL LIPPMAN    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/27/2017 8:19:39     Post Reply
Matt Drudge, the founder and editor of the influential site DrudgeReport.com, has hired Daniel Halper, two sources familiar with the move confirmed to POLITICO. Halper was most recently Washington bureau chief of The New York Post, a position he held for just under a year. Halper was previously online editor at the conservative magazine The Weekly Standard and in 2014 published the book "Clinton Inc." It was not immediately clear what his new position will be at The Drudge Report. Halper quietly left the Post earlier this month and was replaced by Gabby Morrongiello, who joined from the Washington Examiner. It´s not the

Exclusive interview: Trump ´absolutely´
looking at breaking up 9th Circuit
Washington Examiner, by Sarah Westwood    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/27/2017 8:09:09     Post Reply
President Trump said Wednesday that he has "absolutely" considered proposals that would split up the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, where judges have blocked two of his executive actions. "Absolutely, I have," Trump said of considering 9th Circuit breakup proposals during a far-ranging interview with the Washington Examiner at the White House. "There are many people that want to break up the 9th Circuit. It´s outrageous."

Trump Eyes Trip to Israel As Centenary
Approaches Of the Balfour Declaration
New York Sun, by Seth Lipsky    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/27/2017 8:05:26     Post Reply
News that President Trump is eying a possible trip to Israel at the end of May certainly puts a spring in the step. Then again, too, if it happens, the Democrats can be expected to mark the occasion by siding with the Arabs. Think I’m kidding? Just this week a New York Times editor chastised the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum for permitting the president to participate in one of its events — on a day set aside for remembering the Shoah. “I understand why the museum’s leaders invited him, but they have effectively invested in Trump by doing so,” the editor,

A Ruling about Nothing
National Review Online, by Andrew C. McCarthy    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/26/2017 3:31:41     Post Reply
A showboating federal judge in San Francisco has issued an injunction against President Trump’s executive order cutting off federal funds from so-called sanctuary cities. The ruling distorts the E.O. beyond recognition, accusing the president of usurping legislative authority despite the order’s express adherence to “existing law.” Moreover, undeterred by the inconvenience that the order has not been enforced, the activist court — better to say, the fantasist court — dreams up harms that might befall San Francisco and Santa Clara, the sanctuary jurisdictions behind the suit, if it were enforced. The court thus flouts the standing doctrine, which limits judicial

Here´s the internal memo Rupert Murdoch
just sent Fox News staff after the first
day of the post-Bill O´Reilly era
Business Insider, by Maxwell Tani    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/26/2017 7:31:36     Post Reply
Rupert Murdoch on Tuesday congratulated Fox News staff in an internal memo after the first day of the network´s new lineup following star host Bill O´Reilly´s departure. "Last night’s ratings are in and I couldn’t be more proud to announce that, not only did FOX News beat all other cable news competition with our new primetime debut, but we also increased our ratings 31% in total viewers and 54% in the demo compared to last year," the executive chair of 21st Century Fox wrote in the memo obtained by Business Insider. "This was a stellar performance that couldn’t have happened without the



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Vacation agrees with her! Smiling and
relaxed Michelle Obama makes her first
public appearance at a Florida conference

36 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by Hannah Parry    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/27/2017 5:57:12 PM     Post Reply
After a leisurely three month vacation, Michelle Obama has made her first public appearance since the inauguration. Looking refreshed and relaxed after her three-month vacation, the former first lady greeted the audience with a smile and a wave at the AIA Conference on Architecture 2017 in Florida on Thursday. Obama was the keynote speaker at the event, organized by the American Institute of Architects, where she spoke about her time as Chicago´s assistant commissioner of planning and development. The former first lady wore a long black, white and beige dress which showed off her toned arms at the event as she also

Trump Admits He Thought Being
President ‘Would Be Easier’

33 replie(s)
New York Magazine, by Margaret Hartman    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 4/28/2017 6:53:28 AM     Post Reply
Saturday marks President Trump’s 100th day in office, and to celebrate the occasion he got a bit too candid in an Oval Office interview with Reuters. Obviously certain elements of being president are pretty fun, but President Trump has discovered that it isn’t all playing with trucks and pressing a button that makes Cokes appear. Sometimes there’s work to be done, and as it turns out being leader of the free world is a lot harder than running a fake university and playing a caricature of a rich person on TV.“I loved my previous life. I had so many things

Obama lied – and now the truth
33 replie(s)
Arutz Sheva [Israel], by Jack Engelhard    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/28/2017 7:18:17 AM     Post Reply
So how much of our money did Obama ship to the terrorist regime in Iran? We hear $150 billion. We are not sure. Could be a dollar less, a dollar more. We’ll never know for sure. That’s because his entire administration operated in the dark. That’s how he governed and that’s how he got himself elected, in lies and in stealth, and the news media did the rest. They covered for him. They let him get away with murder – and in this case, that is not a cliché, it’s fact. Today, in eye-popping news, we learn, from the New York Post via

Could Trump open the Kennedy files?
President must decide within weeks
on releasing the last secret CIA
and FBI assassination files

33 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by Geoff Earle    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/29/2017 4:52:39 AM     Post Reply
He has floated some conspiracy theories for years, but now President Donald Trump will get to play a crucial role in the long-running saga over the government´s Kennedy assassination records. The 1992 JFK Assassination Records Collection Act, signed by President George H.W. Bush, set a 25-year timetable for declassification of assassination records dealing with President Kennedy. The law set up a single collection of records at the National Archives, and set up a process for declassification. The law required the release of all government records dealing with the assassination within 25 years – with the exception of those the president certifies for

Baltimore Is Begging Feds To Step
In To Restore Law And Order

30 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Amber Randall    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/28/2017 2:00:00 PM     Post Reply
Baltimore’s mayor asked the FBI to send in reinforcements Wednesday to help the city get its murders under control. Mayor Catherine Pugh, speaking at a news conference, explained she went to the FBI’s Baltimore office for extra agents to join with police officers in combating a skyrocketing murder count, reports CNN. “Murder is out of control. There are too many guns on the streets. We’re looking for all the help we can get,” Pugh said. The city already has 101 murders for the year, a number not seen in almost 20 years. The mayor’s spokesperson warned the violence could rise

Caitlyn Jenner: I’ve Got No
‘Loyalty’ To Trump, and I May
Run For Office

27 replie(s)
Daily Beast, by Lloyd Grove    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 4/28/2017 12:38:01 PM     Post Reply
The many versions of Caitlyn Jenner, chronicled in her new book, The Secrets of My Life, have passed through a dizzying series of variations, from a Wheaties box-ready, gold medal-winning Olympian in her former identity as Bruce, to the henpecked husband and paterfamilias of the Kardashian clan and featured player in their reality-television juggernaut, to—at age 65, when she announced her biggest secret to the world—the planet’s most famous transgender woman. (Video)The now 67-year-old Jenner, who has been a celebrity for most of her time on earth and spent the past two years as the nation’s highest-profile activist for LGBTQ

Can Islam ever be reformed?
27 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Nonie Darwish    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/29/2017 9:09:35 AM     Post Reply
Muslim reformer Zuhdi Jasser has recently attacked leaders of the anti-Jihad movement in America. He equated them with jihadists when he called them the derogatory word, alt-jihadists, meaning that Americans who speak and write against the evils of Islamic jihad and sharia are just as bad as jihadists. (snip)I have always respected what Zuhdi Jasser was trying to do and avoided contradicting him in public, even though I do not believe that Islam is reformable. I have kept my opinion to myself regarding the false hope Muslim reformers are giving to the Americans regarding Islam. But when Jasser attacked leaders

John Kasich’s Solution To North
Korea? ‘Eradicate The Leadership’

26 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Kaitlan Collins    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/28/2017 2:19:00 PM     Post Reply
Governor of Ohio John Kasich urged Donald Trump to “take out” the top leadership in North Korea in order to solve the looming nuclear weapon problem. “We are getting very serious that they cannot have an ICBM. There’s a point at which saber-rattling is not effective, and you have to be very careful on how you approach that,” Kasich said at the Monitor Breakfast in Washington Friday. “I think you have to be careful that you get to a certain point. What do I think is going to happen there? I think the THAAD is the first big leverage I’ve

Climate of Complete Certainty
26 replie(s)
New York Times, by Bret Stephens    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/29/2017 4:37:58 AM     Post Reply
When someone is honestly 55 percent right, that’s very good and there’s no use wrangling. And if someone is 60 percent right, it’s wonderful, it’s great luck, and let him thank God. But what’s to be said about 75 percent right? Wise people say this is suspicious. Well, and what about 100 percent right? Whoever says he’s 100 percent right is a fanatic, a thug, and the worst kind of rascal. — An old Jew of Galicia In the final stretch of last year’s presidential race, Hillary Clinton and her team thought they were, if not 100 percent right, then very close.

FBI Court Filing Reveals Grand
Jury Targeted Hillary Clinton

25 replie(s)
Judicial Watch, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/27/2017 9:54:25 PM     Post Reply
(Washington, DC) — Judicial Watch today released new State Department documents including a declaration from FBI Special Agent E.W. Priestap, the supervisor of the agency’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email activities, stating that the former secretary of state was the subject of a grand jury investigation related to her BlackBerry email accounts. (Snip) In the filing Priestap declares under penalty of perjury that the FBI “obtained Grand Jury subpoenas related to the Blackberry e-mail accounts, which produced no responsive materials, as the requested data was outside the retention time utilized by those providers.” On April 30, 2015, Judicial Watch sued

This doctor plans to perform a
human head transplant this year

24 replie(s)
New York Post, by Christian Gallayan    Original Article
Posted By: mc squared- 4/28/2017 5:19:06 PM     Post Reply
Sergio Canavero, a controversial professor and neurosurgeon, wants to perform the first human head transplant in December. He told German magazine OOOM that the procedure will take place in China. According to the Observer, it will take 80 surgeons, 36 hours and $10 million to execute. Like a sci-fi tale come to life, Canavero, who’s also the former director of the Turin Advanced Neuromodulation Group, claims that people whose brains have been cryogenically frozen could be revived within three years. “At the moment, I can only disclose that there has been massive progress in medical experiments that would have seemed

Student Union Wants to Ban
Clapping and Cheering Because
it Excludes Deaf People

23 replie(s)
Heat Street, by Lukas Mikelionis    Original Article
Posted By: Tianne- 4/29/2017 2:34:35 AM     Post Reply
Britain’s largest national student union has told attendees of its annual conference they would face “consequences” for cheering and clapping because these forms of expression exclude deaf people. The National Union of Students (NUS), which includes most university student unions, held a two-day conference on Tuesday. During the conference, audience members were repeatedly warned that they must stop whooping and expressing support for a speaker because it has “serious impact” on the accessibility of the conference, The Daily Telegraph reported. Instead of clapping, the students were advised to use “jazz hands” – a gesture when people wave their hands in


Post Reply   Close thread 907255



ST-GC


Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2015 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS