A Message From Lucianne  



Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google

US Senate passes measure to take
first step in dismantling Obamacare

RT News [Russia], by Staff

Original Article

Posted By:PageTurner, 1/12/2017 5:22:54 AM

US senators have passed the first measure on the way to dismantling outgoing-President Barack Obama’s much debated health care law, commonly known as Obamacare. Early on Thursday, the Senate voted 51-48 in favor of a nonbinding Republican-backed budget measure that will make it easier to pass repeal legislation, which could be voted on as early as next month. epublicans plan to get rid of the law and replace parts of it by the end of February, according to House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, speaking on “The Hugh Hewitt Show”, a conservative radio program, on Wednesday. Other Republicans, however, say the

I love it! Our long national nightmare may really be coming to an end!


Post Reply   Start of thread  

Reply 1 - Posted by: miceal, 1/12/2017 5:39:07 AM     (No. 11105464)

Repeal is needed. Replacement, not so much. Sorry, but covering preexisting conditions IS NOT insurance but some sort of "rider." Keeping kids on a parent´s policy is fine, but kids reach the age of consent at 18. Health insurance was available BEFORE Obamacare and will be after as well. I think health insurance caused the HUGE cost of getting well after being sick. I´m old and possibly I can´t see the forest for the trees....?

Reply 2 - Posted by: Mushroom, 1/12/2017 5:59:47 AM     (No. 11105478)

Non-binding. How is this helpful?




Reply 3 - Posted by: Tehtriggerman, 1/12/2017 6:41:03 AM     (No. 11105505)

When do we get our refunds?

Reply 4 - Posted by: privateer, 1/12/2017 6:43:40 AM     (No. 11105508)

Why not pull an Alinsky on the dhims? Force the plan to live up to its promises. 1. give each family a check of $2500 per year for the savings lying barry claimed a typical family would get. 2. you are free to return to the doctor you formerly had and liked. 3. you may return to the plan you formerly had and liked. If doctor or plan no longer are available, you are free to quit ozerocare and find a policy on the open market.

Reply 5 - Posted by: Patchy Groundfog, 1/12/2017 6:57:02 AM     (No. 11105519)

Non-Binding. Isn´t that McConnell´s nickname?

Reply 6 - Posted by: uno_thatguy, 1/12/2017 7:06:50 AM     (No. 11105532)

Previous insurance was weighted against the self-employed. It gave lousy coverage no matter how much you paid. Covering pre-existing conditions is not an entitlement, but coverage should be available, but NOT at standard rates.

Pre-existing conditions could be covered in a pool among all companies and then become affordable but not cheap. A friend who had coverage paid off $450K because his insurance (self-employed) paid only $30K for his wife´s conditions that led to her demise. I paid $6000 when my wife had some health problems. The insurance would not pay for "diagnosis" though I had the policy for years. What?????

There are ways to fix all this without 30K pages of crap in husseinCare. Repeal this nonsense. It´s criminal theft from all Americans.

And #4, I´d go for the $2500 check each year if it came out of hussein´s, piglosi´s and many other cretin´s who "represent us" pockets. Coming out of OUR pockets would again be theft!

Reply 7 - Posted by: winnie1, 1/12/2017 7:11:05 AM     (No. 11105535)

Open the State boundaries now for people to purchase insurance like you would do for car insurance. The polls showed 85% were happy with our old plan. Once you make it competitive prices will reduce. You will have to figure out what to do with people who have pre-existing illness maybe form a risk pool. A lot of people who have this condition are complaining now they are not being treated anyway, so Obamacare is not working. I think Trump is the only one who can negotiate with the Insurance companies and make a fair deal.




Reply 8 - Posted by: MoBeef4u, 1/12/2017 7:20:16 AM     (No. 11105545)

Health savings accounts for the small stuff coupled with a high deductible major medical policy for the big stuff. This basic formula would work for the majority which is how all insurance has to be designed. There can be ways devised to handle the rare exceptions. Also allowing 18-26 year-olds to be covered by their parents´ plans is counter productive. These are the ones who should be paying a modest amount while they´re young and healthy against future need when they´re not. It´s not that hard unless people want it to be.

Reply 9 - Posted by: Udanja99, 1/12/2017 7:22:11 AM     (No. 11105548)

It may be non-binding but at least it´s a thumb in the eye of smidgen BEFORE he even leaves office.

Reply 10 - Posted by: JansGraphix, 1/12/2017 7:36:45 AM     (No. 11105562)

Replace ´parts of it´?

That´s what I was afraid of.

These clowns just won´t let go of ´control´ and ´power´ over the voters. They just won´t go back to free market principles. Maybe 30%. Maybe 50%. Maybe 70% of what we used to have.

But NEVER give 100% free market, free choice back complete to the electorate, LIKE THEY have. NEVER!

Reply 11 - Posted by: Highlander, 1/12/2017 7:42:22 AM     (No. 11105571)

Non-binding doesn´t mean diddlysquat if it´s still tax-supported. We don´t need it and we don´t want it. It´s just a colossal stinking pile of doggy do.

Reply 12 - Posted by: strike3, 1/12/2017 8:24:37 AM     (No. 11105637)

Zerocare was not about healthcare coverage, it was about government control and all parts should be thrown out immediately because they are all worse and more expensive than what we had before. Solve the problems of outrageous costs accrued through unnecessary tests and treatment to avoid litigation, outlaw the ambulance chasers and open the state lines. Force doctors with bad records out of the system. This still won´t make the perpetually ill happy but taxpayers are not obligated by the Constitution to make them happy. Require that people stop drinking, smoking, doing drugs and gaining hundreds of pounds through overeating before they get the first treatment for anything. The same people who drain us for food stamps, EBT cards, free education, etc. are also the ones that overburden the healthcare system. They need to be restricted and inconvenienced, not the working taxpayers.




Reply 13 - Posted by: Speedypetey, 1/12/2017 8:33:48 AM     (No. 11105660)

The fact that the legislators we voted for, or a little more than half, didn´t read it is ridiculous but what led to total disaster was Pelosi, Reid and Obama did not regionally develop the system and fix the mess before it went national. It was as if they wanted the health care segment of the economy to collapse. But it hung in there for the improvement and fixes needed.

Reply 14 - Posted by: Nevadadad46, 1/12/2017 8:33:58 AM     (No. 11105662)

Okay; Think- In my time as a worker, I had a great job whichh as a Benefit, offered H Insurance via Kaiser Permanente. My co-pay premium was $80.00 a month. The company failed after I had been there six years. We had two kids in that era and my wife came down with early onset arthritis for which se was take some expensive meds- without insurance cost us $190.00 a month. I got a new job, but, not nearly the good job I had. It paid less and the insurance was not nearly as good. And, the new insurance would not cover my wife´s pre-existing condition, plus my oldest son´s asthma, which was diagnosed a few months before I had lost the good job. We were overwhelmed with medical expenses. We actually cold not make ends meet. I took a second job and wife had to go get a job- child care expenses practically sucked that income up. Why should that happen in this society? All we needed was continuation of our health insurance. It took us ten years to recover from that disaster and some families never recover. And it is a very common thing for American families. That´s what needs a fix. Not what Gruber and Emmanuel and the Democrats did. Instead, they fixed a crack in the dry wall with a bulldozer.

Reply 15 - Posted by: privateer, 1/12/2017 9:30:58 AM     (No. 11105751)

Apologies for not including the sarcasm \ in my reply at #4. I don´t think there is ANY chance of those points being enacted.

Reply 16 - Posted by: sorosisbehindit, 1/12/2017 9:32:33 AM     (No. 11105757)

Obamacare just changed who the uninsured people will be. It used to be that the poor showed up at free clinics and the hospital and were never turned away. The problem was that they had no insurance for elective procedures. Now they have free obamacare because of their income level, and I have no insurance.

When I realized that paying $700/month for a very high deductible insurance got me nothing all year but a free mammogram, I chose to go uninsured. You can usually get a discount for self pay, because they don´t have to deal with insurance.

Reply 17 - Posted by: ida lou pino, 1/12/2017 9:36:13 AM     (No. 11105769)

What no one is mentioning - -

- - is that the "success" of "20 million" enrollees is because enrollment is MANDATORY! You enroll - - or you go to jail!

Nice business model, ain´t it? Buy my product or we´ll take you away. Not so hard to be "successful" with a scheme like that.




Reply 18 - Posted by: Arby, 1/12/2017 10:37:27 AM     (No. 11105862)

I hear the strains of a death knell. It makes me feel alive.

Reply 19 - Posted by: NotaBene, 1/12/2017 10:52:26 AM     (No. 11105886)

I had great insurance with ÆTNA. Still work at the same good job but as soon as Obamacare started our gold plated plan got downgraded to Blue Cross with a second company for dental. Copayment up, services down. I liked my plan, could not keep my plan. Period. In the meantime California insured millions of illegal aliens I what is simply an expansion of Medicaid to the undeserving. They pay zero dollars because of subsidies to paupers, while the self-employed pay and pay. Medical treatment for the poor was ALWAYS available at health clinics, emergency rooms and county hospitals. No one died in the streets in California before Obamacare.

I am so glad that this Obamacare nightmare will be terminated. Health savings accounts will revive the economy because the money from the healthy will be invested.

Mitch McConnell is our Senate leader and I am well pleased with him. Thanks to the 51 senators for holding together.

Reply 20 - Posted by: Butch59, 1/12/2017 11:41:13 AM     (No. 11105995)

IMHO, what is needed is to form a committee made up of doctors, nurses, hospital personal, insurance personal and come up with a working plan that will do what the majority of the people can be happy with. And to add, get rid of that idiotic idea of not being able to purchase a policy out of state. In a few words, get health care out of political hands. Not very many of them are doctors or any other healthcare givers.

Reply 21 - Posted by: whyyeseyec, 1/12/2017 11:51:01 AM     (No. 11106012)

I am for keeping Obamacare, but only if it applies to all federal workers - including current and former congress members, the Executive Branch and the SC members. Let´s force them to live by the rules they forced on the private sector!!

Reply 22 - Posted by: dvc, 1/12/2017 1:00:25 PM     (No. 11106143)

Chip, chip, chip. Like repainting a battleship, first you chip off the old paint, bit at a time.

After a while, you have it stripped down, the rot removed and next you cover it with a nice new coat of paint.




Post Reply   Close thread 900303

End of Thread  

Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "PageTurner"


Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)

Most Recent Articles posted by "PageTurner"

The Sordid History of the Firm
Behind the Trump-Russia Dossier
Weekly Standard, by Mark Hemingway    Original Article
Posted By: PageTurner- 1/12/2017 12:15:48 PM     Post Reply
Thursday´s New York Times has a report on how the highly suspicious dossier alleging that Donald Trump was compromised by Russian intelligence agents came into existence. Among the other interesting revelations was that the dubious opposition research report was put together by the research firm Fusion GPS: The story began in September 2015, when a wealthy Republican donor who strongly opposed Mr. Trump put up the money to hire a Washington research firm run by former journalists, Fusion GPS, to compile a dossier about the real estate magnate´s past scandals and weaknesses, according to a person familiar with the effort. The

Booker Was a Bust
Weekly Standard, by Fred Barnes    Original Article
Posted By: PageTurner- 1/12/2017 12:05:41 PM     Post Reply
From the moment Donald Trump picked Senator Jeff Sessions to be the next attorney general, it was clear what Democrats would need to defeat the Sessions nomination: a surprise witness. It was such a witness whose testimony led to the Senate´s rejection of Sessions for a federal judgeship in 1986. Back then, a reluctant Justice Department lawyer, Gerald Hebert, was drawn into testifying against Sessions by the staff of then-Judiciary committee chairman Joe Biden. At a confirmation hearing, he said Sessions had made racially tainted remarks when they worked together on civil rights cases in Alabama in the early 1980s. Hebert´s testimony

US Senate passes measure to take
first step in dismantling Obamacare
RT News [Russia], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: PageTurner- 1/12/2017 5:22:54 AM     Post Reply
US senators have passed the first measure on the way to dismantling outgoing-President Barack Obama’s much debated health care law, commonly known as Obamacare. Early on Thursday, the Senate voted 51-48 in favor of a nonbinding Republican-backed budget measure that will make it easier to pass repeal legislation, which could be voted on as early as next month. epublicans plan to get rid of the law and replace parts of it by the end of February, according to House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, speaking on “The Hugh Hewitt Show”, a conservative radio program, on Wednesday. Other Republicans, however, say the

How Venezuela’s corrupt socialists
are looting the country to death
New York Post, by Thor Halvorssen    Original Article
Posted By: PageTurner- 1/12/2017 4:26:29 AM     Post Reply
Venezuela is no longer a country with a government, institutions and a civil society. It’s a geographic area terrorized by a criminal enterprise that pretends to govern, with a civil society made up of two sets of people: accomplices and victims. More than 30 million of the latter. The Hugo Chavez-led looting spree began in 2000. By “looting,” I mean fraudulent government contracts, a celebration of bribery, phantom payrolls across all government ministries, bogus government-grant programs, the sacking of Venezuela’s gold reserves and a massive currency-exchange scam. More than $1 trillion has disappeared — some of it wasted on social programs that produced

Marco Rubio goes after Trump’s
pick for secretary of state. Hard.
Washington Post, by Amber Phillips    Original Article
Posted By: PageTurner- 1/12/2017 3:02:31 AM     Post Reply
Going into Wednesday´s hearing for President-elect Donald Trump´s secretary of state nominee, Rex Tillerson, all eyes were on Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who could choose whether to give deference to Trump´s pick — or try to tear him apart. In the opening hour of the two-day hearing, Rubio went on the attack. [Notably, Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) let him go on that attack before many other senators had a chance to speak, and before Trump´s news conference was going to suck up all the political oxygen.] No matter when it happened, Rubio´s bull-dog approach could spell

P***gate: Fake news but also fake outrage
Washington Examiner, by Mark Grabowski    Original Article
Posted By: PageTurner- 1/12/2017 12:09:34 AM     Post Reply
Buzzfeed´s "Pissgate" story about President-elect Trump is arguably fake news. Trump might even have a case against the popular millennial news site for defamation. But Trump supporters should probably check their outrage: It´s a bit hypocritical. First, Buzzfeed has overnight arguably expanded the definition of "fake news" with its publication of a controversial 35-page document with information about ties between the Russian government and Trump. Buzzfeed didn´t bother independently verifying the "leaked" information, which responsible journalists do, especially when it comes to allegations as explosive as those in the dossier. In an era when information moves at the speed of a tweet,

´Nasty as she wanna be!´ Swimsuit-
clad Lena Dunham poses legs
akimbo as she reflects on her
future in a Trump world and
learning to not be liked
Daily Mail [U.K.], by Chelsea White    Original Article
Posted By: PageTurner- 1/11/2017 7:24:59 PM     Post Reply
She is a Nasty Woman for life and she does not care what you think of it. Lena Dunham has once again pushed the boundaries of what most would consider good taste as she looks towards a very different year to 2016. The 30-year-old actress and writer has bared all - literally and metaphorically - in a new interviewer with Nylon released Wednesday. The Girls´ creator is the magazine´s cover star and, once again, proves when it comes to being a Hollywood starlet, she is not that type of girl. In the interview Lena reveals her fears and hopes now that Donald Trump rather

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)

John McCain passes FBI dossier
alleging secret Trump-Russia contacts

51 replie(s)
The Guardian (UK), by Julian Borger    Original Article
Posted By: MainelySane- 1/11/2017 9:27:58 AM     Post Reply
Senator John McCain passed documents to the FBI director, James Comey, last month alleging secret contacts between the Trump campaign and Moscow and that Russian intelligence had personally compromising material on the president-elect himself. The material, which has been seen by the Guardian, is a series of reports on Trump’s relationship with Moscow. They were drawn up by a former western counter-intelligence official, now working as a private consultant. BuzzFeed on Tuesday published the documents, which it said were “unverified and potentially unverifiable”.

Identity Of "Former Intelligence
Officer" Who Prepared The Trump
Dossier, Has Been Revealed

48 replie(s)
Zero Hedge, by Tyler Durden    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 1/11/2017 2:53:59 PM     Post Reply
While we learned earlier that John McCain was responsible for handing over the 35-page "dossier" of compromising, if arguably fake, revelations about Trump´s connections to Russia over to the FBI, the identity of the actual creator, who was said to be an ex-British intelligence service, remained a mystery. No longer. Courtesy of the WSJ, we now know his name: the former MI-6 officer, now working for a private security-and-investigations firm "who produced the dossier of unverified allegations about President-elect Donald Trump’s activities and connections in Russia" is Christopher Steele, a director of London-based Orbis Business Intelligence.... and before readers google

It was me: Sworn Trump enemy John McCain
admits HE handed smear dossier to FBI-as
details surface of document´s bizarre journey
from British former spy and diplomat

44 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Darren Boyle    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 1/11/2017 1:14:34 PM     Post Reply
Sworn Donald Trump enemy John McCain admitted Wednesday that he passed the dossier of claims of a Russian blackmail plot against the president-elect. The Arizona senator issued a public statement amid mounting questions of his exact role in the affair - and how a document riddled with errors and unverifiable claims came to be published. ´Late last year, I received sensitive information that has since been made public,´ he said. ´Upon examination of the contents, and unable to make a judgment about their accuracy, I delivered the information to the Director of the FBI. ´That has been the extent of

McCain: ‘I Don’t Know’ If Trump-Russia
Dossier ‘Credible,’ That’s Why I Gave
It to the FBI

44 replie(s)
Breitbart Video, by Pam Key    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 1/11/2017 8:02:12 PM     Post Reply
Wednesday on CNN addressing media reports that he had turned over a dossier containing unverified claims about Russia and President-elect Donald Trump, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) said, “I don’t know if it’s credible or not but I thought the information deserved to be delivered to the FBI, the appropriate agency of government.” Partial transcript as follows: MCCAIN: After looking at that information I took it to the FBI and have had no further involvement with it at issue. By the way, according to some media reports they already had that information, but I didn’t know that at the time. I

President Obama Says U.S. Constitution
‘Just a Piece of Parchment’

43 replie(s)
Media Research Center, by Monica Sanchez    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 1/11/2017 10:04:23 AM     Post Reply
President Obama, as he concluded his farewell address in Chicago on Tuesday, called the U.S. Constitution “just a piece of parchment." “Our Constitution is a remarkable, beautiful gift,” said Obama. “But it’s really just a piece of parchment.” “It has no power on its own,” he went on. “We the people give it power. We the people give it meaning with our participation and with the choices that we make and the alliances that we forge…” He later said that as he steps down from the presidency, he plans to play an active role in "the most important office in a democracy: citizen."

Revealed: Hillary Clinton’s Cabinet
Picks (If She’d Won, That Is)

39 replie(s)
Heat Street, by Andrew Stiles    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 1/10/2017 4:11:02 PM     Post Reply
Hillary Clinton’s political career is probably over, but just because she lost the presidential election to Donald Trump doesn’t mean she wasn’t prepared to win. Axios reporter Mike Allen has revealed Hillary’s list of prospective nominees for important cabinet posts in her administration, and it includes a number of interesting choices. John Podesta, her campaign chairman who accidentally exposed his entire email account to Russian hackers, was listed as the frontrunner to be Hillary Clinton’s secretary of state. Vice President Joe Biden was reportedly also being considered for the position. Facebook executive and Lean In author Sheryl Sandberg was in

Fox´s Shepard Smith criticizes
Trump for ´belittling´ CNN

38 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Nikita Vladimirov    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 1/11/2017 4:58:11 PM     Post Reply
Fox News anchor Shepard Smith on Wednesday criticized President-elect Donald Trump for his shouting match with a CNN reporter. (Snip) "President-elect Trump today told CNN´s Jim Acosta the his organization amounts to fake news. CNN´s exclusive reporting on the Russian matter was separate and distinctly different from the document dump executed by an online news property," Smith said during his closing monologue. "Though we at Fox News cannot confirm CNN´s report, it is our observation that it´s correspondents followed journalistic standards and that neither they nor any other journalists should be subjected to belittling and delegitimizing by the president-elect of the


Post Reply   Close thread 900303

End of Thread  


Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google

© 2015 Lucianne.com Media Inc.