A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


British terror fighters banned from
coming home by David Cameron

Daily Express [UK], by Caroline Wheeler

Original Article

Posted By:Attercliffe, 8/30/2014 7:31:41 PM

Britons fighting for the Islamic State will be banned from returning to the UK under radical plans to be unveiled tomorrow. The Prime Minister is expected to announce the crackdown in a Commons statement. Last night a Government source told the Sunday Express: “We are looking at stopping ­British citizens re-entering the country if they are suspected of terrorist activity abroad.” The move comes days after security chiefs raised the threat level to “severe” following ­warnings that a jihadi attack in Britain is “highly likely”. Thesource added: “The Government s considering a range of measures to keep the country safe

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: MMC, 8/30/2014 7:38:59 PM     (No. 9987669)

Obama will give the US terrorists a hero welcome and dinner at the White House.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    63 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: chumley, 8/30/2014 7:45:43 PM     (No. 9987673)

Why is that radical? Its the very least they should do. Another option might be to convict them in abstentia and have a firing squad ready if they try to re-enter.
Only a total fool allows his enemies into his house.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    117 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: bighambone, 8/30/2014 7:53:04 PM     (No. 9987678)

It seems like every time the UK Government takes effective action in matters like this, that some EU Court pops up and rules that the UK has violated the terrorists human rights and throws the UK Government ruling out.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    39 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Scribelus, 8/30/2014 7:53:28 PM     (No. 9987680)

Not a problem. They can be smuggled in to Texas with the next load of cocaine.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    40 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Nevadadad46, 8/30/2014 7:57:24 PM     (No. 9987686)

And the French, the Netherlands, Germany, Belgium, are they just sitting on their hands expecting to welcome the repatriated terrorists with a free lunch and a hand shake on return?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    33 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Udanja99, 8/30/2014 9:15:46 PM     (No. 9987739)

Hey, all the terrorists have to do is don a burqa and the UK will let them waltz right through airport customs and into a taxi.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    26 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: PAdiva, 8/30/2014 9:38:45 PM     (No. 9987764)

BO will give them a free phone.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    34 persons like this.


   

 

R-VAR_AD
  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Maggie2u, 8/30/2014 9:42:14 PM     (No. 9987768)

They don´t even have to do that Poster #6. All they have to do is claim they´re gay and it´s a free ride back to Briton.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    38 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Lawsy0, 8/30/2014 10:55:21 PM     (No. 9987805)

I wish the US Dept of State had the nads to do the same!!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    36 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Trigger2, 8/31/2014 5:07:24 AM     (No. 9987908)

No, the worthless State Dept only cares about diversity including the diversity of jihadists.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    31 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: uno, 8/31/2014 7:33:21 AM     (No. 9987978)

See that body swinging in the August breeze of Washington DC?
It used to be known as Unity and it had a good reputation!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    29 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Rinktum, 8/31/2014 7:43:06 AM     (No. 9987987)

It took a while before the world understood the threat of Nazism. Fast forward several decades and we see evil once again on the march. Muslims commit horrific brutal acts that would turn the stomach of any human being and they spew hate filled rhetoric promising more of the same to anyone who will not to submit to their worldview. They are well funded, determined to succeed and are occupying many countries in the Middle East. How can the world ignore this threat? It makes no logical sense and yet, here we are. Governments around the globe have allowed them access for years and now when the threat is real and imminent they still can´t find the courage to stop them from entering their countries. This truly is insane.

Read the comments after the article. The people of Britain are outraged that their government has ignored this threat because of political correctness. They have no confidence that Cameron will follow through in a meaningful way. Sounds very familiar. Our government does not have the will to protect its citizens either. I fear that thousands if not millions will die before there is a concerted effort to defeat this global threat.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    41 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: dudette4freedom, 8/31/2014 8:19:32 AM     (No. 9988016)

#12 agree---the one thing going for us is we have the 2nd amendment and an armed citizenry is not going to roll over like the helpless Brits, poor folk.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    37 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: strike3, 8/31/2014 9:04:21 AM     (No. 9988061)

The returning jihadis can be recognized by the suntan around their eyes where the mask didn´t cover the skin. You can´t get that in Britain.

In an ideal world there would be none left alive to return.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    30 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Udanja99, 8/31/2014 9:23:24 AM     (No. 9988089)

The difference, #12, is that most people didn´t see what the Nazi´s were really doing until the end of the war when the camps were liberated. Today, everyone sees exactly what the Islamists are doing, right there on YouTube and the 24/7 news networks and STILL there are those on the left who deny that there´s any threat. Just ask Jean Fraud Kerry.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    27 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: M2, 8/31/2014 10:12:27 AM     (No. 9988134)

British cojones has recently been an oxymoron, but no more. Hooray for the Brits. At least its Leader has a set. Wish ours did.

Refusing to allow them back in, though, is a mild rebuke. I´d put them through a food processor. With the 1mm slicing blade.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    29 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Mobyclik, 8/31/2014 12:12:19 PM     (No. 9988317)

I´m waiting for the muzzies already in Great Britain to become OUTRAGED at this obvious attack on peace loving muslims attempting to return to the country they love.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    16 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Ida Lou Pino, 8/31/2014 12:37:53 PM     (No. 9988352)

Cameron is just a another conniving, lying, glo-bull warmist pol.

The only reason he´s acting "tough" right now is because he´s facing a landslide defeat in upcoming by-elections by the right-wing UKIP (United Kingdom Independent Party).

He´s the John McQueeg of England. Talk right-wing just before elections - - then go hard left after them.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    36 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: dman, 8/31/2014 2:18:17 PM     (No. 9988434)

Regardless what you may think of Cameron, this is the right thing for England to do.

What about us? What about US citizens training and fighting along with ISIS and other terrorists? What about our Visa Waiver Program? Why has that not been suspended - for starters?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    31 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: billkoch, 8/31/2014 4:21:43 PM     (No. 9988532)

This is what o should be doing, but is too busy protecting his friends and not protecting his country.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: WIBadger, 8/31/2014 5:59:27 PM     (No. 9988606)

This is supposed to be a big deal ? Why not just kill them instead and bill their families for the ordinance and troop transport costs ?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    20 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 799267




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Attercliffe"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Attercliffe"



So Britain is Still Great.
But For How Much Longer?
Breitbart London [UK], by James Delingpole    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 9/19/2014 1:36:58 PM     Post Reply
First the good news. Thanks to last night´s "No" vote in the Scottish referendum Britain has been spared the following: a run on the pound; the hasty exodus of Scotland´s finance industry; the premature death of UKIP; the gloating of Alex Salmond; a Red-Wedding-style outbreak of backstabbing and bloodletting among Tories and Labour alike; a collapse in the markets; at least two years of procedural sclerosis in the British and Scottish parliaments; the entirely unnecessary and utterly ill-considered rupture of a the greatest Union between nations the world has ever known; waking up this morning to find ourselves no longer

Washington will be hugely
relieved by Scotland’s ´No´ vote
Telegraph [UK], by Nile Gardiner    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 9/19/2014 1:17:58 PM     Post Reply
Scotland’s rejection of independence from Great Britain will be greeted with a huge sigh of relief in Washington, on both sides of the political aisle. [Snip] There were also major concerns in the Pentagon over the desire of Scottish Nationalists to remove Britain’s nuclear deterrent from Scottish waters. The president himself made an intervention in the Scottish debate, and dozens of Members of Congress signed on to a resolution urging Britain to remain intact. With a crisis brewing in the Middle East, and the United States fighting a war against a barbaric Islamist army in Iraq that is now stronger

Scottish independence:
Scotland votes No
Scotsman [UK], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 9/19/2014 8:33:09 AM     Post Reply
Alex Salmond’s dream of independence has been shattered after Scotland voted to stay part of the United Kingdom. Scotland today rejected independence and voted to remain part of the United Kingdom at the end of the most intense political campaign the country has ever seen. The silent majority finally raised its voice on a tense yet utterly compelling night of political history. During a referendum that attracted record numbers of voters and was hailed as a triumph of democracy, the people voted to maintain the 307-year Union. A decisive No vote was the culmination of two and a half-years of

Scotland votes No:
what happens now?
Telegraph [UK], by James Kirkup    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 9/19/2014 8:21:35 AM     Post Reply
Scotland has voted against independence. Here’s a quick look at what happens--and doesn’t happen--now: The Union stands. That is all. A political union that has lasted for 307 years continues. Scotland remains part of the United Kingdom. Border posts are not thrown up in the Cheviots. Britain’s nuclear-armed submarines remain based in Scotland. The pound, though it may wobble, does not tumble on currency markets. Billions of pounds invested in Scottish banks mostly stays put. As do the banks. The biggest constitutional crisis in British history does not happen. Alex Salmond has some tricky questions to answer.

Scottish independence:
referendum results - live
Telegraph [UK], by Georgia Graham    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 9/19/2014 12:10:33 AM     Post Reply
Latest 04.59: John Curtice, professor of politics at University of Strathclyde says it is likely to be No and by a bigger margin than any recent polls suggested. 04.57: Scottish Borders opts for No by big margin - Yes: 27,906 No: 55,553. 04.55: THE VOTE SO FAR: Yes: 1,036,810 (46.34%) No: 1,200,695 (53.66%). 04.53: Glasgow votes Yes - Yes: 194,779, No: 169,347. 04.52: Glasgow coming now, this is big turnout 75%. 04.49: Perth and Kinross votes no. Yes: 41,475 No: 62,714. 04.48: South Lanarkshire has votes No for the Union - Yes: 109,990, No: 121,800

Salmond hammered in his own backyard:
First Minister flies to Edinburgh as his
dream of Scottish independence is rejected
again and again by voters, including in his*
Daily Mail [UK], by Matt Chorley    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 9/18/2014 11:44:54 PM     Post Reply
A miserable Alex Salmond boarded a private jet at Aberdeen airport this morning, as his dream of Scottish independence was shot down in flames by voters across the country. In a bombshell first result, Clackmannanshire--rated by Credit Suisse as the most likely to vote Yes--dramatically rejected independence by 54 percent to 46 percent. After Orkney and the Shetland Islands also voted no, it emerged voters in Mr Salmond´s own backyard in Aberdeenshire also look set to have rejected separation in his own backyard, just as the SNP conceded defeat in West Lothian. Senior figures in the Better Together campaign now

Scottish independence campaign - live
Telegraph [UK], by Matthew Holehouse    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 9/18/2014 8:10:54 AM     Post Reply
12.40 In Donetsk, eastern Ukraine, a demonstration takes place in support of Scottish independence. "I support the Scots. Their referendum is going peacefully, without war. I´m very jealous, and I wish them all the best," tells Natalia Isaeva tells the patriotic Russian channel LifeNews. Why´s it significant? Moscow watches the referendum closely. In part, because Scottish independence puts a big question mark over the future of Britain´s nuclear arsenal, and the Nato patrols that intercept stray Russian flights. [Snip] 12.30 Around 1,000 people, including leaders from the Better Together and Yes campaigns, are expected to attend the Church of Scotland’s

Scots Should Vote
No on Independence
Breitbart London [UK], by Peter Morici    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 9/18/2014 2:31:23 AM     Post Reply
Scots will be worse off if they vote for independence. It’s not good economics and not much else is at stake.[Snip] Independence has been seized by the professional left—academics, artists of all kinds and other “social thinkers”—who believe an independent Scotland could raise taxes and spend more to affect more progressive social values. The Scots do support Labor candidates for Westminster in much greater numbers than do the English. Scotland is hardly shortchanged by London. It accounts for 8.3 percent of the UK population but receives 9.2 percent of public spending. Nevertheless, advocates of independence say if Scotland got control

Cases of rare and severe
respiratory illness enterovirus 68
confirmed in 14 states as it spreads
quickly among children across America
Daily Mail [UK], by Associated Press & Alexander Klausner    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 9/18/2014 2:10:31 AM     Post Reply
Health officials say 14 states now have respiratory illnesses caused by an uncommon virus--enterovirus 68 which is marked by severe breathing problems and will continue to infect children in more states. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention officials say Alabama, Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, New York, Oklahoma and Pennsylvania together have 130 lab-confirmed cases. As of Wednesday both Minnesota and New Jersey also have confirmed cases of the severe virus. [Snip] The Star Tribune reports that The Children’s hospitals in Minneapolis and St. Paul have been averaging a combined total of around 300 children transferred to

Could this be the next Queen
of Scotland? As independence
looms, will Stuart crown return?
Daily Express [UK], by Ted Jeory    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 9/17/2014 5:53:43 PM     Post Reply
And an 87-year-old billionaire from Spain might argue she has the strongest claim. For the Duchess of Alba is said to be one of two main contenders from the Stuart dynasty, whose Scottish monarchs transformed the country during their time in power. While First Minister Alex Salmond insists Queen Elizabeth II would remain as head of state after a Yes vote, others are not so sure. Some Scots look back fondly in the history books to their Stuart kings, the first of whom was Robert II in 1371. By the 17th century, they ruled all of England, Wales, Ireland and Scotland.

Cameron hails huge drop
in unemployment as ´plan
for economy is working´
Daily Express, by Owen Bennett    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 9/17/2014 5:46:37 PM     Post Reply
Figures released by the Office for National Statistics revealed 2.02 million people were jobless between April and June--a fall of 468,000 on the same period in 2013. There are now 30.61 million people in work, 74,000 more than in February to April this year. The number of people claiming Jobseeker’s Allowance has also fallen with fewer than a million receiving the benefit last month--the lowest level for six years. The Prime Minister, speaking on a visit to Weir Minerals Europe, a factory near Fleet in Hampshire, described the fall in people claiming unemployment benefit as “really remarkable”.

Gaza Belt Residents Say ´Bad
Feeling´ Hovers Over Security
Arutz Sheva [Israel], by Benny Toker    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 9/17/2014 5:39:03 PM     Post Reply
Anat Heifetz, a member of Kibbutz Nirim in the Gaza Belt, told Arutz Sheva on Wednesday night that the region´s residents have been left with a "bad feeling" about the current negotiations in Cairo. "We hope that it is a one-time feeling, but there´s a feeling that maybe things are starting to deteriorate prior to the expiration of thirty-day ceasefire," Heifetz stated. "Everyone knows it´s over on Rosh Hashanah [New Year´s; next week Wednesday-Friday - ed.], since negotiations were set to resume then," she added. "They talk about the series of political decisions or an permanent solution [to come], but we do



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Democrats Slam Debbie Wasserman Schultz
46 replie(s)
Breitbart InstaBlog, by Dan Riehl    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 9/17/2014 8:56:27 PM     Post Reply
Politico reports that "long-simmering doubts" and a renewed lack of confidence in Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz from the White House, congressional Dems and other Washington Democrats has Schultz struggling to try and hold onto her job. They´ve lost faith in her as "a unifying leader and reliable party spokesperson" just as we approach a mid-term election that already has Democrats at a disadvantage. Recently, Wasserman Schultz criticized the White House’s for it´s handling of the immigration crisis and also border crisis and also compared the political right to wife beaters. The chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee

Obama slaps down top
general and insists there
will be NO combat boots on
the ground in battle against
ISIS as he rallies troops
at air base

41 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by David Martoski    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 9/18/2014 5:14:05 AM     Post Reply
President Barack Obama insisted on Wednesday that he would not send ground troops into Iraqi combat zones to fight the ISIS terrorist army, directly contradicting his top general who said a day earlier that the president asked him for boots-on-the-ground recommendations ´on a case-by-case basis.´ (Snip)´As your commander-in-chief,´ Obama insisted, ´I will not commit you and the rest of our armed forces to fighting another ground war in Iraq.´ On Tuesday, however, Joint Chiefs chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey told lawmakers that circumstances on the ground could drive him to push for American combat troops to be embedded with Iraqi army

Michelle Obama: ´Being Married
to the President ... Can Be Hard´

39 replie(s)
Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 9/18/2014 8:45:39 AM     Post Reply
First Lady Michelle Obama visited sick children at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, where she complained about living at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and being married to the president of the United States. She made the comments in response to being asked about her "favorite part about being in the White House." "About being in the -- about being First Lady is being able to do stuff like this, really. And it is so special for me to get to meet kids like you guys," Michelle Obama started. "Because sometimes living in the White House and being married to the

Michelle Obama: Americans ´Take for
Granted´ How Much Barack Has Improved US

38 replie(s)
Breitbart Big Government, by Charlie Spiering    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 9/19/2014 10:49:59 AM     Post Reply
First Lady Michelle Obama proudly defended her husband’s record at a Washington, D.C. fundraiser, reminding the attendants how far the country had come since the Obamas entered the White House. “Just think about how different our country looks to children growing up today,” she said. “Think about how our kids take for granted that a black person or a woman can be President of the United States.” She also praised President Obama for changing history on gay marriage and the Supreme Court. “They take it for granted that for the first time in history, there are three brilliant women serving

Obamacare Creator: Die At 75!
35 replie(s)
Breitbart, Big Government, by Ben Shapiro    Original Article
Posted By: Vastrightwingconspirator- 9/18/2014 5:00:01 PM     Post Reply
Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, one of the masterminds behind Obamacare, has now explained that he wishes to die at age 75. In an article in The Atlantic, Emanuel writes, “Seventy-five. That’s how long I want to live: 75 years.” He explains that his daughters disagree; so do his brothers and his friends. But, he says, “I am sure of my position…here is a simple truth that many of us seem to resist: living too long is also a loss. It renders many of us, if not disabled, then faltering and declining, a state that may not be worse than death but

Rift widens between Obama,
U.S. military over strategy
to fight Islamic State

35 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Craig Whitlock    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 9/18/2014 10:18:03 PM     Post Reply
Flashes of disagreement over how to fight the Islamic State are mounting between President Obama and U.S. military leaders, the latest sign of strain in what often has been an awkward and uneasy relationship. Even as the administration has received congressional backing for its strategy, with the Senate voting Thursday to approve a plan to arm and train Syrian rebels, a series of military leaders have criticized the president’s approach against the Islamic State militant group. Retired Marine Gen. James Mattis, who served under Obama until last year, became the latest high-profile skeptic on Thursday, telling the House Intelligence Committee

Michelle Obama to hold fashion workshop
at the White House next month

33 replie(s)
New York Daily News, by Beth Stebner    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 9/17/2014 5:33:33 PM     Post Reply
First Lady Michelle Obama is proving herself a very dear friend to the fashion world. Obama, a master of both high and low sartorial styles, will be hosting a Fashion Education Workshop at the White House next month. According to an email obtained by Women´s Wear Daily, celebrated designers like Prabal Gurung, Reed Krakoff, Maria Cornejo, and Bibhu Mohapatra have been invited to attend "to bring members of the fashion industry to the White House and enlighten, educate and mentor the next generation of fashion leaders." In addition, college students from around the Washington area will attend the Oct. 8 educational workshop, which

Hillary Clinton: Congress Out of
Touch on Women´s Issues

33 replie(s)
NBC News, by Kasie Hunt    Original Article
Posted By: BaseballFan- 9/18/2014 5:15:18 PM     Post Reply
Congress is living in an "evidence-free zone" as it debates issues of equal pay and family-friendly work policies, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Thursday. "Unfortunately, reality is not always the context in which these decisions are made. The Congress increasingly -- despite the best efforts of my friends and others -- is living in an evidence-free zone," she said during a roundtable discussion at the Center for American Progress focused on women´s issues. "What the reality is, in the lives of Americans is so far from the minds of too many who don´t place the highest priority" on

Ferguson Mob Threatens StL County
Leaders: “If Wilson Get Off, Y’all
Better Bring Every Army Y’ Got,
Cuz It’s Going Down”

32 replie(s)
Gateway Pundit, by Jim Hoft    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 9/17/2014 5:05:51 PM     Post Reply
Hundreds of Ferguson protesters and local far left activists packed the St. Louis County Council meeting last night in Clayton, demanding action in the Michael Brown shooting case. Brown was shot dead in Ferguson, Missouri on August 9, 2014 after he robbed a local Ferguson convenience store. Brown reportedly smashed police officer Darren Wilson in the face, severely injuring Wilson, before he was shot dead. Protesters threatened continued rioting and violence if Officer Wilson is let off. (Tweet) The mob told Councilman Steve Stenger that he has until noon on Wednesday to denounce County Prosecutor Bob McCulloch, who endorsed Stenger’s

How gender mattered in the rise and
fall of Debbie Wasserman Schultz

28 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Nia-Malika Henderson    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 5:06:33 AM     Post Reply
Devastating. That´s really the only way to describe Politico´s piece on DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz. (I hereby nominate her for Worst Week in Washington.) (Editor´s note: Three words -- Joseph. Robinette. Biden.) Based on interviews with DNC staffers -- both former and current -- the piece described Wasserman Schultz as something of a modern-day Tracy Flick: over-eager, disloyal and not shy about promoting her ambitions. It would be fair to say that she sounds like, well, a lot like other politicians. And this would be accurate. But the wholesale bashing of Wasserman Schultz at every level of the party -- White House,

Outraged Swiss village of 1,000
residents forced to raise taxes after
African refugee mother-of-seven
moves there and costs them
£40,000 a month in benefits

26 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by John Hall    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 9/17/2014 8:10:03 PM     Post Reply
A village of just 1,000 residents in Switzerland has been forced to raise taxes because an African refugee and her seven children cost the local authority £40,000 in benefits every month. Hagenbuch, in the Swiss canton of Zurich, is understood to be spending close to a third of its total annual budget on the family after they arrived from Eritrea in East Africa three years ago. The massive benefits bill covers day-to-day living expenses such as groceries and cleaning costs, as well as paying for four of the woman´s children to be housed in an orphanage and even bills for

Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee
on the strategy for dealing with ISIL

25 replie(s)
Kingwood Observer (Houston, TX), by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 9/17/2014 5:55:33 PM     Post Reply
Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee, a Senior Member of the House Homeland Security Committee and House Judiciary Committee and Ranking Member of the Border and Maritime Subcommittee.(snip) The Congresswoman released the following statement: “The bloodshed at the hands of ISIL has been enormous. Religious minorities have been persecuted. American and British citizens have been beheaded. There is a further threat of other innocent human beings to be beheaded or killed in some way. It is also clear that a war including the United States is not the answer. I abhor the violence of war when diplomacy can be used.


Post Reply   Close thread 799267





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS