A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


How to replace the EPA
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson

Original Article

Posted By:fishbone, 8/12/2014 12:32:29 PM

Of all the regulatory deadweight on the economy, the Environmental Protection Agency is almost certainly the heaviest of the federal government’s intrusions. If voters should hand control of the White House and Congress to the GOP in 2016, structural reform ought to be the heart of the program to rescue America from the disasters Obama and the Democrats have wrought. Part of that structural reform should be replacement of the EPA with a more effective and economical institutional arrangement.

Comments:
I wholeheartedly disagree. The EPA should be totally expunged. All the other agencies should be scrutinized, as well. They were all created with the intention of protecting the Congress from fallout for making bad decisions and "regulations" with the force of law. Return this "responsibility" to Congress where they are held accountable, as well they should be. (soapbox off)

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Drive, 8/12/2014 12:33:45 PM     (No. 9963055)

Wasn´t this the agency that Rick Perry wanted to eliminate?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    9 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: SouthSanAntonio, 8/12/2014 12:36:35 PM     (No. 9963060)

We are talking about the federal government. They NEVER just get rid of any level of bureaucracy. They always replace it with something bigger and more burdensome to the average person or business, and then insist that we are all "better off"...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    15 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Hazymac, 8/12/2014 12:55:09 PM     (No. 9963098)

The plan of the Heartland Institute to phase out EPA over five years and allow the states to set their own environmental standards is in my opinion the most politically palatable (if not to us, then to most of the population) way to rid ourselves of these religio-political Green zealots. Even if both houses of Congress were solid majority Republican, I see no way that EPA could just be squashed with one fell sledgehammer blow.

The states--you know which ones they are--that choose to knuckle under to their Green constituencies will be terrible places to live and do business, while the ones that allow only sensible regulations will prosper. Let the states once again become the laboratories of democracy, and let them compete.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: tisHimself, 8/12/2014 12:55:51 PM     (No. 9963099)

First you make the case at the local level--- state level, bout the failures and abuses EPA has directed.

Then you reduce the size of the agency drastically and block grant land management issues to the states. One size never fits all.

Reward states that find cheaper ways to implement federal mandates by allowing them keep part of what doesn´t get spent.

Celebrate local successes and gradually kill off the EPA.

Does this with a high profile governor from a western state with small government proclivities and a history of protecting local interests against Washington and Wall Street.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    8 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Ellen852119, 8/12/2014 1:01:51 PM     (No. 9963114)

The EPA was created by executive order and could be instantly eliminated by another executive order, and should be. We would then have an economy again, and something other than part-time, minimum wage jobs.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    9 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: JimBob, 8/12/2014 1:07:31 PM     (No. 9963129)

A good place to start is to re-insert the word ´navigable´ describing the waters under the EPA´s control. As I understand it, by having this word removed from their charter, the EPA made a power grab that extended its reach from the navigable waters to ALL the waters, and now has grabbed even more, extending its reach to ´ephemeral streams´. Now, if you pee in the woods and the liquid trickles across the ground before soaking in, the EPA can claim jurisdiction.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: agrunt, 8/12/2014 1:07:37 PM     (No. 9963130)

Eazy -- with a hole in the ground.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


   

 

R-VAR_AD
  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: agrunt, 8/12/2014 1:09:31 PM     (No. 9963133)

Sorry about the eazy non funny spelling joke.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    8 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Carolina Kat, 8/12/2014 1:16:01 PM     (No. 9963144)

Agreed - #3. Currently the environmental regulations in states are compliance to EPA or better. As in the case of the NELAC (an accrediting program to nationalize environmental quantification and qualification standards) fewer than a dozen states actually sought accrediting authority, and there was still such a wide variety of quality, the program has really epically failed. The EPA could not impose their rules - States rights - and finally - ostensibly - gave up. The sophistication of environmental agencies varies dramatically between the states, and each Region within the EPA also varies with the level of management. We don´t have a national program, really, anyway. EPA needs to dissolve, and the state programs which are the best enforcers of ´true´ issues, would be left alone to do real environmental protection. Unfortunately the EPA has given shrift to the real needs of contamination remediation in favor of the flavor AGW of the day, and have rendered themselves moot to real environmental issues.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    8 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: dman, 8/12/2014 1:25:25 PM     (No. 9963156)

EPA, along with Education, Energy, HUD, Homeland Security, and several others, should be on the "chopping block" for replacement or elimination.

However, the Heartland Institute´s approach does not go nearly far enough. What is needed is fundamental, Constitutional bureaucracy reform.

A few thoughts:
* All bureaucratic regulations and executive orders must be approved by Congress, perhaps within a set "grace" period to accommodate emergencies
* All regulations and executive orders should expire with the Presidential term, unless explicitly renewed by Congress. (Actually, all legislation should "sunset" after a fixed period unless explicitly renewed. One Congress or President should not be allowed to bind all future Congresses and Presidents without an explicit Constitutional amendment.)
* Civil service rules should be overhauled. Tenure should be eliminated. Elected officials should be held accountable for the actions and treatment of those working under their authority.
* Public employees should not be permitted to strike and their unions should not be permitted to participate in the electoral process (especially contributions), other than to publicly state any grievances thay may have.
* Individual citizens and legal residents should be able to appeal bureaucratic penalties and forfeitures via their Congressman. Congress should have power to nullify such "enforcement" actions.

Just a few items on a very long list to be considered. The reforms need to be in the Constitution, subject to approval of the states and away from the whims of Congress. Here is where the word "comprehensive" (which I have grown to hate) actually would apply.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    9 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: dman, 8/12/2014 1:30:08 PM     (No. 9963166)

.. and last, but certainly not least: the IRS.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    8 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: columba, 8/12/2014 1:31:00 PM     (No. 9963168)

Any outfit that can create a famine in California and say that it is needed to protect a kind of fish, is clearly anti-human in its thinking and deeds to be eliminated by whatever means available.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: mickturn, 8/12/2014 1:41:54 PM     (No. 9963192)

Why modify it to come back again, DELETE IT!

All govt. agencies should have to get Congress (75%) approval and POTUS signature to put in place any regulations (each voted on separately, no bundling permitted!).

That way they can´t go wild and damage America with their personal agenda´s.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    9 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: mickturn, 8/12/2014 1:48:47 PM     (No. 9963205)

The whole bureaucracy thing was a tool of the Dims to take over all real law making in America. Once the agencies have the power there is no stopping them and they will be misused by criminals like the current administration!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    8 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Wakeupcall, 8/12/2014 2:09:54 PM     (No. 9963252)

The only way to accomplish anything with the EPA is to shut it down, disband it completely, fire all the employees and brand them as never rehire-able by any government agency, cancel all benefits forever.

This should be done to most other agencies, also.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    7 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: crimea river, 8/12/2014 2:13:25 PM     (No. 9963258)

Heartland Institute is on the right track and this model should apply to all federal agencies not constitutionally required.

1) Set a 3-5 year schedule to terminate the agency.
2) Devolve all functions and budget to the states.
3) At termination all federal funding ceases.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    9 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: whyyeseyec, 8/12/2014 2:57:33 PM     (No. 9963328)

When I got to ´dismantle and replace´ I stopped reading. Total elimination of the EPA should be the intended goal. Anything less will morph into a new govn behemoth in short order. Since most if not all states have their own form of mini-EPA, the federal version is no longer necessary other than to be used to terrorize the American public.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    7 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 

Post Reply   Close thread 796655




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "fishbone"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "fishbone"



New Deal for Insider Spies Could
Have Prevented Snowden Case
American Thinker, by Bernie Reeves    Original Article
Posted By: fishbone- 9/8/2014 11:00:54 AM     Post Reply
In the espionage business, uncovering secrets passed on to the enemy by a captured insider spy is critical to resuming normal operations. Until a thorough damage assessment is completed, intelligence agencies don’t know what data are secure, or if agents in place are safe. And while a captured insider spy routinely agrees to cooperate if prosecutors drop the death penalty, psychiatrist David L. Charney discovered that the defendant is not committed to the assessment process. He (rarely a she) knows that the U.S. has not exercised the death penalty to punish spies since 1953, when Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were

How to replace the EPA
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: fishbone- 8/12/2014 12:32:29 PM     Post Reply
Of all the regulatory deadweight on the economy, the Environmental Protection Agency is almost certainly the heaviest of the federal government’s intrusions. If voters should hand control of the White House and Congress to the GOP in 2016, structural reform ought to be the heart of the program to rescue America from the disasters Obama and the Democrats have wrought. Part of that structural reform should be replacement of the EPA with a more effective and economical institutional arrangement.

CDCV chief: Ebola spread
to US ´inevitable´
American Thinker, by Rick Moran    Original Article
Posted By: fishbone- 8/9/2014 12:17:44 PM     Post Reply
The head of the Centers for Disease Control, Tom Frieden, told a House committee that, inevitably there will be travelers, American citizens and others who go from these three countries -- or from Lagos if it doesn´t get it under control -- and are here with symptoms." He added that he was "confident that there will not be a large Ebola outbreak in the US." Frieden did not say what that confidence was based on. The CDC has already issued its highest alert to hospitals to be on the lookout for patients exhibiting the symptoms of Ebola, but the government is keeping mum on who they are testing and where.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Democrats Slam Debbie Wasserman Schultz
46 replie(s)
Breitbart InstaBlog, by Dan Riehl    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 9/17/2014 8:56:27 PM     Post Reply
Politico reports that "long-simmering doubts" and a renewed lack of confidence in Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz from the White House, congressional Dems and other Washington Democrats has Schultz struggling to try and hold onto her job. They´ve lost faith in her as "a unifying leader and reliable party spokesperson" just as we approach a mid-term election that already has Democrats at a disadvantage. Recently, Wasserman Schultz criticized the White House’s for it´s handling of the immigration crisis and also border crisis and also compared the political right to wife beaters. The chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee

   

 



 
Obama slaps down top
general and insists there
will be NO combat boots on
the ground in battle against
ISIS as he rallies troops
at air base

41 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by David Martoski    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 9/18/2014 5:14:05 AM     Post Reply
President Barack Obama insisted on Wednesday that he would not send ground troops into Iraqi combat zones to fight the ISIS terrorist army, directly contradicting his top general who said a day earlier that the president asked him for boots-on-the-ground recommendations ´on a case-by-case basis.´ (Snip)´As your commander-in-chief,´ Obama insisted, ´I will not commit you and the rest of our armed forces to fighting another ground war in Iraq.´ On Tuesday, however, Joint Chiefs chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey told lawmakers that circumstances on the ground could drive him to push for American combat troops to be embedded with Iraqi army

Michelle Obama: ´Being Married
to the President ... Can Be Hard´

39 replie(s)
Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 9/18/2014 8:45:39 AM     Post Reply
First Lady Michelle Obama visited sick children at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, where she complained about living at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and being married to the president of the United States. She made the comments in response to being asked about her "favorite part about being in the White House." "About being in the -- about being First Lady is being able to do stuff like this, really. And it is so special for me to get to meet kids like you guys," Michelle Obama started. "Because sometimes living in the White House and being married to the

Michelle Obama to hold fashion workshop
at the White House next month

33 replie(s)
New York Daily News, by Beth Stebner    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 9/17/2014 5:33:33 PM     Post Reply
First Lady Michelle Obama is proving herself a very dear friend to the fashion world. Obama, a master of both high and low sartorial styles, will be hosting a Fashion Education Workshop at the White House next month. According to an email obtained by Women´s Wear Daily, celebrated designers like Prabal Gurung, Reed Krakoff, Maria Cornejo, and Bibhu Mohapatra have been invited to attend "to bring members of the fashion industry to the White House and enlighten, educate and mentor the next generation of fashion leaders." In addition, college students from around the Washington area will attend the Oct. 8 educational workshop, which

Obamacare Creator: Die At 75!
33 replie(s)
Breitbart, Big Government, by Ben Shapiro    Original Article
Posted By: Vastrightwingconspirator- 9/18/2014 5:00:01 PM     Post Reply
Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, one of the masterminds behind Obamacare, has now explained that he wishes to die at age 75. In an article in The Atlantic, Emanuel writes, “Seventy-five. That’s how long I want to live: 75 years.” He explains that his daughters disagree; so do his brothers and his friends. But, he says, “I am sure of my position…here is a simple truth that many of us seem to resist: living too long is also a loss. It renders many of us, if not disabled, then faltering and declining, a state that may not be worse than death but

Ferguson Mob Threatens StL County
Leaders: “If Wilson Get Off, Y’all
Better Bring Every Army Y’ Got,
Cuz It’s Going Down”

32 replie(s)
Gateway Pundit, by Jim Hoft    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 9/17/2014 5:05:51 PM     Post Reply
Hundreds of Ferguson protesters and local far left activists packed the St. Louis County Council meeting last night in Clayton, demanding action in the Michael Brown shooting case. Brown was shot dead in Ferguson, Missouri on August 9, 2014 after he robbed a local Ferguson convenience store. Brown reportedly smashed police officer Darren Wilson in the face, severely injuring Wilson, before he was shot dead. Protesters threatened continued rioting and violence if Officer Wilson is let off. (Tweet) The mob told Councilman Steve Stenger that he has until noon on Wednesday to denounce County Prosecutor Bob McCulloch, who endorsed Stenger’s

Hillary Clinton: Congress Out of
Touch on Women´s Issues

32 replie(s)
NBC News, by Kasie Hunt    Original Article
Posted By: BaseballFan- 9/18/2014 5:15:18 PM     Post Reply
Congress is living in an "evidence-free zone" as it debates issues of equal pay and family-friendly work policies, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Thursday. "Unfortunately, reality is not always the context in which these decisions are made. The Congress increasingly -- despite the best efforts of my friends and others -- is living in an evidence-free zone," she said during a roundtable discussion at the Center for American Progress focused on women´s issues. "What the reality is, in the lives of Americans is so far from the minds of too many who don´t place the highest priority" on

Sarah Palin Jokes About Makeup-Free
Photo, Says She Looks Like a
´´Sheepdog!" See the Funny Post

26 replie(s)
E! OnLine, by Brett Malec    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 9/17/2014 7:16:16 AM     Post Reply
Just call her a pit bull without lipstick! Sarah Palin is proving she has a sense of humor about the makeup-free photos that surfaced this week. On Monday, the 50-year-old politician was photographed by paparazzi looking fresh-faced without any cosmetics on. But instead of getting mad about the slyly snapped no-makeup shots, the former Alaska governor took to Facebook to joke about the incident. "Feel bad for the poor paparazzi hounding outside my truck this morning hoping to capture a tabloid ‘exclusive´ of me coming out of Bikram Hot Yoga. How about we take away their ‘exclusive´ and I´ll give

Outraged Swiss village of 1,000
residents forced to raise taxes after
African refugee mother-of-seven
moves there and costs them
£40,000 a month in benefits

26 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by John Hall    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 9/17/2014 8:10:03 PM     Post Reply
A village of just 1,000 residents in Switzerland has been forced to raise taxes because an African refugee and her seven children cost the local authority £40,000 in benefits every month. Hagenbuch, in the Swiss canton of Zurich, is understood to be spending close to a third of its total annual budget on the family after they arrived from Eritrea in East Africa three years ago. The massive benefits bill covers day-to-day living expenses such as groceries and cleaning costs, as well as paying for four of the woman´s children to be housed in an orphanage and even bills for

Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee
on the strategy for dealing with ISIL

25 replie(s)
Kingwood Observer (Houston, TX), by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 9/17/2014 5:55:33 PM     Post Reply
Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee, a Senior Member of the House Homeland Security Committee and House Judiciary Committee and Ranking Member of the Border and Maritime Subcommittee.(snip) The Congresswoman released the following statement: “The bloodshed at the hands of ISIL has been enormous. Religious minorities have been persecuted. American and British citizens have been beheaded. There is a further threat of other innocent human beings to be beheaded or killed in some way. It is also clear that a war including the United States is not the answer. I abhor the violence of war when diplomacy can be used.

Dick Durbin: Amnesty Bill Will
Help Contain Ebola

24 replie(s)
Breitbart Big Government, by Tony Lee    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 9/17/2014 6:37:23 AM     Post Reply
On Tuesday, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) said that a comprehensive amnesty bill would have helped America contain the Ebola epidemic in Africa. Durbin, a member of the Senate´s Gang of Eight that wrote the immigration reform bill, said during a Senate hearing on Ebola that the Senate´s amnesty bill would have even allowed doctors in the United States to travel to Africa to combat Ebola "without jeopardizing their immigration status." “We included in the immigration reform bill, which passed the United States Senate, a provision which provided, in one respect, if you are medically trained in Africa and promise to

Corker´s Kerry Critique Leaves
Boxer ´Shaking and Trembling´

24 replie(s)
Breitbart TV, by Pam Key    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 9/17/2014 4:54:50 PM     Post Reply
(Video) Wednesday at the Senate Foreign Relation Committee hearing on U.S. strategy for combating ISIS, after Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) criticized Secretary of State John Kerry, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) was left "shaking and trembling" in shock. Boxer said, "I think it is shocking and a sad state of affairs that we heard just now, such angry comments aimed at you, Mr. Secretary, and through you, at our president instead of at ISIS, a savage group who decapitated two Americans and have warned, and I quote, that their thirst for more American blood is right out there." "I think it´s shocking,"

   

Post Reply   Close thread 796655





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS