A Message From Lucianne  



Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google

Federal Judge to Camera-Shy
Austin Cops: People Have a Right
to Record You. Deal With It.

Reason, by Jacob Sullum

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 7/27/2014 6:04:36 AM

As my colleagues and I frequently note, Americans have a well-established constitutional right to record police officers as they publicly perform their duties. Yet cops across the country continue to harass and arrest people for exercising that right, using bogus charges such as wiretapping, resisting arrest, and interfering with police. Yesterday yet another federal judge issued a clear message to those cops: Cut it out. The case was brought by Antonio Buehler, an Austin, Texas, activist who has had several run-ins with camera-shy cops. The first incident occurred on January 1, 2012, when Buehler pulled into a 7-11 in Austin


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Shucky, 7/27/2014 6:28:30 AM     (No. 9941691)

We The People pay the salaries of public servants, who serve us and we are their masters. It is high time that they be on notice that we will watch them and lawfully record them while on duty and hold them accountable for any and all abuses of the public trust which is a privilege we bestow them from our good graces. We are their masters, not the other way around. We should never have to dread interactions with police, bureaucrats or anyone else on the public payroll. That´s un-American.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.

Reply 2 - Posted by: gerty, 7/27/2014 6:33:25 AM     (No. 9941695)

Couldn´t agree with the Federal Judge more--however, the right to record police is easily abused. When does the execution of this right turn into harassment and/or obstruction?

In the inimitable words of Yul Brynner in The King and I "...it´s a puzzlement!"

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.




Reply 3 - Posted by: Cavallodifiero, 7/27/2014 6:40:54 AM     (No. 9941701)

The Police have a way of exercising control over the citizenry which admittedly is often not legal, however the people who find themselves victims of that sort of behavior by the Police are usually the Antonio Buehlers´ of the world, they try to get the Police dealing with the enemies of our society, the protectors of illegal aliens, Muslim activists who constantly try to create scenarios where our enemies are "seemingly" doing nothing wrong.

In fairness to everyone I don´t think the Police simply pick on innocent neighborhood organizers walking down the street. Do you? What the Police are DEALING with, are mostly anti-societal punks playing all the angles. On the other hand no one seems to care about Politicians and government agencies who usurp their power at the expense of the citizens the Federal Judge claims to be protecting. Can you say Obama, Holder, Pelosi or Harry Reid boys and girls.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.

Reply 4 - Posted by: bubby, 7/27/2014 6:44:28 AM     (No. 9941702)

#1 I agree. I support cops and know they have a very tough often thankless job. But I´m sick of that attitude also, the shooting of dogs for no reason, the excessive use of force on the elderly and handicapped, telling innocent civilians what they can or can´t do often in violation of the law or they will get arrested. It has to stop. If the cops are not violating the law then they shouldn´t have any problem with being recorded. I believe all cops should wear cameras to avoid incomplete videos being used against them. Spend more money on individual cameras and less on military assault equipment. I´m concerned the Feds are turning our own police against us.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    22 persons like this.

Reply 5 - Posted by: chumley, 7/27/2014 7:06:55 AM     (No. 9941707)

A small win for the good guys. I do feel for the cops in that everyone makes small mistakes in their jobs. Most of the time we are able to brush it over and press on. If someone were following me around with a camera and publishing every mistake it would be at the very least unnerving.
Unfortunately, the police code of silence has caused it to swing so far the other direction that all mistakes and even deliberate criminal activity are hidden. Truly evil bullies are as protected as the guy who forgot to calibrate his radar.
Besides, the courts have decided that we have no expectation of privacy in public, so the government can record us any time they want, Soviet style. Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    16 persons like this.

Reply 6 - Posted by: franq, 7/27/2014 7:25:20 AM     (No. 9941723)

Wiretapping? That´s good. Perhaps my cynicism is shaped by all the cops I´ve seen hiding with radar guns, trying to generate revenue. One day coming home from work I saw four cops on motorcycles in a 2 mile stretch, with people pulled over. These new "unmarked" motorcycles and riders are almost Robo-coppish.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    8 persons like this.

Reply 7 - Posted by: Doctor P, 7/27/2014 7:47:19 AM     (No. 9941738)

Can I have a piece of the lawsuit?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.




Reply 8 - Posted by: Scrubber, 7/27/2014 7:54:55 AM     (No. 9941750)

#4, "thankless job". Nah. These blue-suited, jackbooted thugs(tm) are constantly hailed as heroes. Yet 90% of their time seems to be generating revenue on the public roads. I hope this Buehler (Buehler, Buehler, Buehler) nails the municipality for $197,877,054.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    9 persons like this.

Reply 9 - Posted by: StormCnter, 7/27/2014 7:58:27 AM     (No. 9941756)

I have friends and neighbors who are cops. It´s a hard job and not well-paid. Most of them deserve our respect. There is a certain type of personality, however, that too often gravitates to either law enforcement or the military where power can be exercised. Now, both are using psychological testing to avoid those individuals.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.

Reply 10 - Posted by: uno, 7/27/2014 8:33:33 AM     (No. 9941795)

There is an increasing effort to militarize the police in this county with this administration giving military hardware to Police departments knowing they will not be refused. Along with all this is the attitude of invincibility and superiority that can develop in some officers. Of course this administration is also creating crisis after crisis to fan the flames as well, so this is a good decision, but expect to see more of this chaos on You Tube!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    8 persons like this.

Reply 11 - Posted by: stablemoney, 7/27/2014 8:39:52 AM     (No. 9941803)

Cops have known its your word against theirs, and they are backed by their friends at court. The cameras are good thing that make it no longer your word against theirs, and forces them to obey the law as well.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.

Reply 12 - Posted by: skedaddle, 7/27/2014 8:53:32 AM     (No. 9941816)

The moral of this story is to only record the cops if you´re set up to automatically upload the video somewhere else besides the camera. And password protect the uploading. It´s honestly doing a favor to good cops for the bad ones to be publicly outed and hopefully reformed or fired. And since when is ignorance of the law an excuse - it´s not and the cops should be deeply ashamed for even trying that angle.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    7 persons like this.




Reply 13 - Posted by: 100percenttexan, 7/27/2014 9:32:24 AM     (No. 9941854)

A couple of things come to mind in relation to this.
First, If he has been arrested 3 times for legally filming police in the performance of their public duties then the police department and the city of Austin have violated the federal RICO statutes which require 3 predicate acts to establish. RICO allows for treble damages.
Second: If the officers knew that what he was doing was legal (which the Judge says they should) and they arrested him anyway then they have committed the criminal act of "Official Oppression Under The Color Of Law". He can and should ask the Travis County D.A. to file criminal charges against the officers.

I believe in the rule of law and that means those that enforce the law must abide by the law.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.

Reply 14 - Posted by: wilko, 7/27/2014 9:33:06 AM     (No. 9941856)

I have never been assaulted by a cop, stopped for no reason or questioned, or had my dog shot, had my door broken in, been accused of a crime I didn´t commit, Tased, pepper sprayed,handcuffed.......
I´m a law abiding citizen and if you read the news, all cops are on the take, bullys, sociopaths,liars...etc. I reject that completely. Our police officers for the most part are just like you and me, they have families, they go to church, they want the society we live in to be a safe place.
I encourage ride-alongs to meet the men and women we entrust with our safety. It´s free and it helps us better understand who and what they are.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    8 persons like this.

Reply 15 - Posted by: HPmatt, 7/27/2014 9:47:50 AM     (No. 9941882)

Police Chiefs (to use a non-PC term) should obey the law and FIRE officers that cross the line in trying to prevent taping of their actions. Citizens shouldn´t be in the middle of the police business, but the 1A is not the 10A - it is FIRST of the Amendments for that reason, just as it is followed by the 2A regarding Right to Keep and Bear Arms.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.

Reply 16 - Posted by: mc squared, 7/27/2014 11:33:00 AM     (No. 9942017)

#14; I wish I´d been able to film a cop at a bridge crossing years ago.

A gate wouldn´t rise after I paid my toll and after several minutes a surely cop showed up and started to bark at me that I wasn´t in NJ anymore and told me to shut up. He was walking around my car telling me that ´we´ were always pulling ´stuff´ like this and he took out his handcuffs and approached me. My elderly mom and pop were in the car and he barked at them too, lest he arrest all of us.

After several more minutes he raised the gate and let us pass.

Cops aren´t just like you and me. They have to power to harass and arrest for any imagined slight.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.

Reply 17 - Posted by: enuf8, 7/27/2014 12:09:29 PM     (No. 9942044)

The writer of this article misstated facts.
The police were at the gas pumps as was the woman they abused. Bueller was across the street. He was capturing their actions by his cell phone but what brought him to his attention was the fact he was defending the woman and saw how the cops manhandled her which was nothing more than police brutality. The writer also failed to mention he had just returned from active duty in Afghanistan where he was a decorated serviceman.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    6 persons like this.




Reply 18 - Posted by: Rivetjoint, 7/27/2014 1:05:02 PM     (No. 9942101)

Cops in NJ are very well paid, around $100,000 plus OT in many cases. The urban cops earn less while the cops out in the well-to-do suburbs do very well and get to drive around sealed off from the citizenry in their cruisers with little to do but prey on wayward out-of-towners. A recent survey of places for road trips in the USA listed NJ as eighth from the bottom. No wonder, as with 565 municipalities, and many having their own police force, the state is simply crawling with the constabulary. As someone mentioned above, Princeton, NJ comes to mind with a police presence that seems way too much. As for the dangers of the job, it doesn´t appear the top ten of US occupations.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    8 persons like this.

Post Reply   Close thread 794369

Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"


Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

The unbearable lightness of Hillary, 2016
Hot Air, by Noah Rothman    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 3:57:30 PM     Post Reply
The rule is always to first do no damage. If, however, there is such a thing as being too cautious, her inevitableness Hillary Clinton may be flirting with that condition as her long march to the Democratic nomination continues. The unease over Clinton’s candidacy on the left continues to grow, and it is a phenomenon which has become inescapably obvious to those following the nascent presidential race. While polls suggest that Clinton remains the prohibitive favorite to become the next Democratic presidential standard-bearer, those political reporters who tout top lines without noting the left’s unabashed dissatisfaction with Clinton are flirting with

Even a Top Democrat Thinks Obama´s
Legal Case for War Makes No Sense
Daily Beast, by Eli Lake    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 3:55:20 PM     Post Reply
Obama is trying to argue the group is the “true inheritor of bin Laden” in order to legally justify the war. Just don´t tell al Qaeda, which booted ISIS in February. The White House and senior members of the Obama administration have been trying to convince Congress all week that, legally speaking, there’s no difference between ISIS and al Qaeda. But at the same time—and, often, in the very same classified briefings—members of the U.S. intelligence community are telling lawmakers that the two Islamic radical groups aren’t in cahoots at all. In fact, they’re competitors for supremacy in the global jihadist

Greg Abbott launches first
negative TV ad against Wendy Davis
Dallas Morning News [TX], by Wayne Slater    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 11:49:19 AM     Post Reply
AUSTIN — Greg Abbott’s campaign launched a new attack on Democratic rival Wendy Davis’ ethics Thursday, saying she voted on legislation as a state senator that personally benefited her business. A new 30-second TV ad airing statewide marks a political escalation by the Abbott campaign, which has largely ignored Davis in its TV ad campaign and instead focused on the Republican attorney general’s platform and personal story. While Davis has targeted Abbott relentlessly on TV, Abbott’s ads until now have been an effective contrast, signaling to his Republican base that he’s in good shape. In the ad, an announcer accuses Davis of



Anatomy of a hanging
New York Daily News, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 5:35:14 AM     Post Reply
The show trial is underway and the guilty verdict is guaranteed, as a United Nations panel makes a pretense of investigating human rights violations in the 50-day war between Israel and Hamas. To his severe discredit, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon has sanctioned a proceeding whose transparent rigging would be at home in a totalitarian regime. Israel is, of course, the defendant going down the tubes. Hamas started the conflict by firing thousands of rockets indiscriminately into the Jewish state from heavily populated areas of Gaza, and prolonged the suffering by violating ceasefire after ceasefire that Israel honored. While each Hamas rocket was

Perpetual second fiddle Joe Biden
praying for a Hillary screw-up
Washington Times, by Ben Wolfgang    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 5:21:38 AM     Post Reply
Joseph R. Biden’s 2016 presidential ambitions already look like they have been swallowed whole by the Hillary Rodham Clinton juggernaut, but political analysts say the vice president still has a narrow path to victory — one that depends on either out-politicking the former first lady in crucial states such as Iowa or praying she makes a grave mistake. Mr. Biden and Mrs. Clinton both visited Iowa, home of the first caucuses in the presidential primary cycle, over the past week. Neither has declared a White House run in two years, but each seemed to be courting the Democratic foot soldiers necessary

Replacing Obamacare Saves a Lot of Money
National Review Online, by James Capretta    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 5:18:52 AM     Post Reply
Supporters of the Obama administration like to create the impression that there is no viable alternative to the Affordable Care Act — i.e., Obamacare. But that is demonstrably not true. Republican senators Richard Burr, Tom Coburn, and Orrin Hatch introduced a plan earlier this year that would cover just as many people with insurance as Obamacare at a fraction of the cost. Now we have confirmation, in the form of a new cost estimate, that a similarly constructed but slightly different proposal would also cost less, while covering nearly the same number of people. The plan, developed and promoted by the 2017

The Anti-Terrorism Bloviators
American Spectator, by Betsy McCaughey    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 5:16:03 AM     Post Reply
On Monday, Attorney General Eric Holder, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, and New York’s Governor Andrew Cuomo sounded the alarm about the escalating danger of a terrorist attack on America by ISIS and other jihadists. Too bad the Obama administration lacks the resolve or sense of urgency to meet this danger head on. Worse, political correctness is hindering New York, a likely target, from tracking and stopping the jihadists in our midst. Holder announced “pilot programs” to “raise awareness,” bringing together religious leaders, community leaders, and law enforcement to build “community partnerships.” Sounds heartwarming. The White House will also hold a

Left blasts Clinton in secret emails
The Hill [DC], by Alexandra Jaffe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 5:13:41 AM     Post Reply
Emails sent by liberal activists and obtained by The Hill reveal significant dissatisfaction with Hillary Clinton, the front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2016. The critical messages about the former first lady show that she has a long way to go to assuage skepticism from influential voices on the left. The Hill reviewed hundreds of emails from a progressive members only Google group called the “Gamechanger Salon,” a forum where nearly 1,500 activists, strategists and journalists debate issues and craft messaging campaigns. The group includes prominent Democrats, Sierra Club officials, journalists who work for The Huffington Post and The Nation magazine, senior

The Strategy That Might
Have Beaten Mitch McConnell
New Republic, by Alec MacGillis    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 5:09:30 AM     Post Reply
he New York Times on Wednesday carried a provocative front-page dispatch from Kentucky by Abby Goodnough, who’s been doing a superb job of covering the impact of the Affordable Care Act in the Bluegrass State as a window into the law’s import nationally. The piece captures the political dynamic in Kentucky, where Obamacare has slashed the rate of the uninsured from 20.4 percent to 11.9 percent, the second largest drop after Arkansas, but where this success is seemingly not redounding to the benefit of Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grimes, who is now lagging in the polls against Mitch McConnell.

How gender mattered in the rise and
fall of Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Washington Post, by Nia-Malika Henderson    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 5:06:33 AM     Post Reply
Devastating. That´s really the only way to describe Politico´s piece on DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz. (I hereby nominate her for Worst Week in Washington.) (Editor´s note: Three words -- Joseph. Robinette. Biden.) Based on interviews with DNC staffers -- both former and current -- the piece described Wasserman Schultz as something of a modern-day Tracy Flick: over-eager, disloyal and not shy about promoting her ambitions. It would be fair to say that she sounds like, well, a lot like other politicians. And this would be accurate. But the wholesale bashing of Wasserman Schultz at every level of the party -- White House,

Barack Obama Transformed into Lyndon
Johnson So Slowly, I Hardly Even Noticed
PJ Media, by Ed Driscoll    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 4:52:47 AM     Post Reply
Now is the time when we juxtapose, Small Dead Animals-style: I have been in the White House on a number of occasions when military operations are launched and once the decisions are made and the orders have been issued the people in the White House from the President on down are really out of the action, at least is they are smart. And President Bush was especially good as was President Reagan of giving the military their mission, their orders and staying the hell out of the way. And not trying to micro-manage the conflicts, so you don’t have a Lyndon

White House: It’s not combat, but US
troops will return fire if they’re shot at…
Hot Air, by Noah Rothman    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 4:48:18 AM     Post Reply
It is becoming increasingly clear that almost no one in the press believes that the nearly 1,700 American service men and women currently in Iraq (a number even The New York Times believes will balloon in short order) will not encounter armed resistance. On Thursday, when White House Press Sec. Josh Earnest was asked how Americans who are asked to serve in what Gen. Martin Dempsey called a “combat advisory role” alongside indigenous forces would react if they were fired upon, Earnest replied with the obvious (via The Washington Times): President Obama expects U.S. troops to return fire if Islamic State militants

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)

Michelle Obama: Americans ´Take for
Granted´ How Much Barack Has Improved US

46 replie(s)
Breitbart Big Government, by Charlie Spiering    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 9/19/2014 10:49:59 AM     Post Reply
First Lady Michelle Obama proudly defended her husband’s record at a Washington, D.C. fundraiser, reminding the attendants how far the country had come since the Obamas entered the White House. “Just think about how different our country looks to children growing up today,” she said. “Think about how our kids take for granted that a black person or a woman can be President of the United States.” She also praised President Obama for changing history on gay marriage and the Supreme Court. “They take it for granted that for the first time in history, there are three brilliant women serving

Obama slaps down top
general and insists there
will be NO combat boots on
the ground in battle against
ISIS as he rallies troops
at air base

41 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by David Martoski    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 9/18/2014 5:14:05 AM     Post Reply
President Barack Obama insisted on Wednesday that he would not send ground troops into Iraqi combat zones to fight the ISIS terrorist army, directly contradicting his top general who said a day earlier that the president asked him for boots-on-the-ground recommendations ´on a case-by-case basis.´ (Snip)´As your commander-in-chief,´ Obama insisted, ´I will not commit you and the rest of our armed forces to fighting another ground war in Iraq.´ On Tuesday, however, Joint Chiefs chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey told lawmakers that circumstances on the ground could drive him to push for American combat troops to be embedded with Iraqi army

Michelle Obama: ´Being Married
to the President ... Can Be Hard´

39 replie(s)
Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 9/18/2014 8:45:39 AM     Post Reply
First Lady Michelle Obama visited sick children at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, where she complained about living at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and being married to the president of the United States. She made the comments in response to being asked about her "favorite part about being in the White House." "About being in the -- about being First Lady is being able to do stuff like this, really. And it is so special for me to get to meet kids like you guys," Michelle Obama started. "Because sometimes living in the White House and being married to the

Rift widens between Obama,
U.S. military over strategy
to fight Islamic State

38 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Craig Whitlock    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 9/18/2014 10:18:03 PM     Post Reply
Flashes of disagreement over how to fight the Islamic State are mounting between President Obama and U.S. military leaders, the latest sign of strain in what often has been an awkward and uneasy relationship. Even as the administration has received congressional backing for its strategy, with the Senate voting Thursday to approve a plan to arm and train Syrian rebels, a series of military leaders have criticized the president’s approach against the Islamic State militant group. Retired Marine Gen. James Mattis, who served under Obama until last year, became the latest high-profile skeptic on Thursday, telling the House Intelligence Committee

Obamacare Creator: Die At 75!
35 replie(s)
Breitbart, Big Government, by Ben Shapiro    Original Article
Posted By: Vastrightwingconspirator- 9/18/2014 5:00:01 PM     Post Reply
Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, one of the masterminds behind Obamacare, has now explained that he wishes to die at age 75. In an article in The Atlantic, Emanuel writes, “Seventy-five. That’s how long I want to live: 75 years.” He explains that his daughters disagree; so do his brothers and his friends. But, he says, “I am sure of my position…here is a simple truth that many of us seem to resist: living too long is also a loss. It renders many of us, if not disabled, then faltering and declining, a state that may not be worse than death but

How gender mattered in the rise and
fall of Debbie Wasserman Schultz

35 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Nia-Malika Henderson    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 5:06:33 AM     Post Reply
Devastating. That´s really the only way to describe Politico´s piece on DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz. (I hereby nominate her for Worst Week in Washington.) (Editor´s note: Three words -- Joseph. Robinette. Biden.) Based on interviews with DNC staffers -- both former and current -- the piece described Wasserman Schultz as something of a modern-day Tracy Flick: over-eager, disloyal and not shy about promoting her ambitions. It would be fair to say that she sounds like, well, a lot like other politicians. And this would be accurate. But the wholesale bashing of Wasserman Schultz at every level of the party -- White House,

Hillary Clinton: Congress Out of
Touch on Women´s Issues

34 replie(s)
NBC News, by Kasie Hunt    Original Article
Posted By: BaseballFan- 9/18/2014 5:15:18 PM     Post Reply
Congress is living in an "evidence-free zone" as it debates issues of equal pay and family-friendly work policies, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Thursday. "Unfortunately, reality is not always the context in which these decisions are made. The Congress increasingly -- despite the best efforts of my friends and others -- is living in an evidence-free zone," she said during a roundtable discussion at the Center for American Progress focused on women´s issues. "What the reality is, in the lives of Americans is so far from the minds of too many who don´t place the highest priority" on

Is Obama Wagging the Ebola Dog?
27 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Lauri B Regan    Original Article
Posted By: tisHimself- 9/18/2014 6:40:19 AM     Post Reply
The anti-war president has finally found a way to wag the dog without upsetting his liberal base and war-weary electorate. Despite the beheading of two Americans, establishment of an Islamic caliphate, direct threats to the U.S. homeland, and the destabilization of the entire Middle East, Obama refuses to acknowledge that we are at war with barbaric Islamic jihadists. And he refuses to authorize the requisite boots on the ground. However, Obama just discovered his pre-midterm election method of wagging the dog -- distracting from his incompetent and dangerous response (or lack thereof) to the real threats to America’s national security

Obama Says Senate Vote To Arm
Syrian Rebels Was US Politics
´At Its Best´

26 replie(s)
Business Insider, by Hunter Walker    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 9/19/2014 5:13:01 AM     Post Reply
The U.S Senate passed a bill Thursday evening that will give President Barack Obama the authority to arm moderate Syrian rebels, which is a key part of his plan to fight the jihadist group Islamic State (also known as ISIS and ISIL). Shortly after the Senate passed the bill, which was passed by the House on Wednesday, Obama spoke from the White House. "I´m pleased that Congress, a majority of Democrats and a majority of Republicans in both the House and Senate, have now voted to support a key element of our strategy," Obama said. Obama, who reiterated the fact

John Kerry: US At War With
The ´Enemy of Islam´

24 replie(s)
Breitbart Big Peace, by Jordan Schachtel    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 9/19/2014 3:17:20 PM     Post Reply
On Thursday In a session with the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Secretary of State John Kerry was asked by Rep. Joe Wilson (R-SC) whether America was at war in Iraq and Syria. (Video) Kerry responded: “If you’re more comfortable calling it a war against this enemy of Islam then please do so. We’re happy to call it that.” So its official: America is at war with the enemy of Islam. However, strange bedfellows arise if the Obama administration so chooses to uphold Kerry’s claim that we are at war with the enemy(s) of Islam. The following displays that Secretary

Where is Our Voice in the Wilderness
Touting Conservatism?

22 replie(s)
Canada Free Press, by Lloyd Marcus    Original Article
Posted By: tisHimself- 9/18/2014 6:33:24 AM     Post Reply
For crying out loud, will someone “pleeeeease” take a stand for Conservatism? Someone forwarded this article to me, “Why Are Republicans Suddenly Leaning Left?” The article cites numerous examples of the GOP obviously believing it must embrace at least lukewarm Liberalism while backing away from Conservatism to win elections.The article mentioned that Mitt Romney avoided saying “Republican” in an ad supporting Scott Brown’s Senate run. Romney said in the ad referring to Brown, “will buck his own party to do what’s right for New Hampshire.” Romney’s statement implies that Conservatism can be mean, but rest assured that Brown will push

WSJ: Obama will require military to get his
personal approval for U.S. strikes in Syria

22 replie(s)
Hot Air, by Allahpundit    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/18/2014 3:08:29 PM     Post Reply
A man who’s a better speechwriter than his speechwriters, a better political director than his political directors, and who knows more about policy than his policy advisors must surely also be a better general than his generals, no? The U.S. military campaign against Islamist militants in Syria is being designed to allow President Barack Obama to exert a high degree of personal control, going so far as to require that the military obtain presidential signoff for strikes in Syrian territory, officials said. The requirements for strikes in Syria against the extremist group Islamic State will be far more stringent than those targeting


Post Reply   Close thread 794369

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google

© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.