A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


ObamaCare in death spiral
after federal appeals court
strikes down some subsidies

Fox News, by Betsy McCaughey

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 7/23/2014 4:28:17 AM

Tuesday, a federal appeals court slapped down the Obama administration in a 2-1 ruling that could kill the president’s signature health care law. If upheld by the Supreme Court, the ruling would force Congress back to the drawing boards to design a health law that is actually affordable, rather than bearing the false title “Affordable Care Act.” The ruling in Halbig v. Burwell bars the federal government from handing out taxpayer-funded subsidies to people who buy ObamaCare plans in nearly two-thirds of the states. Those subsidies took the sting out of being forced to buy pricey ObamaCare plans. If the ruling

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Trigger2, 7/23/2014 5:13:05 AM     (No. 9936288)

It all goes back to Roberts. There is no severability provision in BarryCare. That ruling alone should have deep sixed BarryCare. The Federal Appeals Court should have deep sixed it again.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    69 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: pucky1, 7/23/2014 5:23:19 AM     (No. 9936291)

Just a drafting glitch, huh?

Here´s the full section:

‘‘(2) PREMIUM ASSISTANCE AMOUNT.—The premium assistance
amount determined under this subsection with respect
to any coverage month is the amount equal to the lesser of—
‘‘(A) the monthly premiums for such month for 1 or
more qualified health plans offered in the individual market
within a State which cover the taxpayer, the taxpayer’s
spouse, or any dependent (as defined in section 152) of
the taxpayer and which were enrolled in through an
Exchange established by the State under 1311 of the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,
or
‘‘(B) the excess (if any) of—
‘‘(i) the adjusted monthly premium for such month
for the applicable second lowest cost silver plan with
respect to the taxpayer, over
‘‘(ii) an amount equal to 1/12 of the product of
the applicable percentage and the taxpayer’s household
income for the taxable year

If the intent was to extend the subsidy to everyone, why was that last phrase inserted (see bold)? That insertion was intended as a restriction oon who got the subsidy.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    17 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: StormCnter, 7/23/2014 6:01:15 AM     (No. 9936307)

I´m with Dr. Krauthammer. The wording was not a "glitch" nor a "typo". It was deliberately phrased in the assumption that states would love the federal money flowing in as subsidies. When 36 states said no, the Affordable Care Act was stuck with wording that required something unenforceable.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    28 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Dodge Boy, 7/23/2014 7:26:13 AM     (No. 9936385)

Thanks Roberts. So what was it that Obie threatened you with to force you to switch your vote, bro? Since you have a job for life, why not just come clean and let us know?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    24 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: TOOTALL, 7/23/2014 7:33:18 AM     (No. 9936394)

I´m with StormCtr (#3), but I´d go further. It wasn´t a ´carrot´ to incentivize States to set up exchanges, it was a deliberate, partisan act to force states into setting up exchanges. My way or the highway.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: lil dotty, 7/23/2014 7:37:31 AM     (No. 9936397)

Fear the terrible death spiral. This will never be slain. The gopes (pubbies) and O the Dark Won will reconstruct into the Son of Obombacare, whereby it will rise off the table and continue on by starts and jolts, the sequel to follow this act of betrayal in which WTP found we are nothing at all but little ants bound by a queen and her/his/its) court

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: bpl40, 7/23/2014 7:56:24 AM     (No. 9936413)

If intent of the ACA drafters is the issue, there is plenty of information on what went on in that sausage factory before this evil emerged. Subsidies paid by states would not be counted as part of ACA cost but any that would be paid by the Federally set up exchanges would. Remember this thing passed by a single vote in the Senate. Wavering Senators were promised that the ACA would be deficit neutral. Any such subsidies would be blow deficit neutrality claims sky high. Ben Nelson of Nebraska was especially nervous. So the scheme was to deny Federally set up exchanges the authority to pay subsidies. As a protection to that the HHS Sec was given the authority to withhold Medicaid funding of any state that wavered.
This arrangement was torpedoed by CJ Roberts when he declared that authority to be unconstitutional and the whole house of cards fell apart. The fact that 36 states have refused to set up these exchanges is a clear indication of the will of the people. IMO this time Roberts will take that into account. This pig is done.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    22 persons like this.


   

 

R-VAR_AD
  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: congar, 7/23/2014 8:43:19 AM     (No. 9936474)

Once again a critically important issue of great national importance will be decided by how many judges you have bought.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    23 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Grampy, 7/23/2014 9:28:45 AM     (No. 9936549)

Say or think what you want. My advice is to plan your reaction for when the law is again upheld.
Make no mistake; I hope to heaven it´s struck down and dies a death talked about in history books in a thousand years, but the realist in me seriously doubts that.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: RancherJack, 7/23/2014 9:38:50 AM     (No. 9936561)

Uh huh, sure.

Congress, both sided of the aisle are going to fiddle, and tweak and massage this monstrosity until it is so farked up ...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: antiquegolf, 7/23/2014 10:01:42 AM     (No. 9936598)

Poster 9 expressed my thoughts. This federal appeals ruling is tantalizing, but it is doubtful that the Scotus will shoot down the behemoth health care law. That would be too good to be true. Interestingly the submission of this post was interrupted by a call regarding enrollment in a national health care exchange. I quickly declined. When I asked the caller who he worked for, he hung up. How is that for transparency? Ha! I called the number back to engage in a fishing expedition, but dispute assurances I´d be transferred to the next available agent, after a hold time of exactly 6 minutes, the neuter voice said goodbye. A check of my directory shows 5 or 6 calls from 651-333-4139 --- a Minnesota number --- in the past week.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: antiquegolf, 7/23/2014 10:02:54 AM     (No. 9936601)

Despite. Sorry.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: nevernaught, 7/23/2014 10:18:58 AM     (No. 9936628)

I have hope this time, if only because Obama has just said he is going to ignore the ruling. It isn´t smart to go around calling people who could destroy your ´signature´ legislation incompetent.

Judges have feelings too. I hope the Supremes are paying attention. This is a crooked Administration that needs a wakeup call.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Jethro bo, 7/23/2014 10:25:09 AM     (No. 9936639)

Though I do believe the next Rebublican president should nominate a NEW Chief Justice and replace Roberts, I also think this is a chance for him to make good on the initial impression that he wasn´t a Black Robed Demigod. The Forst ruling was based on interpretation of taxing powers. This is about clear separation of powers to tax and allocate funds. Only Congress can enact taxing and allocate funds, not the Executive branch through its various agencies (in this case the IRS). Of late, the SCOTUS has unanimously voted to enact clear separation of powers when Obambi and his minions over reach. This too, I believe, will be the case in this situation.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    9 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: jglas, 7/23/2014 11:03:21 AM     (No. 9936697)

They wrote an irresistible bribe into the law that got resisted. Now it threatens to blow up the whole law so they want to take it back with the very liberal argument that it´s not what the law says that matters, it´s what the law writers intended it to mean that counts. That is they wrote a law that explicitly said you could only get subsidies through state sponsored exchanges in an attempt to bribe the states into opening exchanges but they really meant you can get subsidies through the government exchange too. Well if that is true then there must be a wink, wink, nudge nudge written into the law somewhere with regard to the state sponsored exchange requirement. If they can´t show the wink wink, nudge nudge then they´re just asking for a do-over. Fine, send that thing back to the congress to do-over. I´m good with that.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: trapper, 7/23/2014 11:41:28 AM     (No. 9936745)

Remember this article by Mr. Turley?

http://www.lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=790508

The full DC Circuit is not going to reverse its 3 judge panel, and the S Ct is not going to reverse the DC Circuit on this. The language is clear and the legislative history supports the intention that "state" means state. But, if Obama can refuse to enforce immigration law, and grant defacto amnesty by declaring his own DREAM program, why not expect him to ignore the S Ct and do what he wants? It is a short step from defying Congress to defying the S Ct.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Butch59, 7/23/2014 12:45:03 PM     (No. 9936843)

Lets all not jump on the happy wagon just yet. Remember, the 4th court by a 3/0 count ruled the same thing OK. So it will reach the SC and there is where it can and probably will hit a brick wall. There are 3 SC justices that will rule in favor of the 1st court. And there are 4 that will vote against it. That leaves just 2. And right now, I really don´t trust either one of them. Roberts, for clear reasons, and Kennedy, someone whom no one can rely on. Is he a conservative that upholds the Constitution or is he one that rules according to his "feelings"? That question is very hard to answer.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: jeffkinnh, 7/23/2014 2:03:59 PM     (No. 9936930)

A very BIG if: "If upheld by the Supreme Court"

We all, even liberals (especially liberals), thought BOCare was dead after the arguments before the SCOTUS but Roberts torturously resurrected it. It´s like the "Monkey´s Paw" story that brings back the dead but in the shape they are after being dead for a while. A hideous thing.

The problem with BOCare is that it is a hideous thing to begin with. Roberts was trying to preserve something that deserved to be dead to begin with.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    8 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Ida Lil, 7/23/2014 5:22:40 PM     (No. 9937151)

Try a different point of view.
The act is ONLY legal as a vehicle of the US IRS with no state taxing authority.
That designation allows NO legality as a duly processed law as could have been redone if the tax label was not in force.
The S Court possibly can not make a case to redirect the details based on any part of the act that isn´t tied totally to a tax.
Exchanges were not set up as a Tax
This now becomes a states rights issue and the wording gives standing to the states. Since 36 states did not set up exchanges the IRS and Obe´s administration does not have the superior standing.
Roberts did tie the administration hands to execute actions outside the tax legality.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 793740




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



Something is terribly wrong
with the Secret Service
Washington Examiner [DC], by Byron York    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/23/2014 5:22:46 AM     Post Reply
President Obama is supporting the Secret Service in the wake of a deeply troubling incident in which a disturbed man jumped the White House fence, sprinted across the North Lawn, and actually entered the White House Friday evening. The man, 42 year-old Omar Gonzalez, had a folding knife in his pocket and had left 800 rounds of ammunition in his car not far from the White House. Gonzalez had also drawn the attention of authorities at least twice a few weeks ago — once in Virginia, when he was found with a sniper rifle, a sawed-off shotgun, and a map with

Robert Kennedy Jr., Aspiring Tyrant
National Review Online, by Charles C.W. Cooke    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/23/2014 5:19:08 AM     Post Reply
Blissfully unaware of how hot the irony burned, Robert Kennedy Jr. yesterday took to a public protest to rail avidly in favor of censorship. The United States government, Kennedy lamented in an interview with Climate Depot, is not permitted by law to “punish” or to imprison those who disagree with him — and this, he proposed, is a problem of existential proportions. Were he to have his way, Kennedy admitted, he would cheer the prosecution of a host of “treasonous” figures — among them a number of unspecified “politicians”; those bêtes noires of the global Left, Kansas’s own Koch Brothers;

   

 



 
Liberal Incivility and Gabby Giffords
Commentary Magazine, by Jonathan S. Tobin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/23/2014 5:16:59 AM     Post Reply
When a gunman attempted to murder Rep. Gabriel Giffords in January 2011, the country was shocked by what was widely interpreted as an act that symbolized the incivility that had transformed American politics. That assumption, which was primarily aimed at undermining the Tea Party movement that had swept the midterm elections months before in the 2010 midterms, was soon debunked when we learned the shooter was an apolitical madman. But liberals have never ceased yapping about the implications of their opponents’ alleged meanness. Now it turns out the person who is doing the most to give the lie to this

This One Little Secret Could
Sink the Hillary Campaign
Washington Free Beacon, by Sonny Bunch    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/23/2014 5:10:15 AM     Post Reply
I’m always amused when journalists, in particular, read one of our stories about Hillary Clinton—such as, say, this one on her relationship with her pen pal, Saul Alinsky—and respond “Oh, this isn’t going to derail her campaign LOL YAWN.” That sort of response is kind of missing the point, now, innit? Here are never-before-reported-on primary documents written by the probable next president of the United States to a figure of historical significance. They are, on their face, newsworthy and of import, especially to political reporters. The fact that these letters aren’t going to “take Hillary down” doesn’t really matter. Anyway. Hillary’s

Republicans and the IRS
New York Post, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/23/2014 5:05:16 AM     Post Reply
If you wonder what difference this fall’s elections might make in Washington, look no further than the IRS. On Tuesday, the Republican House passed several reform bills. One would ensure that anyone who did what Lois Lerner did — i.e., send out confidential taxpayer info on her private e-mail — would be violating the law. Others are designed to help taxpayers appeal when their groups are denied tax-exempt status or to ensure that officials who deliberately destroy federal records get the old heave-ho. Here’s the problem: The bills now head to a Senate controlled by Democrat Harry Reid. During his time as majority

US to put climate change ´front and
center´ of diplomatic efforts, Kerry vows
Guardian [UK], by Suzanne Goldenberg & Fiona Harvey    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/23/2014 4:59:47 AM     Post Reply
The US secretary of state, John Kerry, promised to put climate change “front and center” of American diplomacy on Monday, raising expectations for this week’s United Nations climate summit. A day before the first world leaders’ meeting on climate change in five years, Kerry said he would take it upon himself to make sure the international community steps up to deal with the threat. “This is an enormous challenge, and this is why the United States is prepared to take the lead in order to bring other nations to the table,” Kerry said in remarks at the start of a week of

Sorry, Politico, But Lois
Lerner Is Not A Victim
The Federalist, by David Harsanyi    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/23/2014 4:53:13 AM     Post Reply
Lois Lerner. Hero. Servant. Brownie-baking puppy lover. Sister of the Blessed State. This is about all a person reading Politico’s new exclusive “interview” with the former head of the I.R.S. division that oversees tax-exempt groups, might take away. “I didn’t do anything wrong” claims Lerner, who, like any innocent person, is flanked by a major law firm’s partner, two personal attorneys and her husband – a lawyer. “I’m proud of my career and the job I did for this country.” And in around 3,700 obsequious words, Politico seems to agree. What exactly did she do for her country, you ask? Well, sitting

Pat Roberts to bring Jeb Bush to campaign
in Wichita; Sarah Palin in Independence
Wichita Eagle [KS], by Bryan Lowry    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/23/2014 4:49:00 AM     Post Reply
Jeb Bush, the former governor of Florida and a possible 2016 presidential candidate, will come to Wichita on Sept. 29 to stump for U.S. Sen. Pat Roberts in a tight Senate race that has drawn national attention. Bush, the son and brother of the former presidents, will join the three-term senator at a luncheon at Murfin Stables, 14525 E. 13th St. Cost for attendees ranges from $100 up to $2,600 for a seat at the head table, according to the invitation. On Thursday, Roberts will be joined by a special guest at the Independence Historical Museum and Art Center in Independence, Kan.

Trotsky’s Curse: BHO Goes to War
PJ Media, by Roger L. Simon    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/23/2014 4:45:46 AM     Post Reply
“You may not be interested in war,” Comrade Trotsky supposedly said (but probably didn’t), “but war is interested in you.” And right he was, as Barack Hussein Obama, the American president least interested in war in most of our lifetimes, possibly ever, has found himself plunged half-heartedly in the middle of it, going to war, bombing Islamic State territories within Syria, a country he at first warned would itself be bombed for its use of chemical weapons. Now he’s bombing on that Syrian regime’s side and also acting in behalf of the Islamic Republic of Iran, a nation we are supposedly

Speak for Middle America
Weekly Standard, by Jay Cost    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/23/2014 4:32:27 AM     Post Reply
Pundits throw out all sorts of numbers to explain the Republican defeat in the 2012 presidential election. So here’s our number: $65,000. That is a rough estimate of the household income of the average 2012 voter. Republicans lost because Mitt Romney did not do well enough with this voter or those near him on the income scale. These middle class Americans have some but not a lot of property, who fret about the effects of economic forces outside their control, who worry about whether their kids will enjoy a decent standard of living, and who have been struggling one way

Lois Lerner breaks silence
Politico, by Rachel Bade    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/22/2014 5:41:22 AM     Post Reply
Employers won’t hire her. She’s been berated with epithets like “dirty Jew.” Federal agents have guarded her house because of death threats. And she’s spent hundreds of thousands of dollars defending herself against accusations she orchestrated a coverup in a scandal that has come to represent everything Americans hate about the IRS. Lois Lerner is toxic — and she knows it. But she refuses to recede into anonymity or beg for forgiveness for her role in the IRS tea party-targeting scandal. “I didn’t do anything wrong,” Lerner said in her first press interview since the scandal broke 16 months ago. “I’m

The Crumbling Climate-Change Consensus
National Review Online, by John Fund    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/22/2014 5:39:38 AM     Post Reply
The United Nations Climate Summit will begin in New York this Tuesday, but environmental activists didn’t wait. All day Sunday, they filled the streets of Manhattan for a march that featured Al Gore, New York City mayor Bill de Blasio, and various Hollywood actors. But they certainly didn’t act like a movement that was winning. There was a tone of fatalism in the comments of many with whom I spoke; they despair that the kind of radical change they advocate probably won’t result from the normal democratic process. It’s no surprise then that the rhetoric of climate-change activists has become increasingly



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Lois Lerner breaks silence
58 replie(s)
Politico, by Rachel Bade    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/22/2014 5:41:22 AM     Post Reply
Employers won’t hire her. She’s been berated with epithets like “dirty Jew.” Federal agents have guarded her house because of death threats. And she’s spent hundreds of thousands of dollars defending herself against accusations she orchestrated a coverup in a scandal that has come to represent everything Americans hate about the IRS. Lois Lerner is toxic — and she knows it. But she refuses to recede into anonymity or beg for forgiveness for her role in the IRS tea party-targeting scandal. “I didn’t do anything wrong,” Lerner said in her first press interview since the scandal broke 16 months ago. “I’m

´My kids´ defense of my family makes
my heart soar´: Sarah Palin finally speaks
out about Alaska brawl and proudly
defends ´straight-shooter´ Bristol accused
of punching a man in the face

40 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Ashley Collman & Mia De Graaf    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 9/21/2014 12:04:21 PM     Post Reply
Sarah Palin has come out in defense of her daughter Bristol who allegedly punched a man in the face during a family brawl. The former Vice President candidate hailed her child as a ´straight shooter´ in a Facebook which appears to be her first veiled reference to the fight two weekends ago. The 23-year-old is said to have repeatedly hit the owner of a home in Anchorage, Alaska, during an outburst in which her brother Track broke four ribs and her father Todd was left with a bloody nose. (Tweet) It came after Willow Palin´s ex-boyfriend allegedly engage in some

The Crumbling Climate-Change Consensus
36 replie(s)
National Review Online, by John Fund    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/22/2014 5:39:38 AM     Post Reply
The United Nations Climate Summit will begin in New York this Tuesday, but environmental activists didn’t wait. All day Sunday, they filled the streets of Manhattan for a march that featured Al Gore, New York City mayor Bill de Blasio, and various Hollywood actors. But they certainly didn’t act like a movement that was winning. There was a tone of fatalism in the comments of many with whom I spoke; they despair that the kind of radical change they advocate probably won’t result from the normal democratic process. It’s no surprise then that the rhetoric of climate-change activists has become increasingly

Afghan soldiers missing
from Joint Base Cape Cod

36 replie(s)
Cape Cod Times [MA], by George Brennan    Original Article
Posted By: happywarrior- 9/22/2014 6:22:41 AM     Post Reply
Camp Edwards - Police and military officials are searching for three officers from the Afghanistan National Army who were engaged in a training exercise at Joint Base Cape Cod. Massachusetts National Guard spokesman Lt. Col. James Sahady said the three men were reported missing on Saturday night after travelling into Hyannis that day. “They didn´t report back (to the base),” Sahady said. “There is no indication they pose a threat to the public.” Police and base officials are cooperating in the search for the three men, identified as Maj. Jan Mohammad Arash, Capt. Mohammad Nasir Askarzada, and Capt. Noorullah Aminyar.

Robert F Kennedy Jr loses his cool
and grabs mic from reporter pushing
him about his own carbon footprint

35 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by Mia De Graaf    Original Article
Posted By: Ribicon- 9/22/2014 2:21:31 PM     Post Reply
He was a leading figure in one of the biggest climate change marches to date. But it seems Robert F Kennedy Jr was not so forthcoming when it came to questions about his own carbon footprint. Confronted by a reporter asking if he would give up his phone and car, the environmental lawyer became visibly irate before grabbing the microphone and accusing her of ´destroying democracy´ as a member of the press. The interview in New York yesterday afternoon started with a conversation about the number of flyers produced for the event, which Kennedy Jr claimed was necessary to garner ´people power´.

The Hillary Letters
32 replie(s)
Washington Free Beacon [DC], by Alana Goodman    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 9/22/2014 3:29:20 AM     Post Reply
Note: Read the Hillary Clinton-Saul Alinsky Letters here. Previously unpublished correspondence between Hillary Clinton and the late left-wing organizer Saul Alinsky reveal new details about her relationship with the controversial Chicago activist and shed light on her early ideological development. Clinton met with Alinsky several times in 1968 while writing a Wellesley college thesis about his theory of community organizing. Clinton’s relationship with Alinsky, and her support for his philosophy, continued for several years after she entered Yale law school in 1969, two letters obtained by the Washington Free Beacon show. The letters obtained by the Free Beacon are part

Democrats Are Poised To Hold The
Senate, And It´s Conservative´s Fault

31 replie(s)
Townhall, by Derek Hunter    Original Article
Posted By: SpeedMaster- 9/21/2014 12:25:17 PM     Post Reply
I know a lot of people are giddy at the prospect of Republicans taking the Senate this November, but that’s becoming less and less likely. It’s not because Democrats are rallying around a particular mission or set of candidates; it’s because Republicans and conservatives aren’t. It seems like I’m always writing on issues no one wants to hear are mistakes, such as messaging or social issues. But I don’t care. These things have to be said. If these columns are received like a gaseous cousin on a long car trip through the desert, so be it. Crack a window… If things continue on their current course, the GOP will not retake the Senate.

Four teachings from Jesus
that everybody gets wrong

30 replie(s)
CNN, by Amy-Jill Levine    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/21/2014 3:52:29 PM     Post Reply
It was once said, “religion is designed to comfort the afflicted and to afflict the comfortable.” Jesus’ parables – short stories with moral lessons – were likewise designed to afflict, to draw us in but leave us uncomfortable. These teachings can be read as being about divine love and salvation, sure. But, their first listeners – first century Jews in Galilee and Judea – heard much more challenging messages. Only when we hear the parables as Jesus’ own audience did can we fully experience their power and find ourselves surprised and challenged today. Here are four examples of Jesus’ teachings that everybody gets wrong: 1.

Rick Perry Defends In-State Tuition for
Illegals, Despite Tough Border Talk

25 replie(s)
Breitbart Texas, by Sarah Rumph    Original Article
Posted By: SpeedMaster- 9/22/2014 9:19:05 AM     Post Reply
AUSTIN, Texas -- At an event today at the University of Texas Austin campus, Texas Governor Rick Perry reaffirmed his support of allowing illegal immigrant students to pay in-state tuition at Texas colleges and universities, while U.S. citizens from other states continue to pay higher out-of-state tuition rates. Perry made his remarks in a "One-on-One Conversation" with Texas Tribune CEO and Editor-in-Chief Evan Smith at the Texas Tribune Festival, an annual event organized by the online media outlet. Breitbart Texas made several queries to Governor Perry´s press office for comment, but as of press time,

Wesleyan rules fraternities
must start accepting women

25 replie(s)
Washington Times, by Jessica Chasmer    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 9/22/2014 2:43:16 PM     Post Reply
Fraternities at Wesleyan University in Middletown, Connecticut, must start accepting women and all residential fraternities must become fully co-educational over the next three years, the school’s Board of Trustees has ruled. The decision was made “with equality and inclusion in mind,” school President Michael Roth and Trustee Chairman Joshua Boger wrote in an email to students on Monday, Business Insider reported. “Our residential Greek organizations inspire loyalty, community and independence. That’s why all our students should be eligible to join them.” The school has focused on issues with Greek life ever since a woman filed a lawsuit against Wesleyan two years ago

People´s Climate March projects
crowd of over 100,000 people

24 replie(s)
New York Daily News, by Connie Lestch    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 9/21/2014 11:30:33 AM     Post Reply
The forecast is for people, and lots of them. The People’s Climate March is expected to bring more than 100,000 people who want to save the planet to the city Sunday. The march to address climate change, billed as the largest in history, is occurring two days before President Obama and world leaders attend a summit dealing with the same issue at the United Nations. U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon — who has fought passionately against global warming — along with celebrities, CEOs and activists are expected to descend on the city for the massive event.

Obama Taps Star General to Build
Syrian Rebel Army to Fight ISIS

23 replie(s)
Daily Beast, by Josh Rogin & Eli Lake    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/22/2014 5:18:07 AM     Post Reply
Gen. Michael Nagata is promising to build a new force to destroy ISIS, but lawmakers worry he has been given an impossible mission. As lawmakers prepared to take a risky and fateful vote on Obama’s plan to train and equip the Syrian rebels, the man who assured them it could be done was Gen. Michael Nagata, Obama’s point man for the mission to build an ISIS-killing army in Syria. There are skeptics both inside and outside the government who doubt Obama’s new plan to arm the Syrian rebels can work. First of all, the administration has said for years that the moderate

   

Post Reply   Close thread 793740





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS