A Message From Lucianne  



Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google

Impeachment: The Red Line
and the Last Straw

American Thinker, by Cindy Simpson

Original Article

Posted By:DW626, 7/14/2014 6:12:41 AM

Where is the red line of impeachment? In theory, a red line might be located somewhere on a list of impeachable offenses – perhaps at the point where a certain number of transgressions is exceeded, or next to a specific instance because of its significance or impact. In reality, though, that red line exists along a spectrum of “political will.” As Andrew McCarthy explained: “You can have a thousand provable impeachable offenses, but before Congress may remove the president from power, there must be strong popular support – a public will that cuts across partisan and ideological lines.”


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Tulunk, 7/14/2014 6:38:01 AM     (No. 9923281)

I think the Dems would love to have the GOP impeach Obama. The novelty of a brave young black crusader has worn thin, and instead they have an uppity N word who won´t listen to them and wallows in expensive perks. If the GOP impeach we will get Biden, who is a good Dem soldier, and they play the race card.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    16 persons like this.

Reply 2 - Posted by: GreatGreyhounds, 7/14/2014 6:42:18 AM     (No. 9923284)

The line is the threshold of Dingy Harrys office. Nothing regarding impeachment will cross that line, even if Our Dear Reader ordered the round-up and execution of political opponents...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.




Reply 3 - Posted by: Kitty Myers, 7/14/2014 6:59:20 AM     (No. 9923297)

At some point the American people must take a stand. History is filled with stories of people taking a stand against all odds and winning.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.

Reply 4 - Posted by: bubby, 7/14/2014 7:05:29 AM     (No. 9923302)

FTA"The Democratic Party and its media complex are masters of tactics. They’ll continue to paint conservatives as extremists and racists. Obama will ridicule and taunt his opponents and rile up his fans with speeches. The media will fight to save President Obama’s legacy, and thereby its own reputation."

#3 I disagree no one in Congress is willing to take a stand. It is better to let the country be destroyed by obama and the Democrats than to called a racist by the msm. He will serve out his term and the country will be in ruins by then.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.

Reply 5 - Posted by: flybynight, 7/14/2014 7:30:44 AM     (No. 9923324)

Agree with #1. Did we learn nothing from the Clinton fiasco? Talk about snatching defeat!

It seems absurd to have to explain...again...the mechanics and reality of impeachment, to people who should have paid attention in 9th grade civics class.

We´ll take it real slow here for those of you howling for impeachment:

1.Even if we have the certain votes to impeach in the House, we do not, and likely will not in these midterms, have a 2/3 majority to convict in the Senate. so we are back to a smirking president saying, "I won."
2. There is our village idiot Biden waiting in the wings. Out of the frying pan, into the fire.
3. We offer the looney left all this stupid racist-ammo for which there is no defense. Are we going to get into a kindergartener´s "am-not, are-too" back-and-forth?

Nope. We will continue to pay put rope, hoping the pResident will hang himself in the midterms, and wake up a bunch of hopey-changey voters for 2016 who will realize how badly they were had by that political charlatan they elected. Twice.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.

Reply 6 - Posted by: EnsignOToole, 7/14/2014 7:33:22 AM     (No. 9923328)

Sarah Palin´s very valid point of saying that it is “time to impeach” is one, if ignored, that will leave unacceptable consequences. There will be an era of lawlessness which will become the norm on every level of government - some people believe it is already here with the IRS scandal, fast and furious scandal, the VA scandal and others.

The Founders knew why they were providing for impeachment - they wanted to avoid a war among the new nation´s citizens. Impeachment is the only civil way to put this derailed nation back on its tracks.

It amazes me why good men and women don´t understand what is at stake. Sarah is right when she says: “If after all this he’s not impeachable, then no one is.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.

Reply 7 - Posted by: bpl40, 7/14/2014 7:59:45 AM     (No. 9923351)

Sarah Palin is a smart, level headed politician. If we put aside the knee jerk Sarah hatred and listen carefully a lot of sensible ideas come through.
1.She knows it will never get past this Senate. But Dingy will be forced to hold the trial. There is no constitutional escape.
2.It will clearly establish that the Republicans are not party to this ruinous rampage making a mockery of everything we have inherited. Republicans are rapidly becoming defacto accessories by not acting.
3. Her real target is the Congressional Democrats and potential 2016 nominees. Forcing them to publicly defend the indefensible has great value with the wavering middle 10% that 0bama carried twice. It is this middle that she is after.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.




Reply 8 - Posted by: EnsignOToole, 7/14/2014 8:01:56 AM     (No. 9923352)

Pardon a second comment - I hadn´t read the whole article before I wrote my comment above.

Cindy Simpson must have been sitting in my class when I taught history. One of my best students was a very bright young lady named Cindy (different last name) who was an extremely good writer. This Cindy has expressed her argument well, and I just pray that her conclusion can be avoided. Moreover, I fervently pray that intelligent people (we need the not-so-intelligent, too) will remember that the Constitution is our road map to a civil society.

Cindy´s conclusion: A future Congress controlled by a majority that proclaims its unwillingness, in advance, to even consider impeachment may find itself unable to deter a president who dares to cross it.
That, my friends, was Sarah´s point.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    22 persons like this.

Reply 9 - Posted by: Kitty Myers, 7/14/2014 8:06:28 AM     (No. 9923357)

#4 I did not mention, nor imply, Congress.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.

Reply 10 - Posted by: StormCnter, 7/14/2014 8:21:32 AM     (No. 9923369)

Look, we all know how richly Obama deserves any humiliation we can pile on him and his administration acolytes. We also know how really good it would feel to present articles of impeachment, pass them in the House and get conviction in the Senate. We also know it´s not going to be successful now. Better legal and political scholars than I have pointed it out on this and previous threads. So, it´s a waste of energy to keep discussing it as if it could really happen. Obama´s administration is going down in glorious flames in many places and for many reasons. A futile GOP movement to impeach would save him. We don´t have to do it. There are other ways of blocking his royal edicts and history will take care of judging him.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.

Reply 11 - Posted by: Kitty Myers, 7/14/2014 8:24:29 AM     (No. 9923378)

#10 You miss the point entirely.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    28 persons like this.

Reply 12 - Posted by: ilovedogs, 7/14/2014 8:38:22 AM     (No. 9923399)

So #1, we too forget principle and join in the strategy/tactic team????

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.



Reply 13 - Posted by: ramona, 7/14/2014 8:43:19 AM     (No. 9923412)

Just how does this popular support develop? Surely someone must begin the drumbeat. We need more leaders like Sarah Palin who are willing to endure the scorn of the Establishment politicians and media to start banging that drum.
Ramona (the Pest)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    26 persons like this.

Reply 14 - Posted by: dman, 7/14/2014 8:46:27 AM     (No. 9923418)

We keep restating the same arguments. One side worries about playing into the Democrats hands, jeopardizing the "sure thing" election in NOvember, and we can´t get the 2/3 vote in the Senate to convict anyway. The other worries about separation of powers, the Constitution, and tyranny establishing itself right before our eyes.

I say: call the question. Put articles of impeachment on the table, campaign on them, and let the voters weigh in. Not some rigged poll with slanted questions and a skewed sample, but an actual election. If we can no longer trust the electorate, then it is all over anyway - we are fighting over a corpse.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.

Reply 15 - Posted by: OhMy, 7/14/2014 8:47:54 AM     (No. 9923419)

The article makes a good point. If this lawless president cannot be impeached then no-one can. This is another part of the constitution that is / may as well be shredded! It is just a matter of the GOP learning to fight. They need to make the case. Holder is playing his race card saying all opposition is racist. This is the first thing that needs to be debunked. Didn´t MLK give us the standard - content of character not colour of skin! MLK is honoured while his words are dismissed! Can´t the GOP even make this case? They are so useless I believe they must bear much responsibility for the Obama disaster.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    15 persons like this.

Reply 16 - Posted by: eoddad, 7/14/2014 8:56:02 AM     (No. 9923440)

Make the democrats defend the corruption we have seen. Obama is going to continue to push, where do you draw the line. One year from now this will NOT be crazy talk.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.

Reply 17 - Posted by: StormCnter, 7/14/2014 8:57:55 AM     (No. 9923445)

In truth, #11, the "point" you want readers to get is exactly what I am speaking to. Rallying "the people" to realize and attack the President´s egregious illegalities is a waste of energy. Our efforts, at this time and under these circumstances, is better spent clipping his wings and waiting him out. I´m sure you don´t agree. I´ll be more admiring of your stance when I see you leading the charge.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.




Reply 18 - Posted by: kahunavol, 7/14/2014 9:04:58 AM     (No. 9923461)

So why aren´t you admiring Sarah´s stance?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    22 persons like this.

Reply 19 - Posted by: 49 Ford, 7/14/2014 9:05:30 AM     (No. 9923463)

Where in the country - outside of the conservative blogosphere - is the popular will for impeachment? It´s just not there, and the MSM will never permit the notion to gain any serious traction. And as long as that´s the case it is unrealistic to expect elected officials to get behind it.

Those of us of a conservative bent like to refer to "the American people" as though we were still a cohesive entity united by common belief in a few important values or ideas. No mas. Decades of leftist moral, intellectual and cultural rot have left us balkanized, ignorant, self-absorbed and easily distracted. We would not be whwere we are today if that were not the case.

We here may just happen to be living in the era when the piper has to be paid.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    7 persons like this.

Reply 20 - Posted by: chumley, 7/14/2014 9:10:14 AM     (No. 9923472)

Thank you #13. The communists know something that has eluded so many of us. When they want to "have a conversation" about something, they are building popular support in an effort to take something away from us. We arent allowed to object because its just a simple conversation, after all.
Ok, lets have a conversation about impeachment and removal.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.

Reply 21 - Posted by: ColoWapiti, 7/14/2014 9:13:26 AM     (No. 9923480)

Just when I thought the GOP Establishment cheerleaders were finally going to engage in a real conversation, #17 had to come along with that last line and resort to a personal attack to defend their position. Pitiful.

It is clear this issue revolves around either waiting Obama out and letting him fall of his own weight, or using the constitution to stop him. I see both sides.

What concerns me is the evidence that he clearly intends to ratchet up his executive order pace during the next two years. How much more damage to the nation is required before the GOP makes a real attempt to stop him?

Are we going to wait until he grants full citizenship to 20-30 million illegals, then fight it in the courts for years? By that time it will be too late, those illegals will have given the Dems permanent control over numerous states and the federal government.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.

Reply 22 - Posted by: Kitty Myers, 7/14/2014 10:41:30 AM     (No. 9923659)

Back in November 1992, Grover Norquist warned about "The Coming Clinton Dynasty" in which he said: "He will use the power and finances of the state to build an impregnable fortress..."

Considering the topic at had, it´s well worth reading. It´s now in pdf form, so just google the title and add Grover Norquist.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.



Reply 23 - Posted by: whyyeseyec, 7/14/2014 10:59:56 AM     (No. 9923696)

Does anyone really believe Boehner would allow impeachment proceedings to take place? That guy is so lame he almost makes Biden look like an intellectual genius.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    7 persons like this.

Reply 24 - Posted by: mathman, 7/14/2014 12:26:19 PM     (No. 9923856)

Don´t impeach him.
Defund his office. Stop paying his salary, and the expenses of his office.
Does not Congress control the purse?
Stop paying IRS.Stop paying Justice.
Let them print their own money.
Impeachment is a non-starter.
But money? Follow the money.
Cut off the money. Then see what happens.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    7 persons like this.

Post Reply   Close thread 792265

Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "DW626"


Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)

Most Recent Articles posted by "DW626"

The Unspoken Obama Lie
That Led to Benghazi
American Thinker, by Jack Cashill    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 9/24/2014 4:37:53 AM     Post Reply
To make a difference going forward, Trey Gowdy and the House’s Benghazi select committee may want to ask how the U.S. got involved in Libya in the first place. What they will discover is that Barack Obama borrowed a page from the Clinton playbook on Kosovo, a lethal exercise in mendacity unparalleled in recent American history. Much of the mischief I unearthed in my forthcoming book, You Lie!, I expected to find. This nugget surprised me. In his March 2011 address to the nation, Barack Obama laid out the case for America’s surprise military intervention in Libya.

Outrageous IRS Commissioner
False Claim: ´Whenever we can,
we follow the law´
American Thinker, by Mark J. Fitzgibbons    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 9/16/2014 5:51:37 AM     Post Reply
Internal Revenue Service Commissioner John Koskinen made a disturbing statement before Congress that the IRS follows the law “whenever we can.” As Thomas Lifson wrote, “The law, to Koskinen, evidently is a suggestion, not an ironclad requirement.” Actually, the situation is even worse than that. Lernergate unveiled for the public a deeper, even more sinister problem at the IRS. The evidence of criminal wrongdoing in the Tax Exempt unit of the IRS, with its cover-up involving widespread destruction of evidence, is like one highlight reel of a bigger reality within the Service and government agencies generally. The IRS, like other

Secretary Clinton: Stop Digging!
American Thinker, by Ken Blackwell    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 9/10/2014 6:32:52 AM     Post Reply
It’s one of the oldest rules in politics. And it’s one that her husband, Bill Clinton, made famous: “When you’re in a hole, stop digging!” So why is Secretary Hillary Clinton continuing to dig away? Her book tour was bound to be rocky. With a tin ear for the nuances of young feminists, she titled her book, Hard Choices. But the Washington Post recently published Janet Harris’ column urging all liberals to “stop saying abortion is a difficult choice." If you talk like that, Harris says, you are putting the focus on the fetus. Well, we can’t do that!

´Progressive Moral Depravity´:
A Confederacy of Dunces
American Thinker, by Clarice Feldman    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 9/7/2014 5:33:52 AM     Post Reply
There’s a wonderful book, A Confederacy of Dunces, the title of which refers to an epigraph from Jonathan Swift´s essay, "Thoughts on Various Subjects, Moral and Diverting": "When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him." I was reminded of it this week when the confederacy of dunces both here and in Great Britain seems to have linked arms against the genius of Western civilization and the long-suffering middle class which has for so long sustained it. Key players in the confederacy are perpetually offended

What kind of men are we?
American Thinker, by Jeremy Egerer    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 8/31/2014 5:27:54 AM     Post Reply
One of the strangest periods of Roman history was the period right before the republic collapsed and became an empire. The Romans weren´t known for losing, but during this period, they lost nearly everything they put their hands to. Catiline nearly overthrew the republic by rallying profligates, whoremongers, and drunken hipsters under the flag of rapacity. A Numidian king named Jugurtha practically walked into the Senate, bribed a bunch of senators, and caused them to overlook his hostile foreign policy – which cost a friendly kingdom its ruin. Pirates practically owned the seas, so that all sea trade had practically

Respectability and Racism
American Thinker, by Patricia L. Dickson    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 8/26/2014 5:38:30 AM     Post Reply
I recently came across an article entitled “No One Treats African-Americans Worse Than We Treat Each Other: The troubling self-flagellation in Ferguson´s black community” published in the New Republic. When I first read the title, I thought to myself, here it comes, this article is going to tell it like it is. However, after reading the first paragraph, I realized that it was yet another America is still a racist country tripe. The author is Julia Ioffe, a Russian-American journalist and blogger. She traveled to Ferguson, Missouri to interview mostly prominent black figures about the events unfolding in the black

Obama´s Willful Blindness
American Thinker, by Ed Lasky    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 8/25/2014 5:24:21 AM     Post Reply
In America justice is supposed to be blind not our commander-in-chief. In Obama’s topsy-turvy America justice is not blind but our President is-and willfully so-when it comes to threats facing Americans. Will he remove his blinders? Only if he is forced to and by then it may be too late. Charles Krauthammer, one of America’s smartest columnists, said it best regarding President Obama and the threats to America coming from ISIS: “I don’t think the issue is the president was unaware or taken by surprise. I think this was willful blindness to the nature of the threat.”

Yazidi is Kurdish for
´Unarmed Israeli´"
American Thinker, by Clarice Feldman    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 8/10/2014 6:56:56 AM     Post Reply
So said the brilliant Iowahawk this week as most people of the world watch in horror the spectacle of 40,000 members of this beleaguered Iraqi minority huddled without food or water on rocky Sinjar mountaintops. Below them the savages of ISIS kidnap Yazidi women, raping them and selling them into slavery. Heads of children ISIS decapitated are displayed on pikes in public parks and there are reports of distraught families tossing their beloved babies from mountaintops rather than watch them slowly starve to death. This barbarism comes after tens of thousands of Christians were raped, murdered, driven from their ancestral homes

Aunt Peggy Frowns
at the Obama Boys
American Thinker, by Christopher Chantrill    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 8/5/2014 5:43:32 AM     Post Reply
Every remembers a formidable aunt who could cool the jets of the rambunctious neighborhood boys with a glance. The U.S. has Peggy Noonan for that, and last week Aunt Peggy frowned at the Obama boys. The president shouldn´t be using a fateful and divisive word like "impeachment" to raise money and rouse his base. He shouldn´t be at campaign-type rallies where he speaks only to the base, he should be speaking to the country. Then there´s the Pelosi rich-girl clique: The House minority leader shouldn´t be using the border crisis as a campaign prop, implying that Republicans would back Democratic

Three Ninnies and a Jackass:
This Week in Gaza
American Thinker, by Clarice Feldman    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 8/3/2014 5:15:15 AM     Post Reply
This week we learned that former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, the elected choice of the wealthy denizens of San Francisco, believes that Hamas is a humanitarian organization. Qatar, Hamas’ principle supporter, told her so. From former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton we learned that the reason Hamas’ weapons are found stored in civilian sites -- schools, mosques, hospitals, and UNWRA buildings -- is because the area is so small there’s nowhere else to hide them. And from the UN’s High Commissioner for Human Rights, the viciously anti-Israeli Navi Pillay, we learned that the Israel may have committed war

Obama the Blamethrower
American Thinker, by Ed Lasky    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 7/30/2014 4:23:44 AM     Post Reply
Is Obama the most pathetic president in American history? That was a rhetorical question. Barack Obama promised so much: to heal our racial divisions, slice the deficit, provide health care that was cheaper, more widely available and that would not add one dime to the deficit. More grandly, he promised to stop the rise of the oceans and heal the planet. He was so cool. He was transcendent –an enlightened being -- a “Lightworker” and a “sort of God.” Yes…well...how did all that work out? Critics have judged him by his own words and he has been found wanting.

Providence is Not Just
a City in Rhode Island
American Thinker, by Clarice Feldman    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 7/27/2014 5:05:35 AM     Post Reply
Every now and then we are reminded by events that providence has saved our civilization from disaster. There was, for example, reminds my friend Narciso, the Bojinka plot In which Ramzi Yousef and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed planned to assassinate Pope John Paul II, bomb 11 passenger planes, and crash a plane into CIA headquarters. A chemical fire in one of the plotter’s kitchens disrupted those plans. (Khalid went on to commit other atrocities -- including planning 9/11 -- but providence cannot always protect us.) This week the Daily Mail reported that the underwear bomber failed in his mission

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)

Lena Dunham: I Was Raped By
a ´Campus Republican´ In 2008

49 replie(s)
Breitbart Big Hollywood, by John Nolte    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 10/3/2014 8:29:26 PM     Post Reply
In her just-released memoir, 27 year-old "Girls" star Lena Dunham claims that as a 19 year-old Oberlin College student in Ohio, she was raped by a college Republican. In the first chapter that addresses the encounter, Dunham describes the "ill-fated evening of lovemaking" as awkward and hollow. The most sensational moment comes from the fact that "Barry" wasn´t wearing a condom. In the next chapter, Dunham backtracks with the claim that she´s an "unreliable narrator" and accuses "Barry" of rape: [I]n another essay in this book I describe a sexual encounter with a mustachioed campus Republican as the upsetting but

EXCLUSIVE: Ousted Secret Service chief
was ´sandbagged´ by ´p***ed off agents
who had had enough´ of her and thought*

41 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 10/2/2014 9:11:57 PM     Post Reply
A recently retired Secret Service agent told MailOnline on Thursday that former director Julia Pierson´s resignation will be welcomed by the agency´s rank-and-file because ´people in the service thought she was a joke from Day One.´ He attributed her swift fall from grace to a cadre of ´p***ed off agents who had had enough´ of feeling disrespected by the service´s first female director. ´Putting her in charge was part of the [Obama] administration´s push to feminize the service after the "hookergate" nightmare,´ the agent said, referring to agents who were fired after patronizing prostitutes during a security-check trip to Colombia

The Case for Panic
33 replie(s)
Washington Free Beacon, by Matthew Continetti    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 10/3/2014 5:27:33 AM     Post Reply
Deadly, irrational, and determined, the intruder snuck across a weakened perimeter. Eluding capture, the intruder was detained only after missteps and close calls. The spin began soon after the threat was isolated. Information was selectively leaked. Half-truths and untruths were uttered. Responsibility was avoided; privileges and credentials asserted; authority reasserted. Trust us. Remain calm. Don’t panic. This is the template of recent events. A mental case jumps the White House fence. He makes it to the East Room before he’s tackled by an off-duty Secret Service agent. Initial statements turn out to be misleading or false. We discover that lapses in

28 words that Democrats
really wish President Obama
didn’t say today

26 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Chris Cillizza    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 10/2/2014 10:48:52 PM     Post Reply
President Obama was at Northwestern University on Thursday to deliver an economic speech that, he and his team hoped, would lay out the case for why the public is better off today than they were six years ago -- even if they didn´t feel it in their everday lives. Instead, Obama just gave every Republican ad-maker in the country more fodder for negative ads linking Democratic candidates to him. Here are the four sentences that will draw all of the attention (they come more than two thirds of the way through the speech): "I am not on the ballot this

Mitt Romney and 2016:
Could It Be True?

25 replie(s)
ABC News, by Alana Abramson    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 10/2/2014 1:46:59 PM     Post Reply
A presidential defeat isn’t an easy thing to bounce back from. And Mitt Romney did it twice. So it was understandable that after he lost the presidential race in 2012, he was adamant about closing the door to the possibility of a third campaign. But recently, speculation is whirling that Romney may not be so adamant anymore. When asked if he was running in a New York Times interview published earlier this week, Romney said : “I have nothing to add to the story. We’ve got a lot of people looking at the race,” he said. “We’ll see what happens.” That response, which

Meghan McCain on Secret
Service: ´I hated all of them´

24 replie(s)
The Hill (Washington DC), by Judy Kurtz    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 10/3/2014 12:30:44 AM     Post Reply
Meghan McCain joined the dog pile on the Secret Service this week, saying she’s had “nothing but horrible experiences" with the agency and likening the agents to “glorified mall cops.” The 29-year-old author and television personality, who is also the daughter of former GOP presidential candidate Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), opened up on Pivot’s “TakePart Live” about some of her interactions with the Secret Service. "I have nothing but horrible experiences with the Secret Service,” McCain said. “One of my friends called them glorified mall cops and I don´t think that´s terribly far off. I found them cliquey. I hated

Some Blacks See Secret Service
as Flawed Shield for the President

23 replie(s)
New York Times, by Peter Baker    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 10/3/2014 12:16:43 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — Representative Elijah E. Cummings of Maryland was at the grocery store the other day when he ran into an elderly black woman who expressed growing concern about President Obama’s safety. Why, she asked, wasn’t he being better protected by his Secret Service agents? The furor that led to this week’s resignation of the director of the Secret Service resonated deeply among blacks, outraged that those supposed to be guarding the first black president were somehow falling down on the job — and suspicious even without evidence that it may be deliberate. “It is something that is widespread in

White House says it has
Ebola virus under control

23 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Sarah Ferris    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 10/3/2014 6:55:38 PM     Post Reply
Top White House officials on Friday worked to reassure the American public that the national response to Ebola is under control. Leaders of the country’s health, defense and military branches stressed that they are taking the right steps to contain the spread of the deadly virus, which was first diagnosed in the U.S. on Tuesday. Top White House officials on Friday worked to reassure the American public that the national response to Ebola is under control. Leaders of the country’s health, defense and military branches stressed that they are taking the right steps to contain the spread of the deadly virus, which

Most Texas abortion clinics shut down
as abortion rights recede in South

23 replie(s)
Christian Science Monitor, by Patrik Jonsson    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 10/4/2014 7:48:03 AM     Post Reply
ATLANTA — Texas, America’s second-most populous state behind California, saw 13 of its last abortion clinics turn away women on Friday, after a federal appeals court upheld a law that practically guarantees that only a handful of clinics will remain open in the state. The strictest-of-its-kind Texas law requires abortion providers to build hospital-grade facilities and obtain sometimes impossible-to-get hospital admitting privileges. After signed into law last year by Gov. Rick Perry (R), the law forced most of the 41 clinics operating to close. Thursday’s ruling wiped out a brief victory this summer for abortion rights proponents,

California’s next big political fight:
Plastic grocery bags

22 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Reid Wilson    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 10/3/2014 9:19:26 AM     Post Reply
Go to a grocery store in California and buy all the milk, eggs and vegetables you want. But there’s one thing you won’t find at the checkout line, beginning July 1, 2015: Plastic bags to carry your stuff home. Gov. Jerry Brown (D) on Tuesday signed into law a ban on single-use plastic bags, making California the first state to prohibit stores from using the ubiquitous carry-alls. Shoppers will be charged 10 cents for every paper bag and heavy-duty plastic bag they use. “This bill is a step in the right direction,” Brown said in a press release announcing his approval. “It

Lindsey Graham Mulling White House Run
22 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Alex Pappas    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 10/3/2014 1:37:53 PM     Post Reply
The hawkish Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina says he is thinking about running for president in 2016. In an interview with Stephen Hayes of the Weekly Standard, the senator, running for re-election to the Senate this year, said: “If I get through my general election, if nobody steps up in the presidential mix, if nobody’s out there talking — me and McCain have been talking — I may just jump in to get to make these arguments,” Graham said. Graham, 59, also dismissed Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, 43, as a presidential candidate, saying he is too young. “He’s a good

Obama Mocks Fox News
For Obamacare Reporting

21 replie(s)
Breitbart TV, by Pam Key    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 10/2/2014 5:35:04 PM     Post Reply
Thursday while speaking at Northwestern University in Evanston, IL, President Barack Obama giggled and raised his arms as he mocked the Fox News Channel for it´s reporting on ObamaCare. Obama said, "There is a reason fewer Republicans, you hear them running around about ObamaCare, cause while good affordable health care might seem like a fanged threat to the freedom of the American people on Fox News it turns out its working pretty well in the real world."

Post Reply   Close thread 792265


Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google

© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.