A Message From Lucianne  



Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google

Sarah Palin´s impeachment nonsense
could keep Democrats in power

Washington Examiner [DC], by Editorial

Original Article

Posted By:MissMolly, 7/12/2014 5:02:52 AM

“Without borders, there is no nation,” former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin wrote in a Breitbart op-ed this week. “Obama knows this. Opening our borders to a flood of illegal immigrants is deliberate. This is his fundamental transformation of America ... President Obama´s rewarding of lawlessness, including his own, is the foundational problem here ... It´s time to impeach; and on behalf of American workers and legal immigrants of all backgrounds, we should vehemently oppose any politician on the Left or Right who would hesitate in voting for articles of impeachment.” That this desperate cry for attention (dangling participle and all)



Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Charactercounts, 7/12/2014 5:10:51 AM     (No. 9920796)

Whatever else her talk of impeachment is, it is not nonsense.

He is guilty of many things for which impeachment is the remedy.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    28 persons like this.

Reply 2 - Posted by: mws50, 7/12/2014 5:35:25 AM     (No. 9920811)

Nothing to see here folks, This is just another typical Washington Post editorial...

Oh? Wait...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    17 persons like this.




Reply 3 - Posted by: krause, 7/12/2014 6:02:47 AM     (No. 9920831)

Why publicly take remedies off the table? "We will be pulling our troops out..., There will be no impeachment, etc. All it does is give the opposition a comfort level.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    24 persons like this.

Reply 4 - Posted by: Policom, 7/12/2014 6:06:36 AM     (No. 9920835)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.

Reply 5 - Posted by: Policom, 7/12/2014 6:11:23 AM     (No. 9920838)

When upper management in big business has a problem with it´s CEO they´re gone. This should have happened a long time ago with Obama. I did not vote for Hope and Change but I am now. I Hope we Change the CEO of this Country. And the sooner the better.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    30 persons like this.

Reply 6 - Posted by: PoliticalJunky, 7/12/2014 6:26:23 AM     (No. 9920848)

We should lay low until we get the Senate.

Start thinking folkd? Is this a good time for this fight. It would be snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. I could not believe that Sarah Palin could come up with something so foolish and, yes, stupid.
If she can see her way clear to how we can jump the hurdle of a Democrat Senate she should explain it to us.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    31 persons like this.

Reply 7 - Posted by: tappin52, 7/12/2014 6:40:33 AM     (No. 9920857)

If impeachment is not to be used for a President such as Obama, then there is absolutely no condition under which it would ever be appropriate. It is a legitimate tool for congress to remove a president guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors. Obama certainly qualifies. The fact that politicians look at this from the perspective of political fallout is the problem. They have sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution, not their respective political party. Do what is right for America! It is your job.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    43 persons like this.




Reply 8 - Posted by: pucky1, 7/12/2014 6:42:35 AM     (No. 9920858)

By all means, let´s keep talking daily about the reasons this man should be impeached. Talk loud, talk often. Build a roar across America that even the MSM can´t ignore.

Go beyond that. Talk of the immense damage this man is causing now and in the future. Highlight his lawlessness, his folloies and his mendacity so that our next generations know what to avoid.

So the Senate Democrats block removal. HAH! Let them stand for the political diseases this man is spreading. Force them to swallow it whole.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    86 persons like this.

Reply 9 - Posted by: TakeBackAmerica, 7/12/2014 6:47:13 AM     (No. 9920859)

Apparently, then, the only way for us to express our disgust for Obama´s criminal intention of bringing America to it´s knees for it´s perceived crimes is by letting him finish his second term and fade away.

Somehow, he has more than that coming to him!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    31 persons like this.

Reply 10 - Posted by: Catherine, 7/12/2014 6:47:54 AM     (No. 9920860)

Another clueless moron. I bet the majority of people in this country would love to see Obama impeached. He´s broken so many laws and told so many lies I´d rather he be arrested and charged with everything from fraud to not even being eligible to be president. Palin still scares the bejeezus out of crackpot democrats and RINO´s.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    44 persons like this.

Reply 11 - Posted by: Malia2012, 7/12/2014 6:52:51 AM     (No. 9920863)

At the risk of being turned into a "Sarah Palin hater", I agree with #6. There will BE a time and place to impeach the worst "president" in the history of our country, but IMHO, it is AFTER we take back the Senate. Talk of impeachment now only helps the "corrupt-campaigner-in-chief" who is now CAMPAIGNING on being "impeached" and "sued"! Empty threats of impeachment gets his base of-lo-fo´s all excited and brings them out from under the rocks to defend their "dear leader". If we do not retake the Senate in November, there is no hope for this country. How many Americans want to see the House, as well as the Senate and the w.h. being further destroyed by demonrats?........When your enemy is destroying himself, why not stay out of the way?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    28 persons like this.

Reply 12 - Posted by: Coy860, 7/12/2014 6:53:49 AM     (No. 9920864)

While Harry Reid´s senility and addiction to the Koch Brothers is ignored.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.




Reply 13 - Posted by: Keekng, 7/12/2014 7:04:02 AM     (No. 9920874)

Is everything written in Washington DC nonsensical?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    17 persons like this.

Reply 14 - Posted by: StormCnter, 7/12/2014 7:08:24 AM     (No. 9920879)

Mrs. Palin can say or write whatever she wants, of course. By doing so, however, she and her fans should understand not everyone will agree and disagreement might also be stated and written.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    20 persons like this.

Reply 15 - Posted by: steveW, 7/12/2014 7:13:06 AM     (No. 9920881)

No, Mr. Ed Itorial, the best way to keep Democrats in power is to refrain from challenging their lawlessness. You keep them in power by pretending their utter disregard for constitutional, limited government can be legitimately labeled "fairness" "compassion" or "helping people", even when they, like Dear Leader, smugly shred their oath of office. If a president openly flaunts border laws or is under the strongest suspicion of criminally corrupting the IRS, how is impeaching him not a political option, but a sacred duty?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    64 persons like this.

Reply 16 - Posted by: Kitty Myers, 7/12/2014 7:18:13 AM     (No. 9920884)

I like this comment a reader posted at the end of the article: Love her or hate her, she acts on principle and not the politics of convenience or popular sentiment.

And this one: Who says the House shouldn´t act because of what the Senate may or may not do? THAT is the problem, playing politics is killing Americans. More people taking a stand is needed to right this wrong in D.C. And Palin is spot on. How could the Washington Examiner publish this absolute drivel?

And then there´s this one: What absolute imbecile wrote this article?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    55 persons like this.

Reply 17 - Posted by: jglas, 7/12/2014 7:23:31 AM     (No. 9920885)

I agree, wait until we have the senate to start impeachment proceedings . . . but Obama had nothing to do with the children flooding across the southern border? Please. He´s the architect of that chaos. He made it clear the borders are open and children won´t be sent back. He wants the borders open so he can get as many potential welfare recipients into the country as possible. That´s just Alinsky 101. It accomplishes two things, it forces government action on the immigration bill and so amnesty for the millions of illegal immigrants already here who are all potential Democrat voters and it gets even more illegal immigrants into the country. The trick is that many of them are unaccompanied children. Who can be so cruel as to turn away unaccompanied and often sick children? In fact more than half of those children are male teenagers, likely or potential members of gangs and a mistake to treat as children. Undoubtedly in the mix are opportunistic terrorists. This is Obama´s dream team, innocent little waifs who must be taken in with a bomb in the middle. The attack on America from within and without continues.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.




Reply 18 - Posted by: Spidey, 7/12/2014 7:37:07 AM     (No. 9920899)

There´s nothing wrong in theory with what Palin said,the problem is republicans don´t have a good enough case. You can´t impeach someone one with death by a thousand cuts. You need something so egregious that 60% of the country will stand behind it.Republicans can´t get 60% support for anything,nada,nothing.

Obamas simply hasn´t tripped the right wire yet and a civil war is much more likely than him being impeached. Most people are willing to wait out 2 more years.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.

Reply 19 - Posted by: ruready?, 7/12/2014 7:39:08 AM     (No. 9920902)

Note the complaints above about Sarah versus what the GOP did in Mississippi.

A teachable moment.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    28 persons like this.

Reply 20 - Posted by: sg, 7/12/2014 7:39:32 AM     (No. 9920903)

the author of the article is right. Impeachment talk will benefit Obama. There will be a backlash against it and it will never succeed, even if the Repubs hold a senate majority. you´ll loose the support of moderates and independents. Then there´s the racial thing. You think he plays the race card to counter legitimate, polite criticism? He´ll ignite a firestorm if impeachment looms, and if Palin keeps talking about, he´ll certainly exploit it to roil the masses. Blacks are starting to get queasy about the border situation, according to some news footage I saw. Why hand them a reason to ignore it?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.

Reply 21 - Posted by: MirJoy, 7/12/2014 7:40:55 AM     (No. 9920904)

#8 - I agree. Someone should be talking about it, and I am happy that Sarah Palin is the one to do so.

As to the snarkiness of this article, "That this desperate cry for attention (dangling participle and all)..." I don´t remember the definition of a participle, but just wondering:

FTA: "his policies - including ON immigration - ..."

Would this be an example of a dangling preposition? Sounds kind of awkward.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.

Reply 22 - Posted by: bubby, 7/12/2014 7:42:27 AM     (No. 9920905)

The GOP establishment have taken impeachment as a remedy for obama´s lawlessness off the table. He now knows that even should the Republicans take control of the Senate nothing will happen. To me that only encourages his lawlessness and in fact will embolden him to do more destruction than previously thought possible. Once again the Constitution is being ignored by the GOP establishment. If we are unwilling to protect our borders why have a Federal government? We would be better serverd to let the States do that.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    22 persons like this.



Reply 23 - Posted by: sg, 7/12/2014 7:42:51 AM     (No. 9920906)

...and to the extent that he has usurped Congress´s powers, let Congress find where it put its bottle of testosterone, take a dose, and start pushing back at Obama´s encroachment on their power. Other Congresses have pushed back hard against strong presidents who treaded on their turf. The Democrats are all too willing to surrender their authority. It´s unprecedented.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    17 persons like this.

Reply 24 - Posted by: Rinktum, 7/12/2014 7:44:16 AM     (No. 9920907)

Nothing wrong in talking about impeachment. Unfortunately with this crop of Republicans they can´t agree on much of anything because they are too busy fighting each other. The establishment would more readily agree with the democrats against it and both would paint conservatives as racists.

Timing is everything and although I do believe Obama is more than deserving to be impeached, we must be smart about this. It would be more effective right now if the cry for impeachment came from the people. I am all for talking it up and creating a groundswell. Keep the politicians out of it at this point. Americans are ticked off and they know what the remedy is. Let the people carry the message. Impeach Obama.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.

Reply 25 - Posted by: John c, 7/12/2014 7:49:16 AM     (No. 9920910)

I frequently hoist an impeach obama sign on a (Boston) overpass and have such positive response from drivers that a nearby homeowner asked me to move or she would call the cops because of the noise.

Sarah is right again.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    89 persons like this.

Reply 26 - Posted by: ruready?, 7/12/2014 7:51:28 AM     (No. 9920911)

#22 properly reminded us that "The GOP establishment have taken impeachment as a remedy for obama´s lawlessness off the table."

That sounds a lot like the Obama/Kerry dream of negotiating with Iran of taking military options off the table.

Boehner moves slow - except when taking the impeachment option off the table. He strike against Sarah´s recommendation was faster than the strike of a rattle-headed copper moccasin.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    25 persons like this.

Reply 27 - Posted by: MissMolly, 7/12/2014 7:59:36 AM     (No. 9920919)

#26, do a bit of research. The planning for Boehner´s legal action began many months ago. The legal experts have been working on it for a long time, narrowing it down to the most winnable issue, Obama´s changes to the healthcare law in violation of his authority. This has nothing at all to do with anything Sarah Palin might have said or done.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    16 persons like this.

Reply 28 - Posted by: Wakeupcall, 7/12/2014 8:47:00 AM     (No. 9920976)

Impeachment will never happen of any Marxist communist elected official or just in the government bureaucracy of which we now most likely have over one half of all the bureaucracy who are communist calling themselves progressives or socialist, whatever, anything but what they are.

What is needed is enough freedom loving non communists to do as our founders said would be necessary form time to time. And, when done reduce government back to it´s founding documents limitations and put and end to "Our Constitution is open to Interpretation". It is written in plain English and means what it says. There is no, Well that would depend on what the meaning of ´is´ is.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.

Reply 29 - Posted by: EnsignOToole, 7/12/2014 8:47:08 AM     (No. 9920977)

Thank you #15, your comment is the best and needs repeating.
No, Mr. Ed Itorial, the best way to keep Democrats in power is to refrain from challenging their lawlessness.

I am shocked that Mr. Ed Itorial doesn´t have the gonads to identify himself/herself. I just lost a lot of respect for that paper.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    16 persons like this.

Reply 30 - Posted by: LouD, 7/12/2014 8:52:27 AM     (No. 9920983)

#24, since when did Sarah become a politician? She is a private citizen, and one of us "people". She has the same right as and citizen to speak out, whether about impeachment or anything else.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    54 persons like this.

Reply 31 - Posted by: Susannah, 7/12/2014 8:53:55 AM     (No. 9920986)

#29, editorials are always anonymous because they represent the viewpoint of the entire editorial board of the paper.

Palin certainly is doing her best to help the Democrats. Donations to the party have gone up since she called for impeachment.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.

Reply 32 - Posted by: privateer, 7/12/2014 9:21:07 AM     (No. 9921022)

I hear the Sunshine Patriots on this board saying: in cases where a duly-elected tyrant is guilty of abuse of power and offenses against the separation of powers, as well as mis-rule, and persecution of the People, there is NO remedy. The Constitution should be amended to read: in a contest between the tyrant and the Constitution, El Supremo must NOT be questioned, impugned, accused, criticized or impeded in any way. Guatemala is coming to us, and we are becoming Guatemala!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    27 persons like this.

Reply 33 - Posted by: steelbreeze, 7/12/2014 9:24:43 AM     (No. 9921028)

worked real well when Mitt and Mccain refused to call out Obama and say what he really is didn´t it?We lost big time not once but twice to that skinny-armed commie loving little girl.We absolutely need more GOP folks to stand up to this clown in the White House.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.

Reply 34 - Posted by: mikkins2, 7/12/2014 9:29:41 AM     (No. 9921037)

So the argument is for the Republican Establishment to avoid doing its job and hide behind litigation that every American citizen with an ounce of common sense knows is designed to mask their inaction and will drag on until Obama leaves office anyway.

The amazing part is that the establishment lackey thinks this is everyone first political season rodeo but not theirs. They whine that people are allowed to disagree with Sarah Palin but seem to forget that people are also allowed to disagree with them as well.

I suggest if you are too sensitive to have your comments responded to then maybe you should consider commenting where everyone will agree with you. I am sure the NRC has a comment page. Or maybe the Democrat Underground. They must have a rather rousing and energetic snarky thread dedicated to all things Anti-Palin.

Until then, suck it up buttercups! Not everything is about you and the Republican Establishment getting the senate.

If the Republican Establishment cannot stand and speak up for justice, the rule of law, and doing whats right no matter what the political climate now....

Why should we expect that to change if they actually did control the senate.

Remember Mississippi!
Got Sarah Palin?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    28 persons like this.

Reply 35 - Posted by: mulhaven, 7/12/2014 9:34:35 AM     (No. 9921046)

It is a phoney Democrat argument that impeachment will help the Democrats. Why would a Democrat or Rino make such an argument unless the opposite were true? It is most likely that the Democrats fear impeachment now. If they thought it would help them then they would promote it, or at a minimum quietly hope it would proceed. Too much bluster from them is a give away They have lied about how it helped Clinton and they are lying now. Standing on principle against such blatant lawlessness will be welcomed by the American people. It is important to ignore those whose interest is in supporting the lawlessness.

Clinton won a second term not because of his impeachment, but in spite of it. The Democrat media propaganda helped him, as did the pathetic Republican candidate and party.

Certainly the people would welcome with open arms those who support their obvious need for law and order to descend upon Washington. How can that be denied? People are not nearly as stupid or passive as the Democrats would like everyone to think.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    16 persons like this.

Reply 36 - Posted by: hamrman, 7/12/2014 9:47:34 AM     (No. 9921069)

Did Karl Rove write this?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    17 persons like this.

Reply 37 - Posted by: Hazymac, 7/12/2014 9:57:08 AM     (No. 9921089)

Morally, Gov. Palin is resoundingly right. It must be said that if Obama had different color skin, his final days in office would be near if not already past. That´s especially true if his latest deliberate policy that is causing over one thousand illegal aliens per day to pour over the border leads to an epidemic of, say, tuberculosis, which is highly, highly contagious. Almost everything he has done is not only wrong but dastardly, and should not only get him removed from office--it should land his tail in jail. He should not be forgiven for the human misery he´s bringing about.

And yet, the Republicans would be making a strategic mistake if they try to get rid of Obama before November. Win back the majority in the Senate first. Congress will be in session for exactly twelve more days until after ther election, and pushing hard for impeachment will bring Lofos flooding to his defense, not to mention that twelve days isn´t nearly enough time to impeach in the House. Also, it would take 67 votes in the Senate to convict Obama and remove him from office.

If a few thousand healthy people come down with TB, scabies, dengue fever, or something as bad, perhaps the movement to rid the Nation of Obama might gain sufficient momentum to make removal politically possible. Unfortunately, those who are predisposed to vote left are going to have to see with their own eyes just how bad things could be. It hasn´t gotten that bad. Yet.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.

Reply 38 - Posted by: Me_Opinionated_Nah, 7/12/2014 10:26:56 AM     (No. 9921144)

To those crystal ball owners who vociferously agree with this excessively meanspirited, unnecessarily snarky editorial, I trust you’ve been enjoying President Romney’s second term in office as much as you did his first.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    32 persons like this.

Reply 39 - Posted by: chillijilli, 7/12/2014 10:39:10 AM     (No. 9921162)

The issue here seems to be that some are equating "Don´t Impeach NOW" with "Don´t Impeach."
I doubt if anyone in this forum thinks Obama should be allowed to continue his executive overreach and disregard for the Constitution until his term runs out.
But what is the harm in waiting a few months until we have regained the Senate and have more muscle in our fight? Why not let Boehner´s lawsuit run continuously in the background during the run up to the elections... and then strike?
Politics is all about timing and we are involved in a very precise chess game here. Sometimes it takes lots of subtle moves to get to the end game.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    29 persons like this.

Reply 40 - Posted by: kahunavol, 7/12/2014 11:07:28 AM     (No. 9921205)

Is Sarah Palin the only national figure who spoke in favor of impeachment or does it tell us much about who they fear that she alone was/is singled out in the editorial and in the comments here? By the way, what´s good for the goose is good for the gander. The Examiner´s editorial board and establishment R´s have every right to say and write as they please but they should understand the rest of us have every right to argue and disagree with them. We also have every right to stop holding our noses and voting for your preferred moderates.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    21 persons like this.

Reply 41 - Posted by: IdahoSky, 7/12/2014 11:09:12 AM     (No. 9921211)

I don´t know about "keeping the Democrats in power" with her nonsense, but elections have consequences, and if you don´t like Obama, and you didn´t vote for Romney, then you have only yourself to blame.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    16 persons like this.

Reply 42 - Posted by: SouthSanAntonio, 7/12/2014 11:21:11 AM     (No. 9921226)

Only Congress can impeach Øvomit.

But Congress has a strong majority of Demon-RAT´s and RINO´s.

And, sadly, even if the Republicans re-take the Senate and keep the House in November, Congress will still have a strong majority of Demon-RAT´s and RINO´s.

So Sarah can say what most of us know, but it´s not going to happen.

This once-great nation is just circling the drain, waiting for that final "flush" to end our misery...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    17 persons like this.

Reply 43 - Posted by: stablemoney, 7/12/2014 11:55:44 AM     (No. 9921288)

Impeach Obama Now. I have had it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.

Reply 44 - Posted by: earlybird, 7/12/2014 1:21:47 PM     (No. 9921440)

Re #31, the editorial board - insofar as I could find it published anywhere - is Stephen G. Smith, Mark Tapscott, and op-ed writers Tim Carney and Byron York.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    15 persons like this.

Reply 45 - Posted by: earlybird, 7/12/2014 1:29:51 PM     (No. 9921448)

#44 cont´d.

Stephen G. Smith, editor of The Washington Examiner since February 2007, is the only journalist to hold senior-level editing positions at all three American news magazines. He was editor of U.S. News & World Report, executive editor of Newsweek, and Nation editor of Time. He was also editor of National Journal, a weekly devoted to government and politics, and founding editor of Civilization, which in 1996 won a National Magazine Award for General Excellence. Smith also worked as Washington bureau chief for the Houston Chronicle, as Washington news editor for Knight Ridder Newspapers, and as an editor and reporter for the Boston Globe and the Philadelphia Inquirer. He grew up in New York City and graduated from Penn.

Here´s what Smith had to say " with torn feelings" about a major shakeup at the Examiner in 2013:

As for the highly competitive news field into which the Examiner is now jumping, Smith said, “It is a crowded marketplace.” The new entity will distinguish itself, he says, with “strong coverage of politics and government that doesn’t have what is a generally a liberal tilt in the media.” Right up the center of the road, in other words. Managing a publication with straight news and conservative opinion, he says, poses little “problem” for Smith, who has worked at Newsweek, U.S. News & World Report and the Boston Globe, among others.

“This is not some wild-eyed right-wing Web site, such as some that might come to mind,” says Smith. “Oddly enough, I think having a print presence is important in that respect in that it disciplines you and shows you that the information that you’re publishing both online and in print is edited, considered for fairness and accuracy and isn’t just a bunch of folks spouting off.”


Seems to me that Smith has never been really comfortable with the conservative point of view...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    20 persons like this.

Reply 46 - Posted by: earlybird, 7/12/2014 1:36:31 PM     (No. 9921456)

More about Editor Smith here will aid you in evaluating his "editorial board". Not pretty.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    15 persons like this.

Reply 47 - Posted by: BigGeorgeTX, 7/12/2014 5:21:57 PM     (No. 9921616)

Funny how someone that the Kneepad Media and certain posters have deemed no longer relevant can cause such an uproar with a Facebook posting.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    16 persons like this.

Reply 48 - Posted by: EnsignOToole, 7/12/2014 5:42:02 PM     (No. 9921631)

#31 thank you for having read my post @#29. I am well aware, though, of the practices of newspapers and editorials. I happen to have a high regard for Byron York and for Mark Tapscott. #44 and #45 shed some light on Stephen G. Smith as Editor and, thus, makes me feel my original thought was not off base.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    15 persons like this.

Reply 49 - Posted by: strike3, 7/13/2014 10:09:07 AM     (No. 9922308)

Everybody has their sights set on November like somehow having a majority of republicans in the Senate is going to fix the whole Obama situation. It won´t. Republicans have done nothing for five years and will continue to do nothing because they are terrified of the accusation of having ruined the reign of the First Black President. It doesn´t matter that Obama has broken every major tenet of the Constitution and has screwed up America to the breaking point, he´s Black and he´s untouchable.

I have been calling for his impeachment since his first few months in office and Sarah is spot on for calling for it now.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.

Post Reply   Close thread 792025

Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "MissMolly"


Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)

Most Recent Articles posted by "MissMolly"

Tea Party revolt imperils Kansas
The Hill [DC], by Alexandra Jaffe    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 10/1/2014 12:10:11 PM     Post Reply
Kansas Tea Party supporters are threatening to sit out the state’s pivotal Senate election, potentially dealing another blow to the reelection hopes of Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan.). Though schisms within the GOP base rarely have such an outsized impact on a general election contest, the lack of support from the conservative base could be devastating to the vulnerable Roberts’s chances against surging independent Greg Orman. Multiple sources tell The Hill that a group of Tea Party leaders in the state are meeting Wednesday to try to decide whether they should go to bat for the incumbent this fall or sit out of

Suit: Black donor´s sperm
sent to white woman
Chicago Tribune, by Meredith Rodriguez    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 10/1/2014 5:17:47 AM     Post Reply
A white Ohio woman is suing a Downers Grove-based sperm bank, alleging that the company mistakenly gave her vials from an African-American donor, a fact that she said has made it difficult for her and her same-sex partner to raise their now 2-year-old daughter in an all-white community. Jennifer Cramblett, of Uniontown, Ohio, alleges in the lawsuit filed Monday in Cook County Circuit Court that Midwest Sperm Bank sent her the vials of an African-American donor´s sperm in September 2011 instead of those of a white donor that she and her white partner had ordered. After searching through pages of comprehensive

The inhumane society
Washington Times, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 10/1/2014 5:06:03 AM     Post Reply
Americans love animals, even cats. Eight million stray dogs and cats find their way into animal shelters every year, and the lucky ones are adopted into a warm home with a loving family. Shelters are operated by small charities usually called “humane societies,” whose good deeds are funded by private generosity. The Humane Society of the United States trades on the good of others to finance a radical agenda. In May, the Humane Society and a handful of other radical animal-rights groups had to write a $15.8 million check to the Ringling Bros. Barnum & Bailey Circus for damages done. The

Teen girls recall horrors
while held in ISIS captivity
New York Post, by Leonard Greene    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 10/1/2014 5:00:18 AM     Post Reply
Teenage girls who escaped the brutal clutches of ISIS terrorists have recounted a harrowing nightmare of beatings, torture, rape and degradation that included being forced to watch videos of men being beheaded. The girls, members of the persecuted Yazidi minority from northern Iraq, say they were captured and sold or given as gifts. “We would try to make ourselves look ugly,” an escaped girl, 15, told the Global Post news service. “Some women would cry or scream or fight, but it made no difference. They were always taken anyway,” She said they were debased so badly that death, even by suicide, was more

Here’s Where Martha Coakley
Stands on Noncompete Clauses.
Oh Wait, Nobody Has Any Idea
Boston Globe, by Adam Vaccaro    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 9/30/2014 3:36:08 PM     Post Reply
If there’s one major policy issue to the startup community, it’s noncompete clauses. Should they be legal? Should they be limited? On Monday, some members of that community were looking to get answers from Martha Coakley and Charlie Baker about their stances when the candidates for governor spoke to a tech- and startup-minded crowd in Cambridge. They didn’t get much. Noncompetes are a contractual tool with which employers can require new hires to agree not to work for a competitor for some time after they leave. Imagine you worked as a data analyst for a few years and decided it

Rosie O´Donnell, Whoopi Goldberg
get in shouting match in front
of ´The View´ studio audience
New York Daily News, by Don Kaplan    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 9/30/2014 5:43:43 AM     Post Reply
Well, that didn’t take long. Just two weeks into the new season of “The View,” co-hosts Rosie O’Donnell and Whoopi Goldberg tore into each other during a commercial break — in front of their stunned studio audience. The spat erupted Thursday after Goldberg interrupted O’Donnell to go to a commercial break before the mother of five was finished commenting in a “Hot Topic” discussion about spanking children on the ABC gabfest. O’Donnell refuses to wear an earpiece to stay in contact with producers while the live show is airing, so she had no clue it was time to stop talking.

America About to Dethrone Saudi
Arabia as Liquid Petroleum King
American Interest, by Walter Russell Mead & Staff    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 9/30/2014 5:03:28 AM     Post Reply
The U.S. shale boom is about to hit another big milestone, as it looks like fracking will propel American liquid petroleum production (that includes oil and natural gas liquids) past Saudi Arabia for the first time in nearly a quarter century. The FT reports: US production of oil and related liquids such as ethane and propane was neck-and-neck with Saudi Arabia in June and again in August at about 11.5m barrels a day, according to the International Energy Agency, the watchdog backed by rich countries. With US production continuing to boom, its output is set to exceed Saudi Arabia’s this month or

Top VA officials steered contracts
to firm, investigation finds
Washington Times, by Jim McElhatton    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 9/30/2014 5:01:14 AM     Post Reply
Investigators have recommended the government bar a Virginia company that employs a who’s who list of former powerful federal officials from getting contracts after they found employees at the Department of Veterans Affairs improperly tried to steer business to the firm. The VA’s inspector general said in a scathing report that Susan M. Taylor, deputy chief procurement officer for the Veterans Health Administration, “continually” lied about her dealings with FedBid, the well-connected reverse auction company whose advisers and employees include two former top White House procurement officials, a general and a former congressman. Ms. Taylor and FedBid officials sought to “thwart” a

Eric Holder´s political justice
Washington Examiner [DC], by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 9/29/2014 5:07:21 AM     Post Reply
Upon Attorney General Eric Holder´s resignation last week, NBC´s Chuck Todd made an odd comment: “[W]hat’s interesting about him, he is a very non-political person.” There may be merit to saying Holder has been more ideological than political, but it still seems like a strange thing to say about him. After all, his most famous act before his tenure as Attorney General had been to help arrange President Bill Clinton´s highly unusual and controversial last minute pardon of a wanted fugitive — mega-donor and billionaire Marc Rich. Holder not only recommended the pardon (calling himself “neutral leaning favorable”) but was also

Professor plague
New York Daily News, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 9/29/2014 5:01:54 AM     Post Reply
The slogan of Delaware State University is “Making Our Mark on the World,” and a faculty member is doing just that by endangering the lives of thousands of people in Ebola-ravaged West Africa. As medical workers, bolstered by the U.S. military, struggle to contain a rapidly expanding epidemic, Prof. Cyril Broderick published a newspaper article in Liberia stating that the same military “manufactured” Ebola as a biological weapon and started the plague by testing it on Africans. Still more, Broderick, a plant biologist, asserts that some of the organizations battling Ebola — including the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, the World Health

The Difference Between Winners and Whiners
American Spectator, by David Catron    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 9/29/2014 4:59:22 AM     Post Reply
Democrats think conservatives in general, and Tea Partiers in particular, are stupid. Here’s how to reinforce that belief: Sit out the 2014 congressional elections because your favorite candidate lost his primary bid to an establishment Republican. If you live in Kansas, for example, you can suck your thumb while Democrat ringer Greg Orman beats Republican Senator Pat Roberts. If you’re a Kentucky conservative, you can stay home and b***h about Mitch while Alison “Rubberstamp” Grimes heads to Washington. If you’re in Mississippi, you can stay mad at Thad and allow Travis “no repeal” Childers to win. That’ll show those RINOs! It

Left’s Pre-emptive Hits on
Walker, Christie, & Perry
Townhall, by Matt Batzel    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 9/29/2014 4:45:00 AM     Post Reply
Just this week, two seemingly unrelated events unfolded, but they actually reveal a new liberal tactic. The Hillary Clinton Front-Group, American Bridge, filed a bogus federal complaint against Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker and then a federal probe into New Jersey Governor Chris Christie found no evidence linking Christie to “Bridge-Gate.” Meanwhile, Texas Governor Rick Perry was indicted last month. Make no mistake, these events are related. Emerging is a new liberal tactic to gin up legal proceedings against conservatives and then use the media to amplify the investigations and make the officials look guilty. These attacks are part of a

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)

Report: Obama Has Missed over Half
His Second-Term Daily Intel Briefings

65 replie(s)
Breitbart National Security, by Wynton Hall    Original Article
Posted By: happywarrior- 9/30/2014 7:44:05 AM     Post Reply
A new Government Accountability Institute (GAI) report reveals that President Barack Obama has attended only 42.1% of his daily intelligence briefings (known officially as the Presidential Daily Brief, or PDB) in the 2,079 days of his presidency through September 29, 2014. The GAI report also included a breakdown of Obama’s PDB attendance record between terms; he attended 42.4% of his PDBs in his first term and 41.3% in his second. The GAI’s alarming findings come on the heels of Obama’s 60 Minutes comments on Sunday, wherein the president laid the blame for the Islamic State’s (ISIS) rapid rise squarely at

White House fence-jumper made
it far deeper into building than
previously known

49 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Carol D. Leonnig    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 9/29/2014 5:02:31 PM     Post Reply
The man who jumped the White House fence this month and sprinted through the front door made it much farther into the building than previously known, overpowering one Secret Service officer and running through much of the main floor, according to three people familiar with the incident. An alarm box near the front entrance of the White House designed to alert guards to an intruder had been muted at what officers believed was a request of the usher’s office, said a Secret Service official who spoke on the condition of anonymity. The officer posted inside the front door appeared to

Pentagon Official: The President Is Lying
To America — About Us, And About ISIS

47 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Joseph Miller    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 10/1/2014 5:24:44 AM     Post Reply
President Barack Obama has taken a lot of flack since his Sunday night “60 Minutes” interview, in which he blamed the intelligence community for his failure to tackle the threat posed by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. And that is right and proper. Because not only was his excuse of blaming us a lie, but when questioned on his lie, White House press secretary Josh Earnest doubled down with a whole new lie — both of which are easily, publicly proven false. On Sunday, Obama said the intelligence community had underestimated the rise of ISIS, saying in an interview

Secret Service let armed felon
ride in an elevator with Obama

46 replie(s)
Fox News, by Chad Pergram    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 9/30/2014 8:41:39 PM     Post Reply
President Obama shared an elevator earlier this month with an armed security contractor who has three felony convictions relating to assault and battery, in the latest report of a serious violation of Secret Service security protocols. Multiple sources confirmed to Fox News the incident, which took place in an elevator during Obama´s Sept. 16 visit to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta. The incident was first reported by The Washington Post and the Washington Examiner. The latest embarrassment for the Secret Service comes after agency Director Julia Pierson told lawmakers at a Tuesday hearing

LA Times: ´Worst is Yet to Come´
If Ferguson Officer Not Indicted

43 replie(s)
Truth Revolt, by Bradford Thomas    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 9/29/2014 7:18:59 PM     Post Reply
The L.A. Times is warning that the “worst is yet to come” if a grand jury fails to indict white officer Darren Wilson for shooting and killing black 18-year-old Michael Brown. If the grand jury fails to indict the officer who killed Michael Brown, almost everyone here thinks things will get worse. “They’re not going to be looting next time,” said Kevin Seltzer, 30, who lives at an apartment complex near where Brown, 18, was shot. “They’re going to burn the city down.” The article highlights recent indications that the city is “far from finding peace,” including continued clashes with officers, the shooting

Jimmy Carter says he would have
defeated Reagan had he been more ´manly´

40 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Paul Bedard    Original Article
Posted By: grace52- 10/1/2014 11:36:03 AM     Post Reply
Former President Jimmy Carter claimed Wednesday that he would have been re-elected and beaten Ronald Reagan in 1980 if had been more “manly” in his dealings with Iran. Interviewed by the show "CNBC Meets," Carter repeated his belief that the failed mission to free American hostages held in Tehran killed his chances, but then added that had he gone to war, America would have rewarded him with a second term in 1980.

Cornyn to PJM: Time for ‘Arguments
Within the Family… Has Passed’ If
Conservatives Want to Win Senate

38 replie(s)
PJ Media, by Bridget Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 9/29/2014 6:49:16 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — The Senate’s minority whip is confident about Republicans being the majority in the 114th Congress — if conservatives can set aside differences and work to combat the massive influx of donor cash that has Democratic campaigns ahead in the money race. Only in the majority, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) stresses, can conservatives make headway on tamping down overregulation, repealing and replacing Obamacare, securing the “chaotic” border, getting Keystone XL moving, and bringing civilized debate back to the upper chamber. And only by realizing the gravity of the battle for November, he argues, can Republicans relegate Harry Reid (D-Nev.)

Dallas´ Ebola case confirmed
by CDC; first diagnosis in U.S.

33 replie(s)
Dallas Morning News [TX], by Sherry Jacobson*    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 9/30/2014 4:58:09 PM     Post Reply
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention notified the media at 3:32 p.m. Tuesday that Dallas has the first diagnosed Ebola case in the nation. The federal agency scheduled a media briefing at 5:30 p.m. from its headquarters in Atlanta. Dallas County officials are expected to participate. Dallas County went through a day-long anxiety attack Tuesday, waiting to hear if the first Ebola diagnosis in the nation would happen here. An unnamed patient at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas was placed in isolation while awaiting test results for the dreaded virus. Apparently, the patient had traveled recently to a

State Dept. On Obama Intel Briefings:
´He Receives Those Whenever He Can´

32 replie(s)
Breitbart National Security, by Wynton Hall    Original Article
Posted By: chicodon- 10/1/2014 7:04:43 AM     Post Reply
The Obama administration found itself scrambling on Tuesday to defend President Barack Obama for his lackluster 42% attendance record on daily intelligence briefings, a finding from a new report issued by the non-partisan Government Accountability Institute (GAI). When asked about the GAI revelation on Fox News, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki appeared flustered and unprepared. "Well, I have no validation of those statistics," said Psaki. "There are a range of ways that you can get your intelligence briefings on the road, in the White House, and I know that he receives those whenever he can."

Media Ignores Obama’s 60 Minutes
Ratings Collapse – Down 69% in a Week

30 replie(s)
Gateway Pundit, by Kristinn Taylor    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/30/2014 5:36:40 AM     Post Reply
The sympathetic news media is avoiding mentioning his name, instead they are blaming the lack of a football intro for the massive collapse in ratings Sunday night for President Barack Obama’s appearance on CBS’ 60 Minutes. Americans turned away from watching Obama even though he was being interviewed about the nation’s new war on ISIS. For example, Deadline Hollywood didn’t even mention Obama’s 60 Minutes interview when reporting on the drop in viewers. “With no football lead-in, CBS’ Sunday lineup fell from last week. As expected, the drop was steepest at 7 PM, with 60 Minutes (1.1) off by 69%

Rosie O´Donnell, Whoopi Goldberg
get in shouting match in front
of ´The View´ studio audience

30 replie(s)
New York Daily News, by Don Kaplan    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 9/30/2014 5:43:43 AM     Post Reply
Well, that didn’t take long. Just two weeks into the new season of “The View,” co-hosts Rosie O’Donnell and Whoopi Goldberg tore into each other during a commercial break — in front of their stunned studio audience. The spat erupted Thursday after Goldberg interrupted O’Donnell to go to a commercial break before the mother of five was finished commenting in a “Hot Topic” discussion about spanking children on the ABC gabfest. O’Donnell refuses to wear an earpiece to stay in contact with producers while the live show is airing, so she had no clue it was time to stop talking.

CDC: Ebola confirmed in Dallas patient
30 replie(s)
WFAA-TV [Dallas, TX] **, by Janet St. James & Josh Davis *    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 10/1/2014 5:35:31 AM     Post Reply
Dallas - A patient in a Dallas hospital was confirmed Tuesday to have the deadly Ebola virus, the Centers for Disease Control said Tuesday. (Snip) September 19: The adult patient boards a flight to the U.S. in Liberia after being screened for Ebola symptoms - September 20: The patient arrives in the United States - September 24: Patient shows first symptoms of Ebola - September 26: Patient seeks initial medical care - September 28: Patient admitted to Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas - A Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital spokesman said the patient has been in isolation since he arrived on Sunday,

Post Reply   Close thread 792025

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google

© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.