A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


Why Mitt Romney should not be
the 2016 GOP Nominee

American Thinker, by S. John Massoud

Original Article

Posted By:mikkins2, 7/9/2014 6:51:37 PM

Lately there has been a lot of buzz about having Mitt Romney as the GOP nominee in 2016. And there can be little doubt that many things Mitt talked about from 2007 to 2012 have come true (crumbling of Iraq, Putin being our number one geo-political foe, Obamacare not being workable). And while there was no bigger supporter of Mitt Romney than I was (for the record I was a member of a group called Evangelical Christians for Mitt Romney and I also managed several precincts in Shenandoah County Virginia for the Romney campaign during the 2012 primary) the fact

Comments:
The author has some good points but in the end misses the true reason why Romney lost and would not win in 2016.

Its not a "like" issue with Romney. Its a trust issue.
Our government is truly broken and is in need of drastic change. Romney was and is not trusted enough to enact the change that is desperately needed in Washington D.C.; reign in government spending, ending cronyism, and the use of taxpayer money for a politicians personal gain.

This is why Romney lost and would again.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Coy860, 7/9/2014 7:03:59 PM     (No. 9917411)

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again but expecting a different result.
Romney the re-tread..sheesh.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    16 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: eoddad, 7/9/2014 7:07:53 PM     (No. 9917415)

If Romney could not win in 2012 with the mess Obozo had made he never will.

I Voted for Romney. We have Run one RINO after another and we keep loosing. We need a CONSERVATIVE.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    32 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: shamus, 7/9/2014 7:11:45 PM     (No. 9917418)

Romney´s a loser.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    15 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: SpeedMaster, 7/9/2014 7:12:39 PM     (No. 9917419)

For a Republican to win, he MUST capture the votes from the "Reagan Democrats", who for years have been sold down the river by the Chamber of Commerce (establishment). Mitt Romney oozes CoC.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    35 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Blackeagle, 7/9/2014 7:20:02 PM     (No. 9917430)

If the GOP runs with the same pack of characters they did in 2012, Mitt would be easily renominated. I´m not sure what adding Cruz or Rand Paul to the mix would change.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    8 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Whamdbambam, 7/9/2014 7:26:55 PM     (No. 9917441)

If he could run only against Republicans, he´d be a real pit bull.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    25 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Bad Dog, 7/9/2014 7:29:22 PM     (No. 9917444)

Not only would Romney NOT win in 2016, but he would play dirtier against his Republican opponents than he would against Hillary, or Lizzie Warren. Imagine it: Romney with his binder full of women, ´´attacking´´ his woman opponent..... oh, the howls of indignation!! the squeals of misogyny!!

Please, GOP, let´s not do this again. Sure, a recent poll says more people wish Romney had been elected in 2012, but that does not - NOT, GOP Estab - mean we want to go this route again in 2016.

I too voted for Romney, and in fact I preferred him in 2008. But Romney still speaks about the economy as his top issue. Sure, it´s faltering still looming over our necks, but there are sooooo many more issues sharing the front burner now than there were a mere 2 years ago. Has he even mentioned any of the current geopolitical situations we´ve gotten into lately? Any of the domestic social issues? Anything else, but the economy and insults at Obama? Hey - I love those, but we have to speak to the country about WHAT IS GOOD about America, and about conservatism, and I just don´t believe someone who describes himself as a ´´severe´´ conservative knows how to do that. (And just what did that mean, anyway.... severe....?? Too weird.)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    21 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: SheikYerBooty, 7/9/2014 7:35:21 PM     (No. 9917452)

Romney doesn´t have the stomach for the fight which is why he folded up like a cheap lawn chair in 2012. The RINO war on it´s base also weighed heavily in Romney´s loss.

Getting advice from Karl Rove the biggest loser ($400 million of OPM squandered on losing RINO candidates in 2012) and hiring McCain´s advisors was a huge blunder as well.

The biggest problem Romney and the rest of RINO liberals have is that they are out of touch with middle America.

Get ready for Jeb "illegal immigration is an act of love and not a felony" Bush to be the nominee in 2016.

















  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    15 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: ida Lou Pino, 7/9/2014 7:37:57 PM     (No. 9917456)

Bring back John McCain!

That is - - if Bob Dole doesn´t want it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    26 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Nevadadad46, 7/9/2014 8:05:40 PM     (No. 9917490)

Romney should know better than to run again. I sure hope he knows better. He´s a disaster!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    15 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Yorkiemom, 7/9/2014 8:22:27 PM     (No. 9917509)

Yeah, we sure don´t want a decent, honest, hardworking, smart person for our next president. And, he´s not conservative enough for a lot of people. Let´s hope Hillary wins and continues the Obama policies.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: TXknitter, 7/9/2014 9:18:38 PM     (No. 9917593)

Just because Romney is decent and hardworking does not mean he should be President. His God-given gifts have always centered around business. He does not have a stellar history as an elected politician. I bet his wife wishes he would quit being a round peg trying to fit himself into a square hole. I agree with others and think he isn´t running. He is helping the GOP establishment and strategically greasing the skids ($$$) for a son´s political career.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    25 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: ColonialAmerican1623, 7/9/2014 9:44:29 PM     (No. 9917632)

I would vote for Mitt any day over Jeb, but we need a pit bull.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    8 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: PageTurner, 7/9/2014 11:25:55 PM     (No. 9917751)

What OP and #13 said.

I also agree very much with the article - that 47% remark of his, caught on tape by a Jimmy Carter slimeball, was his death knell. Nobody should be saying such words, as if people LIKE to be unemployed and on food stamps. That killed his chances off.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: locarno, 7/9/2014 11:33:58 PM     (No. 9917758)

Agree with #11. Reading the postings here, its not hard to see why Romney lost. Until we settle this little ´war´ we´re in, we can forget winning the presidency anytime soon. The article wants us to find ´find a standard bearer who will unite the GOP and lead us to victory in 2016.´ Like who? Rand Paul? The knives have already come out on him for his comments on immigration. Ted Cruz? Can anyone imagine the GOP establishment $$$ supporting him for President?

The point I´m trying to make here is that sometimes politics is a matter of degrees. Okay, so Mitt wasn´t the perfect Reagan-Conservative we´d all like to vote for. But he was a 100 more competent and agreeable than the dolt thats in there now. Unless we begin to rebuild the Republican brand into the party that supports a strong America, the free market, and a restoration of Constitutional rule, we can forget the Presidency.

The lo-fo/media/leftist axis is well oiled and ready to cheat, lie, and corrupt in ANY way possible to win. So as long as we keep eating our own, hello President Hillary.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: SouthSanAntonio, 7/10/2014 1:11:41 AM     (No. 9917822)

If Romney couldn´t beat the worst president in the history of this once-great nation, he doesn´t deserve a second chance.

I voted for Romney. I know he would have done about 1,000,000,000,000 times better job than Øvomit these past couple of years.

But he is the worst looser in history, and he is toast.

Besides, after the least two elections, we know a RINO will never get the base fired up, much less get any undecided votes. Hey, if they are going to vote for a DemonRAT-lite, they might was well vote for the real thing...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    7 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Trigger2, 7/10/2014 4:17:06 AM     (No. 9917859)

We need a competent Republican Governor to run, not Romney, not Jeb Bush, and certainly no one from congress who never ran anything.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: oldsfc, 7/10/2014 5:15:33 PM     (No. 9918790)

I will not vote for a RINO. It´s like voting for a liberal Democrat. I will not fall for the GOP/Rove scare tactics. A stand must be made. If not now, when?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 791642




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "mikkins2"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "mikkins2"



Washington is divided because
it has abandoned federalism
Washington Examiner, by Philip Klein    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 8/14/2014 7:24:03 PM     Post Reply
It may sound pedestrian to point out, but it’s critical to restate why it’s so important that our nation is called the United States of America, and not simply America. The full name emphasizes that the Founders viewed the nation not as one monolithic entity but as a union of sovereign entities delegating limited powers to a central government.To preserve this balance, the Founders put a number of checks in the U.S. Constitution, most notably creating the Senate, which allows for equal membership from every state, thus preventing states with larger populations from running roughshod over the interests of smaller

Krugman Upended by His Own Logic
American Spectator, by Andrew B. Wilson    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 8/14/2014 7:00:06 PM     Post Reply
In a recent New York Times column, Paul Krugman made the assertion that “self-proclaimed libertarians deal with the problem of market failure both by pretending that it doesn’t happen and by imagining government as much worse than it really is.” But suppose we flip that around — substituting “muddle-headed progressives” for “self-proclaimed libertarians” and “government failure” for “market failure.” Compliments to Per Bylund, a research professor at the Hankamer School of Business at Baylor University, for making the necessary adjustments in a blog post at Mises. org. This is what you get: Muddle-headed progressives deal with the problem of government

Chris McDaniel Files Legal Challenge
After GOP Refuses to Review Evidence
Bretbart´s Big Government, by Matthew Boyle    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 8/14/2014 6:45:15 PM     Post Reply
Mississippi State Sen. Chris McDaniel has filed his official challenge of the June 24 GOP primary runoff results against incumbent Sen. Thad Cochran (R-MS) in state court, he and his lead attorney Mitch Tyner announced Thursday. "Republicans did not elect the nominee on June 24," McDaniel said in a statement, adding that “we are excited for the opportunity for Republicans to reclaim their primary process.” "This challenge is not about the candidates,” McDaniel said. “It is about the integrity of Mississippi´s election process, and we are committed to ensuring that process is accurate and fair for future Republican candidates.”

   

 



 
On Immigration, G.O.P. Starts
to Embrace Tea Party
New York Times, by Jonathan Weisman    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 8/13/2014 11:38:41 AM     Post Reply
Late last month, as members of Congress were poised to leave for their summer recess, the House Republicans’ top policy experts found themselves in a barren conference room in the Capitol’s basement, negotiating with the party’s most ardent opponents of immigration overhaul. As senior members of the Judiciary Committee looked on, the opponents — Representatives Raúl R. Labrador of Idaho, Louie Gohmert of Texas, Steve King of Iowa and Mo Brooks of Alabama — reshaped two bills to address the rush of unaccompanied children trying to enter the country illegally. Representative Michele Bachmann, Republican of Minnesota, was there, too, and she

Who rules America?
Allan J. Lichtman, by The Hill    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 8/13/2014 11:25:47 AM     Post Reply
A shattering new study by two political science professors has found that ordinary Americans have virtually no impact whatsoever on the making of national policy in our country. The analysts found that rich individuals and business-controlled interest groups largely shape policy outcomes in the United States. This study should be a loud wake-up call to the vast majority of Americans who are bypassed by their government. To reclaim the promise of American democracy, ordinary citizens must act positively to change the relationship between the people and our government The new study, with the jaw-clenching title of "Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites,

Without a Vision, GOP Senators Seek
Love in All the Wrong Places
Bretbart´s Big Government, by Robert W. Patterson    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 8/13/2014 11:02:32 AM     Post Reply
Roger Clegg and Hans A. von Spakovsky deserve high praise for debunking the latest GOP brainchild that does nothing to help the party nationally — a Senate resolution encouraging all private-sector employers to adopt the National Football League’s “Rooney Rule” — and illustrating that “conservative” Republicans, too, can be limousine liberals. Five GOP senators — including presidential hopefuls Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, and Rob Portman — think both commercial and nonprofit enterprises should, per the NFL and Black Entertainment Television founder Robert L. Johnson, interview up to at least two “minority” candidates for every management or professional opening. Clegg and

Changing Border Bill and Re-Voting Before
Saturday Would Violate Boehner´s Own Rule
Bretbart´s Big Government, by Matthew Boyle    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 8/1/2014 8:26:12 AM     Post Reply
If the House makes any changes whatsoever to the immigration bill that blew up and died before Speaker John Boehner tried to bring it back to life—and then votes on those changes on Thursday evening or on Friday—it would be a violation of Boehner’s own 72-hour rule. “I proposed a 72-hour minimum time for members to read bills,” Boehner said as House minority leader on May 14, 2009. “I think it’s important that members do have a chance.” "Americans not only expect lawmakers to know what they’re voting on, they deserve to know what’s in these bills as well,” Boehner added on

House border bill implodes, and Ted Cruz
stands amid wreckage (+ video)
Christian Science Monitor, by Francine Kiefer    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 8/1/2014 6:19:08 AM     Post Reply
On Thursday, the House GOP imploded over its border bill to solve the child-migrant crisis, pulling the legislation from the floor for lack of votes. And there, standing among the legislative wreckage, stood the proud senator from Texas, Ted Cruz. Not literally, of course. But the tea party Texan is once again smack in the middle of a House Republican debacle. With a reach as wide as his state, the freshman senator has his arm around conservative House Republicans. He has been lobbying them over Chick-fil-A and pizza to change the House bill “to end Obama’s amnesty.” By that he

Rep. Chris Van Hollen: ‘Speaker Cruz’
Politico, by Sarah Smith    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 8/1/2014 5:48:06 AM     Post Reply
Rep. Chris Van Hollen slammed House Republicans on Thursday, saying members now have to check with “Speaker Cruz” to get any legislation passed. “It was Senator Cruz calling the shots, and that’s why people around here are calling him ‘Speaker Cruz’ today,” the Maryland Democrat said to MSNBC’s Alex Wagner. “It means when Speaker Boehner says he’s going to get something done from now on, he’d better be checking with Senator Cruz to see if he’s gonna get the votes because clearly the new leadership team isn’t up to the task.” Van Hollen’s jab came as the GOP fought over a

Two Thumbs Down
American Spectator, by Larry Thornberry    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 8/1/2014 5:24:56 AM     Post Reply
Harry Enten, an analyst with FiveThirtyEight, a political website owned by ESPN, claims he can prove with charts and graphs that Republican Florida Governor Rick Scott and his Democratic challenger Charlie Crist are the most unpopular pair to face each other in a governor’s race for at least the last decade. Without even consulting the charts and graphs, few Floridians outside of Scott’s or Crist’s camp would argue with Enten. Both candidates’ favorable/unfavorable ratings are below water. Scott’s ratings have been in the unfavorable range for almost the entire three-years-plus he has been governor. He has mostly done what he ran

The Three Faces of Cronyism
American Thinker, by C. Edmund Wright    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 8/1/2014 5:09:17 AM     Post Reply
There has been a lot said in recent years by Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh, and other conservatives about crony capitalism – or if you prefer, crony socialism, crony government, corporatism – or just plain cronyism. Whatever you call it, this conversation is increasingly vital as government grows and continues to pervert markets by picking winners and losers as a way to obtain wealth for powerful lawmakers and their fund-raisers and friends. This rampant cronyism is one of the most insidious outgrowths of a government gone wild, and has become a swirling vortex of self sustaining and systemic corruption. Thus, the focus

Former Senators Take Revolving
Door Lobbying International
Bretbart´s Big Government, by Wynton Hall    Original Article
Posted By: mikkins2- 8/1/2014 4:44:05 AM     Post Reply
Former U.S. Sens. John Breaux (D-LA) and Trent Lott (R-MS), who recently merged with international law giant Squire Patton Boggs, say they are excited to leverage their crony lobbying contacts globally on behalf of the world´s highest corporate bidders. "Now we have the opportunity to be able to tell these clients that we’ve had that not only can we do lobbying work on the Hill, but now we can do transactional work anywhere in the world for them,” Breaux told The Hill. To help facilitate such "transactional work," Breaux and Lott say they must convince foreign clients that lobbying is not the
Please split wide headlines.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



´We don´t have a strategy yet´: Obama
stuns Washington by admitting he
is clueless about tackling ISIS

54 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 8/29/2014 4:25:33 AM     Post Reply
President Barack Obama said during a Thursday press conference that his administration doesn´t have a plan worked out yet for defeating the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) in Syria. [Snip] ´What I´ve seen in some of the news reports suggests that folks are getting a little further ahead of where we´re at than we currently are,´ Obama cautioned. He mentioned four times his intention to seek advice from Capitol Hill before deploying more military assets in the Middle East, likely in response to concerns from members of the House and Senate that he was unconstitutionally freezing them out.

Obama: ‘We Don´t
Have a Strategy Yet’

48 replie(s)
Daily Beast, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 8/28/2014 4:38:42 PM     Post Reply
In a statement from the White House on Thursday, President Obama addressed the world on fire. ISIS terrorists are losing arms and equipment because of U.S. strikes, Obama said, adding that “our focus right now is to protect American personnel on the ground in Iraq.” However, he also cautioned against rushing in. "I don´t want to put the cart before the horse, we don´t have a strategy yet," he said. The Daily Beast reported that the president asked for a war plan for ISIS in Syria by Friday. On the topic of the slow-motion invasion of Ukraine by Russia, Obama

Pelosi: Women Were ´Starved,´
´Force-Fed,´ ´Could Barely
Speak in Their Homes´

42 replie(s)
Cybercast News Service, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: mitzi- 8/29/2014 9:11:36 AM     Post Reply
Victims then, and victims now: American women were not "given" the right to vote. They had to fight for it, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told a conference call on Thursday. "It was a struggle all the way," she said. "Women marched. Women starved. Women were starved. Women were force-fed. Women could barely speak up in their own homes. "Women left their homes to take the message. And it was successful, and the right to vote, again, so precious, so hard fought...We hope women will continue to exercise forcefully, because then all of the issues we care about, whether it´s equal

Burger King’s Bonanza: The media
finally wake up to corporate chicanery

41 replie(s)
Fox News, by Howard Kurtz    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 8/28/2014 8:05:51 AM     Post Reply
I feel confident in saying that most Americans are disgusted by the perfectly legal practice of U.S. companies avoiding taxes by incorporating in another country. So why does it take a whopper of a story to get the media to pay attention? Burger King, as you know, is moving to buy the Canadian chain Tim Hortons, and this is more about dollars than doughnuts. The hamburger giant plans to move its headquarters to Canada, thereby slashing its Treasury tax bill. The White House doesn’t like it. Democrats don’t like it. The Republicans don’t like it. And, as usual, it doesn’t look like Washington

Obama’s ‘schmoozing’ to
cause holiday travel havoc

33 replie(s)
New York Post, by Emily Smith    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 8/28/2014 5:29:21 AM     Post Reply
President Obama’s plan to schmooze Wall Street honchos at a Westchester fund-raiser Friday is grounding wealthy weekenders who planned to fly to the Hamptons or Nantucket for the Labor Day holiday. The FAA has issued a no-fly warning that extends for most of Friday and all day Saturday through Sunday, grounding seaplanes to East Hampton, Montauk, Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket. On Friday, Obama will be feted at the home of one of his top bundlers, 32 Advisors’ Robert Wolf, in the aptly-named Purchase, NY, with 250 high-rollers paying up to $32,000 each to bend Obama’s ear. Obama will then fly

Fox’s Ed Henry: Obama’s ‘No Strategy’
Remark a ‘Disaster’ for WH

33 replie(s)
Mediaite, by Josh Feldman    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 8/28/2014 9:49:00 PM     Post Reply
Megyn Kelly was incredibly bewildered Thursday night at President Obama‘s comment about having no concrete Syria strategy yet. Ed Henry was very blunt in telling Kelly that this is an unqualified “disaster” for the White House. Henry admitted he was “stunned” that none of his colleagues in the briefing room followed up on that remark of the president’s, especially considering how quickly after the presser the White House jumped right into “damage control mode.” And whereas last night Henry blew Kelly’s mind by telling her Obama would be attending one fundraiser on Friday, he told her tonight that actually, it’s going to

Chelsea Clinton Is Leaving NBC News
32 replie(s)
People, by Sharon Cotliar    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 8/29/2014 11:01:16 AM     Post Reply
Chelsea Clinton says she´s stepping out of her correspondent job as she looks forward to taking on mom duties After not quite three years as a special correspondent for NBC News – and with just a little while until she and husband Marc Mezvinsky are expected to become parents – the former first daughter is now leaving that position, she tells PEOPLE in a statement, "to continue focusing on my work at the Clinton Foundation and as Marc and I look forward to welcoming our first child." Having specialized in feel-good stories of "remarkable people and organizations making a profound

CA Looks To Ban
Confederate Flag

28 replie(s)
Human Events, by Johnny Kampis     Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 8/28/2014 12:58:44 PM     Post Reply
CULLMAN, Ala. — California is looking to bar the “Stars and Bars.” A bill sits on Gov. Jerry Brown’s desk to ban California from displaying or selling the Confederate flag or objects with images of it. The state’s Legislature passed the bill nearly unanimously last week. Assemblyman Isadore Hall III, D-Compton, introduced the legislation after his mother discovered the Capitol gift shop sold a replica of Confederate money that contained a picture of the flag, according to the L.A. Times. The lone dissenting vote among the 67 cast was from former California GOP gubernatorial candidate Tim Donnelly of Twin Peaks. He argued

Why Karl Rove and the GOP
Establishment Will Lose Again

27 replie(s)
American Thinker, by C. Edmund Wright    Original Article
Posted By: SpeedMaster- 8/29/2014 8:12:45 AM     Post Reply
Karl Rove is at it once again. The so-called “strategist” is again confusing strategy with tactics, and is about to blow easy Senate pickups in Arkansas and North Carolina. This is not merely snatching defeat from the jaws of victory -- this is snatching defeat from the bowels of victory -- in astonishing tone-deaf fashion. There is absolutely no excuse for not winning these two races. So how is the one-time “boy genius” doing this? By running ads attacking Senators Mark Pryor and Kay Hagan from the left. Yes, you heard that right. Rove’s Crossroads GPS PAC is insisting in their latest

It´s coming: Romney for president redux
26 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Rick Moran    Original Article
Posted By: zephyrgirl- 8/28/2014 12:43:24 PM     Post Reply
The last two Republican candidates for president have been among the weakest GOP candidates in 50 years. Barack Obama presented Mitt Romney with a gift in 2012: A struggling economy, sluggish growth, a paucity of jobs, and a health care law that was extremely unpopular. In what should have been a landslide rejection of Obama´s policies, Romney flubbed it big time and allowed his opponent to define him - and Republicans - in the most unflattering way imaginable. You would have hoped that Romney would have retired from the public arena and kept a low profile as other losers have done in

Captives held by Islamic
State were waterboarded

26 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Adam Goldman & Julie Tate    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 8/28/2014 4:30:40 PM     Post Reply
At least four hostages held in Syria by the Islamic State, including an American journalist who was recently executed by the group, were waterboarded in the early part of their captivity, according to people familiar with the treatment of the kidnapped Westerners. James Foley was among the four who were waterboarded several times by Islamic State militants who appeared to model the technique on the CIA’s use of waterboarding to interrogate suspected terrorists after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. The victims of waterboarding are often strapped down on gurneys or benches while cold water is poured over a cloth covering

‘Significant increase’ in
terror chatter as haunting
anniversary of 9/11 nears

26 replie(s)
Washington Times, by Douglas Ernst    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 8/28/2014 10:15:19 PM     Post Reply
intelligence community has observed a “significant increase” in chatter among terrorist organizations as the 13th anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks nears. “We’ve noticed a significant increase in chatter among Islamic terrorist organizations overseas both on the Internet and phone lines,” a U.S. government official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told The Blaze. While the intelligence community can not pinpoint whether or not an attack is planned, the official said that agencies “did see this kind of increase in chatter before the September 11 attacks.”

   

Post Reply   Close thread 791642





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS