A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


Stunning: California Couple
Says They Were Asked to
House Immigrant Children

RushLimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh

Original Article

Posted By:KarenJ1, 7/8/2014 3:30:26 PM

RUSH: This is Ann and Ed in Southern California. Welcome. It´s great to have you on the phone. Hello. ANN: Hello. RUSH: Hi. ANN: Hi, Rush. How are you? RUSH: Just fine. Thank you very much. ANN: Great. Well, we have some interesting news. My husband Eddie is on the phone with us. We live in Southern California, and we´re Catholic, active Catholics in our community, and there was a town hall meeting last evening, emergency meeting called by our local parish priest, ordered by our bishop (unintelligible) and the Archdiocese of San Bernardino. They have made the decision that they´re going to absorb the

Comments:
This was indeed a stunning phone call. It is unbelievable that the regime called the Bishop´s office and told them to house these illegals encouraging people to take them into their homes. There´s no way I would take lice ridden, diseased people into my home! The caller´s husband is a doctor and is terrified of what they may be bringing to our country. It is one of the most shocking calls I have heard on Rush´s show.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Coy860, 7/8/2014 3:35:06 PM     (No. 9915554)

Please fix link.
Link appears to be working fine. Staff

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    9 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: stevendm, 7/8/2014 3:38:49 PM     (No. 9915558)

I think every Democratic voter should be forced to take in 1/2 dozen of these third world urchins. After all, it is such a great idea to have them in the US.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    24 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: BaseballFan, 7/8/2014 3:47:55 PM     (No. 9915572)

A couple of thoughts on this:

1) The Catholic Church has long been in favor of "looking the other way" with respect to illegal immigrants. (And I say that as a life-long and practicing Catholic).

2) They´re asking parishioners to house/clothe/feed these illegal immigrants "for up to a month". But what then? Where do they go?

3) If you drive I-15 South from Nevada into Southern California, there´s an agricultural checkpoint at / near the state line. I find it terribly ironic that the state of California (via the USDA - e.g., the federal government) are more concerned with a fruit fly than with all the various diseases that are being brought in via this swarm of illegal immigrants.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    36 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: FL_Absentee_Voter, 7/8/2014 3:49:11 PM     (No. 9915575)

So the caliphate now turns to the Roman Catholic Church for assistance in its time of need? Gives a whole new meaning to the term, "Church of Convenience."

And 30 days? Just what are parishioners like the Ann and Ed expected to do when 30, 45, 60 days pass and STILL no one from ICE or HHS is answering the phone?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Doctor P, 7/8/2014 3:49:52 PM     (No. 9915576)

Sounds like a great rare THIRD amendment case in the making.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Hazymac, 7/8/2014 3:55:04 PM     (No. 9915588)

What next? The Third Amendment is hardly ever mentioned or even remembered, but if "Soldier" is changed to "illegal alien," "gang member," or "foreign invader" being quartered in our residences, that´s what this endlessly corrupt Regime is seeking. As to whether the present is a time of peace or war, that´s a matter of opinion. Considering the expansively coercive attitudes of our wayward rulers toward us, the latter makes more sense.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Charactercounts, 7/8/2014 4:04:02 PM     (No. 9915605)

#3, the annual Bishop´s Appeal lists so many charitable outreach activities to aliens it seems as if that´s all they´re collecting for.

Why should the Church and its members do anything to aid this administration after the way it has treated the Church, and people of good will of all Judeo-Christian faiths?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    39 persons like this.


   

 

R-VAR_AD
  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: walli, 7/8/2014 4:06:56 PM     (No. 9915611)

Well, it´s not government asking people to take in the illegals, is it. A church can ask members if they wish and as long as it is voluntary, no violation of the 3rd Amendment. (No doubt a violation of immigration laws, though.) This is how the Catholic Church has always seen its role, and while I would advise anyone against risking the health and safety of their own families, I am not at all surprised that the church has taken this position. As they truly believe this is what Christ would have them do, they are consistent in their actions. Non-Catholics (like me) should understand that we largely agree with Catholics about many, many topics, but the death penalty and immigration are two areas where many conservatives will disagree with the Catholic Church.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    15 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: droopydog, 7/8/2014 4:09:58 PM     (No. 9915615)

Do they have to provide them free birth control?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: NYMom, 7/8/2014 4:12:54 PM     (No. 9915621)

#2 is exactly right. They should instead be going through the Democratic voter list. Let these diseased illegals bunk with them.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: berthabutt, 7/8/2014 4:16:20 PM     (No. 9915624)

Set up tents on White House lawn for Obamaville. He can cherish them all much closer there.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: MamaElephant, 7/8/2014 4:16:44 PM     (No. 9915626)

Any CA LDotters have some wisdom about what might happen if these charitible Californians ask their "guests" to leave and the guests decline to do so? I believe it´s a matter for civil litigation and not law enforcement. Are they tenants? Squatters? What are their rights once they´re through the door?


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: PoliticalJunky, 7/8/2014 4:22:39 PM     (No. 9915637)

Two things even more stunning are that the Bishop agreed and asked his congregation to accept some children and this couple agreed to do it. If they don´t withdraw their assent they will have these children forever and be putting them through college.

Of course, all the people coming are Catholics. Maybe the Bishop sees advantage to more Catholics. This was urged on French Canadians in Canada where the church urged them to have children to outnumber the oter Canadians.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: TheOwl, 7/8/2014 4:24:30 PM     (No. 9915640)

And insurance liability rates go sky high trying to cover everything that will go wrong while the illegal immigrant children are housed in their homes??? And may these illegal immigrant children later SUE for insufficient care in their view, while so housed? Or supposed abuse??

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: M2, 7/8/2014 4:29:21 PM     (No. 9915647)

I too heard the phone call on Rush´s show today. It is beyond the pale for the government of the United States to call Catholic Bishops who then insist that their parishioners take these immigrants into their own homes. As if that were not bad enough, they are then asked not to speak to any media people about it.

These immigrants are then fanned out across the entire country carrying God knows what kinds of plagues. This is beginning to look positively biblical.

When you combine this apocalyptic immigrant story, (with sole credit going directly to Barack Obama) with the accelerated war that is going on in Israel as we speak, it is getting downright scary at this point.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: watashiyo, 7/8/2014 4:50:20 PM     (No. 9915677)

Catholics circumvented immigration law by giving refuge to the illegal aliens. Members became accomplice to the crime by supporting and aiding the church. What is America doing? Asking its citizen to commit a crime at the risk of exposing themselves to foreign diseases? This is Twilight Zone. Imagine, Catholic church asking its congregations to commit a crime, to sin, to willfully break the law of the land. ....america is lost.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: bdog, 7/8/2014 5:14:24 PM     (No. 9915707)

Funny, when W wanted to use churches to help take care of the poor, the left went nuts and called it a violation of the separation of church and state.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    20 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: mitzi, 7/8/2014 5:26:56 PM     (No. 9915723)

#16 - A sin is an offense against the law of God, not the state.

If an offense against the state were a sin - then that would mean the state has established a religion and that in itself is against the Constitution.

Now - if I obeyed the law such as HHS mandates - that would be a sin!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Edgelady, 7/8/2014 5:42:46 PM     (No. 9915736)

But wait a minute -- what about those FEMA camps, who are they for?

Six or so years ago I´d listen to about 30 minutes of crazy Alex Jones out of Austin while I was driving back roads on Sundays. He was telling people these FEMA camps were being formed back then -- that things were being set up - but for what? An emergency, yes - but what emergency? And have any of them been used??

And why aren´t they being used now? Will people who are protesting the buses be taken there? All of this is crazy.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    16 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: politicalguru, 7/8/2014 5:43:36 PM     (No. 9915741)

I thought I read a story not too long ago where New York said is was against the law to feed the homeless because the food your feeding might not meet health department regulations. What if you don´t provide the proper food for these people?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Lucky4, 7/8/2014 5:44:41 PM     (No. 9915742)

Who is screening these people they are taking in? They can be gang members, murders, criminals and all kinds of things. I would never agree to that. I think it is very odd that 70% of the people at the church meeting said they would do it. If this actually happens, there will be some real horror stories that come out this kind of thing, truly bad things will happen to some people.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    16 persons like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Coy860, 7/8/2014 6:33:29 PM     (No. 9915809)

Maybe the Bishop and parishioners need to know:
Immigration law, 8 US Code 1324 states that it is a crime to, either knowingly or recklessly, “conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, or attempt to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection… transport, or move or attempt to transport or move” or to even “encourage or induce” an illegal alien “to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowingly or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law.” It is not only a crime to actually commit these offenses, but it is a crime to even attempt to do so. Anyone found guilty of violating 8 US Code 1324 is subject to fines, prison or both.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    16 persons like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: Geelabeela828, 7/8/2014 6:39:17 PM     (No. 9915816)

I know Christ said that He came to divide and not unite and I cannot think of a better example to illustrate that than what is happening today to my Catholic Church.

That being said, tomorrow I am going to call my priest and ask what my parish is doing concerning these "immigrants" and see if his response is similar to California.

In the meantime, I will not give one thin dime to them, but to organizations I know are on our side. Wow, we are living in interesting times!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: ByteGuru, 7/8/2014 6:49:13 PM     (No. 9915829)

From a legal point of view one must refuse if asked to house aliens. There are too many cases of squatters being accorded ´rights´ that they have no reason to have. Leftist ambulance chasers will judge shop until they find one that will sign eviction papers for removing YOU, not your house ´guests´, you from your home.

Be polite. Don´t threaten someone, the Feds, or Zero himself no matter how you feel about this whole situation. Remember you may be being recorded (remember the NSA?). Just say "NO."

Also be sure that your neighbors know that if someone in your home gets sick because your neighbor hosts a horde of illegals, you expect him to pay for your care and possibly will bring legal charges against him.

Sound cold? Maybe so but IMO our citizens must draw the line somewhere. So it´s Tuff tacos, Pancho. You should have stayed home and worked to improve your own backyard.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: attorneyforfreedom, 7/8/2014 7:05:50 PM     (No. 9915844)

to #12 and 22
Yes there will be legal consequences. The problem is that we have a lawless administration. The constitution and "laws" mean nothing unless the government needs to enforce something to keep you, the working tax paying citizen, from getting in their way.
There will eventually be an executive order that requires American families to "house" the illegals who the government already refers to as "refugees". Doesn´t matter what the constitution says. Things are escalating around the world.

Stand your ground and have the courage of your convictions.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    16 persons like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: preciosodrogas, 7/8/2014 7:18:16 PM     (No. 9915853)

I don´t see a problem with government asking the churches to pitch in and help out. I didn´t see the problem when W suggested it, I don´t see a problem now. Everyone is still free to say no.
And while I see taking in the poor and the stranger as a Christian duty and blessing I don´t think it applies to aiding and abetting crimes. I also do not see aiding and abetting the government in perpetuating a crime as a Christian duty. Moreover, to the extent they are helping to spread disease, I do not see a Christian duty. Finally, I do not see a Christian duty in subverting the laws of the US that result in a burden upon fellow Americans.
I might see things differently if the poor did not have a home. But they do and they can go back to it. This is simply helping people break the law to gain something they are not entitled to have. They are helping these people steal from fellow Americans. That is not a Christian duty.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: hamrman, 7/8/2014 7:23:30 PM     (No. 9915860)

No way! Although we could probably house a couple thousand in Washington DC!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    7 persons like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: ktwo, 7/8/2014 7:23:48 PM     (No. 9915861)

It is no surprise to see the Catholic Church taking that position. It can if it wants.

But the individual should be careful. All sorts of legal woes may arise from offering strangers a place in your home. And no Bishop can exempt you from those.

The RC church has cathedrals and parish halls and schools and camps and retreats. I would tell the Bishop to contact me again when those all overflow.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 791451




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"



Megyn Kelly Responds to
Bill Ayers ‘Cyborg’ Diss
Mediaite, by Eddie Scarry    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 9/18/2014 10:00:59 PM     Post Reply
Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly shot back Thursday at former U.S. domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, who in a recent interview said that Kelly was has “very cold” eyes and that she’s “like a Cyborg.” “Only when I’m looking at a man who bombed the USA and home of a little boy, Bill!” Kelly wrote on Twitter. Kelly also took a jab at Salon, the online publication that printed Ayers’s remarks, calling it a “left-wing rag.” Kelly conducted an uncomfortably tense interview with Ayers over the summer. Ayers told Salon that the interview itself wasn’t “a big deal,” but that Kelly is “like a

“Megyn Kelly’s eyes are very cold”:
Bill Ayers on his Fox News appearance,
education “reform” and the problem
with the Ivy League
Salon Magazine, by David Masciotra    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 9/18/2014 9:57:51 PM     Post Reply
Bill Ayers, according to the right, is Barack Obama’s terrorist trainer and ghostwriter. Upon further inspection, Ayers is nothing quite as dramatic or fearsome. While more famous for his anti-war activities as a founder of the Weather Underground in the 1960s and ‘70s, he is now a committed educator. Retired from his education professorship at the University of Illinois in Chicago, Ayers continues to give lectures to teachers in training, speak at education conferences and agitate against America’s two-tiered educational system – one for rich, one for poor – on behalf of low-income parents, students and instructors. I recently had

US to Assign 3,000 From
US Military to Fight Ebola
Associated Press, by Jim Kuhnhenn    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 9/16/2014 9:11:49 AM     Post Reply
The Obama administration is ramping up its response to West Africa´s Ebola crisis, preparing to assign 3,000 U.S. military personnel to the afflicted region to supply medical and logistical support to overwhelmed local health care systems and to boost the number of beds needed to isolate and treat victims of the epidemic. President Barack Obama planned to announce the stepped up effort Tuesday during a visit to the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta amid alarm that the outbreak could spread and that the deadly virus could mutate into a more easily transmitted disease. The new U.S. muscle comes

WH Can´t Define Victory: ´I Didn’t
Bring My Webster’s Dictionary´
Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 9/12/2014 10:18:31 PM     Post Reply
White House spokesman Josh Earnest couldn´t define what victory against ISIS will look like. "I didn´t bring my Webster´s dictionary," he told a reporter. "What does victory look like here?" asked a reporter. "I mean, you´ve talked about destroying ISIL. I honestly don´t know what that means. What does it mean" "I didn´t bring my Webster´s dictionary with me up here," Earnest said.

Obama travels for briefings
on Ebola, Islamic State
Washington Examiner, by Brian Hughes    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 9/12/2014 9:48:30 PM     Post Reply
President Obama next week will hit the road to receive updates on bombings against the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria and efforts to contain the Ebola virus in Africa. White House press secretary Josh Earnest Friday said Obama would travel to Atlanta Tuesday for a briefing from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on both Ebola and a respiratory virus in the Midwest. The president on Wednesday will conduct a meeting with U.S. Central Command in Tampa, Fla., to review the administration’s efforts to eliminate the Islamic State. The White House has said that Americans should not fear

Tavis Smiley on CNN: ´Racism, Poverty
and Militarism´ Behind Ferguson Shooting
NewsBusters, by Matthew Balan    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 9/12/2014 9:29:41 PM     Post Reply
PBS´s Tavis Smiley shamelessly invoked Dr. Martin Luther King on Thursday´s CNN Tonight, as he commented on the ongoing controversy surrounding the shooting of Michael Brown: "It underscores that Martin [Luther] King was right about what he called the ´triple threat´ almost 50 years ago....He said what´s threatening our very democracy is what he called the triple threat of racism, poverty, and militarism. What we saw in Ferguson was racism, poverty and militarism." [MP3 audio available here; video below] Smiley added that this apparent "triple threat" is a "burden that all of us in this country bear, and we´ve got

The Obama Bomb
PJ Media, by David Solway    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 9/12/2014 9:18:12 PM     Post Reply
In a recent interview with Fox 25 TV in Oklahoma City, Senator Jim Inhofe, the ranking GOP member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, worries that the terror consortium that goes by the name of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) is developing a megabomb to blow up an American city. “We’re in the most dangerous position we’ve ever been in as a nation,” he warns; ISIS is “rapidly developing a method of blowing up a major U.S. city, and people just can’t believe that it’s happening.” What kind of megabomb that might be, its precise components, and how

Pro-Life Group Won’t March in
St. Patrick Parade But Gay Group Will
Cybercast News Service, by Michael W. Chapman    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 9/12/2014 9:08:26 PM     Post Reply
Bill Donohue, president of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, said he will not march in the 2015 St. Patrick’s Day Parade in New York City because he was repeatedly misled by parade committee officials that a pro-life group would be allowed to march, along with a pro-gay contingent, as part of an alleged rules change agreement. “My reasons for withdrawing from the parade have nothing to do with Cardinal Dolan or with gays,” said Donohue in a Sept. 11 statement. “It has to do with being betrayed by the parade committee. They not only told me one thing,

Third Time’s the Charm
Politico, by Robert C. O´Brien & Hugh Hewitt    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 9/12/2014 9:04:52 PM     Post Reply
In early June 1964, a group of Republican governors sought to wrestle control of their party from Barry Goldwater, the Arizona conservative who was about to lead the GOP to one of the most crushing defeats in its history. The governors saw a disaster in the making, and sought a moderate candidate who could capture the imaginations of grassroots Republicans—but also beat President Lyndon Johnson in the general election. Led by Ohio’s James Rhodes—the Republican Governors Association was meeting in Cleveland, and Rhodes was a legendary vote counter—the group included Pennsylvania’s William Scranton and later New York’s Nelson Rockefeller. When

´Atlas Shrugged: Who Is John Galt?´
Hits Theatres This Weekend
Breitbart Big Hollywood, by John Nolte    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 9/12/2014 8:51:07 PM     Post Reply
For those of you waiting for the final chapter of the Atlas Shrugged trilogy, the wait ends today, Friday, when "Atlas Shrugged: Who Is John Galt?" lands in 254 theatres this weekend. You can use this site to find a theatre close to you. Naturally, if the film does well, it should expand in the coming weeks. Here´s the official trailer: Box Office Mojo expects Shrugged fans to bring in a cool $1 million this weekend, which lines up with the openings of the previous chapters. Part 1 (2011) opened to 1.69 million. Part two (2012) bested that with $1.75

Obama Rejected "Best Military Advice"
Real Clear Defense, by Dustin Walker    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 9/12/2014 8:34:43 PM     Post Reply
As he laid out his strategy to combat the Islamic State in both Iraq and Syria, President Obama rejected the “best military advice” of his top military commander in the Middle East. Quoting two U.S. military officials, the Washington Post reported on Wednesday that Army Gen. Lloyd Austin, commander of U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), said “that his best military advice was to send a modest contingent of American troops, principally Special Operations forces, to advise and assist Iraqi army units in fighting the militants.” Austin’s recommendation was taken to the White House by the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen.

Rand Paul Vows to Repeal Every Prior
Executive Order if Elected President
Breitbart Big Government, by Matthew Boyle    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 9/12/2014 8:28:33 PM     Post Reply
MANCHESTER, New Hampshire — In front of a boisterous pub crowd of young voters here, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) ripped into President Obama over executive overreach and even vowed to repeal “all previous executive orders” in one of his first acts as president, should he run. Paul’s comments came to the New Hampshire chapter of Generation Opportunity, a national grassroots conservative group with a libertarian appeal with thousands of young liberty-minded activists nationwide engaged through it. Paul focused much of his remarks on executive overreach by President Barack Obama, saving some of his most interesting points for a question-and-answer session



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Michelle Obama: Americans ´Take for
Granted´ How Much Barack Has Improved US

46 replie(s)
Breitbart Big Government, by Charlie Spiering    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 9/19/2014 10:49:59 AM     Post Reply
First Lady Michelle Obama proudly defended her husband’s record at a Washington, D.C. fundraiser, reminding the attendants how far the country had come since the Obamas entered the White House. “Just think about how different our country looks to children growing up today,” she said. “Think about how our kids take for granted that a black person or a woman can be President of the United States.” She also praised President Obama for changing history on gay marriage and the Supreme Court. “They take it for granted that for the first time in history, there are three brilliant women serving

Obama slaps down top
general and insists there
will be NO combat boots on
the ground in battle against
ISIS as he rallies troops
at air base

41 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by David Martoski    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 9/18/2014 5:14:05 AM     Post Reply
President Barack Obama insisted on Wednesday that he would not send ground troops into Iraqi combat zones to fight the ISIS terrorist army, directly contradicting his top general who said a day earlier that the president asked him for boots-on-the-ground recommendations ´on a case-by-case basis.´ (Snip)´As your commander-in-chief,´ Obama insisted, ´I will not commit you and the rest of our armed forces to fighting another ground war in Iraq.´ On Tuesday, however, Joint Chiefs chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey told lawmakers that circumstances on the ground could drive him to push for American combat troops to be embedded with Iraqi army

Michelle Obama: ´Being Married
to the President ... Can Be Hard´

39 replie(s)
Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 9/18/2014 8:45:39 AM     Post Reply
First Lady Michelle Obama visited sick children at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, where she complained about living at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and being married to the president of the United States. She made the comments in response to being asked about her "favorite part about being in the White House." "About being in the -- about being First Lady is being able to do stuff like this, really. And it is so special for me to get to meet kids like you guys," Michelle Obama started. "Because sometimes living in the White House and being married to the

Rift widens between Obama,
U.S. military over strategy
to fight Islamic State

38 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Craig Whitlock    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 9/18/2014 10:18:03 PM     Post Reply
Flashes of disagreement over how to fight the Islamic State are mounting between President Obama and U.S. military leaders, the latest sign of strain in what often has been an awkward and uneasy relationship. Even as the administration has received congressional backing for its strategy, with the Senate voting Thursday to approve a plan to arm and train Syrian rebels, a series of military leaders have criticized the president’s approach against the Islamic State militant group. Retired Marine Gen. James Mattis, who served under Obama until last year, became the latest high-profile skeptic on Thursday, telling the House Intelligence Committee

Obamacare Creator: Die At 75!
35 replie(s)
Breitbart, Big Government, by Ben Shapiro    Original Article
Posted By: Vastrightwingconspirator- 9/18/2014 5:00:01 PM     Post Reply
Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, one of the masterminds behind Obamacare, has now explained that he wishes to die at age 75. In an article in The Atlantic, Emanuel writes, “Seventy-five. That’s how long I want to live: 75 years.” He explains that his daughters disagree; so do his brothers and his friends. But, he says, “I am sure of my position…here is a simple truth that many of us seem to resist: living too long is also a loss. It renders many of us, if not disabled, then faltering and declining, a state that may not be worse than death but

How gender mattered in the rise and
fall of Debbie Wasserman Schultz

35 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Nia-Malika Henderson    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 5:06:33 AM     Post Reply
Devastating. That´s really the only way to describe Politico´s piece on DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz. (I hereby nominate her for Worst Week in Washington.) (Editor´s note: Three words -- Joseph. Robinette. Biden.) Based on interviews with DNC staffers -- both former and current -- the piece described Wasserman Schultz as something of a modern-day Tracy Flick: over-eager, disloyal and not shy about promoting her ambitions. It would be fair to say that she sounds like, well, a lot like other politicians. And this would be accurate. But the wholesale bashing of Wasserman Schultz at every level of the party -- White House,

Hillary Clinton: Congress Out of
Touch on Women´s Issues

34 replie(s)
NBC News, by Kasie Hunt    Original Article
Posted By: BaseballFan- 9/18/2014 5:15:18 PM     Post Reply
Congress is living in an "evidence-free zone" as it debates issues of equal pay and family-friendly work policies, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Thursday. "Unfortunately, reality is not always the context in which these decisions are made. The Congress increasingly -- despite the best efforts of my friends and others -- is living in an evidence-free zone," she said during a roundtable discussion at the Center for American Progress focused on women´s issues. "What the reality is, in the lives of Americans is so far from the minds of too many who don´t place the highest priority" on

Is Obama Wagging the Ebola Dog?
27 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Lauri B Regan    Original Article
Posted By: tisHimself- 9/18/2014 6:40:19 AM     Post Reply
The anti-war president has finally found a way to wag the dog without upsetting his liberal base and war-weary electorate. Despite the beheading of two Americans, establishment of an Islamic caliphate, direct threats to the U.S. homeland, and the destabilization of the entire Middle East, Obama refuses to acknowledge that we are at war with barbaric Islamic jihadists. And he refuses to authorize the requisite boots on the ground. However, Obama just discovered his pre-midterm election method of wagging the dog -- distracting from his incompetent and dangerous response (or lack thereof) to the real threats to America’s national security

Obama Says Senate Vote To Arm
Syrian Rebels Was US Politics
´At Its Best´

27 replie(s)
Business Insider, by Hunter Walker    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 9/19/2014 5:13:01 AM     Post Reply
The U.S Senate passed a bill Thursday evening that will give President Barack Obama the authority to arm moderate Syrian rebels, which is a key part of his plan to fight the jihadist group Islamic State (also known as ISIS and ISIL). Shortly after the Senate passed the bill, which was passed by the House on Wednesday, Obama spoke from the White House. "I´m pleased that Congress, a majority of Democrats and a majority of Republicans in both the House and Senate, have now voted to support a key element of our strategy," Obama said. Obama, who reiterated the fact

John Kerry: US At War With
The ´Enemy of Islam´

24 replie(s)
Breitbart Big Peace, by Jordan Schachtel    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 9/19/2014 3:17:20 PM     Post Reply
On Thursday In a session with the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Secretary of State John Kerry was asked by Rep. Joe Wilson (R-SC) whether America was at war in Iraq and Syria. (Video) Kerry responded: “If you’re more comfortable calling it a war against this enemy of Islam then please do so. We’re happy to call it that.” So its official: America is at war with the enemy of Islam. However, strange bedfellows arise if the Obama administration so chooses to uphold Kerry’s claim that we are at war with the enemy(s) of Islam. The following displays that Secretary

Where is Our Voice in the Wilderness
Touting Conservatism?

22 replie(s)
Canada Free Press, by Lloyd Marcus    Original Article
Posted By: tisHimself- 9/18/2014 6:33:24 AM     Post Reply
For crying out loud, will someone “pleeeeease” take a stand for Conservatism? Someone forwarded this article to me, “Why Are Republicans Suddenly Leaning Left?” The article cites numerous examples of the GOP obviously believing it must embrace at least lukewarm Liberalism while backing away from Conservatism to win elections.The article mentioned that Mitt Romney avoided saying “Republican” in an ad supporting Scott Brown’s Senate run. Romney said in the ad referring to Brown, “will buck his own party to do what’s right for New Hampshire.” Romney’s statement implies that Conservatism can be mean, but rest assured that Brown will push

WSJ: Obama will require military to get his
personal approval for U.S. strikes in Syria

22 replie(s)
Hot Air, by Allahpundit    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/18/2014 3:08:29 PM     Post Reply
A man who’s a better speechwriter than his speechwriters, a better political director than his political directors, and who knows more about policy than his policy advisors must surely also be a better general than his generals, no? The U.S. military campaign against Islamist militants in Syria is being designed to allow President Barack Obama to exert a high degree of personal control, going so far as to require that the military obtain presidential signoff for strikes in Syrian territory, officials said. The requirements for strikes in Syria against the extremist group Islamic State will be far more stringent than those targeting


Post Reply   Close thread 791451





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS