A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


Supreme Court conservatives
are playing a long game

Los Angeles Times, by David Savage

Original Article

Posted By:FlyRight, 7/6/2014 7:41:49 AM

The Supreme Court led by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. showed again this year that it is playing a long game, writing opinions that move the law in small but steady steps in a conservative direction.At first glance, many of its decisions appear modest, and the justices themselves downplayed them as narrow and tightly targeted. But they also set the stage for broader rulings, and liberals voiced concern about their long-term impact.Many rely on well-established rights, such as freedom of speech and free exercise of religion, but extend those rights for the first time to corporations, wealthy donors and

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: dwa, 7/6/2014 7:59:24 AM     (No. 9912587)

What idiots like writers for the LATimes don´t seem to get is that the "conservative" justices are for the most part relying on the Constitution for the basis of their decisions (though what Roberts was thinking on Obamacare is anyones guess). The liberals on the other hand are looking at international law, feelings etc, not the Constitution. The Constitution puts too much restraint on the agenda of the Left. The liberal justices and the left believe in the rule of man, not the rule of law cause the former can be changed as will to suit what they want.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    17 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Globalwarmer, 7/6/2014 8:02:15 AM     (No. 9912590)

Savage is worried about stealth conservatism when really, it´s the other way around.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Lawsy0, 7/6/2014 8:02:17 AM     (No. 9912591)

Ask career Integrationists what they think of incrementalism.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Patchy groundfog, 7/6/2014 8:33:34 AM     (No. 9912625)

By ´conservative direction´ does the writer mean reading and applying the actual language of the Constitution and statutes?

Those radicals!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: bpl40, 7/6/2014 8:56:15 AM     (No. 9912644)

Apply the Constitution which founded the Republic and its real meaning which established its legitimate government to actual governance. What an extreme, radical out of mainstream idea!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: marthaville, 7/6/2014 9:19:04 AM     (No. 9912664)

Perhaps Mr. Savage would prefer that the Supreme Court determine all First Amendment rights apply only to individuals. Then the Los Angeles Times, New York Times, Washington Post, and every other newspaper and media outlet operating in corporate form would no longer have First Amendment rights attributed to freedom of the press. Now that would change the course of our nation.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: shamus, 7/6/2014 9:47:48 AM     (No. 9912688)

Only those suffering under the delusion that there is free stuff that they can get could care about "employer provided birth control".

The employer isn´t providing birth control. Money earned by the employee is used to buy birth control. Since employees pay either way, it make no difference whether employees forgo earnings or pay out of pocket. Both outcomes are identical.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    15 persons like this.


   

 

R-VAR_AD
  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Avikingman, 7/6/2014 10:18:01 AM     (No. 9912715)

Riiiight.
When a bankrupt town can seize your property because it needs the cash (Kelo vs New London), eminent domain was as distorted as Roberts´ jujitsu on the Unaffordable Care Act.

The Supremes have a long way back and with Barky around, we worry.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    15 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: WAN2, 7/6/2014 10:25:41 AM     (No. 9912723)

One lousy vote seals our fate.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: PoliticalJunky, 7/6/2014 10:32:00 AM     (No. 9912729)

I still think the decision that Roberts made gives us an opportunity. The many charges in Obamacare, if a tax, must be illegal because they do not meet the requirments as to how a tax can be proposed and passed. Maybe the problem is one of standing. There must be a way. Maybe in addition to filing the proposed suit by the House of Representatives that Obama has injured the House by usurping its powers it should add that these taxes are illegal because they did not originate in the House.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: TulsaTowner, 7/6/2014 11:27:20 AM     (No. 9912783)

The problem #12, is that the Republican party must take action on this opportunity, and we all know they will not. Americans are left to twist in the wind while our freedoms are rapidly eroded by the left and the Republican establishment ruling class.

Ughh!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    9 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Smart11344, 7/6/2014 11:42:15 AM     (No. 9912799)

Skunk Savage another crybaby far leftist who is not getting his way. Get over it. Real America has gotten extremely tired of leftist activist judges and courts. Just look how many cases have been overturned after the 9th circuit court went off the deep end on many of their rulings.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    9 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: M Stuart, 7/6/2014 11:53:42 AM     (No. 9912804)

Stupid premise.

When Congress & Feds made themselves exempt from 0bamacare & managed to hold onto their jobs, we lost!

They blather, but they are not affected. Our guy Rep.Scott even had the nerve to say that they needed 0bamacare to retain the talent in their offices!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: mitzi, 7/6/2014 11:53:42 AM     (No. 9912803)

Many rely on well-established rights, such as freedom of speech and free exercise of religion, but extend those rights for the first time to corporations, ...

According to Wiki, corporations are treated as "persons" under contract law - how can that same criteria not apply to First Amendment rights? Nothing new about corporate personhood.

While the headnote is not part of the Court´s opinion and thus not precedent, two years later, in Pembina Consolidated Silver Mining Co. v. Pennsylvania – 125 U.S. 181 (1888), the Court clearly affirmed the doctrine, holding, "Under the designation of ´person´ there is no doubt that a private corporation is included [in the Fourteenth Amendment]. Such corporations are merely associations of individuals united for a special purpose and permitted to do business under a particular name and have a succession of members without dissolution."[3] This doctrine has been reaffirmed by the Court many times since.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 791145




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "FlyRight"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "FlyRight"



Benghazi Bombshell: Clinton
State Department Official Reveals
Details of Alleged Document Review
Daily Signal, by Sharyl Attkisson    Original Article
Posted By: Flyright- 9/15/2014 8:04:50 AM     Post Reply
As the House Select Committee on Benghazi prepares for its first hearing this week, a former State Department diplomat is coming forward with a startling allegation: Hillary Clinton confidants were part of an operation to “separate” damaging documents before they were turned over to the Accountability Review Board investigating security lapses surrounding the Sept. 11, 2012, terrorist attacks on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya.New Benghazi allegation puts spotlight on Hillary Clinton confidants, alleged after-hours document review.According to former Deputy Assistant Secretary Raymond Maxwell, the after-hours session took place over a weekend in a basement operations-type center at State Department

Obama´s Speech on ISIS, in Plain English
Atlantic, by David Frum    Original Article
Posted By: Flyright- 9/12/2014 7:41:48 AM     Post Reply
Qua speech, Barack Obama’s address Wednesday on the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria was surprisingly terrible: a disorganized mess, insincere and unconvincing. To appreciate just how bad and bizarre it was, compare the president’s speech announcing a new air campaign in Iraq and Syria to Dwight Eisenhower’s 1958 statement on his decision to intervene in Lebanon with 14,000—14,000!—troops. The statement contains no chest-thumping about America’s leadership in science and medicine. No pivot to the auto industry and medical research. Eisenhower simply explained what had been done, and why.

   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Obama war request puts congressional
Democrats in a tight spot
Washington Examiner, by Byron York    Original Article
Posted By: Flyright- 9/12/2014 7:18:32 AM     Post Reply
Some Capitol Hill lawmakers are baffled. What does President Obama want from Congress as he begins the U.S. military escalation in Iraq and Syria? The question wasn´t answered by the president´s much-anticipated speech Wednesday night. First, Obama seemed to tell Congress to mind its own business. "I have the authority to address the threat from ISIL," he said, indicating he didn´t need or want any permission from the legislative branch to fight the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria.Then Obama added, "But I believe we are strongest as a nation when the president and Congress work together. So I welcome congressional

Obama’s Three Fatal ISIS Delusions
White House Dossier, by Keith Koffler    Original Article
Posted By: Flyright- 9/11/2014 4:09:23 PM     Post Reply
With his address to the nation Wednesday evening, President Obama revealed that he is a leader in deep denial about the threat the United States faces, and about the steps that are necessary to deal with it. In his remarks, Obama offered up a series of delusions, each of which point to the ultimate defeat of the United States in the war he has embarked upon. Delusion #1: Obama still thinks ISIS is the JV team. Here’s how he began his speech: We can’t erase every trace of evil from the world, and small groups of killers have the capacity to do great harm. ISIS

Obama announces ‘broad coalition’ to
fight Islamic State extremist group
Washington Post, by Juliet Eilperin and Ed O´Keefe    Original Article
Posted By: Flyright- 9/11/2014 6:48:45 AM     Post Reply
President Obama on Wednesday night outlined an open-ended campaign to combat the threat posed by the Islamic State, significantly expanding the counter­terrorism strategy that has been a hallmark of his presidency.Obama said in a prime-time speech televised from the White House that the United States will join “with our friends and allies to degrade, and ultimately destroy, the terrorist group known as ISIL,” using an alternative acronym for the group that has emerged in Iraq and Syria.Saying the United States is meeting the threat with “strength and resolve,” the president also sought to assuage the concerns of Americans who are

Poll: Public supports strikes in Iraq, Syria;
Obama’s ratings hover near his all-time lows
Washington Post, by Dan Balz and Peyton M. Craighill    Original Article
Posted By: Flyright- 9/9/2014 7:10:48 AM     Post Reply
Americans overwhelmingly view Islamic State terrorists as a serious threat to vital U.S. interests and, in a significant shift, widely support airstrikes in Iraq and Syria, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.The nation’s increasingly hawkish mood will form part of the backdrop for a speech by President Obama on Wednesday, when he will outline his thinking on how to confront the threat from the Islamic State. Obama’s remarks will come a day after he confers with congressional leaders at the White House about the administration’s planning.Obama’s speech also comes at a critical moment in his presidency. He will

S’long, Jeet
New Yorker, by Roger Angell    Original Article
Posted By: Flyright- 8/30/2014 8:36:10 AM     Post Reply
We know Derek Jeter by heart, so why all this memorizing? The between-pitches bat tucked up in his armpit. The fingertip helmet-twiddle. The left front foot wide open, out of the box until the last moment, and the cop-at-a-crossing right hand ritually lifted astern until the foot swings shut. That look of expectation, a little night-light gleam, under the helmet. The pitch—this one a slow breaking ball, a fraction low and outside—taken but inspected with a bending bow in its passage. More. Jeter’s celebrity extends beyond his swing, of course, but can perhaps be summarized by an excited e-mail once

   

 



 
U.S. Tells Russia to ´Stop Lying´
About Its Involvement in Ukraine
National Journal, by Marina Koren    Original Article
Posted By: Flyright- 8/29/2014 8:50:18 AM     Post Reply
The United Nations Security Council met Thursday to discuss the Ukraine crisis for the 24th time this year, after reports indicated that Russian soldiers and weapons had crossed the border into eastern Ukraine to support insurgents there. Samantha Power, the U.S. ambassador to the U.N., said that Russia is not pulling back in Ukraine as it has repeatedly promised to do. "Russia has come before UNSC to say everything except truth. It has manipulated. It has obfuscated. It has outright lied," Power said. "We have learned to measure Russia by its actions, not its words. In last 48 hours, Russia´s actions have

Ukraine detains Russian paratroopers;
U.S. ambassador warns of ‘counteroffensive’
Washinton Post, by Annie Gowen and Karoun Demirjian    Original Article
Posted By: Flyright- 8/26/2014 7:34:55 AM     Post Reply
KIEV, Ukraine — Ukraine said Tuesday its forces detained a group of Russian paratroopers who crossed the border into eastern Ukraine, and the U.S. ambassador to Kiev warned of a possible “Russian-directed counteroffensive” by pro-Moscow separatists, raising tensions between the two countries ahead of a planned meeting between their presidents at a regional summit.In a briefing Tuesday, Ukrainian military spokesman Andriy Lysenko said the Ukrainian army detained 10 Russian paratroopers in the Donetsk region, scene of some of the heaviest fighting with separatist rebels in the east. The spokesman said the Russians were detained with their documents and weapons and

Judicial Watch Statement on Discovery of
Backups for “Missing” Lois Lerner IRS Emails
Judicial Watch Press Release, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Flyright- 8/26/2014 7:21:45 AM     Post Reply
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced the following developments in the IRS’ missing emails investigation. Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton stated:Department of Justice attorneys for the Internal Revenue Service told Judicial Watch on Friday that Lois Lerner’s emails, indeed all government computer records, are backed up by the federal government in case of a government-wide catastrophe. The Obama administration attorneys said that this back-up system would be too onerous to search. The DOJ attorneys also acknowledged that the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) is investigating this back-up system.We obviously disagree that disclosing the emails as required would be

Secrets of the Clinton Library
Politico, by Josh Gerstein    Original Article
Posted By: Flyright- 8/25/2014 8:13:25 AM     Post Reply
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — It is a lingering mystery of Bill Clinton’s White House: the genesis of the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy that gay groups came to revile. But soon, this and other secrets that remain hidden away here at the Clinton Presidential Library may be unlocked. What did the Justice Department say about all the random requests for pardons? What kind of advice came from Clinton staffers such as now-Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan? What strategic thoughts were offered to the president and first lady Hillary Clinton on terrorism, Whitewater and health care reform? And what’s the library been

How Al Sharpton is using Obama, Ferguson
and MSNBC to boost his influence
Fox News, by Howard Kurtz    Original Article
Posted By: Flyright- 8/25/2014 7:12:41 AM     Post Reply
Al Sharpton is again working both sides of the street, and it’s paying off for him.As he’s inserted himself into the tense situation in Ferguson, he’s had an assist from none other than the president of the United States.And he continues to bask in the spotlight at MSNBC, where he uses his nightly cable show to advance the causes he fights for as a civil rights activist. But these two roles are increasingly coming into conflict. It happened last year with the killing of Trayvon Martin, and it’s happening again with the death of Michael Brown. Sharpton is scheduled to deliver the



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Michelle Obama: Americans ´Take for
Granted´ How Much Barack Has Improved US

47 replie(s)
Breitbart Big Government, by Charlie Spiering    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 9/19/2014 10:49:59 AM     Post Reply
First Lady Michelle Obama proudly defended her husband’s record at a Washington, D.C. fundraiser, reminding the attendants how far the country had come since the Obamas entered the White House. “Just think about how different our country looks to children growing up today,” she said. “Think about how our kids take for granted that a black person or a woman can be President of the United States.” She also praised President Obama for changing history on gay marriage and the Supreme Court. “They take it for granted that for the first time in history, there are three brilliant women serving

Michelle Obama: ´Being Married
to the President ... Can Be Hard´

39 replie(s)
Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 9/18/2014 8:45:39 AM     Post Reply
First Lady Michelle Obama visited sick children at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, where she complained about living at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and being married to the president of the United States. She made the comments in response to being asked about her "favorite part about being in the White House." "About being in the -- about being First Lady is being able to do stuff like this, really. And it is so special for me to get to meet kids like you guys," Michelle Obama started. "Because sometimes living in the White House and being married to the

Rift widens between Obama,
U.S. military over strategy
to fight Islamic State

38 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Craig Whitlock    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 9/18/2014 10:18:03 PM     Post Reply
Flashes of disagreement over how to fight the Islamic State are mounting between President Obama and U.S. military leaders, the latest sign of strain in what often has been an awkward and uneasy relationship. Even as the administration has received congressional backing for its strategy, with the Senate voting Thursday to approve a plan to arm and train Syrian rebels, a series of military leaders have criticized the president’s approach against the Islamic State militant group. Retired Marine Gen. James Mattis, who served under Obama until last year, became the latest high-profile skeptic on Thursday, telling the House Intelligence Committee

Obamacare Creator: Die At 75!
35 replie(s)
Breitbart, Big Government, by Ben Shapiro    Original Article
Posted By: Vastrightwingconspirator- 9/18/2014 5:00:01 PM     Post Reply
Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, one of the masterminds behind Obamacare, has now explained that he wishes to die at age 75. In an article in The Atlantic, Emanuel writes, “Seventy-five. That’s how long I want to live: 75 years.” He explains that his daughters disagree; so do his brothers and his friends. But, he says, “I am sure of my position…here is a simple truth that many of us seem to resist: living too long is also a loss. It renders many of us, if not disabled, then faltering and declining, a state that may not be worse than death but

How gender mattered in the rise and
fall of Debbie Wasserman Schultz

35 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Nia-Malika Henderson    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 5:06:33 AM     Post Reply
Devastating. That´s really the only way to describe Politico´s piece on DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz. (I hereby nominate her for Worst Week in Washington.) (Editor´s note: Three words -- Joseph. Robinette. Biden.) Based on interviews with DNC staffers -- both former and current -- the piece described Wasserman Schultz as something of a modern-day Tracy Flick: over-eager, disloyal and not shy about promoting her ambitions. It would be fair to say that she sounds like, well, a lot like other politicians. And this would be accurate. But the wholesale bashing of Wasserman Schultz at every level of the party -- White House,

Hillary Clinton: Congress Out of
Touch on Women´s Issues

34 replie(s)
NBC News, by Kasie Hunt    Original Article
Posted By: BaseballFan- 9/18/2014 5:15:18 PM     Post Reply
Congress is living in an "evidence-free zone" as it debates issues of equal pay and family-friendly work policies, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Thursday. "Unfortunately, reality is not always the context in which these decisions are made. The Congress increasingly -- despite the best efforts of my friends and others -- is living in an evidence-free zone," she said during a roundtable discussion at the Center for American Progress focused on women´s issues. "What the reality is, in the lives of Americans is so far from the minds of too many who don´t place the highest priority" on

Is Obama Wagging the Ebola Dog?
27 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Lauri B Regan    Original Article
Posted By: tisHimself- 9/18/2014 6:40:19 AM     Post Reply
The anti-war president has finally found a way to wag the dog without upsetting his liberal base and war-weary electorate. Despite the beheading of two Americans, establishment of an Islamic caliphate, direct threats to the U.S. homeland, and the destabilization of the entire Middle East, Obama refuses to acknowledge that we are at war with barbaric Islamic jihadists. And he refuses to authorize the requisite boots on the ground. However, Obama just discovered his pre-midterm election method of wagging the dog -- distracting from his incompetent and dangerous response (or lack thereof) to the real threats to America’s national security

Obama Says Senate Vote To Arm
Syrian Rebels Was US Politics
´At Its Best´

27 replie(s)
Business Insider, by Hunter Walker    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 9/19/2014 5:13:01 AM     Post Reply
The U.S Senate passed a bill Thursday evening that will give President Barack Obama the authority to arm moderate Syrian rebels, which is a key part of his plan to fight the jihadist group Islamic State (also known as ISIS and ISIL). Shortly after the Senate passed the bill, which was passed by the House on Wednesday, Obama spoke from the White House. "I´m pleased that Congress, a majority of Democrats and a majority of Republicans in both the House and Senate, have now voted to support a key element of our strategy," Obama said. Obama, who reiterated the fact

John Kerry: US At War With
The ´Enemy of Islam´

25 replie(s)
Breitbart Big Peace, by Jordan Schachtel    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 9/19/2014 3:17:20 PM     Post Reply
On Thursday In a session with the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Secretary of State John Kerry was asked by Rep. Joe Wilson (R-SC) whether America was at war in Iraq and Syria. (Video) Kerry responded: “If you’re more comfortable calling it a war against this enemy of Islam then please do so. We’re happy to call it that.” So its official: America is at war with the enemy of Islam. However, strange bedfellows arise if the Obama administration so chooses to uphold Kerry’s claim that we are at war with the enemy(s) of Islam. The following displays that Secretary

Where is Our Voice in the Wilderness
Touting Conservatism?

22 replie(s)
Canada Free Press, by Lloyd Marcus    Original Article
Posted By: tisHimself- 9/18/2014 6:33:24 AM     Post Reply
For crying out loud, will someone “pleeeeease” take a stand for Conservatism? Someone forwarded this article to me, “Why Are Republicans Suddenly Leaning Left?” The article cites numerous examples of the GOP obviously believing it must embrace at least lukewarm Liberalism while backing away from Conservatism to win elections.The article mentioned that Mitt Romney avoided saying “Republican” in an ad supporting Scott Brown’s Senate run. Romney said in the ad referring to Brown, “will buck his own party to do what’s right for New Hampshire.” Romney’s statement implies that Conservatism can be mean, but rest assured that Brown will push

WSJ: Obama will require military to get his
personal approval for U.S. strikes in Syria

22 replie(s)
Hot Air, by Allahpundit    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/18/2014 3:08:29 PM     Post Reply
A man who’s a better speechwriter than his speechwriters, a better political director than his political directors, and who knows more about policy than his policy advisors must surely also be a better general than his generals, no? The U.S. military campaign against Islamist militants in Syria is being designed to allow President Barack Obama to exert a high degree of personal control, going so far as to require that the military obtain presidential signoff for strikes in Syrian territory, officials said. The requirements for strikes in Syria against the extremist group Islamic State will be far more stringent than those targeting

Interpreting the Islamic State’s jihadi logic
22 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Charles Krauthammer    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 9/18/2014 10:23:58 PM     Post Reply
What was the Islamic State thinking? We know it is sophisticated in its use of modern media. But what was the logic of propagating to the world videos of its beheadings of two Americans (and subsequently a Briton) — sure to inflame public opinion? There are two possible explanations. One is that these terrorists are more depraved and less savvy than we think. They so glory in blood that they could not resist making an international spectacle of their savagery — after all, they proudly broadcast their massacre of Shiite prisoners — and did not quite fathom how such a

   

Post Reply   Close thread 791145





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS