A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


The Lawyers Behind the
Lawsuit against Obama

National Review Online, by Ian Tuttle

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 7/5/2014 5:25:07 AM

For some time now, Elizabeth Foley and David Rivkin have had two questions about the 44th president: “How is he getting away with this? And why isn’t someone doing something about this?” Foley, a professor of constitutional law at Florida International University College of Law, and Rivkin, lead outside counsel of Florida et al. v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, one of three Obamacare challenges that ended up before the Supreme Court in 2012, are doing something. They are the architects of the House of Representatives’ likely lawsuit against President Obama, which would challenge the president’s selective

Comments:
The teaser head is ´Yes, the House has "standing" ´.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: John c, 7/5/2014 5:57:01 AM     (No. 9911601)

FTA: “The president is taking actions that are directly contrary to congressional instructions,” Foley says. “The constitution is clear: He has a duty to faithfully execute the laws. Congress needs to preserve its lawmaking prerogative.”

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    34 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: krause, 7/5/2014 6:21:54 AM     (No. 9911610)

One way or another, he needs to be evicted, like a non-paying renter.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    59 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Country Boy, 7/5/2014 6:36:24 AM     (No. 9911618)

When it came to demanding to see obama´s longform Birth Certificate, nobody had "standing". So I don´t believe this will work either.

Laws apparently don´t apply to special Dems, especially black Dems.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    46 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: mulhaven, 7/5/2014 6:48:40 AM     (No. 9911626)

This really seems to be a game of softball. What consequences, if any, are these two lawyers looking for? Maybe just to get the courts to agree with everyone else? His lawlessness is not a crime or misdemeanour? If not, then what is the seriousness of the charge?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    29 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: judy, 7/5/2014 6:57:23 AM     (No. 9911635)

They´re doing what Boehner & McConnell should be doing.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    30 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Starlady, 7/5/2014 7:41:37 AM     (No. 9911674)

These attorneys think the power of the purse would punish "innocent" organizations. Are the IRS and HHS innocent organizations? Are the EPA and DOJ innocent organizations? We could go on and on.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    32 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: 2dogs, 7/5/2014 7:56:51 AM     (No. 9911685)

The Repubs are afraid to impeach, fearing it will lead to a loss in the midterms. Probably true the media would twist and turn it to make us the bad guys. . We need to survive until November and pray we take over both houses. IF, that is, we can survive another 3 months of his dictatorship.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    34 persons like this.


   

 

R-VAR_AD
  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Poobah, 7/5/2014 8:05:36 AM     (No. 9911695)

So a case would be brought to the Supreme Court late in 2014, and the Court would rule in the summer of 2015 probably saying that Obama is making a mess of our country. Then Obama would ignore the Court just like he ignores the Congress.

It might help elect a Republican in 2016 but probably won´t curb Obama´s overreach.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    20 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Paperpuncher, 7/5/2014 8:06:56 AM     (No. 9911698)

So then what are you going to do when SCOTUS orders zero to enforce the law and he ignores the courts order?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: planetgeo, 7/5/2014 8:25:22 AM     (No. 9911714)

OK, so let´s fast forward to a glorious November and assume for argument´s sake that we now have both a Republican House and Republican Senate. Who here believes that the two houses of Congress will rein in Obama? Buehler? Anyone?

Look up Republicans in Wikipedia under "men without balls." There´s a picture there of Boehner and McConnell carrying Obama´s golf bag.

Congress has become a country club. And once in, they´re loathe to do anything to upset their gravy train. Look what happened to Cantor and Ryan. The corrupting influence of the perks, power, and mountains of easy cash is beyond disgusting.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    40 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Lawsy0, 7/5/2014 8:50:28 AM     (No. 9911731)

My question to Foley and Rivkin is, ´´How long is too long´´ for Obama to get away with it because he has gotten away with it? I agree there´s little chance that impeachment would succeed. Censure, maybe.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    17 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: PoliticalJunky, 7/5/2014 8:52:30 AM     (No. 9911736)

Previous lawsuits have been dismissed for "lack of standing". These two attorneys have solved that and this must be the lawsuit Boehner has mentioned. They explain why impeachment is not in the cards. I know you want to hit Obama hard but read the article. If the Courts rule as the lawyers expect (and I think they will though it might end up in the Supreme Court) he will be rebuked and give up this game. This is our best chance for putting him in his place. I thank these people from the bottom of my heart.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    43 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: M2, 7/5/2014 8:57:12 AM     (No. 9911742)

I´m not certain this will work:

The second option, cutting funds, “creates major distortions in political accountability, which is the genesis, the heart, of the notion of the separation of powers.” Congress, says Foley, should not be blamed for the president’s misdeeds — but that is just what will happen if the House has no recourse but to penalize innocent organizations as a means of punishing the president. Political self-help is important, Foley observes, “but only when proportionate and related to the transgression.”

The organizations mentioned are not "innocent". They are following illegal orders, if not in fact, in spirit. I do not believe that defunding these organizations is "overkill", as the article mentions. In fact, I don´t think it´s enough.

As for impeachment, yes, it is possible it´s a futile gesture, not worth the consequences because impeachment won´t make him stop what he´s doing.

The lawyers here, like most of America, just want the president to cease and desist the monumentally destructive actions he continues to take without adhering to the advise and consent precedent of our government.

With every illegal and immoral action Obama & Co. take without getting slapped down for it, the more he accelerates, as the article mentions. We have little time left. This lawsuit must be put on warp speed before this country enters the black hole filled with nations that have destroyed themselves because no one stood up and fought.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    28 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: EnsignOToole, 7/5/2014 8:57:37 AM     (No. 9911743)

“It is incredible brazenness,” Rivkin adds. “And he[Obama] continues in part because he’s gotten away with it.”

As a former teacher in a school district just outside of Detroit, that statement is the same thing we teachers used to ponder when the Principal was a wimp where "certain" students who caused trouble never got punished but were tolerated. As a result the student body became cynical and depressed, because those not belonging to the "select mischief-makers" group knew that they would have been punished by the Principal for doing the thing the others got away with.

Sorry for the rather cumbersome explanation - I´m taking care to be PC. It was the late 60´s and early 70´s and I suppose school administrators were worried about riots that were taking place in cities such as Detroit spilling over into the surrounding communities.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    28 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: rsgonner, 7/5/2014 9:23:48 AM     (No. 9911751)

Yesterday I read the Declaration of Independence. obozo is worse than George III.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    26 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: bpl40, 7/5/2014 10:13:41 AM     (No. 9911802)

He started getting away with it the moment he said "I do" to the oath he clearly is not eligible to take. The focus now should be strip Reid of his power and prevent the ´Rats from regrouping and the Beast from taking advantage of the confusion.
If this case helps go ahead, otherwise ignore.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: strike3, 7/5/2014 10:16:21 AM     (No. 9911807)

How can the law work when the lawbreaker is above the law? Look at other dictators like Che Guevera and Hugo Chavez. Saddam Hussein. Idi Amin. The only answer is to use force, stop them by something with teeth. The law in this country has become a joke only to be used against the little people. The occupant of the White House is insane and will not stop until he is unable to move.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    28 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: RancherJack, 7/5/2014 10:17:42 AM     (No. 9911809)

Oh, great. A strongly worded letter to a monster for a Court action which will drag on at least until the 2024 elections.

Great move, House

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: chicodon, 7/5/2014 10:36:14 AM     (No. 9911839)

When Obama brazenly said "sue me" he meant it. He´ll be long gone before anything is resolved. We will sit idly by and accept his lawlessness or we won´t. He´s prepared either way.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: chicodon, 7/5/2014 10:38:54 AM     (No. 9911842)

#19
Obama timed this for the 4th of July. They are too busy to respond.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Grandpa Bill, 7/5/2014 10:42:41 AM     (No. 9911846)

It seems many are counting on the mid-terms to change things but for it to happen, there must be honest elections with some mechanism in place to ensure integrity. Note even the manipulation in the recent Mississippi run-off senatorial election

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    16 persons like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: preciosodrogas, 7/5/2014 1:19:01 PM     (No. 9911990)

This strikes me as pure law school professor fantasy with no real world application.
Boehner is going along with it because it makes him look like he is doing something but does not require him to disobey his master.
There are remedies set forth in the Constitution that the professor did not discuss such as the right to impeach agency heads. Nor does it discuss immunity of the president to such a lawsuit. It also doesn´t discuss the need for an enforceable remedy. But hey, why not bring the suit give Boehner cover for a couple more years, pay the professor and/or his buddies a handsome consultant fee, and when the courts dismiss the case for want blame it all on the courts.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: Republic Can, 7/5/2014 1:35:49 PM     (No. 9912005)

This is all well and fine but they better include E. Holder in the lawsuit as he is the one protecting and enabling zero. Holder was his first major appointment for good reason. Both of them are in contempt of court and need to be censored as a pair for anything to be done post-verdict. Someone has to be enabled to enforce the court´s decision or it is just political masterbation.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: Penney, 7/5/2014 1:43:21 PM     (No. 9912019)

There is a new MUST SEE movie coming out later this month: ´´Persecuted,´´ which may help open eyes regarding the current oppressive policies being deemed from the statist beltway gang. Fred Thompson is among other familiar faces in the movie and Gretchen Carlson, the excellent journalist at Fox, also makes an appearance.

The lefties have been using their theatrical craftiness to propagandize their radical PC agenda for years, so it is especially gratifying to see venues such as this film to wake audiences up!!!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: OBX Pete, 7/5/2014 2:12:43 PM     (No. 9912046)

A lawsuit will not work with this tool even if the ruling goes against him. He has no
respect for the laws and has any intention of abiding by them. Impeachment will not
work either because he would just issue an executive order voiding that.

He is comitting domestic terror against the United States every day and should be
classified as a terrorist. He should be arrested by the military, handcuffed and sent to
Guantanamo to await a military trial. This is to avoid being tried by Eric Holder because
we all know that he also has no interest in abiding by the laws. He could be supplied with
the same comforts as the terrorists now imprisoned there, i.e. prayer mat, copy of the
Koran and muslim food.

Just a quickie, off subject question. Am I the only one having trouble posting comments
here? Weird things happen to my computer every time I log on to Lucianne.com.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    24 persons like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: TarAndFeathers, 7/5/2014 2:37:52 PM     (No. 9912064)

Only forcible ejection from the physical and moral office of the Presidency will give relief from this professional scofflaw criminal. That means impeachment!
Lawsuits exist to run out the clock.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: garyhope, 7/5/2014 3:30:00 PM     (No. 9912107)

Part or much of the problem is that SO MANY people still support Obammy, don´t care what he´s doing or totally agree with what he´s doing and think it´s just great. The media, Hollywood, the NEA and teachers and professors and all of their little brainwashed ignorant students.

The obvious question is, if Obammy were a white Republican heterosexual man, real man,...could he get away with all of this?

You don´t have to answer.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    22 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 791049




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



The unbearable lightness of Hillary, 2016
Hot Air, by Noah Rothman    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 3:57:30 PM     Post Reply
The rule is always to first do no damage. If, however, there is such a thing as being too cautious, her inevitableness Hillary Clinton may be flirting with that condition as her long march to the Democratic nomination continues. The unease over Clinton’s candidacy on the left continues to grow, and it is a phenomenon which has become inescapably obvious to those following the nascent presidential race. While polls suggest that Clinton remains the prohibitive favorite to become the next Democratic presidential standard-bearer, those political reporters who tout top lines without noting the left’s unabashed dissatisfaction with Clinton are flirting with

Even a Top Democrat Thinks Obama´s
Legal Case for War Makes No Sense
Daily Beast, by Eli Lake    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 3:55:20 PM     Post Reply
Obama is trying to argue the group is the “true inheritor of bin Laden” in order to legally justify the war. Just don´t tell al Qaeda, which booted ISIS in February. The White House and senior members of the Obama administration have been trying to convince Congress all week that, legally speaking, there’s no difference between ISIS and al Qaeda. But at the same time—and, often, in the very same classified briefings—members of the U.S. intelligence community are telling lawmakers that the two Islamic radical groups aren’t in cahoots at all. In fact, they’re competitors for supremacy in the global jihadist

Greg Abbott launches first
negative TV ad against Wendy Davis
Dallas Morning News [TX], by Wayne Slater    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 11:49:19 AM     Post Reply
AUSTIN — Greg Abbott’s campaign launched a new attack on Democratic rival Wendy Davis’ ethics Thursday, saying she voted on legislation as a state senator that personally benefited her business. A new 30-second TV ad airing statewide marks a political escalation by the Abbott campaign, which has largely ignored Davis in its TV ad campaign and instead focused on the Republican attorney general’s platform and personal story. While Davis has targeted Abbott relentlessly on TV, Abbott’s ads until now have been an effective contrast, signaling to his Republican base that he’s in good shape. In the ad, an announcer accuses Davis of

Anatomy of a hanging
New York Daily News, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 5:35:14 AM     Post Reply
The show trial is underway and the guilty verdict is guaranteed, as a United Nations panel makes a pretense of investigating human rights violations in the 50-day war between Israel and Hamas. To his severe discredit, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon has sanctioned a proceeding whose transparent rigging would be at home in a totalitarian regime. Israel is, of course, the defendant going down the tubes. Hamas started the conflict by firing thousands of rockets indiscriminately into the Jewish state from heavily populated areas of Gaza, and prolonged the suffering by violating ceasefire after ceasefire that Israel honored. While each Hamas rocket was

Perpetual second fiddle Joe Biden
praying for a Hillary screw-up
Washington Times, by Ben Wolfgang    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 5:21:38 AM     Post Reply
Joseph R. Biden’s 2016 presidential ambitions already look like they have been swallowed whole by the Hillary Rodham Clinton juggernaut, but political analysts say the vice president still has a narrow path to victory — one that depends on either out-politicking the former first lady in crucial states such as Iowa or praying she makes a grave mistake. Mr. Biden and Mrs. Clinton both visited Iowa, home of the first caucuses in the presidential primary cycle, over the past week. Neither has declared a White House run in two years, but each seemed to be courting the Democratic foot soldiers necessary

Replacing Obamacare Saves a Lot of Money
National Review Online, by James Capretta    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 5:18:52 AM     Post Reply
Supporters of the Obama administration like to create the impression that there is no viable alternative to the Affordable Care Act — i.e., Obamacare. But that is demonstrably not true. Republican senators Richard Burr, Tom Coburn, and Orrin Hatch introduced a plan earlier this year that would cover just as many people with insurance as Obamacare at a fraction of the cost. Now we have confirmation, in the form of a new cost estimate, that a similarly constructed but slightly different proposal would also cost less, while covering nearly the same number of people. The plan, developed and promoted by the 2017

The Anti-Terrorism Bloviators
American Spectator, by Betsy McCaughey    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 5:16:03 AM     Post Reply
On Monday, Attorney General Eric Holder, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, and New York’s Governor Andrew Cuomo sounded the alarm about the escalating danger of a terrorist attack on America by ISIS and other jihadists. Too bad the Obama administration lacks the resolve or sense of urgency to meet this danger head on. Worse, political correctness is hindering New York, a likely target, from tracking and stopping the jihadists in our midst. Holder announced “pilot programs” to “raise awareness,” bringing together religious leaders, community leaders, and law enforcement to build “community partnerships.” Sounds heartwarming. The White House will also hold a

Left blasts Clinton in secret emails
The Hill [DC], by Alexandra Jaffe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 5:13:41 AM     Post Reply
Emails sent by liberal activists and obtained by The Hill reveal significant dissatisfaction with Hillary Clinton, the front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2016. The critical messages about the former first lady show that she has a long way to go to assuage skepticism from influential voices on the left. The Hill reviewed hundreds of emails from a progressive members only Google group called the “Gamechanger Salon,” a forum where nearly 1,500 activists, strategists and journalists debate issues and craft messaging campaigns. The group includes prominent Democrats, Sierra Club officials, journalists who work for The Huffington Post and The Nation magazine, senior

The Strategy That Might
Have Beaten Mitch McConnell
New Republic, by Alec MacGillis    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 5:09:30 AM     Post Reply
he New York Times on Wednesday carried a provocative front-page dispatch from Kentucky by Abby Goodnough, who’s been doing a superb job of covering the impact of the Affordable Care Act in the Bluegrass State as a window into the law’s import nationally. The piece captures the political dynamic in Kentucky, where Obamacare has slashed the rate of the uninsured from 20.4 percent to 11.9 percent, the second largest drop after Arkansas, but where this success is seemingly not redounding to the benefit of Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grimes, who is now lagging in the polls against Mitch McConnell.

How gender mattered in the rise and
fall of Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Washington Post, by Nia-Malika Henderson    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 5:06:33 AM     Post Reply
Devastating. That´s really the only way to describe Politico´s piece on DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz. (I hereby nominate her for Worst Week in Washington.) (Editor´s note: Three words -- Joseph. Robinette. Biden.) Based on interviews with DNC staffers -- both former and current -- the piece described Wasserman Schultz as something of a modern-day Tracy Flick: over-eager, disloyal and not shy about promoting her ambitions. It would be fair to say that she sounds like, well, a lot like other politicians. And this would be accurate. But the wholesale bashing of Wasserman Schultz at every level of the party -- White House,

Barack Obama Transformed into Lyndon
Johnson So Slowly, I Hardly Even Noticed
PJ Media, by Ed Driscoll    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 4:52:47 AM     Post Reply
Now is the time when we juxtapose, Small Dead Animals-style: I have been in the White House on a number of occasions when military operations are launched and once the decisions are made and the orders have been issued the people in the White House from the President on down are really out of the action, at least is they are smart. And President Bush was especially good as was President Reagan of giving the military their mission, their orders and staying the hell out of the way. And not trying to micro-manage the conflicts, so you don’t have a Lyndon

White House: It’s not combat, but US
troops will return fire if they’re shot at…
Hot Air, by Noah Rothman    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 4:48:18 AM     Post Reply
It is becoming increasingly clear that almost no one in the press believes that the nearly 1,700 American service men and women currently in Iraq (a number even The New York Times believes will balloon in short order) will not encounter armed resistance. On Thursday, when White House Press Sec. Josh Earnest was asked how Americans who are asked to serve in what Gen. Martin Dempsey called a “combat advisory role” alongside indigenous forces would react if they were fired upon, Earnest replied with the obvious (via The Washington Times): President Obama expects U.S. troops to return fire if Islamic State militants



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Michelle Obama: Americans ´Take for
Granted´ How Much Barack Has Improved US

45 replie(s)
Breitbart Big Government, by Charlie Spiering    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 9/19/2014 10:49:59 AM     Post Reply
First Lady Michelle Obama proudly defended her husband’s record at a Washington, D.C. fundraiser, reminding the attendants how far the country had come since the Obamas entered the White House. “Just think about how different our country looks to children growing up today,” she said. “Think about how our kids take for granted that a black person or a woman can be President of the United States.” She also praised President Obama for changing history on gay marriage and the Supreme Court. “They take it for granted that for the first time in history, there are three brilliant women serving

Obama slaps down top
general and insists there
will be NO combat boots on
the ground in battle against
ISIS as he rallies troops
at air base

41 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by David Martoski    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 9/18/2014 5:14:05 AM     Post Reply
President Barack Obama insisted on Wednesday that he would not send ground troops into Iraqi combat zones to fight the ISIS terrorist army, directly contradicting his top general who said a day earlier that the president asked him for boots-on-the-ground recommendations ´on a case-by-case basis.´ (Snip)´As your commander-in-chief,´ Obama insisted, ´I will not commit you and the rest of our armed forces to fighting another ground war in Iraq.´ On Tuesday, however, Joint Chiefs chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey told lawmakers that circumstances on the ground could drive him to push for American combat troops to be embedded with Iraqi army

Michelle Obama: ´Being Married
to the President ... Can Be Hard´

39 replie(s)
Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 9/18/2014 8:45:39 AM     Post Reply
First Lady Michelle Obama visited sick children at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, where she complained about living at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and being married to the president of the United States. She made the comments in response to being asked about her "favorite part about being in the White House." "About being in the -- about being First Lady is being able to do stuff like this, really. And it is so special for me to get to meet kids like you guys," Michelle Obama started. "Because sometimes living in the White House and being married to the

Rift widens between Obama,
U.S. military over strategy
to fight Islamic State

38 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Craig Whitlock    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 9/18/2014 10:18:03 PM     Post Reply
Flashes of disagreement over how to fight the Islamic State are mounting between President Obama and U.S. military leaders, the latest sign of strain in what often has been an awkward and uneasy relationship. Even as the administration has received congressional backing for its strategy, with the Senate voting Thursday to approve a plan to arm and train Syrian rebels, a series of military leaders have criticized the president’s approach against the Islamic State militant group. Retired Marine Gen. James Mattis, who served under Obama until last year, became the latest high-profile skeptic on Thursday, telling the House Intelligence Committee

Obamacare Creator: Die At 75!
35 replie(s)
Breitbart, Big Government, by Ben Shapiro    Original Article
Posted By: Vastrightwingconspirator- 9/18/2014 5:00:01 PM     Post Reply
Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, one of the masterminds behind Obamacare, has now explained that he wishes to die at age 75. In an article in The Atlantic, Emanuel writes, “Seventy-five. That’s how long I want to live: 75 years.” He explains that his daughters disagree; so do his brothers and his friends. But, he says, “I am sure of my position…here is a simple truth that many of us seem to resist: living too long is also a loss. It renders many of us, if not disabled, then faltering and declining, a state that may not be worse than death but

How gender mattered in the rise and
fall of Debbie Wasserman Schultz

35 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Nia-Malika Henderson    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/19/2014 5:06:33 AM     Post Reply
Devastating. That´s really the only way to describe Politico´s piece on DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz. (I hereby nominate her for Worst Week in Washington.) (Editor´s note: Three words -- Joseph. Robinette. Biden.) Based on interviews with DNC staffers -- both former and current -- the piece described Wasserman Schultz as something of a modern-day Tracy Flick: over-eager, disloyal and not shy about promoting her ambitions. It would be fair to say that she sounds like, well, a lot like other politicians. And this would be accurate. But the wholesale bashing of Wasserman Schultz at every level of the party -- White House,

Hillary Clinton: Congress Out of
Touch on Women´s Issues

34 replie(s)
NBC News, by Kasie Hunt    Original Article
Posted By: BaseballFan- 9/18/2014 5:15:18 PM     Post Reply
Congress is living in an "evidence-free zone" as it debates issues of equal pay and family-friendly work policies, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Thursday. "Unfortunately, reality is not always the context in which these decisions are made. The Congress increasingly -- despite the best efforts of my friends and others -- is living in an evidence-free zone," she said during a roundtable discussion at the Center for American Progress focused on women´s issues. "What the reality is, in the lives of Americans is so far from the minds of too many who don´t place the highest priority" on

Is Obama Wagging the Ebola Dog?
27 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Lauri B Regan    Original Article
Posted By: tisHimself- 9/18/2014 6:40:19 AM     Post Reply
The anti-war president has finally found a way to wag the dog without upsetting his liberal base and war-weary electorate. Despite the beheading of two Americans, establishment of an Islamic caliphate, direct threats to the U.S. homeland, and the destabilization of the entire Middle East, Obama refuses to acknowledge that we are at war with barbaric Islamic jihadists. And he refuses to authorize the requisite boots on the ground. However, Obama just discovered his pre-midterm election method of wagging the dog -- distracting from his incompetent and dangerous response (or lack thereof) to the real threats to America’s national security

Obama Says Senate Vote To Arm
Syrian Rebels Was US Politics
´At Its Best´

26 replie(s)
Business Insider, by Hunter Walker    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 9/19/2014 5:13:01 AM     Post Reply
The U.S Senate passed a bill Thursday evening that will give President Barack Obama the authority to arm moderate Syrian rebels, which is a key part of his plan to fight the jihadist group Islamic State (also known as ISIS and ISIL). Shortly after the Senate passed the bill, which was passed by the House on Wednesday, Obama spoke from the White House. "I´m pleased that Congress, a majority of Democrats and a majority of Republicans in both the House and Senate, have now voted to support a key element of our strategy," Obama said. Obama, who reiterated the fact

John Kerry: US At War With
The ´Enemy of Islam´

24 replie(s)
Breitbart Big Peace, by Jordan Schachtel    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 9/19/2014 3:17:20 PM     Post Reply
On Thursday In a session with the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Secretary of State John Kerry was asked by Rep. Joe Wilson (R-SC) whether America was at war in Iraq and Syria. (Video) Kerry responded: “If you’re more comfortable calling it a war against this enemy of Islam then please do so. We’re happy to call it that.” So its official: America is at war with the enemy of Islam. However, strange bedfellows arise if the Obama administration so chooses to uphold Kerry’s claim that we are at war with the enemy(s) of Islam. The following displays that Secretary

Where is Our Voice in the Wilderness
Touting Conservatism?

22 replie(s)
Canada Free Press, by Lloyd Marcus    Original Article
Posted By: tisHimself- 9/18/2014 6:33:24 AM     Post Reply
For crying out loud, will someone “pleeeeease” take a stand for Conservatism? Someone forwarded this article to me, “Why Are Republicans Suddenly Leaning Left?” The article cites numerous examples of the GOP obviously believing it must embrace at least lukewarm Liberalism while backing away from Conservatism to win elections.The article mentioned that Mitt Romney avoided saying “Republican” in an ad supporting Scott Brown’s Senate run. Romney said in the ad referring to Brown, “will buck his own party to do what’s right for New Hampshire.” Romney’s statement implies that Conservatism can be mean, but rest assured that Brown will push

WSJ: Obama will require military to get his
personal approval for U.S. strikes in Syria

22 replie(s)
Hot Air, by Allahpundit    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 9/18/2014 3:08:29 PM     Post Reply
A man who’s a better speechwriter than his speechwriters, a better political director than his political directors, and who knows more about policy than his policy advisors must surely also be a better general than his generals, no? The U.S. military campaign against Islamist militants in Syria is being designed to allow President Barack Obama to exert a high degree of personal control, going so far as to require that the military obtain presidential signoff for strikes in Syrian territory, officials said. The requirements for strikes in Syria against the extremist group Islamic State will be far more stringent than those targeting


Post Reply   Close thread 791049





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS