A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


Now we’re all dopes
Boston Herald, by Howie Carr

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 1/26/2014 5:28:55 AM

Marijuana makes you stupid. Nobody wants to acknowledge the obvious fact, but that’s what this whole legalization debate is all about. That’s why most of the candidates for governor, of both parties, have come out against legalization, even if they have to obfuscate why they’re opposed to the Colorado-ization of Massachusetts. After all, the pols can’t offend that pivotal ganja-American voting bloc, assuming they can remember to vote in November. It’s left to comedians like Jay Leno Thursday night to poke around the truth: “Doctors warn that pot smoking impairs young people’s thinking, which of course makes them much more likely to sign up

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Zarin, 1/26/2014 5:58:33 AM     (No. 9705956)

Good read- funny if it were not true.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    67 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Trigger2, 1/26/2014 6:50:50 AM     (No. 9705980)

Cuomo´s ratings were heading down, down, down until he announced legalization of marijuana, then his approval ratings skyrocketed. Demonrats are losers.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    71 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Tomas, 1/26/2014 6:56:06 AM     (No. 9705983)

As a conservative, I support legalization of pot from the standpoint of one who was thrown through the criminal justice system for simple possession. What we´re doing is taking people who treat pot like most people treat beer - a recreational pursuit that endangers no one, except in extreme circumstances - and turning them into the criminal class. Police record, priors, stigma, fear, what have you.

If we can decriminalize it, turn it into a crime on par with a parking ticket, then, OK, maybe leave it on the books. But, until we figure out how to do that, let´s stop wrecking people´s lives because they have a dime bag in their car.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    83 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Pluperfect, 1/26/2014 6:58:57 AM     (No. 9705985)

#3, why does anyone need a dime bag in their car? Marijuana usage turns kids into zombies and any adult partaking is already an idiot.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    89 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: doodah, 1/26/2014 7:13:43 AM     (No. 9705996)

Howie is right! From first hand knowledge, I have seen a bright young man who had ambitions to be a doctor turn into a party animal, who fanatically preaches how great he is and that he is going to invent a way for all of us to get along and succeed and everyone will be equal, and happy, and it will be a much better world! He hates his world, the capitalistic overreach of the successful and he will change all of that by his invention. It is stunning and so deeply devastating because that habitual pot smoker is in my family. We are all regular people, church goers also, and he has illusions of grandeur plus a touch of the New Age thinking. He is in my prayers daily. If pot is legalized, please maintain some laws to prohibit widespread consumption for the young, something to slow down the "doping of America´s young" until they can learn more about the stuff

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    70 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: bmw50, 1/26/2014 7:31:45 AM     (No. 9706005)

Democrats are satanic. Yes, I said it and it´s true.

Democrats insure their election and re-election by enslaving the public to their won personal sin; whether it be drugs/marijuana, perverted sex, irresponsible sex, money without work...

Once people are enslaved to their sin, the Democrats promise to keep them supplied... as the nation implodes.

How do you defeat them? Teach people to be responsible and that ain´t happening here. Conservatism will never get off the ground with that kind of message.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    60 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Udanja99, 1/26/2014 7:32:18 AM     (No. 9706008)

A dime bag in the car, as in driving under the influence? I did that once about 35 years ago when pot wasn´t nearly as strong as it it today. My inability to function in the drivers seat scared me so badly that I never did it again. Fortunately I managed not to get into an accident. How, exactly, are LEO´s going to test for driving while stoned? How long before someone starts the first chapter of Mothers Against Stoned Drivers?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    37 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Rinktum, 1/26/2014 7:33:48 AM     (No. 9706011)

The government is willing to legalize anything that will make control of the population easier for them. We live in a society where people believe they are entitled to whatever their hearts desire. Sure, go ahead and partake of any substance you want but don´t expect the rest of us to pay for whatever consequences that arise out of your choice. If you choose to lose yourself to drug use instead of cultivating a good work ethic and becoming a productive member of society, don´t look to taxpayers to support you. You must be responsible for your choices in life, all of them.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    76 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Kitty Myers, 1/26/2014 7:36:02 AM     (No. 9706014)

I can support medical marijuana but not for recreational use. We don´t need one more legal high.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    74 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: jinx, 1/26/2014 7:49:45 AM     (No. 9706032)

Not to mention the schools. It is hard enough teaching students who aren´t smoking weed before school! Scores are already down. What about the teachers smoking weed before school. Our schools are going to be worse than ever!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    30 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: globalwarmer, 1/26/2014 7:59:00 AM     (No. 9706043)

Anecdotal, to be sure, but my cousin was a bright kid who took up MJ use as a 15 year old and ended up a high school and Marine Corps dropout, dumber than a bag of dirt. He is now deceased (due to his inability to think straight enough to get out of the way of traffic). Yeah, that marijuana is harmless stuff alright.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    95 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Me_Opinionated_Nah, 1/26/2014 8:03:23 AM     (No. 9706050)

Now we’re all dopes, according to Howie Carr, but only one of us has allegedly earned the right to be Dope-in-Chief and that would be none other than you-know-who, Mr. Mind-Altered-Fundamentally-Transforming-Controlled-Substance-Himself. Leader of the Free World? I think not! Leader-Wannabe of the Imprisoned World is more like it.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    57 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Mazeman, 1/26/2014 8:08:14 AM     (No. 9706053)

"Reefer Madness" redux.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    154 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: flybynight, 1/26/2014 8:23:27 AM     (No. 9706067)

We, too, have a bright young doper in our extended family, currently in Juvie, again. Would he and his loser-stoner buddies have spent their time behind Uncle Ned´s barn smoking unfiltered cigarettes and drinking pilfered booze in the good old days, or would he be setting the curve at his high school? This exceptional, once-charming, now sullen and detached boy might have amounted to something, but his brain seems wrecked now. Terrible waste, but at least, if MJ were legal, we-the-people might not be paying for his three hots and a cot, and earnest, but futile attempts at gittin his mind right.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    28 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: harleynyc, 1/26/2014 8:24:47 AM     (No. 9706069)

I know a working couple, 40ish, heavy pot users. They are unable to use a computer. They always leave their door open, and when they don´t they get locked out. And when they´re out, they leave all the lights and tvs on. They also don´t make much sense in a conversation. Luckily they don´t vote.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    34 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: 2dogs, 1/26/2014 8:27:34 AM     (No. 9706074)

Yesterday I read that Medicare will, in 2015, start controlling the selection of covered drugs for depression and psychosis and some autoimune conditions (the new ones are too expensive). Look for a lot of stoned old people. It may be all we have left.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    26 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Freeloader, 1/26/2014 8:29:07 AM     (No. 9706077)

FTA: "...is it a coincidence America´s best-known marijuana smoker thinks there are 57 states, that they speak Austrian in Austria and pronounces ´corps´ as ´corpse?"

Q: When and why did America´s 40th POTUS, Sir Ronaldus Magnus, institute a "Zero Tolerance" Drug Policy for our nation´s military services?

A: In May, 1981---Right after the horrendous
EA-6B Prowler flight deck crash aboard the USS Nimitz that killed 14, injured 45 and destroyed millions of dollars worth of aircraft and equipment.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    71 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Coy860, 1/26/2014 8:48:55 AM     (No. 9706107)

It is a gateway drug. For some it loses its effect, and then is combined with alcohol, then on to more types of drugs.
It kills in the end. I lost my son to drugs and alcohol last year at 42. He started with pot. 26 years of rehabs and relapses..a slow painful death.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    40 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: philsner, 1/26/2014 9:10:27 AM     (No. 9706138)

#3, conservatives don´t adopt liberal talking points. That you did qualifies you as a seminar poster.

"I love your show, I always agree with you, and I voted for Bush."

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    47 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: bnrmusa, 1/26/2014 9:16:04 AM     (No. 9706144)

I can accept the argument that pot is no worse the alcohol. That´s an admission that pot can wreck your live too.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    47 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: walcb, 1/26/2014 9:25:49 AM     (No. 9706153)

The main argument against smoking tobacco is that it causes cancer. Apparently smoking hemp does not.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    29 persons like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: LC Chihuahua, 1/26/2014 9:54:20 AM     (No. 9706183)

Some things to consider regarding drug use. If the police come raiding, they will question EVERYONE, and not just the drug users. Have plastic sandwich bags or a weight scale in your house? That drug possession charge just got upgraded to drug possession with the intent to sell. You think those pot smokers will just limit themselves to pot? One dose of crack can go for as little as $15 or $20. Is it worth it? The drug legalization crowd will rationalize about it all the way to jail.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    25 persons like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: pineledger, 1/26/2014 10:06:21 AM     (No. 9706200)

Case in point: The Boy King.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    36 persons like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: strike3, 1/26/2014 10:10:13 AM     (No. 9706208)

Good comments #4, #6.

I too knew a fortyish couple who were regular users. He grew weed for sale on their small farm and she worked for the city government. Both were incurable liberals. They were inevitably busted and, after some jail time, neither can now get a job. While they were in jail, their beautiful 20-something daughter died of an overdose of something.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    114 persons like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Bohallx, 1/26/2014 10:19:06 AM     (No. 9706222)

There are now dozens of substantial scientific studies being reported on the Internet about how marijuana can trigger schizophrenia or bipolar disorder in those who have the genes found to be involved in those disorders.

Many schizophrenics could live a good 15 to 20 symptom free years..... but for their use of marijuana in their teenage years.

Advocates FOR marijuana don´t care what it does to others.

I suspect some of them anticipate having a good cackle at some teenager´s expense ~ a lifelong expense BTW ~



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    30 persons like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: Pros7767, 1/26/2014 10:24:32 AM     (No. 9706230)

Pot is a dangerous drug. Withdrawal can last as long as seven days which is why many don´t stop.

Legalizing it is a very dangerous path to go down.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    24 persons like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: zoidberg, 1/26/2014 10:30:16 AM     (No. 9706242)

People need to learn the difference between a vice and a crime.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    30 persons like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: Arby, 1/26/2014 10:38:01 AM     (No. 9706251)

Think about when pot became popular. Think about our cultural life since then. Think about the nature of our ´entertainment´, the state of our universities, the occupant of the white house . . .

Yes, pot makes you stupid.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    117 persons like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: str8divorcee, 1/26/2014 10:38:52 AM     (No. 9706252)

I know plenty of pot smokers, heavy drinkers and other drug users who are a lot more successful in life than teetotaling, clean and sober me. I can´t say that marijuana makes people unable to function.

I just can´t stand to be around people who are high. They are IRRITATING. Drunks are IRRITATING. And I´d rather none of them were driving.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    21 persons like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: RancherJack, 1/26/2014 10:57:15 AM     (No. 9706278)

ReRead Communist Goals (1963) Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35 January 10, 1963

Current Communist Goals EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. A. S. HERLONG, JR. OF FLORIDA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, January 10, 1963

Then visit JR Nyquist´s page today

http://www.jrnyquist.com/

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    33 persons like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: faith_and_reason, 1/26/2014 11:09:54 AM     (No. 9706295)

For those writing about long time pot users and their health and mental issues...

Because pot is illegal, we know for sure that MANY of them consumed dozens and perhaps hundreds of "enhancers" to make non-pot and cheap pot "perform" better. We will NEVER know what the other chemicals were.

Legalization and quality control will fix that.

We know that high profits from government restrained supply will arm terrorists, arm and motivate murderous gangs, corrupt our police, judges, prison guards, border guards.

High profits negate the power of the laws forbidding the sale to minors. (Why risk prison for a 5% profit margin?)

The correlations with mental illness do not show that pot is a cause. Pot may RELIEVE symptoms of mental illness, making it attractive to the mentally ill.

There is no known lethal dose of pot. But an overdose of Big Brother, telling some fool that he doesn´t really own his own body, can lead to that fool´s body being turned over to some violent criminals for forcible sodomy.

And even small doses of Big Brother can get dozens of young blacks and Hispanics killed every week throughout America. It´s called gang violence.

The more powerful pot of modern times will help minimize the "hits" to get high, thus cutting lung damage.

This is the best of all times to stop the Drug War against those who are too poor to go hang-gliding, parachuting, street-luge racing, legal drag racing or any of dozens of risky things we as human beings have a right to do, if we can afford them!


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    69 persons like this.


Reply 32 - Posted by: Ida Lou Pino, 1/26/2014 11:13:51 AM     (No. 9706298)

So?

Let´s accept the premise that marijuana "makes you stupid." Why would that lead anyone who believes in freedom to support pervasive government prohibition of its usage?

Think clearly, my friends. If you want freedom for yourself - - you must support freedom for everyone else - - including "stupid" people.

Once you let government take someone else´s freedom away - - how do you stop it from taking yours away?

The government has no right whatsoever to prohibit anyone from ingesting whatever he or she wants to. Anyone who supports government prohibition is a chump - - and also dangerous.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    72 persons like this.


Reply 33 - Posted by: NOBS, 1/26/2014 11:17:24 AM     (No. 9706303)

Just remember a week ago the article on American Thinker on marjunaa. with lots of responses--worth a look.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    25 persons like this.


Reply 34 - Posted by: faith_and_Reason, 1/26/2014 11:51:25 AM     (No. 9706346)

#4, Pluperfect, wrote:

"#3, why does anyone need a dime bag in their car?"

My response to you: Why does anyone need to go hang-gliding? Why should we allow hunting? (Someone could get hurt!) Why does anyone need a tattoo? A piercing?!

Why should we allow people to think the government doesn´t own them?!! /sarcasm off

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    46 persons like this.


Reply 35 - Posted by: enuf8, 1/26/2014 11:54:48 AM     (No. 9706350)

How to support your habit.......robberies, burglaries have increased beyond belief. Most of the heavy pot/drug users cannot hold onto a job.
I do agree with the rational of those who are on welfare should be tested for drug/alcohol use.
Look to some of the results these days of getting toddlers high and just this week a report of a "teacher" taking MJ laced pot-luck to a function. Yes, the stuff is bad.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    30 persons like this.


Reply 36 - Posted by: faith_and_Reason, 1/26/2014 12:08:01 PM     (No. 9706368)

#35, enuf8, wrote:

"How to support your habit.......robberies, burglaries have increased beyond belief. Most of the heavy pot/drug users cannot hold onto a job."

Honestly. I´m usually impressed by the quality of analysis I find among the comments on Lucianne. Somehow, victimless crimes have some intoxicating, delusion-inducing power over some otherwise brilliant and sober minds.

Pan-handling is ENOUGH to support a pot habit, once it is legal!

Some just GROW their own. (Idea: Let´s legalize that, too!)

Robbery and burglary are dangerous, hard work. Something the stoners supposedly avoid!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    67 persons like this.


Reply 37 - Posted by: patpgmr, 1/26/2014 12:13:02 PM     (No. 9706379)

Marijuana Users Have Abnormal Brain Structure and Poor Memory

Drug abuse appears to foster brain changes that resemble schizophrenia

http://www.northwestern.edu/newscenter/stories/2013/12/marijuana-users-have-abnormal-brain-structure--poor-memory.html

I understand the reason why people want marijuana legalized; it´s fun to get high. Do you really want your adolescent children and grandchildren to develop brain abnormalities because of the increasingly easy access to marijuana? Just asking. Once it is legal, what kid is going to be deterred at all from buying and using? Fear of the criminal justice system is just about all that is at the moment.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    34 persons like this.


Reply 38 - Posted by: Vaquero45, 1/26/2014 12:15:28 PM     (No. 9706382)

Okay, folks....lighten up. A little perspective is in order.

Here in Colorado, the only thing that´s happening is that the tax base increased. People who want to get jobs know that they´ll still be tested for drugs. People also know that if they drive stoned, they´ll get arrested. As with every other intoxicant, there are some people who just can´t handle it and will get themselves into trouble. They have no one to blame but themselves.

I used to be a cop for a while; then, I spent 30 years handling insurance claims, and a lot of those claims involved people who were drunk or stoned. That´s life. I voted to legalize the stuff because I´m tired of the destruction of our civil liberties, and the trashing of the Fourth Amendment, through our ridiculous drug laws. In five years or so, you´ll see that all the nightmare scenarios envisioned by the alarmists will not have occurred.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    58 persons like this.


Reply 39 - Posted by: fishbone, 1/26/2014 12:19:15 PM     (No. 9706389)

When did all these leftist totalitarians start posting on Lucianne? Oops. It´s just those right wingers who believe in smaller government until they want that government to stop some activity they don´t agree with.

I´ve never found a mention of regulating drugs in the Constitution. I´ve never thought that the government had the authority to restrict drug usage. They tried with prohibition and that funded the gangsters and made a lot of people instant criminals. Similarly, drugs, cartels, and users.

BTW, where´s the "tolerance" for differing opinions? Not everyone who has a disagreeable opinion is a "seminar" poster.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    50 persons like this.


Reply 40 - Posted by: 4justice, 1/26/2014 12:36:11 PM     (No. 9706408)

Of course its bad for you and kills your brain cells....so do a lot of things, but decriminalizing it will not create more addicts. Stigma doesn´t work so good anymore. Education is the key.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    37 persons like this.


Reply 41 - Posted by: St. Pitbull, 1/26/2014 12:44:31 PM     (No. 9706416)

I used to think that this was a site for enlightened thinking. Maybe its just that the majority of like-minded thinkers on this issue (legalize drugs) are being polite and not wanting to go against the grain with the posters here. I hope so. You posters (the majority of the previous posters here) obviously want big gov´t - but just for your pet issues. And you want to force it on others.

You are as scary as libs - and you are in fact, libs. Go snuggle up to any dem, because that´s where it sounds like you belong. If you give them enough power and money, you can buy their vote on this issue.

As health care gets rationed - and it is no matter what happens from here on out, the larger picture of legalized drugs is going to be huge. Try to get in front of this issue and leave your reefer madness ideas behind you. It may be your loved ones that need those drugs that are considered illegal and rationed.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    54 persons like this.


Reply 42 - Posted by: Butch59, 1/26/2014 12:51:38 PM     (No. 9706426)

No, there isn´t a word about drugs in the Constitution, but, there IS something in there about "promote the general welfare". Now, if you are involved is something that does harm to the general pubic, then I would say that the government has a say in that particular action. That´s the argument that was made to stop smoking cigarettes. And controlling liquor. And any number of activities. Freedom doesn´t necessarily mean an individual go out and do anything he/she thinks is a great thing to do. You can´t rob a bank because it´s where the money is. Understanding that it´s someone else´s money is necessary. How would you feel if you surgeon toked up just before your critical operation? Or you airplane pilot toked up just before taking the controls? After all, it´s their personal freedom. And yes, I have personally seen the effects of pot on my own son. Thank the GOOD LORD that he is drug free now, but he lost 20yrs of his younger life. I will argue against pot for the rest of life. I know what it does to people!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    24 persons like this.


Reply 43 - Posted by: philsner, 1/26/2014 1:01:21 PM     (No. 9706435)

So, advocating legalization of weed is "enlightened thinking" but being against it isn´t?

Oh okay - in order to be "enlightened", one must agree with you.

Sounds like a leftist to me.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    85 persons like this.


Reply 44 - Posted by: tomanderson61, 1/26/2014 1:08:46 PM     (No. 9706445)

#38, more BS.

Out here in California, the big debate for "medical marijuana", which is a flat out lie in and of itself, was that we would see less crime, less access to pot for kids, and a big tax windfall.

Result? MORE crime, particularly around these dispensaries, NO tax windfall, and MORE kids able to get pot with phony scrips written by quack doctors.

Proof point? My son in high school watched as a group would pile into a car during break, shoot over to the dispensary a few miles away, and come back with their pot. Nice and easy, and they were all 17.

#39, and the rest of you pro-druggies, using your logic, why not make ALL drugs legal? EVERY one.

Why should we discriminate about cocaine? That is unfair. There are cocaine users I am SURE that could come forward and say, hey, I am not addicted! Why is the government coming down on me!

LSD, which can be transferred through the skin? Why not? Legalize it.

But I bet all of you would be crying for the government to DO something if it were you kid in the emergency room, having seizures, and the staff can´t figure out what drug she is on.

Because then it would be YOU, and that would be so unfair, right?

So right there, criminality. That was ONE case one ONE day, at ONE location.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    23 persons like this.


Reply 45 - Posted by: tomanderson61, 1/26/2014 1:20:10 PM     (No. 9706461)

#27 "People need to learn the difference between a vice and a crime."

Ok, so let´s use your logic. All vices should not be considered a crime.

Are you OK with--a gambling den setup next to your house, with prostitutes hanging around outside.? The apartment next to yours having pot blowing in your windows where your child is sleeping. People shooting up on your stairs outside your building.

Not saying any of this will happen--but just want to see a windbag like you who wants to electively choose which vice is ok and which is not, agree that you are perfectly fine with all the above.

You either are, or you´re a hypocrite.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    24 persons like this.


Reply 46 - Posted by: faith_and_Reason, 1/26/2014 1:29:07 PM     (No. 9706469)

#44, tomanderson61, wrote:

"...why not make ALL drugs legal? EVERY one."

Let me be the first to say, "ABSOLUTELY!!"

Every adult who is not in prison or a mental institution should be respected as the owner of his OWN body.

ANY substance, lethal or not, debilitating or not, is his RIGHT to ingest, if he can afford it or can grow it or manufacture it.

If he then harms ANOTHER person, prosecute him to the full extent of the law!!!

My bed-ridden, crippled mother overdosed on legal drugs, purposely killing herself, because YOUR heroes bullied the doctors into NOT allowing her the opiates that would have allowed her to live and function without daily, excruciating pain.

No, I reject the "government owns us" ideology. And I will never apologize for my hatred of that anti-freedom mindset!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    35 persons like this.


Reply 47 - Posted by: St. Pitbull, 1/26/2014 1:32:51 PM     (No. 9706473)

Here comes the hyperbole, anecdotals, scare tactics and falsehoods. Reefer Madness - we are here:

• Marijuana usage turns kids into zombies
• It is a gateway drug. For some it loses its effect, and then is combined with alcohol, then on to more types of drugs. It kills in the end.
• You think those pot smokers will just limit themselves to pot
• marijuana can trigger schizophrenia or bipolar disorder in those who have the genes
• Many schizophrenics could live a good 15 to 20 symptom free years..... but for their use of marijuana in their teenage years
• Advocates FOR marijuana don´t care what it does to others.
• Withdrawal can last as long as seven days which is why many don´t stop.
• Most of the heavy pot/drug users cannot hold onto a job
• Marijuana Users Have Abnormal Brain Structure and Poor Memory
• Drug abuse appears to foster brain changes that resemble schizophrenia
• adolescent children and grandchildren to develop brain abnormalities because of the increasingly easy access to marijuana
• Once it is legal, what kid is going to be deterred at all from buying and using

For those citing studies, look at the comments right below those articles dispelling the studies. For people who have a loved one who has died directly or indirectly from drugs, you have nothing but my sympathy and best wishes to help cope with that tragedy. But it seems that happened when the drugs were illegal. Maybe or maybe not it would have been different if the interdiction dollars went to education instead. And I am never advocating drug availability to children for anything other than medical reasons.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    44 persons like this.


Reply 48 - Posted by: philsner, 1/26/2014 2:20:20 PM     (No. 9706529)

That all posters aren´t seminar posters doesn´t mean none of them are, but when you preface a liberal leaning opinion by saying you are a conservative it qualifies you.
And I disagree that being against legalization means you are pro big government. That is such a liberal canard. It´s like saying that if you appreciate firemen you have to embrace socialism.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    15 persons like this.


Reply 49 - Posted by: mabel normand, 1/26/2014 2:26:12 PM     (No. 9706539)

I raised a child publicly educated in Oakland, CA. He´s 21, drug-free and a moderate drinker. I´m also nobody´s grandma and I´ve never seen the inside of a police station. He could move out, though. If your kid ends up hooked on dope, maybe the answer lies in your mirror.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    35 persons like this.


Reply 50 - Posted by: NorthernDog, 1/26/2014 2:48:43 PM     (No. 9706573)

Most drugs are still prescription only. Their distribution and usage is controlled because they can be misused and cause great harm.
I wonder how long before a multitude of drugs are readily available because people simply want them, and the government can make a nice, tidy profit on their sale.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    21 persons like this.


Reply 51 - Posted by: ketchuplover, 1/26/2014 3:53:49 PM     (No. 9706634)

I only know three people who smoke pot regulary - for 20 years or more. All are relatives. There´s the nephew who is now struggling with heroin addiction and continuously lies about make-believe jobs he supposedly has. He lives in a group home and is in his 30s. There´s another nephew, about the same age, who never graduated from high school and still has no interest in getting a diploma. He goes from job to job, begging people for a car, spiritually searching for the meaning of life - in any source but the Christianity in which he was raised. Then there´s my 50 y.o. sister who sits in her subsidized govt. apt, collecting disability checks from the govt because of supposed anxiety (which none of her family has ever witnessed) got free govt drugs (and then sold them to customers coming to her door), and has no interest in doing any kind of work. (All three love Obama and his handouts). It seems to me that a great deal of legalization advocates are trying to soothe their consciences over their own past use. After all, how can they tell their kids no drugs, when they themselves used drugs at that age? Go ahead and be a purist and say no govt intervention in personal lives. Then when you legalize all drugs, attach a prohibition of govt to treat or care for those who are hospitalized or injured as a result of drug use. Why should law-abiding citizens pay for the "vices" of others? Ahh, yes....legalization of drugs, acceptance of gay lifestyle as normal, no-fault divorce, unmarried pregnancies, the narcotics of more unemployment checks --- the destruction of the family is almost complete.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    51 persons like this.


Reply 52 - Posted by: Stegosaurus, 1/26/2014 4:51:32 PM     (No. 9706668)

Look, Posters, get serious. Smoking marijuana is a stupid thing to do. You don´t have to go any further than that. OK, so some of you smoked marijuana as a 20s something. 20s somethings do stupid things, we all know that - but are you such a fool as to try to pass it off as an OK thing?

Why do people smoke marijuana? The only reason is to get high. But suppose someone said to you: "The reason I drink is to get drunk as a skunk," What would you think of them? Why would you not thin that of marijuana smokers?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


Reply 53 - Posted by: Timber Queen, 1/26/2014 5:13:16 PM     (No. 9706684)

I live in the middle of the Emerald Triangle of northern California. Just about everybody here smokes and/or grows pot. Since the commie-enviros killed the timber industry marijuana is the only economic activity in this county. We have had legal “medical” marijuana for many years. At first the dispensaries caused lots of problems, but individual cities and towns passed laws to curb the egregious public use, and cracked down on quack doctors giving “215 cards” to minors. We have a strong conservative Sheriff who works with the responsible growers to ensure compliance with the plant number restrictions, and protect them from violent poachers. The Sheriff can now focus on the rogue cartel growers in the National Forest who dump pesticides and fertilizers into our creeks and streams. They also poach water from those creeks that impact ranchers downstream. All in all, after the first year, things have gotten better in this county.

All intoxicants effect individuals differently. Some are disposed to be addicts to something that will control their lives, while others can function in life with the same substance and do just fine. I know more successful people who smoke pot than the lazy stereotype hippie-stoner loser. Private use is their business. Public use can be regulated just like with alcohol, as I have seen done in the towns of this county. In regards to the argument about wanting your doctor or your pilot toking up before work, they would face the same consequences if they had a drink of scotch beforehand. Pot smells. A lot. It’s not so easy to cover up if you show up for work stoned.

I side with legalization, and control those who cannot control their public behavior in the same manner as alcohol abusers.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    37 persons like this.


Reply 54 - Posted by: Rumblehog, 1/26/2014 7:08:17 PM     (No. 9706779)

I want to know if now that Coloretardo and other States are legalizing it if some genius ambulance chaser lawyer and his doper client are going to figure out they can sue the State for drug induced damages, loss of job, etc., since, after all, the State said it was, "OK."

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    17 persons like this.


Reply 55 - Posted by: Ida Lou Pino, 1/26/2014 7:46:01 PM     (No. 9706807)

It´s frightening - - to see otherwise decent people who are otherwise believers in freedom become big-government fascists simply because they don´t personally approve of people who take narcotic drugs.

They invoke all kinds of horror scenarios without any sense of irony - - because all of those horror scenarios are occurring RIGHT NOW under Prohibition!

Nothing is more dangerous that the I-want-to-be-free-but-I-don´t-want-him-to-be-free mentality. Wake up, all you Prohibitionists - - it´s your own freedom which you´re surrendering to the leftist fascists. That wouldn´t be so bad in itself - - but at the same time you´re also surrendering everyone else´s freedom - - including mine. And that´s what I deeply resent.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.


Reply 56 - Posted by: jacooley, 1/26/2014 8:01:45 PM     (No. 9706817)

I come down with Bill Buckley on this one. First, I see it as a 10th Amendment issue where there is no role for the feds. Next, I see billions of dollars going to criminal gangs and the criminal justice system. I see dead people shot up in gang wars to control an illegal trade and the corruption of whole countries. Al Capone must be looking down (or looking up)and smiling at how history repeats itself. Then I see the erosion of civil liberties from the "War on Drugs". How many more doors do we need kicked in? How many more homeowners must get shot to death when it turns out to be the wrong doors?

Now, many of the problems people are pointing out are ones associated with a welfare state. We need to rethink the foolish idea that being a drug addict or drunk entitles you to all sorts of government benefits. If Joe Pothead has to stay employed to eat, then Joe Pothead learns to moderate their vices just like Joe Six Pack.

I am perfectly fine with employers having "no stoner" rules in hiring. Drug testing for public benefits is a wonderful idea to me. If you are getting money from me, then please be sober.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    16 persons like this.


Reply 57 - Posted by: philsner, 1/26/2014 8:56:50 PM     (No. 9706843)

#55, saying that an opinion that differs from yours is "frightening" is the province of leftists, and comparing marijuana to alcohol constitutes false equivalence
In addition, it is dishonest to claim dissent is "indecent" or that those who hold a different opinion on pot are "big government fascists". Please.
That just isn´t true, except at places like dailykos or MSNBC.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


Reply 58 - Posted by: TunnelRat, 1/26/2014 9:24:37 PM     (No. 9706855)

I think what is "frightening" is that is supposed to be a relatively conservative site. I am both surprised and saddened to read all the anti-constitutional, anti-personal freedom and responsibility, and pro-Prohibition posts here.

"I don´t like marijuana. I don´t like hippies. Drugs are bad. Therefore we should put them all in jail"

Sorry, I don´t buy it.

I do like the reference to the 10th amendment. Constitutionally, the several states have the police power to regulate drugs; the federal government does not.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    15 persons like this.


Reply 59 - Posted by: tomanderson61, 1/26/2014 9:25:36 PM     (No. 9706856)

#57, thank you. Note that when I make several points, these pro-pot fanatics can do nothing but call us big government.

I love logic. Logic cleans and clarifies. So let´s use the logic again, like the freakshow above that thinks we should legalize ALL drugs.

Ok, I´m game. Let´s do away with all speed limits. Let everyone drive any way they want, and prosecute them to the full extent of the law SHOULD they kill or hurt someone. After all, speed limits are "big government".

There are many, many laws that regulate behavior. Why not get rid of every one. A good child safety seat is not mentioned in the Constitution, so seat requirements, throw those away. I should be able to hang my kid out the window when I drive. Aren´t laws against refusing mortgages to people of color or women encroaching on the personal freedoms of the mortgage company owners? Get rid of those laws as well.

These same people would be screaming for government help should they be in a flood, or their kid comes in contact with some strain of some kind of illicit drug and the ER cannot help him. Then suddenly, because it´s about them, they´d be crying foul.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    15 persons like this.


Reply 60 - Posted by: faith_and_Reason, 1/26/2014 9:39:51 PM     (No. 9706862)

#57, philsner, wrote:

"...saying that an opinion that differs from yours is "frightening" is the province of leftists...
In addition, it is dishonest to claim dissent is "indecent" or that those who hold a different opinion on pot are "big government fascists". Please."

Actually, some beliefs ARE "frightening," fail to be "decent" and display the intentions of "big government fascists." Not because they are dissent or are a contrary opinion to some random critic, but because of their frightening, dangerous fascist aim.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.


Reply 61 - Posted by: St. Pitbull, 1/26/2014 11:30:28 PM     (No. 9706906)

#59 - you are the embodiment of big gov´t and you do not even realize it. IMO, This is not what a conservative should espouse as gov´t´s role. This is what we routinely criticize demtards for. You pick what gov´t´s role should be - the sames as dems do. You´re only difference is what you want gov´t to come down on. People need to understand what liberty was meant to be - it was not meant to be "what I think" but not "what you think". You have become too emotionally attached to this issue - another trait of the dems. I am not criticizing - I just hope that people learn to differentiate.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.


Reply 62 - Posted by: St. Pitbull, 1/26/2014 11:31:59 PM     (No. 9706907)

None of us are "pro pot fanatics". We are liberty fanatics, thank you very much.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    24 persons like this.


Reply 63 - Posted by: snakeoil, 1/27/2014 12:37:32 AM     (No. 9706927)

I´ve never used pot, coke, or any of that illegal stuff because it´s illegal. If only one person in a thousand gets caught I´d be the one. And whatever thrill I might get certainly isn´t worth going to the clink and having my career destroyed. Also how do you know what you´re getting when you use illegal drugs? When you buy whiskey from a liquor store it may be bad for you but at least you know what you´re getting. Even if it becomes legal I´ll pass. My big thrill is waking up in the morning and drinking coffee. The thing I hate about the debate about drugs is like abortion is being used as a wedge issue to split the anti lib vote. I´ll save all my nastiness for the libs.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    42 persons like this.


Reply 64 - Posted by: cat2, 1/27/2014 4:37:10 AM     (No. 9706981)

For all the pro-legalization posters, I hope that when some stoned driver crashes his or her car into yours you will remember all the rationalizations for pot that you have posted here. Or maybe you will be stoned yourself, and think it´s just another day in la-la land.

There is a difference between conservatives and libertarians and the difference is very evident in this thread.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.


Reply 65 - Posted by: Deagin, 1/27/2014 6:18:27 AM     (No. 9707008)

Pot should only be used as medicine in very small doses. I suffer from PTSD and pot helps me calm down and sleep. It is better than any other medicine prescribed for PTSD. It should not be used at parties or when driving.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.


Reply 66 - Posted by: philsner, 1/27/2014 7:16:21 AM     (No. 9707061)

#60, but not this one. Hysterical rhetoric and guilt trips do not make the case for legalization.
And the "big government fascism" argument won´t fly either. All one has to do is apply and extend that flawed logic to see it fail.
For example; if you advocate the minimum wage why not make it $100/hr.?
If you advocate legalizing marijuana and believe doing so is anti big government and pro freedom, why not legalize heroin and methamphetamine too? You should be able to make that choice without government meddling, right?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.


Reply 67 - Posted by: faith_and_Reason, 1/27/2014 8:44:14 AM     (No. 9707168)

#66, there are conservatives who advocate ending the minimum wage. I´m one. I also advocate that any non-incarcerated adult be permitted to ingest ANY substance he chooses and can get his hands on without violating anyone else´s God-given rights.

I favor strong defense. I oppose isolationism and pacifism. I am a conservative, a very libertarian-leaning conservative, like others here.

#64, writes: "There is a difference between conservatives and libertarians and the difference is very evident in this thread."

Neither conservatism nor libertarianism is that narrowly defined. My views are in accord with the Founding Fathers. I am, proudly, a Jeffersonian liberal, as many here are. Whether we call ourselves libertarian, conservative, or both, we favor Jefferson and reject Mussolini and Stalin.

Fascism violates the Jeffersonian ideal.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    16 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 769752




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



What would a Mitch
McConnell-led Senate look like?
Washington Post, by Paul Kane    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/17/2014 5:08:09 PM     Post Reply
It’s no secret that Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) don’t like one another. They battle regularly over legislation and their Senate floor fights over arcane-but-important rules have become must-see entertainment for senatorial insiders. According to aides in both parties, the two leaders have not had a one-on-one sitdown to discuss legislation (or anything else) since late last year. Nowadays, all business is conducted on the phone or in brief discussions on the Senate floor. Part of that feud is political – Democrats targeted McConnell in 2008, Republicans targeted Reid in 2010, Democrats

Jews ´ordered to register and list property´
in east Ukraine city of Donetsk where pro-Russian
militants have taken over government buildings
Daily Mail [UK], by Julian Robinson    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/17/2014 4:55:14 PM     Post Reply
Jews have reportedly been told to ´register´ with pro-Russian forces in the east Ukrainian city of Donetsk. They were also told they would need to provide a list of property they own as well as being ordered to pay a fee or face the threat of deportation. U.S. officials in Washington say leaflets bearing the chilling order have recently appeared in the city amid pro and anti-Russian protests as tensions rise in the area. It comes after Jews leaving a synagogue in the city of Donetsk were reportedly told they had to ´register´ with Ukranians trying to make the city part of Russia.United

The Problem with Rand Paul
Commentary Magazine, by Peter Wehner    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/17/2014 4:51:41 PM     Post Reply
In his column earlier this week, the Wall Street Journal’s Bret Stephens laid out his case against Rand Paul becoming the GOP’s presidential nominee. It was a powerful indictment and perhaps one worth building on. Mr. Stephens highlighted what he believes would be some of the obstacles facing Senator Paul, beginning with his long political association with Jack Hunter, alias the “Southern Avenger,” who among other things wrote an April 13, 2004 column titled “John Wilkes Booth Was Right.” The “Southern Avenger” said this: Although Lincoln’s assassin, John Wilkes Booth’s heart was in the right place, the Southern Avenger

Ave Ava
National Review Online, by Reid Buckley    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/17/2014 2:11:01 PM     Post Reply
EDITOR’S NOTE: Fergus Reid Buckley, the youngest brother of William F. Buckley Jr., and founder of the Buckley School of Public Speaking, died this week. The following article is his remembrance of actress Ava Gardner.I was deeply saddened by the death of Ava Gardner. At one time, I guess I was about as close to her as anyone outside her immediate family. I first met her (I believe it was in connection with the filming of 55 Days at Peking) while lunching at La Puerta de Hierro Country Club near Madrid. She was at the next table. With an absentminded

Boston stung by ‘beekeeper’ with
crush on Dzhokhar Tsarnaev
Boston Herald, by Howie Carr    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/17/2014 2:05:50 PM     Post Reply
Nothing to see here folks, move along. That was the verdict of Mayor Marty Walsh and Police Commissioner William Evans on the latest “performance artist” to plunge the city in turmoil. So what if they had to shut down the Green Line and “detonate” said artiste’s attack backpack Tuesday night on Boylston Street? “There was no breach of security,” said the mayor yesterday. Of course not. A guy dressed all in black with a veil that made him look like the Beekeeper of Death runs barefoot down Boylston Street chanting “Boston Strong!” and then abandons his backpack in the middle

The crashes that changed
plane designs forever
BBC [UK], by Jonathan Glancey    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/17/2014 2:02:12 PM     Post Reply
At any one time hundreds of thousands of us are cocooned in pressurised cabins scything through the cold upper reaches of the troposphere. Soon enough, this figure will rise to a million: a million passengers, flown safely, if not always comfortably, across countries and continents, and with little call for comment. Before engines could lift heavier-than-air machines convincingly off the ground, any attempt at flight had been dangerous, and yet for hundreds of years, adventurers strapped wings to their arms, and leapt off hilltops and towers in the vain hope of flying. Even when a part of the science of flight

Antisemite Max Blumenthal Incites
Murder of Three in Kansas
Accuracy in Media, by Daniel Pipes    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/17/2014 1:55:50 PM     Post Reply
Max Blumenthal, like others on the far-Left, jumped on the July 2011 Norwegian massacre of 77 dead and 319 injured to impugn the counter-jihadi right. His screed, “Anders Behring Breivik, a perfect product of the Axis of Islamophobia” included this sentence: The rhetoric of the characters who inspired Breivik, from Pam Geller to Robert Spencer to Daniel Pipes, was so eliminationist in its nature that it was perhaps only a matter of time before someone put words into action. In other words, we three were to blame for the massacre. A year later, Blumenthal returned to the same theme, this time focusing

Torn Apart by Blast, West, Texas, Is
Rebuilding, but Emotional Toll Lingers
Wall Street Journal, by Nathan Koppel    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/17/2014 8:55:27 AM     Post Reply
WEST, Texas—Block by block, schools, homes and businesses are steadily being pieced back together here, a year after a blast at a fertilizer depot laid waste to much of the town. But the mental wounds suffered by residents are proving much harder to heal. Army veteran Joshua Zarecor was at an apartment complex near the West Fertilizer Co. facility, watching firefighters battle a blaze there last April 17, when the plant suddenly exploded, shattering glass in the complex and causing its walls to collapse. Misty Lambert, 38 years old, who had moved to West several weeks earlier, said she had invited Mr.

Earth Daze: Overcoming
Environmental Hysteria
Reason Magazine, by John Stossel    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/17/2014 5:56:56 AM     Post Reply
"The heavens reek, the waters below are foul ... we are in a crisis of survival." That´s how Walter Cronkite and CBS hyped the first Earth Day, back in 1970. Somehow we´ve survived since then, and most of life got better, although I never hear that from the worrywarts. Of course, some things got better because of government: We passed environmental rules that got most of the filth out of the air and sewage out of lakes and rivers. Great—but now we´re told that we´re in big trouble because greenhouse gases cause global warming. I mean, climate change. "Crop yields are

The Stupid Hounding of Condi Rice
Politico Magazine, by Rich Lowry    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/17/2014 5:53:10 AM     Post Reply
If Condoleezza Rice were as self-pitying and politically crass as Attorney General Eric Holder, she would be wondering aloud what it is about her race and gender that accounts for the hostility of her enemies. Rice’s recent speaking gigs on college campuses and her ascension to the board of the file-sharing company Dropbox have sparked protests calling for her to be disinvited, cashiered and generally isolated and shamed. Condi Rice is not a natural lightning rod. She’s such a disreputable figure that she’s on the board of the Kennedy Center and the Boys and Girls Clubs of America. She’s such a lightweight

Watch a Congressional Candidate
Shoot Down a ´Government Drone´
National Journal, by Alex Brown    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/17/2014 5:49:33 AM     Post Reply
As a "government drone" hovers over Matt Rosendale, the Republican House candidate from Montana tells the camera what he thinks of government overreach, regulation, and "spying on our citizens." Then, standing in front of an ATV, Rosendale coolly puts a rifle to his shoulder, looks up through the sight and "downs" the drone with a single shot. "The federal government is too big and too powerful," Rosendale says. "I´m ready to stand tall for freedom and get Washington out of our lives," he says. Rosendale is trying to stand out in a five-way primary for Montana´s at-large seat in the House. Sporting a barn

Holy Harpocrates!
American Spectator, by Seth Lipsky    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/17/2014 5:22:58 AM     Post Reply
A story is told about Robert L. Bartley, late editor of the Wall Street Journal, and his penchant for long silences. He is supposed to have once taken a job applicant to lunch at which, though the two shared a meal, neither spoke a syllable. That is no doubt apocryphal; the job applicant probably said something. George Washington had a taciturn streak, as did President Coolidge, known as “Silent Cal.” (Snip)But rarely does anyone get as upset about it as Jeffrey Toobin of the New Yorker appears to be in respect of Clarence Thomas. Toobin came unglued at the disinclination of



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Has Rush Limbaugh Finally
Reached the End Of The Road?

47 replie(s)
Forbes Magazine, by Rick Ungar    Original Article
Posted By: EveningStar- 4/16/2014 7:24:05 PM     Post Reply
Like him or hate him, there is no disputing that Rush Limbaugh’s very special brand of mixing right-wing politics with his flare for entertainment has produced one of the most successful radio programs in the medium’s long history. Whatever the burning political question of the day, millions of Americans have relished the opportunity to tune into Rush’s program, knowing that he would quickly take that hot potato, throw a few gallons of verbal kerosene into the mix and elevate the matter into a five alarm fire with a just a few well-chosen words spoken in the style only Rush Limbaugh could

Why is US Senator Harry
Reid so concerned with
a local Nevada rancher?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Wayne Allyn Root    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/16/2014 9:37:12 PM     Post Reply
I live in Las Vegas. I live and breath Nevada politics. Something is very wrong. Something smells rotten in the Nevada desert. And Senator Harry Reid’s fingerprints are all over it. I am of course referring to the Bundy Ranch siege. This was a dispute between a Nevada ranching family with rights to the land in question for 140 years and the BLM (Bureayu of Land Management). The government claims they haven’t paid grazing fees for 20 years. The result was a government assault on the ranch- including snipers with assault rifles, SUV’s, helicopters, airplanes and over 200 heavily armed troops. No

Michelle Obama Riverdances
Through Dublin to the Tune
of $7,921,638

39 replie(s)
Breitbart Big Peace, by Tom Fitton    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/17/2014 6:45:16 AM     Post Reply
When it comes to tracking the cost of Obama family vacations, there are two primary challenges. First, the Obamas are prolific jet-setters, so there are many details to track. Second, the Obama administration, clearly embarrassed by these lavish and frequent family vacations, stonewalls the release of records at every turn. But we have been relentless in pursuit of this information. Our attorneys file the lawsuits and make our case, and our investigators pour through pages of records and crunch the numbers. And the information we’ve uncovered – information that would otherwise remain under lock and key – shows that the

Which Actor Portrays The
Best James Bond?

38 replie(s)
American Spectator, by Jonah Goldberg and Taki Theodoracopulos    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/16/2014 11:20:22 AM     Post Reply
Look, everyone loves Sean Connery, particularly Sean Connery. That’s why he plays Sean Connery in every movie he’s in. People love that Scottish brogue so much, they don’t mind that he has it when he plays Juan Sánchez Villa-Lobos Ramírez, an immortal Spaniard in Highlander. The guy even won an Oscar for playing an Irish cop with a Scottish accent. Talk about sexist double standards: Meryl Streep has to master foreign dialects to get her golden statuettes. Connery just has to show up on time. In economics you devalue a currency by printing too much of it. In film you

White babies just 15 months old show racial
bias when picking playmates, study found

35 replie(s)
Daily Mail (U.K.), by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/15/2014 10:23:35 PM     Post Reply
Toddlers show racial bias when picking playmates, a study reveals. They also take account of how fairly others behave. Researchers tested the reaction of white 15-month-olds as toys were distributed. Two white adults divided the toys, one equally and the other unequally. Seventy per cent of the toddlers chose to play with the researcher who distributed the toys fairly. But in a second test, when one researcher favoured a white recipient over an Asian one, they picked the ‘fair’ researcher less often, the journal Frontiers in Psychology reports. And the babies are more likely to help those who share the same ethnicity, which is known as

Elizabeth Warren whines about coverage
of her fraudulent Indian claim

35 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Patrick Howley    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/16/2014 9:54:52 PM     Post Reply
Democratic Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren wrote in her forthcoming book that she was “hurt” and “angry” by 2012 reporting on her fraudulent claim to Native American heritage. “What really threw me, though, were the constant attacks from the other side,” Warren wrote in her book “A Fighting Chance.” “I would almost persuade myself that I was starting to get the hang of full-throttle campaigning and then — bam! Out of left field, the state Republican Party, or the Brown campaign, or some blogger, would launch a rocket at me,” Warren wrote, adding, ”I was stunned by the attacks.” This reporter (blogger?) reported extensively

Former US president joins
opposition to Keystone XL

33 replie(s)
Houston Chronicle, by Jennifer A. Dlouhy    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/16/2014 10:32:12 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — Former President Jimmy Carter joined fellow Nobel laureates Wednesday in opposing Keystone XL, insisting that approving the pipeline would trigger “more climate upheaval” around the globe. In an open letter to President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry, Carter and the nine other Nobel Peace Prize winners bluntly warned the leaders: “Your decision on the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline will define your climate legacy.” The missive, published as an advertisement in Politico, represents the first time Carter has taken a position on the $5.4 billion project and makes him the first former president to come

Fox News Poll: Many voters say Obama lies
to the country on important matters

29 replie(s)
Fox News, by Dana Blanton    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/16/2014 7:39:27 PM     Post Reply
About six in ten American voters think Barack Obama lies to the country on important matters some or most of the time, according to a Fox News poll released Wednesday. Thirty-seven percent think Obama lies “most of the time,” while another 24 percent say he lies “some of the time.” Twenty percent of voters say “only now and then” and 15 percent “never.” Click here for the poll results. President Obama has been accused by political opponents and media fact-checkers alike of telling falsehoods. Frequently cited: His repeated claim that under Obamacare “If you like your plan, you can keep

Rev. Al Sharpton’s Easter message:
Politically ‘crucified’ Obama has risen again

28 replie(s)
Washington Times, by Jessica Chasmar    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 4/16/2014 3:42:51 PM     Post Reply
With Easter soon approaching, the Rev. Al Sharpton on Wednesday drew parallels between the resurrection of Jesus Christ and the resurrection of President Obama’s political career. Joining the “Tom Joyner Morning Show,” Mr. Sharpton said that his message for this Easter is that “no matter what the world may do to you unfairly, no matter how you’re crucified — nailed to the cross at home, or in your personal relationships, or on the job — that you can rise if you don’t lose yourself during the hard times and the challenges.” The reverend went on to say that Christ endured so much humiliation and unearned suffering leading up to his death,

Wendy Davis will undergo neck surgery
28 replie(s)
Star-Telegram [Fort Worth TX], by Anna M. Tinsley    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/16/2014 4:02:34 PM     Post Reply
FORT WORTH — Democratic gubernatorial candidate Wendy Davis will undergo neck surgery today, her campaign said Tuesday. “After experiencing shoulder and right arm pain in recent weeks, Sen. Davis will have a routine surgical procedure to remove bone spurs and degenerative discs that are creating compression on the nerves in her neck,” campaign spokesman Zac Petkanas said in a statement Tuesday. “This is a common issue experienced by runners and endurance athletes,” he said. Davis, of Fort Worth, will undergo the outpatient surgery at the Fort Worth Brain and Spine Institute. Dr. Thomas Ellis will perform the

Obama administration gives Detroit
$100 million for ´blight removal´

27 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Rick Moran    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/16/2014 1:36:54 PM     Post Reply
The cash infusion by the federal government is actually going to help the city pay pensions, even though they´re playing a kind of shell game with the money. As for "blight removal," perhaps they could start with city hall. Reuters: Michigan officials and President Barack Obama´s Administration are discussing a plan to free up $100 million in federal money to aid Detroit´s retired city workers, the Detroit Free Press reported on Tuesday. Citing two people familiar with the talks, the newspaper said the talks were centered around federal money flowing to Michigan for blight removal. Under the plan, $100 million

Climate change is damaging fish brains and
causing them to lose their survival instinct,
researchers warn

26 replie(s)
Daily Mail (U.K.), by Mark Prigg    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/15/2014 10:32:21 PM     Post Reply
Fish are losing their survival instinct as the world´s oceans become more acidic because of climate change, researchers have claimed. The study confirms laboratory experiments showing that the behavior of reef fishes can be seriously affected by increased carbon dioxide concentrations in the ocean. Carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere is absorbed into ocean waters, where it dissolves and lowers the pH of the water. The new study is the first to analyze the sensory impairment of fish from CO2 seeps, where pH is similar to what climate models forecast for surface waters by the turn of the century. ´These results verify our laboratory


Post Reply   Close thread 769752





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS