A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


Food stamp recipients, feds
cast doubt on Haley proposal

Post & Courier [Charleston, SC], by Lauren Sausser

Original Article

Posted By:Attercliffe, 3/27/2013 8:23:31 AM

West Ashley resident Shirley Wilson gets $32 a month in food stamp vouchers, and she said it´s not the government´s business to tell her what kind of food she should be able to buy with them. “Nobody should tell me how to eat, except when I´m dying and a doctor puts me on restrictions,” said Wilson, shopping at Save-A-Lot in West Ashley Tuesday afternoon. [Snip] That´s exactly what Gov. Nikki Haley wants to do. Haley has proposed restricting soda, candy and other high-sugar, low-fiber foods from purchase by food-stamp recipients in an effort to help curb the state´s obesity problem.

Comments:
I go with Haley on this one. Our money is buying the products that make recipients sick and our money is paying their medical bills. As someone in the article commented, it doesn´t make sense. Candy and soda are not essential "foods" in my book.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: noproblems, 3/27/2013 8:26:41 AM     (No. 9246041)

we live in insane times when people think they can get government money without restrictions, and that they actually can

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Keekng, 3/27/2013 8:37:39 AM     (No. 9246061)

Remember the ´good ol´ days´ when they were given a hunk of cheese instead of money? We need to get back to that.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Pros7767, 3/27/2013 8:40:13 AM     (No. 9246068)

This one will be fun to watch. It´s okay for the government to require the posting of calorie counts at restaurants despite the cost to the owners, but it´s too expensive to figure out which foods are healthy. Go figure!

The difference between Bloomberg´s Big Gulp restrictions and Nicki Haley´s proposal is that the SNAP (supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program) is that it is designed to provide nutrition not junk food. Of course that´s too complex for the government to figure out.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: jond, 3/27/2013 8:44:56 AM     (No. 9246074)

Having watched food stamp recipients load up on Fluffer-Nutter (a combination of peanut butter and marshmallows) I can only cheer.

But seriously, why restrict the stamps at all. We, fascist pig ofay Feds won´t allow them to be used for alcohol or tobacco. At least, not directly.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Teleologicus, 3/27/2013 8:50:17 AM     (No. 9246083)

The same people who applaud Mike Bloomberg´s meddling with the personal choices of New Yorkers are opposed to Nikki Haley´s attempt to meddle with the personal choices of food stamp recipients. Since both meddlers justify their meddling on health and economic grounds there would seem to be little to choose between them. Haley wants to meddle with poor people -or, in any case, food stamp recipients, not all of whom are poor in the traditional sense- and Bloomberg wants to meddle with EVERYBODY everywhere. He is a equal opportunity meddler, a compulsive, perhaps even a pathological case, a Napoleon of social engineers and world-improvers.

But meddling is meddling. While some need and justification can be argued to monitor the use of taxpayer funds by recipients of charity such as food stamps, micromanaging the dietary choices of such individuals is intrusive and of doubtful utility. More stringent means tests and exit strategies, e.g. how to keep the term of dependence on public charity as brief as possible, would seem to be a more productive approach.

The Bloombergs of the world are compulsive meddlers who think it is their responsibility to stick their noses into and to mind other people´s business - for their own good, of course. Nothing can be done about them but to contain their dictatorial impulses. In a certain narrow sort of way, they are actually kind of crazy.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: shalimar, 3/27/2013 8:52:01 AM     (No. 9246085)

I´ve been hearing this idea debated since the 70s. Will be shocked if it goes anywhere.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: billp, 3/27/2013 8:56:55 AM     (No. 9246096)

Except #5, that in the one case, the government provides the money used, with the justification that people will otherwise starve to death. So, does the government not have the responsibility to see to it that public money used specifically to prevent starvation is use to do just that?

In the other case, it´s personal choices made with personal monies that are usually obtained without government involvement and, therefore, the government has no business poking it´s nose into the matter.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: MattMusson, 3/27/2013 8:57:08 AM     (No. 9246097)

Unlike most of you on this site I was actually on foodstamps when the mill I was working in closed. It allowed me to feed my children (along with leftover pizza from the Papa Johns I was able to get a part time job at.) It is a great program. But, I was shocked that there were so few restrictions on what you could buy with food stamps.

After giving up on finding a local job, I moved and was lucky enough to get a professional job again.

So, after living on both sides of the fence - I do not see any reason to be buying poor folks junk food. It is that simple.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: KTWO, 3/27/2013 9:06:24 AM     (No. 9246102)

The question is whether Food Stamps are to be regarded as a gift. Or are they, instead, a grant to be used for a specific purpose?

If they are a gift it is hard to see why or how to restrict which foods are bought with them. Gifts transfer ownership and Ms Wilson could buy a pair of shoes with the $32.

OTOH if we regard them as a grant then adding restrictions seems legitimate.





  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: country boy, 3/27/2013 9:07:37 AM     (No. 9246106)

Taking junk food off the SNAP program is a no-brainer. Taxpayers should not be giving food to the moocher class which will just create huge health costs down the road in Medicare and Medicaid. Anybody who doesn´t understand that is either dishonest or brain dead.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: another_clinton, 3/27/2013 9:07:43 AM     (No. 9246107)

If women who have access to WIC are restricted to what they can buy, why not food stamps. The government should tell you what you can buy, not what you cant.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Felixcat, 3/27/2013 9:15:11 AM     (No. 9246124)

The Shirley Wilsons of the world can´t get on that death bed fast enough.

I, too, was on food stamps for a brief period because of an unexpected change in my employment status. I hated using them - this was back when they were actual paper slips. I would go to a grocery in another town just so now one would recognize me. But I greatly appreciated them. But then again, I´m not Shirley Wilson.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Keekng, 3/27/2013 9:17:30 AM     (No. 9246128)

Good point, #8, food stamps should be there when they are needed. Saw a lady with a cart full of ´greens,´ dried beans and other staple, she paid with food stamps. Her family will eat well. Saw another women, younger, she and her friend were wearing expensive leather jackets, they had lobster, steaks and what not. After paying with food stamps he took out a roll of green to pay for the booze and cigarettes.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Dragonslayer2, 3/27/2013 9:40:00 AM     (No. 9246183)

Someone should tell these folks that one of the prices of getting something for nothing is that you may have to give up some freedom. As famously noted " There ain´t no such thing as a fre lunch." ( Tanstaafl)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: JimJr, 3/27/2013 9:55:10 AM     (No. 9246217)

See, #5, that´s the rub, isn´t it? When the piper plays, you have to dance to his tune. That´s the way governments are, too. If it give you "assistance", you have to do what it says, when it says, how it says. All of these programs, however well intentioned their creators may have been, end up becoming tools for fostering dependency and control.

Welfare isn´t about helping people, it is about control.

"Obamacare" isn´t about health care it is about control.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: JimJr, 3/27/2013 9:56:43 AM     (No. 9246219)

"Gun control" isn´t about safety, it is about control.

(edit)


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: mamafrog, 3/27/2013 10:02:10 AM     (No. 9246238)

This is a wonderful idea, it will be interesting to see if the makers of foods without nutritional value can scuttle it. It is easy to attack the stupid who say they should be able to buy Fluffernutter . . . . . harder to deal with the lobbying of the manufacturer of Fluffernutter.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Sanspeur, 3/27/2013 10:16:35 AM     (No. 9246272)

Fluffernutter , Pringles and bacon rinds are choices I can make with my money .I love them as occasional treats and paid with my own money . they are one of the rewards we have for living in a mostly capitalistic society . the ingenuity and profit potential for the company that provides this is something to appreciate , not condemn .But, to steal my money to give it to someone who unwisely buys Fluffernutter instead of basic nutritional needs hurts the buyer with malnourishment , even if fat , hurts me by the theft and misallocates resources unwisely through gov´t error..

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Teleologicus, 3/27/2013 10:17:13 AM     (No. 9246273)

Controlling people´s choices for their own good is the argument of the philosopher-Sophist Sarah Conly in praise of the government nanny state. She does not link this to public charity. She claims that government has a responsibility to monitor and guide and when necessary coerce individual choices when the latter are adjudged not to be in their true interest - as determined, of course, by Sarah Conly and people like her. This is the basic mindset of all meddlers, do-gooders, control freaks and busybodies. They are, they insist, only trying to help. That their help in seldom if ever requested, indeed that it is many time vehemently opposed and rejected, only proves to them how urgently it is needed.

Micromanaging the dietary choices of recipients of public charity is insulting and unnecessary. Nobody is going to starve to death by eating junk food. The science behind the claims for the adverse effects of such diets is by no means as definitive and unequivocal as nutrition zealots claim. Much of it is propaganda, as with global warming.

Those who are interesting primarily in doing good to food stamp recipients have one agenda, others like me have another. I would like to see as few people as possible enrolled and as many as possible discharged from the rolls as quickly as possible. Of course, that is MY version of doing them good, encouraging them to rely upon their own resources to the maximum extent possible.

Some people who wish to meddle and micromanage the personal choices of recipients of public charity such as food stamps are actually motivated by a desire to punish and humiliate the recipients.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: trappedinmn, 3/27/2013 10:33:30 AM     (No. 9246318)

Wonder which side moochle would side with.
Taxpayer money (ours), so we get to decide.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: snowoutlaw, 3/27/2013 11:01:45 AM     (No. 9246373)

No adults should be getting any Federal hand outs unless they are for their under 18yo kids. No adult foodstamps of any kind, for any product. Then they shouod have to pay it back through income taxes.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Marzon, 3/27/2013 11:30:25 AM     (No. 9246442)

The "we get to control your behavior because we are paying your medical bills" is a very, very dangerous argument to make in the age of Obamacare, subsidized health insurance premiums, and (eventually) single payer.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: ramona, 3/27/2013 11:47:07 AM     (No. 9246473)

The left condemns (and tries to close down) charities like homeless missions that require attendance at a worship service or have other rules of participation in order to receive meals and a bed for the night. They are such hypocrites to criticize any requirements for taxpayer-donated benefits. And where is Mrs. Preezy - why isn´t she championing Gov. Haley´s proposal?
Ramona (the Pest)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: halfnorsk, 3/27/2013 12:17:25 PM     (No. 9246527)

That money was coerced from the taxpayers. Therefore, you shall be coerced to buy with that money only nutritious food.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Boneshaker, 3/27/2013 1:34:57 PM     (No. 9246682)

Drop the SNAP (food stamp) program and go back to issuing a monthly ration of basic commodities like was done in the past - before the "War On Poverty".

Instead of EBT funds to buy steaks, junk food, etc., cheese, butter, rice, powdered milk, lunch meat, flour, etc, were provided to people who had to seek taxpayer help.

It was healthy and nutricious but not something most would want to live on for the rest of their lives.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: Doctor P, 3/27/2013 2:10:35 PM     (No. 9246740)

eat what you want just don´t expect anyone else to PAY for it

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: ColonialAmerican1623, 3/28/2013 12:25:07 AM     (No. 9247561)

The bigger problem is the ones that shouldn´t have food assistance to begin with and getting hundreds of dollars.

We can´t argue that Bloomie and the Wookie has no business telling people what to drink or eat, then checking out grocery cards of the people using EBT cards.

I am concerned that if you have multiple illegitimate children or anchor babies, you need a gold card while the elderly deserve little to nothing. I have no problem with a frail older person eating a half gallon of icecream.

We have more concerns sitting in DC than checking out grocery carts.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 728819




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Attercliffe"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Attercliffe"



Putin laughs in the face of Western
sanctions by asking for his £5,000
monthly salary to be transferred to the
Russian bank singled out for punishment
Daily Mail [UK], by Will Stewart    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 3/21/2014 9:12:49 PM     Post Reply
Vladimir Putin yesterday mocked the West´s sanctions against Russia - as eastern Europe began boosting its defences amid fears of further Kremlin land grabs. Putin dismissively brushed aside concerns raised by Washington, Brussels and London and inked Crimea´s switch to rule by Moscow in defiance of international objections. He also laughed off punishments imposed by the U.S. and EU on his closest friends and their banks. Putin opened an account in blacklisted St Petersburg-based Rossiya Bank, which was singled out for sanctions by America, and ordered that his monthly £4,500 salary be paid into the bank. ´I have ordered the administrative department to transfer

Beijing hotel workers already ´fed up´ with
Obama entourage in 3400-square-foot,
$8,350-per-night suite inconveniencing´ pretty
much everyone´--and the first lady´s mother is*
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 3/21/2014 6:02:02 PM     Post Reply
*´barking at the staff´ Michelle Obama and three of her family members are staying in a $8,350-per-night Beijing presidential suite, but despite a 24-hour butler and other perks that come with the lodging, her entourage has inconvenienced ´pretty much everyone´ and made the hotel staff ´fed up,´ a well-placed hotel staffer has told MailOnline. [Snip] But the Obamas´ stay has already affected staff and guests at the hotel, with the Westin front-desk veteran alleging that Mrs. Obama´s mother Marian Robinson has been ´barking at the staff since she arrived.´ Government security forces from both China and the U.S. started Thursday to screen

The Wankerati Speak: ´Why Can´t
Britain´s Press Be More Like Iran´s?´
Breitbart London [UK], by James Delingpole    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 3/21/2014 12:57:48 PM     Post Reply
The campaign for greater press regulation in Britain has suffered a devastating, possibly fatal blow with the release to the Guardian of a list of the celebrities who are lending their support to the Leveson Royal Charter proposal. "Wankers. Faarsands of them!" commented one former fan of press regulation on seeing the list: "I used to think the British press had got too intrusive and badly needed reining in. But now that I´ve been made aware of the kind of ocean-going knobs who are in favour of the Leveson Royal Charter, I´ve adjusted my position. In fact I´d like to

Mrs Diplomatic! Smitten China falls for
the Obama girls as President Xi Jinping
greets Michelle and her daughters
on their first day in Beijing
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 3/21/2014 12:43:34 PM     Post Reply
Michelle Obama and her daughters charmed China today as they greeted President Xi Jinping on the first day of their week-long trip to the country. The First Lady, who was also accompanied by her mother Marian Robinson, met the President and his wife Peng Liyuan at the Diaoyutai state guesthouse in Beijing. The visit marks the first meeting between Mrs Obama and Ms Peng, whose husbands run the world´s first and second largest economies respectively. And it has been deemed a great success - with Chinese media celebrating a budding relationship between the pair. Today, China News Service has described the First Lady

Malaysian woman claims to have seen
missing MH370 in the water near
Andaman Islands on day it disappeared
Daily Mail [UK], by Richard Shears*    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 3/21/2014 12:26:37 PM     Post Reply
As aircraft and ships continued to search for debris which might be that of the missing flight MH370 on Friday a Malaysian woman on a flight across the Indian Ocean claimed to have seen an aircraft in the water near the Andaman Islands on the day the jet disappeared. The Kuala Lumpur wife was so convinced about what she saw at 2.30pm on March 8, several hours after MH370 vanished, that she filed an official report with police that very day--a full five days before the search for the plane was expanded to the area around the Andaman Islands.

Christians should copy Muslims, and
shout ´human rights abuse!´ at every critic
Telegraph [UK], by Cristina Odone    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 3/21/2014 12:19:10 PM     Post Reply
A senior judge has urged the Church of England to stop being a push-over: that way lies oblivion, said Baroness Hale. If Christians make no demands of our society, they will receive nothing from it. I would apply her wise warning to all Christians: make like the Muslims, I´d tell them, and shout "bigot!" and "human rights abuse!" at every critic. Christians should shake their fist, and stomp their foot. That way lies respect, and not a little awe. Instead of turning the other cheek or bleating about "discrimination", Baroness Hale said, Christians should use the nuclear weapon: human rights

The G8 is dead declares Merkel
as Europe prepares to ramp up
EU sanctions against Russia
Daily Mail [UK], by Suzannah Hills    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 3/20/2014 6:59:01 PM     Post Reply
The European Union is set to impose further sanctions on Russia following its decision to annex Crimea as German Chancellor Angela Merkel today declared the G8 ´is dead´. [Snip] In an address to the German Parliament in Berlin this morning, Merkel said the EU was readying further sanctions and that the G8 forum of leading economies has been suspended indefinitely. Russia holds the presidency of the G8 and President Vladimir Putin was due to host his counterparts, including President Barack Obama, at a summit in Sochi in June. But Merkel today declared the G8 will not meet again until the situation in Ukraine

Obamacare has left a Nevada man with
$407,000 in hospital bills even though
he signed up for a plan a month
before the White House´s deadline
Daily Mail [UK], by Meghan Keneally    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 3/20/2014 6:54:37 PM     Post Reply
A man in Las Vegas who signed up for a state-approved health insurance plan in November has now been told that he didn’t have coverage for the first two months of this year even though he was paying premiums for that time. Larry Basich’s ordeal that has landed him with $407,000 in hospital bills is the latest example of the problems facing Nevada residents due to the state’s problem-riddled exchange system. On Tuesday, a state panel approved a $1.5million consulting contract in an effort to have a private firm fix the state’s exchange.

Sanctions expand: Obama goes after
more wealthy Russians and a ´crony
bank,´ freezes assets and denies US
access in response to Ukraine crisis
Telegraph [UK], by David Marttosko    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 3/20/2014 6:43:21 PM     Post Reply
President Barack Obama has signed a new executive order that authorizes his administration ´to impose sanctions not just on individuals but on key sectors of the Russian economy,´ he said Thursday morning. Speaking on the South Lawn of the White House before boarding Marine One en route to Florida, he also announced a new raft of anti-Moscow choke-holds that the White House is attempting immediately to ´impose additional costs on Russia.´ ´We´re imposing sanctions on more senior officials of the Russian government ... [and] other individuals who provide material support´ to them, Obama said in a brief statement. He also announced new sanctions

Emerging markets face ordeal by fire
as Fed’s Janet Yellen turns tough
Telegraph [UK], by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 3/20/2014 6:35:55 PM     Post Reply
In a normal world the US Federal Reserve would barely cause a ripple by tweaking its interest rate forecast a year or two ahead. But we are not in normal world. We are facing a confluence of events somewhat like 1998 when Fed tightening turned the East Asian crisis into a global credit event. We all forget now that Alan Greenspan told emerging markets to drop dead at his Humphrey Hawkins testimony that year--saying he was more concerned about US inflation--and drop dead is exactly what they then did. (The Fed soon had to slash interest rates to avert a

Here come the (Obama) girls! Michelle
lands in China for week-long trip with
her daughters and mother... while
President admits he´s lonely at home
Daily Mail [UK], by Sara Malm, David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 3/20/2014 12:28:11 PM     Post Reply
Michelle Obama arrived in China on Thursday for a weeklong visit that will steer clear of politics and instead focusing on education and community. [Snip] On Friday, she is to spend the day with Peng Liyuan, the wife of Chinese President Xi Jinping, something which diplomats hope will build bridges between the two countries. ´I think this is a very good opportunity to improve the China-U.S. relations, as the first lady can represent the soft side of diplomacy,´ said Wang Dong, a political scientist at Peking University´s School of International Studies. ´Michelle Obama herself has been accomplished in areas such as

Is Michelle Obama more censored
than China´s First Lady?
Telegraph [UK], by Cathy Newman    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 3/20/2014 10:09:10 AM     Post Reply
She’s one of the world’s most glamorous First Ladies, a star in her own right, and a supportive, caring wife to a super-powerful president. Move over Michelle Obama: China’s First Lady Peng Liyuan is now so famous in her own right, the American president’s wife will find herself having to share the spotlight when the two get together today. During Obama’s visit to China, she’ll no doubt find president Xi Jinping’s wife quite a force to be reckoned with. She’s been named one of Time Magazine’s most influential people in the world. And even if she’s not--yet--a household name across



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Larry Sabato: Jeb Bush now 'the
leader of the field' for 2016

53 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Paul Bedard    Original Article
Posted By: grace52- 3/20/2014 3:01:37 PM     Post Reply
With New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie stalled by the “Bridgegate” affair, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush has become the establishment´s candidate and top pick to win the 2016 GOP presidential nomination, according to a new analysis of the race. “We now consider Bush the leader of the field if he decides to run,” said the influential “Crystal Ball” from the University of Virginia´s Center for Politics. “In recent months, we’ve noticed an unmistakable and widespread desire among some of the Republicans we talk to, particularly ones who would be classified as members of the establishment on and off Capitol Hill, for a third Bush nominee in less than three decades.
Headline corrected by Staff.

Beijing hotel workers already ´fed up´ with
Obama entourage in 3400-square-foot,
$8,350-per-night suite inconveniencing´ pretty
much everyone´--and the first lady´s mother is*

46 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 3/21/2014 6:02:02 PM     Post Reply
*´barking at the staff´ Michelle Obama and three of her family members are staying in a $8,350-per-night Beijing presidential suite, but despite a 24-hour butler and other perks that come with the lodging, her entourage has inconvenienced ´pretty much everyone´ and made the hotel staff ´fed up,´ a well-placed hotel staffer has told MailOnline. [Snip] But the Obamas´ stay has already affected staff and guests at the hotel, with the Westin front-desk veteran alleging that Mrs. Obama´s mother Marian Robinson has been ´barking at the staff since she arrived.´ Government security forces from both China and the U.S. started Thursday to screen

Obama ladies touch down in
China amid taxpayer uproar

41 replie(s)
Washington Times (D.C.), by Cheryl K. Chumley    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 3/20/2014 3:30:44 PM     Post Reply
(Video) The Obama ladies are in the house — the house of China, that is. First lady Michelle Obama, her two daughters, Malia and Sasha, and her mother touched down Thursday in China for what’s being touted as a weeklong feel-good tourist event, amid increasing murmurs back home about U.S. taxpayers having to foot the bill. Mrs. Obama is supposed to use her visit for soft diplomacy only, and shy from the more controversial topics that plague U.S.-China relations, namely human rights and economics. No reporters accompanied the family on the trip. “The nature of her visit is really quite

Nancy Pelosi Annoyed That
People Won’t Stop Calling
Affordable Care Act ‘Obamacare’

39 replie(s)
Mediaite, by Josh Feldman    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 3/20/2014 3:27:46 PM     Post Reply
“Obamacare” as shorthand for the Affordcable Care Act was first used mostly by critics of the law, but now everyone’s using the moniker and President Obama has long since embraced it. But apparently no one told Nancy Pelosi, because she’s still ticked off at how much people talk about “Obamacare” instead of the “Affordable Care Act.” In response to a reporter asking a question about Obamacare being a political winner or loser, Pelosi said, “By the way, it’s called the Affordable Care Act. It’s called the Affordable Care Act. I know you didn’t intend any compliment or derogatory––it’s called the

Too busy to be president
39 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Jeffrey T. Brown    Original Article
Posted By: Hazymac- 3/21/2014 4:06:45 AM     Post Reply
Is Barack Obama simply too busy to be Chief Executive of the United States? Apparently. One of the primary functions of the president is to keep the nation safe, to preserve it from its enemies. To do that effectively, one would actually have to maintain something of a consistent level of attention to the moving pieces that directly influence how future events will unfold. None other than the truly sycophantic thinks for a second that President Obama cares a whit for anything that does not involve fundamentally altering the social composition of this country. Or golf. During the five-plus years

Obama: Deval Patrick ´would
make a great president´

31 replie(s)
Masslive.com, by Shira Schoenberg    Original Article
Posted By: Hazymac- 3/20/2014 1:57:09 PM     Post Reply
President Barack Obama said Wednesday that he thinks Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick “would make a great president or vice president.” Obama and Patrick, both Democrats, are friends and close political allies. The two men have campaigned for each other, with Patrick acting as a surrogate for Obama nationally during the 2012 presidential race. Patrick has said clearly that he intends to return to the private sector when his second term as governor is up at the end of the year and will not run for president in 2016. But he has not ruled out a run for office in the

Black preschoolers more likely
to face suspension

31 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Kimberly Hefling & Jesse J. Holland    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 3/21/2014 11:11:29 AM     Post Reply
Black students are more likely to be suspended from U.S. public schools — even as tiny preschoolers. The racial disparities in American education, from access to high-level classes and experienced teachers to discipline, were highlighted in a report released Friday by the Education Department´s civil rights arm. The suspensions — and disparities — begin at the earliest grades. Black children represent about 18 percent of children in preschool programs in schools, but they make up almost half of the preschoolers who are suspended more than once, the report said. Six percent of the nation´s districts with preschools reported suspending at

Ellen Sucks Up to Obama:
Obamacare ´Doing Very, Very
Well...I Think Everyone´s Very
Grateful You Did This´

30 replie(s)
NewsBusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: FelineFine- 3/20/2014 9:25:21 AM     Post Reply
Ellen DeGeneres was a completely slavish toady to President Obama as he appeared on her show to sell Obamacare -- not to young people, but to mothers. The president made his pitch to "especially all the moms out there who may have young people – 26, 27, do not have health insurance, but they think they’re invincible and nothing’s ever going to happen to ‘em – what we’ve said is you never know what life is going to throw at ya."

First Lady Challenges Americans to ´Try
a New Fruit or Vegetable Each Week´

30 replie(s)
Cybercast News Service, by Timothy Hill    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 3/20/2014 6:16:05 PM     Post Reply
College basketball can wait. Did you know that March is actually National Nutrition Month? Today, First Lady Michelle Obama urged Americans via her "Let´s Move!" initiative to challenge their family members to eat one new fruit or vegetable per week in March to faithfully observe the occasion. "March is National Nutrition Month and you can celebrate by challenging your family to try a new fruit or vegetable each week," First Lady Michelle Obama said in an e-mail to supporters today. Never mind that there were less than two "each weeks" left in National Nutrition Month when the e-mail challenge was

Michelle Obama: It´s very rare
that I have the chance to travel
outside of the United States

30 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 3/21/2014 12:50:07 PM     Post Reply
During her visit to China, first lady Michelle Obama pointed out that the ability to travel outside of the United States was "rare" but that she chose China for a reason. "It’s very rare that I have the opportunity to travel outside of the United States, and it’s even more rare to have the opportunity to travel with three generations — with my daughters, and with my mother," she said. "And it is no accident that one of our first trips as a family is here to China." Obama made her remarks while visiting a school in Beijing, with the Chinese first

Jeb Bush Praises Illegal Immigrants
as ´Risk Takers,´ Defends Common Core

30 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Tony Lee    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 3/21/2014 7:24:57 PM     Post Reply
In a speech Friday, Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush praised illegal immigrants as "risk takers" who embody the entrepreneurial spirit of America and doubled down on his defense of Common Core. According to the Miami-Herald, Bush made his remarks in front of business leaders in Florida. “People who come here legally and illegally are the risk takers,” Bush reportedly said. “If you’re living in a rural area of Guatemala and you come, you’re a bigger risk taker than those who stay,” he added. Of course, the first action of those who come to the country illegally is breaking the law. Bush also said he

Washington Post Falls for Left-Wing
Fraud, Embarrasses Itself

29 replie(s)
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 3/21/2014 5:27:43 AM     Post Reply
Today’s Washington Post features an article by Steven Mufson and Juliet Eilperin headlined, “The biggest lease holder in Canada’s oil sands isn’t Exxon Mobil or Chevron. It’s the Koch brothers.” The article was based on a newly-issued two-page report by the far-left International Forum on Globalization. The Post reported: You might expect the biggest lease owner in Canada’s oil sands, or tar sands, to be one of the international oil giants, like Exxon Mobil or Royal Dutch Shell. But that isn’t the case. The biggest lease holder in the northern Alberta oil sands is a subsidiary of Koch Industries, the privately-owned


Post Reply   Close thread 728819





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS